Tag Archives: moniz

The best (and worst) quotes from the silly House climate hearing

The best (and worst) quotes from the silly House climate hearing

Shutterstock

Capitol Hill

Republicans in the U.S. House hosted a dog-and-pony show in the nation’s Capitol on Wednesday. During a hearing of the Energy and Commerce Committee, they subjected EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy and Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz to a barrel of climate ignorance and peppered them with criticisms of Barack Obama’s climate policies.

The debate progressed along lines that were predictable, given that about a dozen members of the committee are climate deniers. Republicans accused Obama of being a job-killing, coal-hating president who believes fairy tales invented by mischievous scientists. They claimed his plan to move forward on climate regulations without Congress’ support is an abuse of his authority. Team Obama wearily explained the relatively simple science of climate change to the lawmakers and emphasized that the administration is acting completely within the law.

We won’t bore you with all the details. Instead, here are some of our favorite quotes from the hearing:

Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz: “Common sense demands that we take action. As a policy issue, prudence suggests that we should take out an insurance policy, just like any family does on their home or automobile.”

EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy: “We are not doing anything at the EPA and in the climate plan that goes outside the boundaries of what Congress has said is our mission and our authority. … Can the EPA alone solve the problem of climate change? No, we cannot. We are working within our authority to do what we can.”

Rep. Ed Whitfield (R-Texas): “The president’s global warming agenda being implemented through the EPA has been holding back the economy, which continues to struggle. [EPA rules will] have devastating effects on our communities and most importantly, the consumers who pay their electricity bills every month.”

Rep. Gene Green (D-Texas):  “Even though we want as clean air as we can, we still want to be able to turn on the lights and, particularly in Texas, have our air conditioning in the summer.”

Rep. Joe Barton (R-Texas), on the Obama administration sending just two Cabinet-level officials to the hearing when Republicans had asked for more: “Are you trying to hide something? Are you embarrassed by it, or you just don’t care to respond to Congress?”

Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.), on who was not invited to the hearing: “Where are the climate scientists?”

John Upton is a science fan and green news boffin who tweets, posts articles to Facebook, and blogs about ecology. He welcomes reader questions, tips, and incoherent rants: johnupton@gmail.com.Find this article interesting? Donate now to support our work.Read more: Climate & Energy

,

Politics

Read article here:  

The best (and worst) quotes from the silly House climate hearing

Posted in alo, ALPHA, Anchor, FF, G & F, GE, LAI, ONA, solar, solar panels, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The best (and worst) quotes from the silly House climate hearing

Climate change 101 with Ernest Moniz: “Count.”

Climate change 101 with Ernest Moniz: “Count.”

Shutterstock

Basic math.

For the sake of any slow ones in the room, how can we be so sure that humans are responsible for climate change?

Basic mathematics is a good place to start.

That’s how Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz explained his confidence that humanity is to blame for climate distruption. He was addressing Rep. David McKinley (R-W.Va.), a climate skeptic, during a House Energy and Commerce subcommittee hearing on Thursday. McKinley was questioning whether humans or natural cycles were “primarily” responsible for climate change.

“The rise in CO2 emissions in the last half century is clearly tracked to our global increased energy use,” Moniz replied. “I know how to count. I can count how many CO2 molecules have gone out from fossil fuel combustion and I know how many additional CO2 molecules are in the atmosphere.”

Counting, hey? Radical stuff. It sounds suspiciously like science — something that climate skeptics aren’t much into. But McKinley decided to share his views on how science should work nonetheless, deriding the consensus among scientists on anthropogenic global warming.

“I think consensus has a place in politics, but consensus doesn’t have a place in science,” McKinley said.

“My judgment is based on numbers,” Moniz replied, “on data, and not on the consensus.”

Here is video of Moniz’s remarks:

John Upton is a science fan and green news boffin who tweets, posts articles to Facebook, and blogs about ecology. He welcomes reader questions, tips, and incoherent rants: johnupton@gmail.com.

Find this article interesting? Donate now to support our work.Read more: Climate & Energy

,

Politics

Also in Grist

Please enable JavaScript to see recommended stories

Original article: 

Climate change 101 with Ernest Moniz: “Count.”

Posted in Anchor, FF, G & F, GE, LG, ONA, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Climate change 101 with Ernest Moniz: “Count.”

Op-Ed: Confirmations Would Give Energy to Energy

back

Op-Ed: Confirmations Would Give Energy to Energy

Posted 17 April 2013 in

National

Monroe: Confirmations Would Give Energy to Energy
Roll Call 4/17/13
By Adam Monroe

We need Gina McCarthy as the next Environmental Protection Agency administrator and Ernest Moniz as the next secretary of Energy. We believe Congress should confirm these leaders so they can ensure Americans continue to have access to clean, affordable energy — and the benefits that energy brings.

When the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) was signed into law by President George W. Bush, it was envisioned as a two-part strategy: Renewable fuel and technology companies would bring solutions to market, and oil companies would ensure drivers could use them.

We’ve done our part: Foreign oil imports are down 10 percent. We’ve added $40 billion to America’s gross domestic product. We’re offering blends from E15 to E85 in some parts of the country. But, as energy analyst Daniel Dicker says, “[Oil] refiners don’t make ethanol, so they’re not really all that happy about making E15. What they want to do is make gasoline because that’s what they make money off of.”
Imagine how much broader these benefits will be when the oil companies help get more renewable energy into our fuel mix, out to gas stations and to families. Confirming McCarthy and Moniz will only can help us get to that future.

Renewable fuel, which makes up nearly 10 percent of our current gasoline supply, is already saving consumers a big chunk of their take-home pay.

A study out of Louisiana State University credits the mix of renewable fuel in our gasoline with lowering the average price of a gallon by $0.79, and Iowa State University estimates the savings to be $1.09. Either way, that’s a significant savings — giving consumers more money to save or spend on their families.

These benefits will increase as cellulosic renewable fuel continues to scale up. In May of last year, my company, Novozymes, inaugurated the country’s largest enzyme plant dedicated to biofuels in Blair, Neb. That facility creates enzymes for both advanced and traditional renewable fuel. Funded by $200 million in private investment, our facility created 100 careers and 400 construction jobs.

What we have done in Blair is an example of what’s happening across America. Companies like ours have spent more than $1 billion putting steel in the ground and creating jobs. Advanced renewable fuel facilities are operating in more than 22 states. This advanced biofuel is reinvigorating our local economies and the nation’s, too. It’s being made by American workers, offering them good-paying, stable jobs in a growing industry — in fact, advanced biofuels can help create 800,000 more. We can make that reality sooner if leaders continue to support renewable fuel, as McCarthy has and will.

This cutting-edge technology is possible because of innovation, science and investment, which will be expedited through smart public private partnerships that Moniz has the know-how to put together, and the stability of the Renewable Fuel Standard.

The RFS is the most important policy moving the US toward energy security and fuel diversity. As cellulosic facilities scale up and consumers begin to use higher blends of ethanol such as E15 and E85 fuel, we will employ more people, reduce pollution and save Americans cash at the gas pump because of the RFS.

Unfortunately, the oil industry wants to derail this progress to protect their market share. Oil companies control the lion’s share of the infrastructure needed to integrate renewable fuel into our national gasoline supply, allowing them to stop opposition in a way that many other industries cannot.

President Barack Obama wants to get more renewable fuel to families: With his proposed Energy Security Trust Fund, American drivers can benefit from cheaper gas, cleaner air and improved national security.
Congress wants to get more renewable fuel to America: Last month the Senate rejected in a bipartisan manner an amendment from Sen. Patrick J. Toomey, R-Pa., that would have zeroed out funding for renewable fuel development by the Department of Defense.

Despite this momentum, legislative threats to the RFS remain. We must continue to avoid short-term energy policy changes that imperil America’s communities, families and businesses. Maintaining the RFS ensures that America’s renewable fuel industry — from traditional, advanced or cellulosic sources — keeps growing our economy.

We can get to this future of lower gas prices, more jobs and increased security and investment if the RFS stays unchanged. And the path forward will be smoother if we have leaders who can not only add their voices to the growing chorus of renewable fuel supporters, but have the experience to execute on that vision. McCarthy and Moniz have the backgrounds to help this incredible industry flourish. We hope Congress continues to do the same.

Adam Monroe is president of Novozymes North America, a manufacturer of enzymes, microorganisms and biopharmaceutical ingredients.

Fuels America News & Stories

Fuels
View original article: 

Op-Ed: Confirmations Would Give Energy to Energy

Posted in Anchor, FF, GE, ONA, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Op-Ed: Confirmations Would Give Energy to Energy