Author Archives: d2wk58

Could Nemo Inspire More Dubious Climate Change Coverage?

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC “-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN” “http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd”>

“dataSourceUrl”:”//docs.google.com/spreadsheet/tq?key=0AtQ9R38fCP6edG55YldxR2FfanhHcC1HVGZZcHhzMmc&transpose=0&headers=1&range=A1%3AB3&gid=0&pub=1″,”options”:”vAxes”:”useFormatFromData”:true,”title”:null,”minValue”:null,”textStyle”:”color”:”#222″,”fontSize”:”15″,”gridlines”:”count”:”9″,”logScale”:false,”viewWindow”:”min”:null,”max”:null,”maxValue”:null},”useFormatFromData”:true,”minValue”:null,”logScale”:false,”viewWindow”:”min”:null,”max”:null,”maxValue”:null,”titleTextStyle”:”bold”:true,”color”:”#000″,”fontSize”:”20″,”chartArea”:”height”:”61.878%”,”width”:”81.387%”,”left”:”12.591%”,”top”:”19.111%”,”booleanRole”:”certainty”,”title”:”Science vs. Newspapers on Climate Change”,”fontName”:”Georgia”,”legendTextStyle”:”color”:”#222″,”fontSize”:”15″,”animation”:”duration”:500,”legend”:”top”,”hAxis”:”titleTextStyle”:”bold”:true,”color”:”#222″,”italic”:true,”fontSize”:”12″,”title”:”Mother Jones “,”useFormatFromData”:true,”minValue”:null,”viewWindowMode”:null,”textStyle”:”color”:”#222″,”fontSize”:”15″,”viewWindow”:null,”maxValue”:null},”tooltip”:{},”isStacked”:false,”width”:630,”height”:401},”state”:{},”view”:{},”chartType”:”ColumnChart”,”chartName”:”Chart 1″}

Weather forecasts predict that Snowstorm Nemo will be highly unusual in its intensityâ&#128;&#148;the worst blizzard the Northeast has seen in ages. Already, thousands of flights have been canceled and people are scrambling to stock up on emergency supplies. So it might seem like now would be the perfect opportunity for the media to sound the alarm about the connection between climate change and extreme weather. But a new study finds that exactly the opposite is true: When it gets cold out, some prominent newspaper opinion writers start hammering out their next attempt to debunk global warming.

Despite overwhelming scientific consensus about the long-term phenomenon, newspaper op-ed pages are most likely to opine about how climate change isn’t real when seasonal temperatures dip. According to a new study published in Climatic Science, annual and seasonal deviations from mean temperatures can explain attitudes (both positive and negative) expressed in 2,166 opinion pieces between 1990 and 2009 in five major newspapers, the New York Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, USA Today, and Houston Chronicle. (It also demonstrated that national public opinion polls aligned with temperature anomalies.)

During heat waves or temperature spikes, the percentage of newspaper columns that agreed with climate change rose. But when winters were rough or temperatures fell, the percentage of disagreement ratcheted up. Lead author and University of British Columbia climate scientist Simon Donner told Mother Jones it was difficult to explain such correlations, but he and his co-author took a stab at it, this way, in the paper:

Furthermore, editors may be more likely to write about climate change or to accept a submission on the subject during or after and sic anomalously warm season. Therefore, the relationship between climate variability and the opinion data may arise not solely from people viewing weather or climate anomalies as proof or disproof of climate change, but from the anomalies serving as a reminder of the issue of climate change and as â&#128;&#156;hooksâ&#128;&#157; for opinion articles.

The problem with writing opinion articles supporting climate change exclusively during heat waves or slamming it during cooler seasons is that it fails to consider that the phenomenon is really “a long-term average,” Donner says. “If next decade is warmer than this decade, it doesn’t mean every day in next decade is warmer than every day in this decade. There’s still going to be variability in the system.”

If the public and newspapers are going to trust that climate change is real, even when it’s cold outside, scientists and educators also have to step up and be more vocal. “We’ve got to talk about climate change not just when there’s a good ‘hook’ to talking about it, but even you know, on unusually cold days in the summer,” Donner adds.

Original article: 

Could Nemo Inspire More Dubious Climate Change Coverage?

Posted in GE, Uncategorized, Venta | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Could Nemo Inspire More Dubious Climate Change Coverage?

Right-wingers want to teach kids that climate change is a fairy tale

Right-wingers want to teach kids that climate change is a fairy tale

Shutterstock

Last month, Arizona, Colorado, and Oklahoma all introduced bills that would make teaching about climate change in public schools less a science and more a political debate. The bills — based on model legislation from the supremely evil American Legislative Exchange Council — would require schools to teach that climate change is “controversial” and not widely accepted scientific fact.

From DeSmogBlog:

In the past five years since 2008, among the hottest years in U.S. history, ALEC has introduced its “Environmental Literacy Improvement Act” in 11 states, or over one-fifth of the statehouses nationwide. The bill has passed in four states [– Louisiana, South Dakota, Tennessee, and Texas] …

ALEC’s “model bills” are written by and for corporate lobbyists alongside conservative legislators at its annual meetings. ALEC raises much of its corporate funding from the fossil fuel industry, which in turn utilizes ALEC as a key — though far from the only — vehicle to ram through its legislative agenda in the states.

The bills use almost the exact same language. Oklahoma’s, for example, calls for …

… the teaching of “scientific strengths and scientific weaknesses of existing scientific theories,” including of global warming, saying it’s a theory steeped in “controversy” — not that the actual scientific record thinks so.

This is necessary, the bill states, “to help students develop critical thinking skills they need in order to become intelligent, productive, and scientifically informed citizens,” going on to explain that it’s important to explore “differences of opinion on scientific issues.”

In a way, these kinds of laws seem like a last-ditch effort by desperate and backward-thinking plutocrats who are terrified of science and of broad public access to information via new technologies. Not that it makes them any less horrifying.

Teaching climate change not as “science” but as a debatable concept would make our public education system a polarized knowledge-free vacuum — kind of like Congress. And that is truly scary.

Susie Cagle writes and draws news for Grist. She also writes and draws tweets for

Twitter

.

Read more:

Climate & Energy

,

Politics

Also in Grist

Please enable JavaScript to see recommended stories

Continued:  

Right-wingers want to teach kids that climate change is a fairy tale

Posted in Citizen, GE, LG, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Right-wingers want to teach kids that climate change is a fairy tale

Apple CEO wonders who would want to work for an oil company

Apple CEO wonders who would want to work for an oil company

On Friday, ExxonMobil passed Apple to become the most valuable company in the world. We were all very happy to see that happen, because who really cares about Apple stuff when we’ve got Exxon’s newest offerings to lust after. (True gas geeks know no greater thrill than when Exxon CEO Rex Tillerson busts out his signature “one more thing”.)

This is all lies and “jokes”; it is, as we noted last week, disconcerting that oil companies continue to make money hand over fist. (In a few days, ExxonMobil will announce its 2012 earnings, so we’ll revisit this theme then.) But we have an ally in our frustration, it seems — Apple CEO Tim Cook.

deerkoski

Tim Cook, speaking last June

From 9to5Mac.com:

Speaking to employees on the current controversies around Apple’s income and future, Cook reportedly told his workers and colleagues that “we [Apple] just had the best quarter of any technology company ever.” Cook expressed this with immense satisfaction and appreciation for his teams that made this happen.

Cook further added, likely referring to gas and fuel juggernaut Exxon, that “the only companies that report better quarters pump oil.” “I do not know about you all, but I do not want to work for those companies,” Cook reportedly said.

There’s a bit of snobbery at play in that quote, I’ll readily admit. But it’s an interesting reflection of both competition and modernity. Apple is a company predicated on the future, on innovative tools for communication. ExxonMobil is a company built on developing ever more streamlined systems for repeating a 100-year-old business model. It’s a weird race, like two horses on different tracks that happen to be going the same speed. The battle is California versus Texas, white collar versus blue, future versus past, green(ish) versus brown, technology versus natural resources.

In some ways, it’s a distillation of two halves of the country. And, according to section VI, subpart 8 of the Rules of Capitalism, the winner isn’t determined through elections or reasoned debate. The winner is determined by stock price.

Update: IF that’s the case, good news for Apple, which has currently regained the lead. Go horses!

Philip Bump writes about the news for Gristmill. He also uses Twitter a whole lot.

Read more:

Business & Technology

,

Climate & Energy

Also in Grist

Please enable JavaScript to see recommended stories

Follow this link – 

Apple CEO wonders who would want to work for an oil company

Posted in GE, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Apple CEO wonders who would want to work for an oil company

MAP: Does Your State Let You Carry a Gun on Campus?

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC “-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN” “http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd”>

On Tuesday, a dispute between two people at Lone Star College in Houston ended in a gun fight. Three people were wounded (including suspects in the shooting) and a fourth person was reportedly hospitalized with an unspecified “medical emergency” in connection with the incident. It was the sixth shooting on or near a US college campus this month.

Texas generally has lax gun laws, but prohibits carrying a concealed weapon on a college campus. The GOP-controlled Texas legislature may soon change that, however. Last week, state Sen. Brian Birdwell, a Republican, introduced new “campus carry” legislation that would allow firearms to be carried at public colleges with a valid permit. Texas would join six states that, to varying degrees, now allow weapons to be carried on campuses. And lawmakers in at least seven other states are aiming to follow suit.

Does your state allow guns on college campuses? Hover over an individual state for further details. (Also see lists below the map.)

States with laws allowing guns on college campuses: California, Colorado, Mississippi, Oregon, Utah, Wisconsin.

States in which lawmakers have recently introduced legislation to allow guns on campuses: Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Michigan, Missouri, Wyoming.

For more, check out MoJo’s year-long investigation into gun laws and mass shootings in the United States.

Sources: Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence; National Conference of State Legislatures.

See the article here:  

MAP: Does Your State Let You Carry a Gun on Campus?

Posted in GE, Uncategorized, Venta | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on MAP: Does Your State Let You Carry a Gun on Campus?

Chart of the Day: We’re Driving Less and Less and Less

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC “-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN” “http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd”>

Justin Horner points out today that, against all odds, Americans are continuing to drive less and less. Vehicle miles traveled per person plateaued in 2005 and then started declining dramatically in 2008. On average, Americans drove about 700 miles per year less in 2012 than they did in 2007.

So will this trend keep up? Horner offers three possibilities:

  1. The Interrupted Growth Hypothesis: VMT cuts are temporary and increases will resume once the economy picks up (although we know more VMT is not a required, or inevitable, part economic growth);
  2. The Saturation Hypothesis: car ownership and personal travel budgets have hit their limit, so no more growth is likely;
  3. The Peak Car Hypothesis: VMT has hit its peak, and history will now see a VMT decline of undetermined length.

In other words, he says, “in the future VMT will either go up, go down, or stay the same.” His guess is that it will continue to go down.

Excerpt from:

Chart of the Day: We’re Driving Less and Less and Less

Posted in GE, Uncategorized, Venta | Tagged , | Comments Off on Chart of the Day: We’re Driving Less and Less and Less

Why the Government Should Pay Farmers to Plant Cover Crops

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC “-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN” “http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd”>

Globally, 2012 will likely rank as one of the ten hottest in recorded history, The New York Times reports. If it does, “it will mean that the 10 warmest years on record all fell within the past 15 years, a measure of how much the planet has warmed.” Here in the US, last year was far and away the hottest ever on record. In other words, climate change is no longer a theory or a model or an abstract worry involving future generations. It’s happening, now—and if you want to see its likely effect on farming, look at the breadbasket state of Kansas, where the same prolonged drought that reduced corn and soy yields is now pinching the winter wheat crop, as I wrote a few days ago. On Wednesday, the UDSA declared much of the wheat belt a disaster area because of the drought’s effect on the crop.

What would a farming system designed to meet the challenge of climate change look like? US policymakers have bought themselves time to consider that question. Since the Great Depression, US farm policy has been governed by five-year plans known as farm bills, which shape the agricultural landscape through a set of government-funded incentive programs. The previous farm bill expired last year, and Congress failed to come up with a new one, instead patching a one-year, modified extension of the old one to the fiscal cliff deal. That means 2013 will be another farm bill year; another opportunity to come up with climate-ready farm policy.

Continue Reading »

See original article:

Why the Government Should Pay Farmers to Plant Cover Crops

Posted in GE, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Why the Government Should Pay Farmers to Plant Cover Crops