Author Archives: Jimmy Charles

Inhofe’s Grand Climate Conspiracy Theory: It’s All About Barbra Streisand

Mother Jones

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC “-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN” “http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd”>

The recent news on the front page of the New York Times was stark. As thousands of diplomats were gathering in Lima, Peru, to work on an agreement to limit greenhouse gas emissions, scientists and climate policy experts were warning

that it now may be impossible to prevent the temperature of the planet’s atmosphere from rising by 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit. According to a large body of scientific research, that is the tipping point at which the world will be locked into a near-term future of drought, food and water shortages, melting ice sheets, shrinking glaciers, rising sea levels and widespread flooding—events that could harm the world’s population and economy.

But with an effort under way in Lima to protect the difference, as the newspaper put it, “between a newly unpleasant world and an uninhabitable one,” one fellow in Washington is readying himself to prevent any progress toward a climate accord: Sen. James Inhofe. The 80-year-old Republican from Oklahoma is one of the most notorious deniers of human-induced climate change. He has contended that God controls the Earth’s climate, not Homo sapiens, and he has quoted the Bible to make this point: “As long as the Earth remains there will be seed time and harvest, cold and heat, winter and summer, day and night.” And Inhofe, thanks to the recent elections, is in line to chair the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee when the Republicans assume control of the Senate next month. He has vowed to do all he can to block regulations aimed at cutting emissions.

With diplomats in Lima wrestling with the challenges of climate negotiations and Inhofe counting the days until his likely ascension to one of the most powerful environment-related positions on the planet, I’m reminded of a bizarre encounter I had with the senator at a previous climate summit.

In December 2009, the United Nations hosted a global gathering in Copenhagen to hammer out what some participants hoped would be a binding accord that would compel a reduction in emissions around the world. Thousands of diplomats, policy advocates, and scientists flocked to the Danish city for the session, and thousands of reporters were there to chronicle the talks. Inhofe came too. To troll. Or, as he put it, to be “a one-man truth squad.” He slithered in and out of the cavernous media filing center, ever at the ready to speak to reporters looking for the other side quotes denigrating the proceedings, claiming that climate change was no more than a hoax, and celebrating the summit’s failure to produce a binding and comprehensive treaty.

Inhofe was usually mobbed by reporters—especially non-American journalists who found it newsworthy that a US senator would say such things. Judging from the smile on his mug, Inhofe enjoyed skunking up the party. After watching this for a few days, I could not resist the urge to engage.

As he strolled through the media center one afternoon, accompanied by several camera crews recording his pronouncements, I approached and politely asked if I could put a question to him. Sure, he said, in his folksy, avuncular manner.

Look around us, I said, spreading my arms wide. There are thousands of intelligent and well-meaning people in this gigantic conference center: scientists, heads of state, government officials, policy experts. They believe that climate change is a serious and pressing threat and that something must be done soon. Do you believe that they have all been fooled?

Yes, he said, grinning.

That these people who have traveled from all points of the globe to be here are victims of a well-orchestrated hoax?

Yes, he said, still smiling.

That’s some hoax, I countered. But who has engineered such a scam?

Hollywood liberals and extreme environmentalists, Inhofe replied.

Really? I asked. Why would they conspire to scare all these smart people into believing a catastrophe was under way, when all was well?

Inhofe didn’t skip a beat: To advance their radical environmental agenda.

I pressed on: Who in Hollywood is doing this?

The whole liberal crowd, Inhofe said.

But who?

Barbra Streisand, he responded.

I nearly laughed. All these people had assembled in Copenhagen because of Barbra Streisand. A singer and actor had perpetuated the grandest con of the past 100 years?

That’s right, Inhofe said, with a straight face. And others, he added.

By this point, he was losing patience and glancing about for another reporter who wanted to record his important observations. And I was running out of follow-up queries. After all, was I really going to ask, “And Ed Begley Jr. too?” So our conversation ended, and I headed back to reality.

But I was struck by this thought: Did this senator truly believe Barbra Streisand was the devious force behind a completely phony global campaign to address climate change? He seemed to.

In his 2012 book, The Greatest Hoax: How the Global Warming Conspiracy Threatens Your Future, Inhofe does mention Streisand—but only once, lumping her together with Leonardo DiCaprio and John Travolta as celebs whose environmental “alarmism” had to be debunked. But his book did not shy away from clearly identifying the charlatans and hoaxers who have hornswoggled the planet: “environmental activist extremists,” Al Gore, MoveOn.org, George Soros, Michael Moore, and, yes, “the Hollywood elites.”

Perhaps when Inhofe seizes the reins of the Senate environment committee, he can further expose this conspiracy—and for the first witness…Barbra Streisand. It’s time for her to come clean.

Excerpt from:  

Inhofe’s Grand Climate Conspiracy Theory: It’s All About Barbra Streisand

Posted in Anchor, FF, GE, Hagen, LAI, LG, ONA, Pines, Radius, Uncategorized, Venta | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Inhofe’s Grand Climate Conspiracy Theory: It’s All About Barbra Streisand

Quote of the Day: Green Goo Edition

Mother Jones

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC “-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN” “http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd”>

From Stephanie Mencimer, after whipping up one of the holiday offerings in The Romney Family Table:

My DC-bureau testers lost their nerve when presented with the green goo. Some claimed nut allergies (a likely story!). Fortunately, Caldwell, like me, hails from the Jell-O belt and was undeterred.

Fearless journalism indeed.

View original article: 

Quote of the Day: Green Goo Edition

Posted in FF, GE, LAI, LG, ONA, Uncategorized, Venta | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Quote of the Day: Green Goo Edition

Time to Pull the Plug on Egypt

Mother Jones

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC “-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN” “http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd”>

America’s $1.5 billion annual aid to Egypt is supposed to give us a bit of leverage in high places. But in the wake of yesterday’s massacre by the military—in direct opposition to repeated appeals from the U.S.—that leverage seems to be pretty much nonexistent. For that reason, Marc Lynch thinks it’s finally time to pull the plug. Here’s the conclusion of an interview over at Wonkblog between Lynch and Brad Plumer:

BP: Is it possible to envision how the current crisis in Egypt might get resolved at this point?

ML: Honestly, I think things are going to get a lot worse, not better. The military’s rationale for moving in on the protester camps was that this was a festering wound, we just need to clear it out, do a surgical operation, end this, and move on. I think it’s clear that this is not what’s happening. The streets are incredibly polarized right now, and I think it’ll be extremely difficult to calm things down and get people back on the table.

For the past few years I’ve been one of the more optimistic people that Egypt would work things out. It just seems like there were enough state institutions, enough political consensus, enough of a robust civil society to keep things going.

Now I’m not so sure. I think what we’ve got now is a fairly transparent attempt by the military at Mubarak’s restoration, except without Mubarak. I’ve called it “High Mubarakism.”You’ve got a state of emergency, lots of anti-American propaganda. Sissi is a bit more popular, but I don’t think it will work. Mubarak failed for a reason.

BP: And at this point there’s not much the U.S. can do but watch?

ML: The problem is pretty much everyone is hostile to us at this point. The U.S. tried to take the stance of not supporting a particular group. But the more polarized Egypt got, the more everyone thought we were against them. All the liberals thought we were on the Brotherhood’s side. All the Brotherhood thought we were on the liberals side. So now you’ve got antipathy from every player in Egypt. And it’s being fed by a really malicious and malevolent anti-American propaganda campaign in the state media and in the pro-coup independent media. That just creates a really toxic atmosphere.

So America’s ability to do things like being evenhanded broker or try to mediate the conflict is just infinitely harder in that kind of situation.

I think it’s been fairly clear for over a month that the Egyptian military began planning all of this in the spring, possibly even earlier. It was rolled out very carefully, very strategically, and very ruthlessly. And while Mohamed Morsi may have been no saint, it probably didn’t matter. The military never had the slightest intention of allowing true civilian rule, whether from the Muslim Brotherhood or anyone else.

All the too-clever questions over the past few weeks from reporters trying to get Obama spokesmen to commit to calling the military action a coup was always silly. Everyone knew perfectly well why they didn’t, and everyone knew it made perfect sense for them to leave their options open as long as there was any hope of influencing the course of events. At this point, though, there pretty obviously isn’t, so there’s no longer much point to holding back. Lynch is right: you can’t just ignore the massacre of 500 people. It’s time to pull the plug.

Continued here: 

Time to Pull the Plug on Egypt

Posted in FF, GE, LG, ONA, Uncategorized, Venta | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Time to Pull the Plug on Egypt

Urban Sustainable Energy How a Metered Is Adapting and Why It Is Occurring Now

While renewable energy might be great for the surroundings, the ability grid must adjust to the transition to green sources of energy and grow a &ldquosmart” grid to handle variability of your diverse renewable power portfolio.

The smart grid is called the world wide web of things. Each &ldquothing” within the smart grid can be an appliance such as an air conditioning equipment, a controlling device as being a programmable thermostat or motor control center or power source like a solar cell. Alternative energy communicate realtime power generation information to utilities. Even though the theory of the smart grid has been in existence for over a decade, it is simply now transforming into a reality.

How Come the Smart Grid Now possible?

There are several explanations why the smart grid will be released en masse now although the technology has existed for any decade. The principal reasons pushing the smart grid include the economies of scale that now make a good grid affordable, the adoption of renewable energy since its cost per kilowatt comes down, and also the computing infrastructure forced to run smart grids now installed and operating.

Economies of ScaleNetworking the entire metered requires countless sensors. As wireless technology has exploded, the expense of individual wireless communication devices has come down low enough we can consider installing countless them throughout the power company along with appliances as a standard feature. Smart grid sensors use the same cheap communication components as cellular phones, often using similar batteries too. By leveraging the price savings yielded by the economies of scale for producing millions of mobile devices and PDAs monthly, smart grid infrastructure has become affordable enough to become practical and in practically exactly what uses greater than a sip of power.

Renewables Require a Smart GridRenewable energy demands tighter power company monitoring and immediate corrections to take care of. Solar technology production is greatest in the afternoon, when folks often utilize most power. However, it produces little power in the winter though people need energy to stay warm. Wind power peaks at sunrise and sunset, if you find relatively little demand. Adding more renewable energy to the power company multiplies the variability with the power source. When sustainable energy from local sources suddenly drops due to a thunderstorm blocking sunshine, the electricity grid must compensate by either pulling power from batteries or turning on gas main power plants.

For this reason Spain’s solar powered energy and wind power drive caused a horrific economic slump they discovered that for each megawatt of renewable energy installed in, that they had to install an identical capacity of natural gas or oil burning power generation which was then rarely used. Spain was required to build double the power plants with all the higher priced renewable power plants quite often.

The Us is not facing this debacle because it is shifting to gas. Alternative energy that are ideal for the surroundings are coming on line slowly over the grid, while the investors still obtain a return of investment since the gas main vegetation is still employed in some capacity all of the time. However, as more sustainable energy sources think about it line, more back power generators must be added and trapped in sync using the alternative energy supply. As well as a smart grid is inside your handle many small, personal renewable energy projects that supply nearly all of a person’s power but must alternate between accepting locally produced power and delivering power when renewable sources flunk.

Data AnalyticsThe smart grid generates massive numbers of information. Thanks to data analysis and knowledge reporting tools pioneered by the likes of Google, utilities have the ability to compare one utility customer’s date against their neighbors, directory of each person’s prior day’s usage and relate this to the day before’s temperature outside. More to the point, these details could be relayed on the user through utility websites or displayed on the house’s thermostat. Some consumers have signed up for emailed notices and warnings once they use more power than average or their pre-selected quota.

Other users have signed up for discount programs where these are notified of power system overloads and paid to make off devices and convey down their capability consumption. Some utility industry is receiving rewards for shifting power consumption to non-peak times like day and shortly before bedtime. Using affordable cloud-computing and knowledge analysis tools depending on those pioneered by Google, utilities now manage to record energy usage of shoppers minute by minute and reward those who lower their usage in the event the utility asks them to take action. Conservation is good for consumers and also the environment, but it ought to be balanced by consumers’ needs thorough data analysis helps companies and consumers reach a good balance before rolling blackouts hit.

LeadingGreen offers the best LEED Training Toronto and provides the most affordable live LEED Green Associate Exam Preparation Courses in Toronto, Canada.

Posted in alternative energy | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Urban Sustainable Energy How a Metered Is Adapting and Why It Is Occurring Now