Tag Archives: top stories

Real-Life Captain Phillips: The Pirates "Did Not Let Me Urinate"

Mother Jones

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC “-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN” “http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd”>

Captain Phillips is a solid if ultimately forgettable “true story” movie. The film, directed by Paul Greengrass, tells the story of Captain Richard Phillips (played by a New England-accented Tom Hanks), a merchant mariner taken hostage by Somali pirates in 2009. After being held for five days aboard a lifeboat, Phillips was rescued when Navy Seal snipers took out three of his Somali captors. “I share the country’s admiration for the bravery of Captain Phillips and his selfless concern for his crew,” President Obama said in a statement on April 12, 2009. “His courage is a model for all Americans.”

Last week, Phillips attended a special screening of Captain Phillips at the Newseum in Washington, DC. Hanks was there, taking selfies with sailors. Barkhad Abdi (who plays the pirate Abduwali Abdukhadir Muse) was in attendance, as were Navy Commander Frank Castellano (one of the men who saved Phillips) and Greengrass. The 58-year-old English director is a former journalist who directed two other acclaimed docudramas: Bloody Sunday and United 93. “Films aren’t journalism,” Greengrass emphasized while introducing his film, though he argued that dramatizations are capable of conveying certain “truths.”

Continue Reading »

View original: 

Real-Life Captain Phillips: The Pirates "Did Not Let Me Urinate"

Posted in Accent, FF, GE, LAI, LG, ONA, Uncategorized, Venta | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Real-Life Captain Phillips: The Pirates "Did Not Let Me Urinate"

16 Ways Default Will Totally Screw Americans

Mother Jones

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC “-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN” “http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd”>

Perhaps you’ve heard that if Congress fails to raise the debt ceiling by October 17, the United States will face an unprecedented financial default. The way some Republicans talk about the consequences of passing that threshold, you might think that hitting that limit might not be all that bad (Florida’s Ted Yoho, in fact, thinks it would be beneficial). But sober-minded economists are describing the ramifications of a default with terms usually reserved Roland Emmerich flicks—terms like “apocalypse.” The full economic consequences of defaulting are unknown. “It’s a little like asking how many people will be killed if there’s another terrorist attack,” says Isabel Sawhill, a budget expert at the Brookings Institution. But we do know, as early as October 22, the US government will run out of money to pay its bills and federal spending will have to be cut by about 32 percent, according to estimates made by the Bipartisan Policy Center. That’s when Americans of all stripes would start feeling the pain in many different ways. Here are 16 of them:

1. Social security checks will be delayed, possibly cut. According to President Obama, in the event of a default the US government will have no choice but to delay social security checks. Here’s why: The US government owes $12 billion in social security payments on October 23 and an additional $25 billion on November 1. At some point between October 22 and November 1, the Bipartisan Policy Center (BPC) predicts that the US government will have exhausted its borrowing power and will either have to start severely delaying its bills or sort through the millions of different payments it owes each month—on everything from national parks to the FBI—to figure out which ones to stop making. That’s when social security could see sustained cuts.

2. Federal employees will be screwed…even more. If the shutdown had never happened, the US government would have owed $3 billion in federal employee salaries on October 28. That number could now be lower or higher, depending on whether Congress approves back pay for furloughed employees before then. As Shai Akabas, a senior policy analyst at BPC, explains, if the shutdown ends before the debt ceiling date, employees will likely see their back pay. If it doesn’t, their pay will continue to be delayed or cut, depending on how the government decides to pay its bills. And at this point, we really have no idea which federal employees will continue to get paid after a default.

3. Pay and benefits for military service members and veterans will be delayed, possibly cut. The US government owes $12 billion in pay to active and retired military service members on November 1. Those payments will be delayed if the government runs out of money before then, and potentially cut, depending on which bills the US decides to pay.

4. Medicare and Medicaid checks will be delayed, possibly cut. The US government owes $2 billion in Medicaid payments on October 30 and $18 billion in Medicare payments on November 1. Same deal: If the government runs out of money before then, payments will be delayed, or put on the chopping block with everything else.

5. College kids will lose their loans, and have (even more) trouble getting jobs. The Treasury Department has warned that after a default, interest rates will skyrocket. Nick Schwellenbach, a fiscal policy analyst for the Center for Effective Government, says “federally subsidized loans would likely be buffered, but education grants funded by discretionary spending would likely stop during a default. Additionally, increased costs of borrowing would impact students who rely on credit cards and private loans to make ends meet. After graduation, economic downturn and uncertainty could once again increase unemployment rates for recent graduates.”

6. Say goodbye to your retirement savings. After the US government defaults, stock and bond prices will likely fall dramatically, affecting the value of retirement accounts. A default could also trigger a financial crash that could match or surpass the 2008 crash (And in 2008, Americans about to retire lost 25 percent of their assets, a retirement expert at the New School told The New York Times. So Americans near retirement age will likely have to continue working longer before moving to the beach.

7. Good luck buying a home. As the Treasury Department points out, a default would cause mortgage interest rates to skyrocket and banks to tighten their already super-tight lending standards, by, among other things, requiring higher down payments. It may not even take an actual default to affect mortgage rates. During 2011’s debt ceiling debacle, mortgage interest rates jumped higher and stayed that way for months: Specifically, an American taking out a mortgage of $235,000 saw an increase in monthly payments of about $100.

8. Or a car. See above.

9. Or getting a credit card. Ditto.

10. And forget that foreign vacation. A default is widely expected to tank the value of the US dollar. That could be good for US manufacturers, but bad if you’re planning a trip abroad where the buying power of the dollar will be diminished. And the recent political turmoil is already hurting American currency: As the government shutdown began, the dollar “sank to its lowest against the Euro in more than seven months and its weakest level versus the UK pound since January,” The Wall Street Journal reports. Say goodbye to Christmas in Paris.

11. That’s probably for the best since your company might not be able to pay you. Commercial paper, or short term corporate debt, is issued by many large companies to meet payroll and accounts receivable. A default would cause commercial paper rates spike, explains Cornelius Hurley, a professor in Boston University’s School of Law and a former counsel to the Federal Reserve’s Board of Governors, which means that corporations that don’t have a lot of cash socked away “may be unable to meet payroll obligations.”

12. Also, you might lose your job. According to Hurley, post-default “unemployment will spike immediately as firms suspend new and replacement hiring and comb their work forces for cuts.”

13. And you might not be able to get a new one. According to the Treasury Department, “many private-sector analysts believe that a default would lead to events of the magnitude of late 2008 or worse, and the result then was a recession more severe than any seen since the Great Depression.”

14. Small businesses will be hit especially hard. Entrepreneurs don’t want to take out loans when there’s high uncertainty about borrowing costs, and banks don’t want to lend to businesses that don’t have an established history of success. As the Center for Effective Government’s Schwellenbach explains, “In the wake of the 2008 crash, the credit freeze disproportionately affected small businesses. After June of 2008, lending to small firms decreased almost 18 percent.”

15. So will local governments. Schwellenbach says, “Instability in the stock market and higher borrowing costs could decrease confidence in municipal bonds, which are used to finance local schools and infrastructure projects. Unlike the federal government, many states and local governments are unable to borrow to avoid budget cuts, if the budget doesn’t balance. Additionally, a downturn in small business investment, potential decreases in employment, and a depressed housing market could all deprive local governments of revenue and strain resources.”

16. And, after all is said and done, the US deficit will increase. “When there’s a threat of default not to say an actual default, which is much worse you see interest rates go up on treasuries, so you have to have more government spending to pay back the interest,” says Harry Stein, the associate director of fiscal policy for the Center for American Progress. “So then you end up increasing the deficit. If that’s really all you care about, then you’ll see that playing with the default isn’t even productive. So why are we talking about this?”

Continued:

16 Ways Default Will Totally Screw Americans

Posted in FF, G & F, GE, LAI, LG, ONA, Uncategorized, Venta | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on 16 Ways Default Will Totally Screw Americans

Nobody Sane Likes the Republican Party Anymore

Mother Jones

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC “-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN” “http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd”>

I’ve been reading all day that Republican favorability ratings plummeted in the latest Gallup poll, but I didn’t think much of it. After all, favorability ratings for both parties have been pretty low for a while. But when I finally clicked through to look at the actual numbers, it was a lot more dramatic than I thought:

Wow. Republican favorability ratings have been hovering within a few points of 40 percent ever since 2006. Then Ted Cruz mounted his filibuster, Republicans starting threatening to crash the economy, and their favorability crashed ten points to 28 percent, the lowest in history. As we all know, the Crazification Factor is 27 percent, which means that literally nobody sane approves of the Republican Party any longer.

This demonstrates a surprising amount of common sense among average Americans. In a way, I’m heartened.

Read the article – 

Nobody Sane Likes the Republican Party Anymore

Posted in FF, GE, LG, ONA, Uncategorized, Venta | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Nobody Sane Likes the Republican Party Anymore

The 6 Dumbest Government Shutdown Myths

Mother Jones

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC “-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN” “http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd”>

The government shutdown is awful. It’s awful in a lot of different ways—to kids with cancer, to firefighters, to domestic violence centers, to goats. Another way in which this awful manifests itself is through a parade of misinformation and bad memes about what’s going on during this impasse. Here are six of the dumbest myths you’ve probably heard about the government shutdown:

1. Obama closed the ocean.

On Saturday, Breitbart’s Mike Flynn posted a piece, titled “Feds Try to Close the Ocean Because of Shutdown”, that reads, “before the weekend, the National Park Service informed charter boat captains in Florida that the Florida Bay was ‘closed’ due to the shutdown.” A bunch of people started tweeting about how Obama had shut down the ocean, including this Republican congressman from Arizona:

And on Monday, Fox News’ Megyn Kelly had the cast of Fox’s The Five on her new show to talk about what Miley Cyrus looks like when she twerks, but also about Obama closing the ocean.

Barack Obama did not close the ocean. Officials are indeed restricting access (fishing, for instance) to Florida Bay, a body of water that’s part of a national park. Florida Bay encompasses roughly a half-million acres, but exceptions are being made for transit, access for emergencies, and access for the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission to monitor the population of algae. “It’s an exaggeration to state that Obama has tried to shut down the entire ocean—or even to suggest that he has shuttered the Atlantic Ocean or all of the waters in the Keys,” PolitiFact.com concludes. “Tourists and locals can continue to fish, swim and play in the ocean, even in the Keys.”

2. Obama is personally paying to keep a Muslim culture museum open.

During the weekend edition of Fox & Friends, co-host Anna Kooiman claimed that President Obama offered to pay “out of his own pocket” to keep the International Museum of Muslim Cultures open during the shutdown—while refusing to allow World War II veterans to visit their memorial in Washington, DC. Here’s the clip:

This would be outrageous and bizarre—if the claim weren’t based on a piece published on a satirical website. Kooiman later apologized on Twitter, and Fox is set to issue an on-air correction this Saturday.

3. Obama shut down the Amber Alert program.

Conservative bloggers were appalled this week to find that the federal government nixed Amber Alerts during the shutdown. Though the website was down briefly, the program itself was never shuttered. Also, the child abduction alert system is actually a state-based program, two alerts went out during the shutdown, and the website is now back up and running. So that’s that.

4. NASA won’t tell you about world-ending asteroids because #shutdown.

This one tweet kicked off a swirl of speculation and bad headlines about how NASA’s asteroid detection staff had been axed—even though the Asteroid Watch Twitter feed clarified that many observatories and astronomers would continue to monitor the skies. Ninety-seven percent of NASA staff was furloughed, and government social-media accounts took hits across the board. But there’s no reason to think that government officials wouldn’t be able to tell America that a Ben Affleck movie was becoming terrifying reality just because they aren’t currenlty allowed to do it on Twitter.

5. Priests are being threatened with arrest.

“In a stunning development, some military priests are facing arrest if they celebrate mass or practice their faith on military bases during the federal government shutdown,” the Daily Caller reported on Friday, with the provocative headline, “Priests threatened with arrest if they minister to military during shutdown.” Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) tweeted the story, and House Majority Leader Eric Cantor responded:

The Caller story was picked up by various right-winger pundits and bloggers, including Fox News radio host Todd Starnes, who interpreted this as yet another one of Obama’s attacks on religious freedom. This all quickly morphed into the meme that Obama was threatening military chaplains and priests with jail time. This simply isn’t the case, and the Obama administration has yet to initiate any kind of crackdown on Catholic priests. On Saturday, the House passed a measure allowing military chaplains to lead Sunday mass without fear of penalty. The Senate has yet to take up the bill.

6. Shutdowns are “normal.”

On a recent episode of CNN’s Crossfire, co-host Newt Gingrich (who, as former Speaker of the House, led Republicans during the last big shutdown) claimed that shutdown-related hysteria was overblown. “There is an amazing amount of hysteria and vitriol over what is a normal part of the constitutional process,” Gingrich said on September 30. “The government shut down 12 times under Democratic House speaker Tip O’Neill. It was only shut down twice while I was speaker.”

The stated number of shutdowns under O’Neill is misleading, given that they were very short and that nearly half of them weren’t technically government shutdowns. Of the seven genuine shutdowns of the O’Neill era, the longest lasted three days, and the cumulative duration of all seven was 13 days—half the combined length of Gingrich’s two shutdowns (26 days). Via PolitiFact:

In addition, three of those happened primarily on weekends, further minimizing their impact.

A one-day shutdown in October 1982, the Washington Post recently noted, stemmed from a particularly innocuous reason: Congress delayed a session because President Reagan had invited lawmakers to a White House barbecue, and Democrats were holding a $1,000-a-plate fundraising dinner. The funding question was resolved the next day.

For more nuance, click here.

Follow this link:

The 6 Dumbest Government Shutdown Myths

Posted in alo, FF, GE, LAI, LG, ONA, The Atlantic, Uncategorized, Venta | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The 6 Dumbest Government Shutdown Myths

How the GOP’s Kamikaze Club Hijacked John Boehner

Mother Jones

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC “-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN” “http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd”>

How did the Republican Party become a kamikaze club guided by a small handful of hostage-taking radicals hell-bent on causing chaos to ruin the presidency of Barack Obama? It wasn’t by the design of House Speaker John Boehner and the GOP congressional leadership. This came about because a small number of tea party back-benchers in the House and Senate, assisted by a well-financed network of right-wing organizations (some funded by the billionaire Koch Brothers), pushed an issue that was red meat for the GOP’s base—defunding Obamacare—and managed to hijack the party (even more than the tea party already had).

Let’s look at how the Boehner-led GOPers began this latest round of political battle. After Obama won reelection and the Democrats picked up 11 seats in the House last November, Boehner appeared ready to accept political reality. He observed,

It’s pretty clear that the president was re-elected. Obamacare is the law of the land. If we were to put Obamacare into the CR the bill funding the government, known as a continuing resolution and send it over to the Senate, we were risking shutting down the government. That is not our goal.

That is, Boehner had no desire to re-litigate Obamacare through the budget process.

Continue Reading »

Continued here:  

How the GOP’s Kamikaze Club Hijacked John Boehner

Posted in FF, GE, LG, ONA, Uncategorized, Venta | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on How the GOP’s Kamikaze Club Hijacked John Boehner

40 Percent of Your Chicken Nugget Is Meat. The Rest Is…

Mother Jones

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC “-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN” “http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd”>

Marketing isn’t about giving people what they want; it’s about convincing people to want what you’ve got—that is, what you can buy cheap, spiff up, and sell at a profit. Take the chicken nugget, that staple of fast-food outlets and school lunches.

The implicit marketing pitch goes something like this: “You like fried chicken, right? How about some bite-sized fried chicken chunks, without the messy bones?” When most people think of eating chicken, they think of, say, biting into a drumstick. What they get when they do so is a mouthful of muscle—popularly known as meat.

What people are actually getting from chicken nuggets is a bit different, according to a new study by University of Mississippi medical researchers. (Abstract here; I have access to the full paper but can’t upload it for copyright reasons.) They bought an order of chicken nuggets from two (unnamed) fast-food chains, plucked a nugget from each, broke them down, and analyzed them in a lab.

Continue Reading »

Source:  

40 Percent of Your Chicken Nugget Is Meat. The Rest Is…

Posted in FF, GE, LG, ONA, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on 40 Percent of Your Chicken Nugget Is Meat. The Rest Is…

This Supreme Court Case Could Usher In a “System of Legalized Corruption”

Mother Jones

The Supreme Court will hear arguments on Tuesday in McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission, a case that’s been dubbed “the next Citizens United.” The plaintiff, GOP donor Shaun McCutcheon, and his conservative allies say the case is about getting rid of restrictions on political spending that stifle free speech. Campaign finance watchdogs, meanwhile, fear the case could eviscerate an important piece of what’s left of the federal laws governing money in politics. McCutcheon, says Fred Wertheimer, president of Democracy 21, will decide “whether we return to the system of legalized corruption we have had in the past and that has led to some of the worst Washington corruption scandals in the nation’s history.”

Here’s what you need to know about the case.

Continue Reading »

Original post: 

This Supreme Court Case Could Usher In a “System of Legalized Corruption”

Posted in Citizen, FF, GE, LAI, LG, ONA, Uncategorized, Venta | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on This Supreme Court Case Could Usher In a “System of Legalized Corruption”

Why It Doesn’t Matter If People Aren’t Signing Up for Obamacare Yet

Mother Jones

Republicans have been insisting for a week now that Obamacare is a failure because immediately following it’s official debut on October 1, few people actually signed up for subsidized insurance plans through its new health exchanges. “Error message after error message. Failed security standards and 60 hours on website hold for just this one Kansan. It is clear, Obamacare is failing — an embarrassment, particularly for the former Kansas governor who is now in charge of Obamacare,” Kansas Rep. Tim Huelskamp (R) complained on the House floor last week.

But it doesn’t really matter whether many people enrolled in Obamacare last week. Healthcare.gov saw 8 million unique visitors in the first four days the exchanges were open. It isn’t especially surprising that not all those people managed to get covered on Day 1. The coverage people are seeking isn’t even available until January 1. Uninsured Americans have until December 15 to sign up for coverage that starts the first of the year, and another three months to sign up during the open enrollment period that ends March 31. (People can still sign up after March 31 if they have a change in status, such as losing employer-based coverage.) If people weren’t able to sign up October 1 or even October 5, that’s not the end of the world. It’s just the beginning.

Experience shows that getting lots of uninsured people into private health plans and new Medicaid plans is maddeningly difficult and time-consuming. Massachusetts has already done this, after all. In 2006, Gov. Mitt Romney (R) signed into law a health care reform bill that is essentially the model for the Affordable Care Act. Like the ACA, Romneycare expanded the state’s Medicaid program and then opened the Massachusetts Health Connector, the prototype of Healthcare.gov, to provide a marketplace where state residents could purchase subsidized individual health insurance plans.

What happened in Massachusetts is pretty much exactly what’s happening right now with Obamacare. After the law went into effect in Massachusetts, state offices were totally overwhelmed by the number of people clamoring to sign up for insurance, or what the state’s Medicaid director dubbed the “stress of success.” Lost paperwork, computer glitches, confusion over who was eligible for what, and not enough staff to handle the workload meant that in those early days, consumers could wait several months after submitting an application to finally get coverage. So many people were trying to enroll in the expanded Medicaid program that the Medicaid agency ended up with a months-long backlog of applications. In the first two months, only 18,000 of more than 200,000 potentially eligible people had successfully signed up through the connector, according to Jonathan Gruber, an MIT professor who helped design the Massachusetts system and served on the connector board. And all of that happened in a state with only 300,000 or so eligible applicants and without a well-funded opposition trying to derail the law at every turn.

But guess what? Eventually the kinks got worked out and people got covered. Enrollment opened in October 2006, and by the deadline for getting mandatory coverage, July 1, 2007, the Boston Globe reported, 20,000 more people had signed up for insurance on the exchange than the state had expected—12,000 of them in just the two weeks before the deadline. Total enrollment went from 18,000 in December 2006 to 158,000 a year later, says Gruber. Today, Massachusetts has the lowest rate of uninsured residents in the entire country—less than 4 percent—and polls show that people are generally happy with how everything worked out. The conservative Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation has called the state’s health care reform law “a well thought-out piece of legislation.”

The federal exchange is fielding vastly more work than the Massachusetts Health Connector, and if it’s having trouble with the workload, that’s largely thanks to Republican opponents. The drafters of the ACA never envisioned the federal government running health care marketplaces for most of the country. The ACA was specifically designed to respect the state’s rights that Republicans claim to care so much about. It empowered states, which already regulate the sale of insurance, to run the exchanges. Healthcare.gov was supposed to be a backstop for states either too small to run their own or that dropped the ball on setting up their own exchanges. Instead, Republican governors across the country, and mostly in the South, abdicated the job completely. So instead of running a marketplace for a couple of states as planned, Healthcare.gov is having to do the work of 70 percent of them, including big states like Florida, Texas and Virginia (and also, ahem, Kansas). Of course the site was going to have some problems!

The first real measure of how well the system works is still a few months away. Given the human propensity to procrastinate, the surge of actual enrollments will probably come, as it did in Massachusetts, in the week or two before the first coverage deadline on December 15. That’s when people will realize that coverage starts within days—not months or years—and start making decisions in earnest. Bronze plan or silver? Blue Cross or Aetna?

If only a handful of people have successfully enrolled by then, it won’t be just conservatives who are freaking out.

Source:

Why It Doesn’t Matter If People Aren’t Signing Up for Obamacare Yet

Posted in FF, GE, LAI, LG, ONA, PUR, Uncategorized, Venta | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Why It Doesn’t Matter If People Aren’t Signing Up for Obamacare Yet

15 Things You Should Know About the Coal Industry’s Plan to Ship Its Product to China

Mother Jones

After spending years trying and failing to win a global climate treaty, environmental activists have finally changed tactics. Instead pouring all their efforts into passing doomed legislation, they’re picking big symbolic battles with the fossil fuel industry.

The campaign to derail the Keystone XL pipeline from Canada’s tar sands is just the start. On the West Coast, environmentalists have mounted a similar attack on the coal industry, which wants to reverse its steep national decline by exporting millions of tons coal to China. Green groups believe they can prevent the shipments (and keep the coal in the ground) by stopping the construction of huge new coal export terminals at ports in Oregon and Washington. “Based on our back-of-the-envelope calculation, the burning of this exported coal could have a larger climate impact than all of the oil pumped through the Keystone pipeline,” says Kimberly Larson, a spokeswoman for the Sierra Club’s Power Past Coal campaign.

Here’s what you need to know about the biggest climate change fight that you’ve probably never heard of:

Continue Reading »

See the original article here: 

15 Things You Should Know About the Coal Industry’s Plan to Ship Its Product to China

Posted in FF, GE, LG, ONA, Uncategorized, Venta | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on 15 Things You Should Know About the Coal Industry’s Plan to Ship Its Product to China

How Bad Is the Income Gap in Your City? The Answer in GIFs

Mother Jones

Artist and researcher Nickolay Lamm recently created these eye-popping 3-D images of New York City’s towering levels of incoming inequality.

Lamm has now expanded his project to include other major US cities. As you’ll see in the GIFs below, San Francisco, Boston, Chicago, Los Angeles, and Miami are now part of the 3-D inequality club. Using 2012 data from the mapping site ArcGIS, Lamm superimposed green blocks representing the median net worth of census block groups over photos of the cityscape. The effect clearly visualizes the drastic levels of income inequality found across the country.

San Francisco

San Francisco

Boston

Boston

Chicago

Chicago

Los Angeles

Miami

Miami

This article is from – 

How Bad Is the Income Gap in Your City? The Answer in GIFs

Posted in FF, GE, LG, ONA, Uncategorized, Venta | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on How Bad Is the Income Gap in Your City? The Answer in GIFs