Trump supporters believe in Trump and, weirdly, science
By Heather Smithon May 5, 2016Share
Donald Trump may believe that climate change is a myth created by the Chinese to weaken American manufacturing, but believe it or not, a majority of his supporters — 56 percent — say that climate change is real.
Trump supporters are more likely to have a grasp on climate reality than supporters of ex- presidential candidate and Zodiac Killer Ted Cruz. According to a new report released today by the Yale Project on Climate Change Communication, 38 percent of Ted Cruz supporters said that climate change is stone-cold fact. Like Trump, Cruz denies climate change; unlike Trump, he holds the more shopworn theory that it’s a hoax created by scientists out to scare everybody.
Meanwhile, most supporters of Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders think climate change is happening — 92 percent and 93 percent, respectively. Of those, 83 percent of Clinton supporters and 80 percent of Sanders supporters said that they actually worried about it. Some 79 percent of Sanders supporters and 76 percent of Clinton supporters believe that humans are causing it (and the rest believe that it’s due to natural changes in the environment).
This is some crazy news. According to polling data, belief in climate change has waxed and waned over the years. Concern about climate change in America has been rising overall since a not-particularly-mysterious drop around 2008, when the American economy nearly went under, but climate change has been viewed throughout as a margin issue.
Times are changing. Nearly every registered voter who is not a fan of Ted Cruz, regardless of political affiliation, said that they were more likely to vote for a presidential candidate who strongly supports taking action to reduce global warming, regulating carbon dioxide as a pollutant, and requiring fossil fuel companies to pay a carbon tax (provided other taxes, like income tax, were cut).
A majority of all candidates’ supporters, even Cruz’s, want more money for research into renewable energy. They also favor tax rebates for people who buy energy-efficient vehicles or solar panels — all while they continue to endorse expanding drilling for oil and natural gas off the coast of the United States.
Why is this happening? Here’s my theory: Climate change has finally become a part of the national conversation. It’s officially a thing talked about by politicians not named Al Gore. Last year, a coalition of ranchers, Native Americans, and climate activists blocked Keystone XL, a pipeline whose construction seemed inevitable just a few years earlier. Climate change, rarely mentioned in presidential debates, has been a subject of serious discussion this year. President Obama talks about it, often.
That doesn’t mean people know much about climate science. Only a little more than a third of Clinton and Sanders’ supporters, for example, know the extent of the scientific consensus on climate change. That’s despite the fact that research says that said consensus is the single most persuasive fact about climate change, and would theoretically be as familiar to climate change believers as an ice cream truck jingle.
Two of the researchers behind this study, Anthony Leiserowitz, and Ed Maibach, have spent years arguing that climate change is an issue that has the potential to cut across political boundaries. This is just one study, but it bears that theory out.
Find this article interesting?
Donate now to support our work.
Get Grist in your inbox
Link:
