Tag Archives: legislation

Statement on Recent Anti-RFS Legislation

Statement on Recent Anti-RFS Legislation

Posted 7 February 2013 in

National

The following is a statement from the Fuels America coalition on the introduction of anti-RFS legislation in the U.S. House of Representatives:

The bill introduced today from Reps. Gregg Harper (R-Miss.) and Jim Matheson (D-Utah) is short-sighted and plays into the hands of oil companies looking to undermine the renewable fuel industry and deny Americans choice at the gas pump.

This bill guarantees that there would never be an incentive to produce any more cellulosic renewable fuel than was made last year, hardly a recipe for spurring innovation and investment.

What is really costing the American public is oil’s control over our fuel supply. That control creates huge profits for the industry, more than $118 billion in 2012 alone, with current gas prices the highest ever for early February.

Faced with that fact, the real question is whether our country wants alternatives to oil, or not. This bill, and others like it, only ensure one thing: that our economy will continue to be held hostage by the global price of oil by preventing renewable fuel from getting to market.

Back to Blog Home
Share:

Join the Fight

Renewable fuel is more important than ever – driving economic growth in communities that need it, improving our nation’s energy security and attracting millions in new technology dollars to invest in America’s future.

Pledge to Support Renewable Fuel

Fuels
Read this article: 

Statement on Recent Anti-RFS Legislation

Posted in alo, Anchor, ATTRA, GE, PUR, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Statement on Recent Anti-RFS Legislation

New-old disaster aid may be coming for troubled farmers

New-old disaster aid may be coming for troubled farmers

Last year, American farmers saw the worst drought in more than half a century. At the same time, some disaster aid programs went unfunded. Why? Blame the expired Farm Bill, of course.

Crop insurance and emergency disaster loans are still available to farmers and ranchers, but other relief programs designed to help during times of drought and other disasters saw their funding end more than a year ago.

But now Congress is considering a bill to reinstate that aid “until” a new farm bill happens. (Hahaha [weep].) From the Governing blog:

Sen. Max Baucus (D-Mont.) is sponsoring legislation that would retroactively restore those disaster relief programs for 2012 fiscal year as well as the rest of the 2013 fiscal year while Congress works on creating another long-term farm bill.

“These livestock disaster programs expired in September 2011, leaving our livestock producers with no safety net,” Baucus said in introducing his bill. “For over a year and a half, through one of the worst droughts in recent memory, our producers have been left to fend for themselves.”

In addition to helping to pay for dead livestock, the legislation also provides disaster relief for things like destroyed orchard trees and vines, and it helps cover losses not covered by crop insurance.

There are five disaster programs — all created in the 2008 farm bill — that are among the 37 programs that are missing out on funding. Because Congress hasn’t re-authorized them, losses due to disasters that occurred after September 2011 aren’t covered

This is good news for troubled U.S. farmers, but not the greatest for the Farm Bill in total, which looks to be going nowhere fast. Could we get some disaster relief for that, too?

Susie Cagle writes and draws news for Grist. She also writes and draws tweets for

Twitter

.

Read more:

Food

,

Politics

Also in Grist

Please enable JavaScript to see recommended stories

Taken from – 

New-old disaster aid may be coming for troubled farmers

Posted in GE, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on New-old disaster aid may be coming for troubled farmers

Attempts to kill renewable energy just got dumber

Attempts to kill renewable energy just got dumber

Michael Lemmon

The Heartland Institute is terrible in a clumsy way, like a kid who gets riled up and doesn’t know what to do about it. After a clunky ad campaign comparing climate activists with murderers this spring, the organization nearly fell apart. But it didn’t, unfortunately, and is now back to terrible, clumsy attempts to brazenly advance the interests of its largely anonymous, climate-denying funders.

Last month, ALEC (an organization of state legislators who have sworn fealty to big business) began advocating for the “Electricity Freedom Act,” a bit of sample legislation aimed at crippling state renewable energy standards. The title of the bill is brazenly hypocritical — which by itself was probably enough to pique the Heartland Institute’s interest. And sure enough, it’s throwing in.

From The Washington Post:

The Heartland Institute, a libertarian think tank skeptical of climate change science, has joined with the conservative American Legislative Exchange Council to write model legislation aimed at reversing state renewable energy mandates across the country. …

James Taylor, the Heartland Institute’s senior fellow for environmental policy, said he was able to persuade most of ALEC’s state legislators and corporate members to push for a repeal of laws requiring more solar and wind power use on the basis of economics. …

Taylor dismissed the idea that his group pushed for the measure because it has accepted money from fossil-fuel firms: “The people who are saying that are trying to take attention away from the real issue — that alternative energy, renewable energy, is more expensive than conventional energy.”

It is cheaper to leave your garbage all over the ground instead of paying for recycling, too — unless you get a ticket for littering. The fossil fuel industry, which keeps prices low by not cleaning up its pollution, spends a lot of time and money making sure its littering is legal. That’s only one reason fossil fuels are artificially cheap; massive subsidies are another. But Heartland doesn’t care about your “logic” or “arguments.” It cares about bullying the new kid.

In addition to the geniuses at Heartland, the legislation was written by representatives of fossil fuel companies, including Koch Industries. According to the Post, the measure relies on economic “analysis” performed by two organizations funded by the Kochs — though the head of one organization assures us that “Koch certainly has not had the only role in funding these studies.” Rest assured, the analysis is robust and objective.

Good thing, too. If there’s one thing the Heartland Institute won’t stand for, it’s someone who allows biased philosophy to color political positions.

Philip Bump writes about the news for Gristmill. He also uses Twitter a whole lot.

Read more:

Business & Technology

,

Climate & Energy

,

Politics

Also in Grist

Please enable JavaScript to see recommended stories

Excerpt from – 

Attempts to kill renewable energy just got dumber

Posted in GE, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Attempts to kill renewable energy just got dumber