Tag Archives: indian

Pesticides are killing our sperm

Pesticides are killing our sperm

Shutterstock

Killing bugs and sperm at the same time.

Pesticides, which are well known to have caused spectacular declines the world over in bees, birds, and other wildlife, are also taking a heavy toll on the virility of men.

A new study found that the agricultural poisons are reducing the quality and quantity of sperm in men all over the globe, with farm workers bearing the brunt of the sexual desecration. George Washington University researchers pored over 17 scientific studies that were published between 2007 and 2012 and reported in the journal Toxicology that 15 of them found “significant associations between exposure to pesticides and semen quality indicators.”

From Beyond Pesticides’ blog:

In addition to the U.S. findings, studies conducted on French, New Zealander, Indian, Tunisian, and Israeli men have all found decline in sperm count. Some studies record a drop by approximately 50 percent between 1940 and 1990, no small amount.

These results might not be surprising as sperm production is regulated by the endocrine system, a highly sensitive system of hormone regulators. A study on Mexican workers in the floral industry, where workers are routinely exposed to organophosphate, finds that workers not only have increased levels of testosterone, but also suppressed levels of follicle stimulating hormone and inhibin b, which are two sensitive markers for sperm production.

So go organic and save humankind’s ability to reproduce.

John Upton is a science aficionado and green news junkie who

tweets

, posts articles to

Facebook

, and

blogs about ecology

. He welcomes reader questions, tips, and incoherent rants:

johnupton@gmail.com

.

Read more:

Food

Also in Grist

Please enable JavaScript to see recommended stories

View original:  

Pesticides are killing our sperm

Posted in ALPHA, Amana, GE, LG, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Pesticides are killing our sperm

Like salty, warm water? Skip the Dead Sea and head to any ocean

Like salty, warm water? Skip the Dead Sea and head to any ocean

The Dead Sea is dying, but there’s a bit of good news: We’re turning all of our oceans into the Dead Sea.

There are two qualities that set the Dead Sea apart — it’s warm and it’s salty. Happily, our oceans are picking up both of those traits. (Happily for those wishing to soak in warm, salty water. Unhappily for those who live in the water or near its shores or on Earth.)

barthelomaus

The Dead Sea, now an ocean near you!

Getting warmer

From Maine’s Bangor Daily News:

Ed Monat, a seasonal tour boat operator and scallop fisherman from Bar Harbor, has seen a lot in his more than two decades of scuba diving below the waves of Frenchman Bay. …

One thing Monat never saw underwater prior to this past summer … was a 60-plus degree thermometer reading at the bottom of the bay. For much of the year, coastal waters in the Gulf of Maine generally are expected to waver between the mid-30s and mid-50s Fahrenheit, including at depths of 40-50 feet, where Monat often descends. On a late-August dive this summer near the breakwater that helps protect Bar Harbor from the open ocean, he said, his dive thermometer registered 63 degrees.

“That’s crazy, crazy warm,” Monat said recently. “This was a really warm summer in the water.”

This warmth isn’t only in the Gulf of Maine. It’s near Massachusetts and off the coast of Connecticut. It’s warmer in the Arctic and everywhere else. Thanks to our changing climate, oceans are warming and expanding.

And not just during the summer.

Patrice McCarron, executive director of Maine Lobstermen’s Association, said this month that rising temperatures in the gulf are “a huge concern” for the organization, the membership of which includes approximately 1,200 of the state’s 5,300 or so licensed commercial lobstermen. She said she has heard from some association members that water temperatures in the mouth of Penobscot Bay still, as of December, are unusually and consistently warm, from depths of a few feet to more than 150 feet.

“It’s 50 degrees throughout the water column,” McCarron said. “That’s crazy.”

Getting saltier

From Discovery:

The saltiness, or salinity, of the oceans is controlled by how much water is entering the oceans from rivers and rain versus how much is evaporating; what my kids recognize as “The Water Cycle.” The more sunshine and heat there is, the more water can evaporate, leaving the salts behind in higher concentrations in some places. Over time, those changes spread out as water moves, changing the salinity profiles of the oceans.

Oceanographers from Scripps Institution of Oceanography and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory fingerprinted salinity changes from 1955 to 2004 from 60 degrees south latitude to 60 degrees north latitude and down to the depth of 700 meters in the Atlantic, Pacific and Indian oceans. …

Next the ocean data was compared to 11,000 years of ocean data generated by simulations from 20 of the latest global climate models. When they did that they found that the changes seen in the oceans matched those that would be expected from human forcing of the climate.

Grab your beach chair, an umbrella, and some SPF 240 and meet me at the shore. I’ve always wanted to float in the Dead Sea’s famous waters. Little did I know that doing so would become so easy.

Philip Bump writes about the news for Gristmill. He also uses Twitter a whole lot.

Read more:

Climate & Energy

Also in Grist

Please enable JavaScript to see recommended stories

Read this article:  

Like salty, warm water? Skip the Dead Sea and head to any ocean

Posted in GE, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Like salty, warm water? Skip the Dead Sea and head to any ocean

Americans are quite literally giving their gold and silver away

Americans are quite literally giving their gold and silver away

A quick civics quiz to start your day. The answers are in italics at the end of each question. (If you read the headline, you’re cheating.)

  1. When was the General Mining Act, which is still in place, signed into law? 1872.
  2. Under the General Mining Act, how much do companies pay to stake a claim to extract precious metals on public land? How much in annual maintenance costs thereafter? $189; $140.
  3. How much do they pay to the government in royalties for each ounce of gold extracted? Silver? Copper? Zero dollars; nada; zilch.
  4. How much did the government earn in royalties from precious metal extraction last year? Not one fucking penny.

In other words, if your company staked a claim in 1873, and had been mining gold from it continuously, the total cost to your company would have been $19,509. At today’s spot price of $1,715 an ounce, you’d have needed to extract only 12 ounces over the past 139 years to recoup the entire amount you’d paid the U.S. government.

jvleis

This mining operation paid the same amount to the government that a mining company would today, because the system works.

Today, the General Accounting Office will release a report documenting the extent to which the government has been ripped off for more than a century. From The Washington Post:

The GAO report — which estimates that extraction of oil, gas, natural gas liquids and coal on federal and Indian lands produced $11.4 billion in federal revenue last year — said it could not make a similar assessment for hard-rock minerals. Federal agencies generally don’t collect data on the value of hard-rock minerals taken from public land because the only reason to do so would be to calculate royalties, the report states.

Back in 1993, when metal prices were much lower, however, the Interior Department estimated that sales of hard-rock minerals from federal lands totaled $6.41 billion. “This should be front and center of the natural resource agenda for this next administration,” [Sen. Tom Udall (D-N.M.)] said in a phone interview. “These hard-rock minerals belong to the American people, and today we’re quite literally giving our gold and silver away.”

If the 1993 extraction were valued at $6.41 billion, and that’s representative of every year between, say, 1980 and 2012 (which it very much may not be), and the government exacted a 1 percent royalty fee — that’s $2 billion in revenue. Two. Billion. Dollars.

Counterpoint from extractors:

Industry officials say they contribute to the economy even without paying royalties.

Responding to an inquiry last year from [Rep. Raul Grijalva (D-Ariz.)] about the value of uranium that Denison Mines Corp. had extracted from public land, company chief executive Ron F. Hochstein did not divulge any specific figures. But he said the metal ore industry overall accounted for nearly 290,000 jobs and contributed $37.2 billion to the nation’s gross domestic product, according to an industry-commissioned PricewaterhouseCoopers study.

The Federal Reserve puts the number of people employed in non-oil-and-gas mining at about 215,000. But apparently we’re not in the business of holding mining companies accountable for numbers, so who am I to complain?

There have been a lot of rackets in the history of American politics. But this — this massive gift to raw material extractors — is one of the biggest.

Source

Mining firm profits from public lands remain a mystery, new GAO study shows, The Washington Post

Philip Bump writes about the news for Gristmill. He also uses Twitter a whole lot.

Read more:

Business & Technology

,

Climate & Energy

,

Politics

Also in Grist

Please enable JavaScript to see recommended stories

See original article here:

Americans are quite literally giving their gold and silver away

Posted in GE, LG, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Americans are quite literally giving their gold and silver away

Fossil-fuel extraction on public land yields massive economic boom, kind of

Fossil-fuel extraction on public land yields massive economic boom, kind of

roger4336

This is what a government windfall looks like (in Bizarro America).

Good news from the L.A. Times:

Energy development on public lands and waters pumped more than $12 billion into federal coffers in 2012, $1 billion more than the previous year, according to the U.S. Department of the Interior.

“These revenues reflect significant domestic energy production under President Obama’s all-of-the-above energy strategy and provide a vital revenue stream for federal and state governments and American Indian communities,” Interior Secretary Ken Salazar said in a statement.

Yes! Win win win win win. Winners all around. Lots of cash money/moolah just pouring out of the ground like so much crude oil, thanks to the president’s staunch commitment to fossil fuels. Everyone line up for your cut! [PDF]

Just such good news. But we need to do a smidgen of accounting work here.

So: $12 billion in profits from fossil-fuel extraction, great. Of course, $4 billion of that goes back to oil companies in subsidies, so it’s really more like $8 billion. Oh, plus another billion or so to the coal industry. So $7 billion. Still good!

We should also probably consider that the use of those fossil fuels results in $120 billion in healthcare costs each year. In 2009, 35 percent of U.S. healthcare spending was from Medicare and Medicaid [PDF]. Thirty-five percent of $120 billion is $42 billion. Hm.

And then there’s that $50 billion that Obama is seeking to repair damage from Hurricane Sandy. But let’s take only the $5 billion the New York area Metropolitan Transportation Authority needs due to the flooding that was certainly made worse by climate change. Don’t want to be unrealistic, after all!

So, let me get out the adding machine here … Boom. Done. That brilliant all-of-the-above energy approach has indirectly resulted in a rock-solid economic benefit of negative $40 billion to the U.S. economy.

As Assistant Secretary Rhea Suh said in the Interior Department’s press release, “The reforms we have undertaken over the last two years are paying off — quite literally — and I could not be more proud of the work that these public servants perform day in and day out on behalf of the American taxpayer.”

Indeed.

Source

Energy development on public lands generated $12 billion in 2012, Los Angeles Times

Philip Bump writes about the news for Gristmill. He also uses Twitter a whole lot.

Read more:

Business & Technology

,

Climate & Energy

,

Politics

Also in Grist

Please enable JavaScript to see recommended stories

Link: 

Fossil-fuel extraction on public land yields massive economic boom, kind of

Posted in GE, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Fossil-fuel extraction on public land yields massive economic boom, kind of