Tag Archives: house

Ohio fights a multi-front war against blight

Ohio fights a multi-front war against blight

Good samaritans in Ohio may be getting a reprieve from potential misdemeanor charges.

Today the state House is voting on a bill that would allow people to clean up vacant, blighted properties without fear of a trespassing charge. This measure essentially gives residents more power to improve their neighborhoods, harnessing NIMBY instincts for good. From The Columbus Dispatch:

Some residents hesitate to take care of the properties around them because they risk trespassing charges, said Tiffany Sokol, office manager of the nonprofit Youngstown Neighborhood Development Corp., which boards up and cleans up vacant properties. The bill would allow individuals to clean up blighted land or buildings that have clearly been abandoned.

“Very ugly, nasty places,” [said Sen. Joe Schiavoni (D), the bill’s sponsor]. “These properties are an eyesore, a danger to their neighbors.”

mbmatt356

Blight in East Cleveland.

The Rust Belt is only getting rustier, and Ohio communities have tried a number of strategies to fight neighborhood blight. Yesterday, The Columbus Dispatch and a city website published the names of negligent owners of more than 100 blighted properties. The city called it a fight for neighborhoods.

City Attorney Richard C. Pfeiffer Jr. said anything is worth a try.

“If it gets their attention, good,” he said.

In Cleveland, officials are rehabbing the shrunken city by aggressively tearing down houses, not fixing them up. From National Journal:

“Trying to convince my colleagues that demolition was the right way to go was against everything we had been taught,” said [city council member Anthony] Brancatelli, who spent his time at [Cleveland’s] Slavic Village Development Corp. focused on building, not destroying. “We built 500 new homes and rehabbed about a thousand and the market was good,” he said of his early years. But then he saw the market change. And he saw the speculators swoop in and devastate the neighborhood he loved. “There was the mentality of this wild, wild west of real estate that defies any logic that I grew up on,” he said.

He also saw the devastating impact on his neighbors. He still gets emotional about his dealings with one elderly woman who had lived in the same small house for 80 years with her family operating a butcher shop in the front of the house. But now she was the last member of the family in the house and needed to move out. “That,” said Brancatelli, “was probably the hardest thing I had to do was tell this poor woman that all we were going to do is tear it down. … She just cried.” …

[Jim Rokakis, former Cuyahoga County treasurer,] became an unlikely champion of demolition over rehabbing the abandoned houses. “By 2007, it became obvious to me that this was a war,” Rokakis told National Journal. “We had lost. And now we had to bury the dead. And ‘bury the dead’ meant taking these houses down, many of them functionally obsolete.” The logic, he said, is inescapable. “If you live next to a foreclosed house, your house is worth 10 percent less. If you live on a street with multiple foreclosed properties, your house isn’t worth 10 percent less. Your house is just worthless.”

While other progressive bastions of urban idealism wring their hands, Ohio is picking itself up and getting shit done. As Richey Piiparinen writes at New Geography:

[T]his groundedness, this Rust Belt-ness, it’s not a settling or a lack of aspiration, but rather — for Clevelanders populating the city that never knew its heights — a chance to look around and see nothing but work to do, and an opportunity to do it. There are a lot of fresh eyes around. The city psychology is changing. And I think this may save Cleveland, because people are no longer waiting for Cleveland to save us.

The Rust Belt may be gritty, beat-down, and other patronizing adjectives we seem to reserve for post-industrial American cities, but there’s a lot of hope in it yet.

Susie Cagle writes and draws news for Grist. She also writes and draws tweets for

Twitter

.

Read more:

Cities

Also in Grist

Please enable JavaScript to see recommended stories

See the original post: 

Ohio fights a multi-front war against blight

Posted in Citizen, GE, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Ohio fights a multi-front war against blight

Sen. Boxer to form congressional ‘climate change caucus,’ which should do the trick

Sen. Boxer to form congressional ‘climate change caucus,’ which should do the trick

Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) has decided that this is the perfect moment to launch a brand new congressional caucus. From The Hill:

[Boxer] said Tuesday that she’s forming a “climate change caucus,” and argues that Hurricane Sandy “changed a lot of minds” on the topic.

The move signals that Democrats might again be ready to aggressively promote bills to curb greenhouse gas emissions, even as the political prospects for global warming legislation remain remote in Congress.

“I am going to form a climate change caucus, because people are coming up to me, they really want to get into this. I think Sandy changed a lot of minds,” Boxer told reporters in the Capitol.

Pack it in, Chevron. Peace out, coal industry. Ya burnt, so to speak. After all, nothing gets things done like a congressional caucus.

That is why there are over 200 of them. A sampling:

2015 Caucus
30 Something Working Group
Americans Abroad Caucus
Armenian Caucus
Bike Caucus AKA Bicycle Caucus
Congressional Bourbon Caucus
Center Aisle Caucus
Congressional Automotive Caucus
Congressional Bicameral Arthritis Caucus
Congressional Boating Caucus
Congressional Caucus on Hellenic Issues
Congressional Caucus on Youth Sports
Congressional Correctional Officers Caucus
Congressional E-911 Caucus
Congressional Fraternal Caucus
Congressional HUBZone Caucus
Congressional Hockey Caucus
Congressional Horse Caucus
Congressional Kidney Caucus
Congressional Prayer Caucus
Congressional Ski and Snowboard Caucus
Congressional TRIO Caucus
Congressional Zoo and Aquarium Caucus
House Friends of Scotland Caucus
Senate Friends of Scotland Caucus
Future of American Media Caucus
German-American Caucus
House Afterschool Caucus
House Baltic Caucus
House Reading Caucus
Hungarian American Caucus
Interstate 69 Caucus
Liberty Caucus
Minor League Baseball Caucus
North America’s Supercorridor Caucus
Physics Caucus, The
Qatari-American Economic Strategic Defense, Cultural, and Educational Partnership Caucus
River of Trade Corridor Congressional Caucus
Shellfish Caucus
Stop DUI Caucus
TEX-21 Congressional Caucus [Ed. – I mean, does this have multiple members?]
Unexploded Ordnance Caucus
U.S.-Mongolia Friendship Caucus
Youth Challenge Caucus
Zero Capital Gains Tax Caucus

Oh, and:

Congressional Climate Caucus

… which was formed in 2006.

So the good news is that climate change is now one of the 250 or so most important issues in front of Congress. The bad news is that members will have to figure out which super-effective climate caucus is cooler.

Philip Bump writes about the news for Gristmill. He also uses Twitter a whole lot.

Read more:

Climate & Energy

,

Politics

Also in Grist

Please enable JavaScript to see recommended stories

Credit – 

Sen. Boxer to form congressional ‘climate change caucus,’ which should do the trick

Posted in GE, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Sen. Boxer to form congressional ‘climate change caucus,’ which should do the trick

Hundreds of Nebraskans speak out against Keystone XL pipeline

Hundreds of Nebraskans speak out against Keystone XL pipeline

For eight hours last night, Nebraskans at a public meeting in Albion shared their views on the proposed Keystone XL pipeline — most of which were unfavorable. From Nebraska Watchdog:

An estimated 800 people filled a huge metal county fairgrounds building Tuesday night to talk about a proposed $7 billion oil pipeline that would be built through Nebraska en route from Canada to Texas. …

It was a sometimes rowdy crowd, as many opponents to the pipeline booed or applauded speakers — despite admonitions not to — while supporters of the project were less vocal. At times it seemed like boots versus suits, as many people wearing boots, caps and jeans — farmers, ranchers and landowners — testified against the pipeline while many pro-business and free market advocates and people who would help build the pipeline testified in favor of it.

The hearing was the final step in the state’s environmental consideration of TransCanada’s proposal of a new pipeline route. In October, Nebraska gave preliminary approval to the new plan, noting that it avoids the sandy region of the state over the Ogallala Aquifer. So if the pipeline were to rupture (ahem), the state suggests, the damage wouldn’t permanently destroy a critical water source. That would be an improvement.

boldnebraska

A man holds up a container of oil and sand as he testifies at last night’s hearing.

Unless you live near the proposed route.

People such as Bonny Kilmurry of Atkinson said the pipeline would threaten her land and water supply if the pipeline leaks into the aquifer.

“Water is our lifeblood,” she said. “We can live without oil. We cannot live without water.” …

One of the most passionate voices of the night was Susan Luebbe, a Holt County rancher whose land was in the original pipeline route.

“There’s a reason they call it flyover country, because the Midwest does not matter until everyone bitches enough,” she said loudly. She criticized the [Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality]’s $2 million environmental review on the revised route as disorganized, a shamble and embarrassing.

Bold Nebraska, an organization that has taken a leading role in the fight against the pipeline, released a “Citizens’ Review” of the state’s environmental findings. Among the group’s concerns is that the new route would still pass through a sandhill region, marked by a type of soil that absorbs precipitation that ends up in the aquifer. In other words: The new route may have the same problem that the old route did. Bold Nebraska also believes that the state “simply published information given to them by TransCanada.”

Earlier in the day, pipeline supporters rallied in Omaha — led by the local Republican Party, Koch-backed Americans for Prosperity, and the Laborers union. Here’s a photo of the event, held at the Laborers hall. (At political events, Laborers typically wear orange.) Organized labor is split on the pipeline.

Of course, the status of the pipeline in Nebraska is only moot if the pipeline as a whole is approved — a decision that rests some 1,200 miles from Albion, Neb., at the White House. Recently, hundreds of people have also shown up there, also hoping to have their opinions heard.

Philip Bump writes about the news for Gristmill. He also uses Twitter a whole lot.

Read more:

Business & Technology

,

Climate & Energy

,

Politics

Also in Grist

Please enable JavaScript to see recommended stories

Visit site: 

Hundreds of Nebraskans speak out against Keystone XL pipeline

Posted in GE, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Hundreds of Nebraskans speak out against Keystone XL pipeline

Obama signs bill exempting U.S. airlines from E.U. carbon plan

Obama signs bill exempting U.S. airlines from E.U. carbon plan

Now that Obama has won reelection, he is freed up to follow his heart, moving forward forcefully in the fight against climate change. Put a piece of legislation in front of him, Congress, and he’ll sign it.

Even, say, a piece of legislation exempting U.S. airlines from an E.U. carbon dioxide reduction plan.

Simon_sees

The E.U. plan (which has already been postponed anyway) would have required that any airline doing business in its member countries participate in a cap-and-trade system. The U.S. Senate leapt into action, initiating a bill that would exempt U.S. airlines from the mandate (claiming, ludicrously, that it was because it sought more sweeping carbon reduction schemes). The House followed suit.

And now, our president has signed it. From The Hill:

President Obama has signed into law a bill that requires U.S. airlines to be excluded from European carbon emissions fees.

Environmentalists had framed the bill as the first test of the president’s commitment to fighting climate change in his second term and urged him to veto it. Obama signed it over their objections, though the move was not publicized by the White House. …

The New York-based Environmental Defense Fund called the emission ban, “[a]t best … simply superfluous” when it was approved by lawmakers earlier this fall.

But the industry group Airlines for America said Obama’s signature will allow carriers to reduce emissions through international agreements.

Even as we speak, I imagine that the CEOs of American and United and JetBlue and whoever are jet-pooling to Qatar to appeal to the governments of the world to increase the cost of carbon emissions under a sweeping international agreement. “Whatever it takes,” one CEO will say, and the assembled U.N. leaders will rise to their feet, clapping slowly. One will brush away a tear.

Anyway, I’m sure Obama will stand up for the climate next time. Keep flipping a coin and it has to come up heads sometime, right? (No, it doesn’t.)

Philip Bump writes about the news for Gristmill. He also uses Twitter a whole lot.

Read more:

Business & Technology

,

Climate & Energy

,

Politics

Also in Grist

Please enable JavaScript to see recommended stories

Originally posted here: 

Obama signs bill exempting U.S. airlines from E.U. carbon plan

Posted in GE, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Obama signs bill exempting U.S. airlines from E.U. carbon plan