Tag Archives: living

Is it just us, or does it seem a little warm for December?

Is it just us, or does it seem a little warm for December?

Well, it is December, everyone. It’s the time of year when you just want to stay huddled up cozily inside, maybe with a roaring fire to provide comfort given the … unseasonably warm temperatures outside.

The projected high-temperature map for today looks like this:
NOAA

Again, it is December 3. Here in New York City, it is expected to reach 64 degrees today, 70 tomorrow. Normal high temperature for December 4 in New York is 54.

Or, to put it another way: Here is a map of all of the record high and low temperatures set yesterday. The highs are indicated by red dots; the lows, purple ones. I think you get the point.

It’s almost as though this chokingly-hot summer never ended. The drought continues (2,293 counties are still designated as disaster areas [PDF]) as do wildfires — a wind-fueled fire in Colorado burned 4,400 acres over the weekend.

A caveat. There is a difference between the weather and the climate. A hot day in December is not uncommon, much less unusual. If there’s one good thing about the record heat we’re seeing it’s this: We get to enjoy another few days without comments from climate deniers saying, “whatevur happened to global wamring lol al gore suxxx.”

Philip Bump writes about the news for Gristmill. He also uses Twitter a whole lot.

Read more:

Climate & Energy

,

Living

Also in Grist

Please enable JavaScript to see recommended stories

Link:

Is it just us, or does it seem a little warm for December?

Posted in GE, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Is it just us, or does it seem a little warm for December?

Are trendy homesteaders clueless about class differences?

Are trendy homesteaders clueless about class differences?

Organic gardens! Canning! Sewing clothes! All the chickens!  The modern rise of homesteading (of the hipster variety) has gripped the nation’s urban centers. It’s been kind of like this:

Self-sufficiency can’t be bad, though, right? At least when we’re aware of our motivations. Today at Bitch (based in Portland! hm!), Marianne Kirby takes a long look at modern homesteading through the lens of class. She pulls together the history of the 1862 Homestead Act, slave and victory gardens, and ’70s recession efforts at surviving tough times, providing context for how the lifestyle has been newly embraced by the petit bourgeoisie.

“For large portions of the poor and immigrant classes, homesteading skills are still survival skills,” she writes. “Can you really have a rebirth of something that never actually died out in the first place?”

Kirby calls out “capitalistic homesteading” and product branding. But this isn’t just about shopping and culture.

[I]t’s also about policy. My central Florida town recently implemented an urban-chicken pilot program due to a clamor of interest from young, middle-class community members. The program allows people to keep hens, but no roosters. Participants are allowed to raise chickens for eggs, but not for meat. This means urban homesteaders who want to raise eggs in fancy coops have won out — but anyone who needs to raise chickens for subsistence reasons suffers, and is subject to fines and seizure if they get caught.

Governmental limitation of the “wrong” kind of homesteading can be seen elsewhere. In 2011, Denise Morrison’s garden was chopped down by Tulsa, Oklahoma, officials who claimed it violated city ordinances. Morrison grew more than 100 edible and medicinal plants in her yard. Subsistence gardens are more about function than design; they aren’t always pretty, and Morrison wasn’t raising organic fruit and vegetables in neat rows of raised beds. Despite a stay issued by local courts, officials removed every last one of her plants. Unemployed and without health insurance, Morrison had relied on her garden for food and medicine. “They basically took away my livelihood,” she told Tulsa’s KOTV.

“Homesteading, by necessity, isn’t sexy,” says Genny Charet, who blogs at badmamagenny.com. “If it can’t be packaged and spoon-fed to one identifiable demographic, it loses its platform. And how do you package and sell ‘I don’t have enough money for Advil when I have my period so I grow raspberry leaf instead?’ It’s not fair or right, but then, mainstream media is not an avenue that can be counted on to advance the interests of marginalized populations.” Cases like Morrison’s are common; widespread media coverage of them is not.

While poor people of color, like Denise Morrison, steadily practice survival, the cool kids are lauded for their revolutionary interest in a gentrified version of subsistence farming.

Oakland, Calif., where I live, is considered one of the grittier ground zeroes for this movement, but it often butts up against a large low-income population of color, many of whom live on toxic soil that they can’t farm without shelling out for the pricey remediation efforts that hipster homesteaders can afford. Recently at a party a friend showed me a picture he snapped in Oakland’s Chinatown of a neighbor hanging their dead ducks out to cure on a street-facing side of a fence. That neighbor was in all likelihood not a homesteady hipster, but was just living a life of tradition and necessity.

Now I count the days until I see some dead ducks hanging on a fence next to the coffee shop/workspace that homebrews its own kombucha. So long as everyone’s duck is allowed on the fence, right? (Fake kind for me, thanks.)

Susie Cagle writes and draws news for Grist. She also writes and draws tweets for

Twitter

.

Read more:

Food

,

Living

Also in Grist

Please enable JavaScript to see recommended stories

See more here – 

Are trendy homesteaders clueless about class differences?

Posted in GE, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Are trendy homesteaders clueless about class differences?

Mexican environmentalist murdered by drug gangs

Mexican environmentalist murdered by drug gangs

For years, Juventina Villa Mojica worked to preserve the virgin forest surrounding her small Mexican town. Drug traffickers wanted to strip the forest to expand the area in which they could grow poppies and marijuana, but Villa Mojica and her husband led an effort to organize farmers in opposition to the gangs. Last year, her husband and two of her children were murdered. On Wednesday, she and her 10-year-old son met the same fate.

From the Washington Post:

A band of gunmen killed an environmental activist who had received death threats for standing up to drug gangs and had a police guard when she was ambushed in southern Mexico, authorities said Thursday. …

Villa and her children had ridden in an all-terrain vehicle near the top of a mountain where she could get a cellphone signal since there are no telephones in the village. They were ambushed despite the presence of 10 state police officers who were protecting them, state prosecutors said in a statement.

Five of the officers were in a patrol car ahead of Villa and her children and the other five where on foot behind them, the statement said. Villa got ahead of the officers on foot and that’s when the assailants fired their weapons, it said.

catr

Mexican authorities prepare to destroy seized drugs.

The Post notes that Villa Mojica had been uncommonly lucky; more than 20 members of her and her husband’s families had been killed by drug gangs in the past year.

In October, the New Scientist reported that up to 90 percent of tropical deforestation was the result of organized crime, though generally the goal was resale of rare wood. The situation in Mexico presents the rawest form of the conflict between economics and sustainability; the amount of money to be gained by selling illegal drugs is a powerful force compared to efforts to preserve an ecosystem.

Source

Gunmen kill Mexican environmental activist being guarded by police team, prosecutors say, Washington Post

Philip Bump writes about the news for Gristmill. He also uses Twitter a whole lot.

Read more:

Climate & Energy

,

Living

Also in Grist

Please enable JavaScript to see recommended stories

More – 

Mexican environmentalist murdered by drug gangs

Posted in GE, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Mexican environmentalist murdered by drug gangs

Your couch is poisoning you

Your couch is poisoning you

Have you been sleeping on the couch to avoid your toxic mattress? Well, stop that. Because your couch is probably poisoning you right now. Unless you’re at work, in which case right when you get home.

That’s the takeaway from a new study in which scientists found flame-retardant chemicals linked to cancer in 85 percent of the couches they tested. New couches were actually worse, with 93 percent testing toxic. Almost a quarter of sofas tested positive for a chemical banned from kids’ clothes in the 1970s, but still allowed in mattresses and car seats. Mother Jones reports:

“Pretty much everyone in the country with a couch or a chair with foam have as much as a pound of a chemical like DDT or PCB in their home,” Dr. Arlene Blum, the executive director of the Green Science Policy Institute and a coauthor of the paper, told Mother Jones. “Most people think the government protects them, and that if something’s in their couch it must be safe.”

Ha-ha, but you know better than to trust the government. Solutions may include home-crafted bean bags, carved benches, and tall stacks of biodegradable yoga mats.

Susie Cagle writes and draws news for Grist. She also writes and draws tweets for

Twitter

.

Read more:

Living

Also in Grist

Please enable JavaScript to see recommended stories

See more here: 

Your couch is poisoning you

Posted in GE, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Your couch is poisoning you

Toxic toys may be poisoning our best friends

Toxic toys may be poisoning our best friends

My favorite people to buy holiday presents for are animal people. They are always so grateful! But sometimes maybe they shouldn’t be.

A new study out of Texas Tech finds that the chemicals in hard plastic bumper dog toys readily leach into dogs’ mouths.

digital ramble

Dogs’ chewing action stresses the chemical bonds in the plastics that comprise their toys, allowing for the leaching of hormone-mimicking bisphenol A (BPA) and phthalates. From Environmental Health News:

“A lot of plastic products are used for dogs, so to understand the potential for some of the chemicals to leach out from toys is a new and important area of research,” said veterinarian Safdar Khan, senior director of toxicology research at the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals’ Poison Control Center in Illinois. Dr. Khan was not involved in the current study.

Philip Smith, a toxicologist at The Institute of Environmental and Human Health at Texas Tech, became interested in chemical exposures from bumpers after using them to train his own Labrador retrievers.

“Some of the dogs are exposed to plastic bumpers from the time they are born until the day they die.”

Because the researchers conducted the study using synthetic dog saliva (gross? awesome? both?), they can’t say for sure what dogs’ exposure would be post-chew. A previous study found phthalate levels in dogs were as much as 4.5 times higher than the human average. BPA and phthalates have been linked to a variety of health issues in humans and rodents, from decreased fertility to cancers. Some phthalates have been banned from children’s toys, and BPA is not allowed in baby bottles.

For now, best options for dog parents may be good old-fashioned ropes and bones.

Susie Cagle writes and draws news for Grist. She also writes and draws tweets for

Twitter

.

Read more:

Living

Also in Grist

Please enable JavaScript to see recommended stories

See the original article here: 

Toxic toys may be poisoning our best friends

Posted in GE, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Toxic toys may be poisoning our best friends

Americans on pace to spend a record amount of money on gas this year

Americans on pace to spend a record amount of money on gas this year

Americans weren’t paying more for gasoline this year, but we were buying a lot more of it. So the odds are good that 2012 will set a record for the amount of money spent on fuel.

Keep it flowing, America!

From the Los Angeles Times:

The average price of a gallon of regular gasoline in the U.S. this year never reached the highs seen in 2008, when the all-time record of $4.114 was reached. The 2012 average never even climbed as high as it was last year, when it hit $3.965, according to the Energy Department.

But fuel prices have been so consistently high in 2012 that American motorists are on pace to spend more on gasoline this year — $483 billion, or $1.32 billion a day — than they ever have before, according to the Oil Price Information Service in New Jersey.

That would break the old record for the amount of money spent by Americans on gasoline, set last year, by about $12 billion. That’s in spite of the fact that the U.S. average topped out this year at $3.941 a gallon back in April.

Money well spent, to be sure.

Over the past five years, here’s how the average price of a gallon of gas has fluctuated:

GasBuddy.com

Since the end of 2010, that price has stabilized, hovering between about $3.25 and $3.90.

But the really fun part comes when you do a little back-of-the-envelope math. The Times indicates that the Department of Energy pegged the 2012 average price at $3.64 a gallon. If we’ve spent $483 billion on gas, that comes out to about 133 billion gallons of gasoline. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, burning one gallon of gasoline (mixed with ethanol) yields 17.68 pounds of carbon dioxide. So that would be …

2.35 trillion pounds of carbon dioxide.

Not all of that gasoline may have been burnt, and this calculus is very rough. However, that’s a staggering figure — a bit less than half our total CO2 emissions in 2008. For which we shelled out half a trillion dollars.

As I said earlier: Money. Well. Spent.

Source

U.S. motorists on pace to spend a record sum on gasoline in 2012, Los Angeles Times

Philip Bump writes about the news for Gristmill. He also uses Twitter a whole lot.

Read more:

Business & Technology

,

Climate & Energy

,

Living

Also in Grist

Please enable JavaScript to see recommended stories

Excerpt from: 

Americans on pace to spend a record amount of money on gas this year

Posted in GE, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Americans on pace to spend a record amount of money on gas this year

U.K. flooding prompts now-standard question: How will we pay for this?

U.K. flooding prompts now-standard question: How will we pay for this?

Last week’s E.U. report on anticipated effects of climate change made one point clearly: The United Kingdom can expect to see a lot more flooding. In case the Brits didn’t read the report, Mother Nature decided to make that point directly.

From the Capital Weather Gang:

A weather double whammy has smacked the United Kingdom (UK) with flooding rain and powerful winds. The first wave struck this weekend, with the follow-up blow [Sunday] night into [Monday].

The storm that struck over the weekend was the more powerful of the two. The BBC reports more than 800 homes were flooded by the storm in England and Wales, and two people were killed. The worst weather was focused in South West England. The UK Met Office reports 40-60 mm of rain (1.5-2.5 inches) were common through Sunday morning while wind gusts reached 55-70 mph Saturday night. Prime Minister David Cameron described “shocking scenes of flooding” in Cornwall where rainfall reached 3.7 inches according to AccuWeather.

There are any number of photo galleries of those “shocking scenes,” including this one of an elderly man being rescued from his car. Both The Guardian and the BBC had live blogs reporting damage, rescues, and anticipated further flooding. Britain’s Environment Agency has a map of flood warnings that it has updated regularly over the past few days.

Even before the waters have stopped rising (northern England and Wales are being drenched today; one river has already overflowed its levees), the inevitable debate has arisen: How will these floods affect insurance costs?

samsaunders

A warning near Bristol.

Businessweek reports that the estimated damage could top $800 million. According to the Daily Mail (so: grain of salt), homes in high-risk areas may no longer be considered insurable.

Under a previous deal, most homes which will never experience floods pay a ‘small sum’ on their insurance premiums to subsidise cover for high-risk homes.

But this is due to expire next year. …

If no new agreement is reached, households in flood-risk areas would be left at the mercy of the market and around 200,000 homeowners would not be able to secure or afford any insurance at all leaving them unable to sell or re-mortgage their homes.

The U.S. debated this same topic over the summer, eventually deciding to increase flood insurance rates after years of rates so low that the National Flood Insurance Program ran at a deficit. (In the aftermath of Sandy, the program will likely need an additional infusion of funding to pay out claims.) Higher insurance rates have two benefits: They allow the program to better pay for itself and, more importantly, act as a disincentive to build in areas that are more likely to be flooded.

As we noted last week, these maps show how climate change over the next 90 years will affect the U.K. — far more “100 year” floods, like those that are right now swamping the country.

Click to embiggen.

There will be a cost paid. The only question: Will it be paid on the front end in cash or on the back end in much more cash — and lives?

Philip Bump writes about the news for Gristmill. He also uses Twitter a whole lot.

Read more:

Climate & Energy

,

Living

,

Politics

Also in Grist

Please enable JavaScript to see recommended stories

Read More: 

U.K. flooding prompts now-standard question: How will we pay for this?

Posted in GE, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on U.K. flooding prompts now-standard question: How will we pay for this?

California’s Central Valley is tired of taking Los Angeles’ shit

California’s Central Valley is tired of taking Los Angeles’ shit

From the Los Angeles Times:

Los Angeles’ land in Kern County features a red barn and a sign: “Green Acres Farm.” The city’s website proudly describes the corn, alfalfa and oats that are grown there.

Hey, sounds nice! Except:

[T]he city of Los Angeles … has been sending up more than 20 truckloads a day of “wet cake” from the Hyperion Sewage Treatment Plant near LAX. …

Most experts say recycled products such as sludge and compost are safe if handled properly. But Kern County officials filed court declarations from scientists who are skeptical. Portland State University engineer Gwynn Johnson, for instance, said research shows that biosolids contain metals, antibiotics and flame retardants, and that more study is needed to determine the implications for “human health and the environment.”

Residents tend to focus on the “ick” factor.

Ronald Hurlbert, who owned property near one sludge operation that at one point received waste from Orange County, said the odor was “virtually unbearable (like a well-used bathroom at LAX),” according to a sworn declaration filed in court by Kern County officials.

vmiramontes

As it drives through Kern County, this RV will also be leaving behind its sludge.

At issue: Los Angeles’ endless supply of solid waste. Not, you know, garbage. Waste. Much of which is shipped north from the city every day into California’s agricultural heartland, the Central Valley — where it is increasingly unwelcome. This is the downside to recycling: Sometimes, no one wants to do (or live near) the dirty work.

One of the most bitter battles in California is over sludge, the batter-like material left over after treatment plants finish cleaning and draining what is flushed down the toilet or washed down the sink.

“Batter-like.” Let that one marinate in your brain for a while. Until the ’80s, the poo-batter was dumped in the ocean — until someone figured out that dumping lightly processed feces into the sea was a form of pollution.

Kern County voters passed a ballot measure in 2006 banning sludge from entering the county. Los Angeles sued. While the dispute remains unresolved in the courts, Los Angeles is allowed to keep using Kern County as its toilets’ toilet.

And there’s more to come for the Central Valley.

Meanwhile, Los Angeles County announced that it had purchased 14,500 acres in Kings County — also in the Central Valley — where it would be allowed to send hundreds of thousands of tons of sludge and yard waste.

Some material could start arriving at the end of next year.

Source

Central Valley residents tire of receiving L.A.’s urban waste, Los Angeles Times

Philip Bump writes about the news for Gristmill. He also uses Twitter a whole lot.

Read more:

Cities

,

Climate & Energy

,

Living

Also in Grist

Please enable JavaScript to see recommended stories

More here:  

California’s Central Valley is tired of taking Los Angeles’ shit

Posted in GE, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on California’s Central Valley is tired of taking Los Angeles’ shit

Paris to ban older cars, ruining all of your chase scenes

Paris to ban older cars, ruining all of your chase scenes

If you know Paris, you know that it is primarily populated by men with pencil-thin mustaches who wear berets and carry around baguettes in paper bags. A lot of them wear shirts with thick horizontal stripes. These men don’t talk much, they mostly loiter around in the background speaking a language comprised mostly of sniffs and grumbles. (There are also women in Paris; they are uniformly stunning.)

roger4336

This is exactly what Paris looks like today.

The protagonists of the city are the superspies, the well-coiffed American and British men who use Paris as a rendezvous point with clumsy, heavyset agents from Russia or Bulgaria. Invariably, these meetings end poorly, and the superspies — though heavily outnumbered — manage to effect an escape by driving vintage cars along the banks of the Seine. Depending on the day, the Bulgarians either end up in the river, emerging with a spluttering curse, a fish draped across their heads, or they vanish from the scene in some sort of horrific explosion.

But all of that is likely to change, ruining the Paris that we know so well. The mayor of the city is going to ban vintage cars.

From the Times:

[T]he ban would include many of the most recognizably French cars, including the Citroën 2CV, known as the Deux Chevaux; the Citroën DS, celebrated for its clean, distinctive design; the Renault 4L, a practical Everyman’s car of the 1960s and ’70s; and many classic Peugeots. …

The ban would apply to private and commercial vehicles that would be older than 17 years in 2014 and therefore do not comply with existing European standards for the tailpipe emissions that cause smog.

A spokesman for the city estimated that 367,000 cars would be affected. Also targeted are heavy trucks older than 18 years and motorcycles older than 10.

Oh la la, etc.!

The primary motivation for Mayor Delanoë’s decision (an umlaut! How European!) is a set of regulations issued by the E.U. aimed at cutting pollution from automobiles. But Delanoë has been on an anti-car jeremiad for some time. Over the past decade, one expert notes, car traffic in the city dropped by 25 percent.

The plan would extend the mayor’s efforts to make the city more pedestrian-friendly by reducing the number of cars. These efforts include introducing the Vélib’ bicycle rental program, establishing the Autolib’ electric-car rental system and cutting vehicle traffic along the banks of the Seine.

We share this story primarily because it will have a ripple effect. Not in the sense that other cities will soon ban their signature vehicles, but because the next time you travel to Paris for a bit of skulduggery, your adrenaline-drenched chase will be an exhausting one, taking place on a bike. Or, worse, you’ll be zipping along the Champs Élysées in a silent electric car, suddenly able to hear all of the various tut-tuts of those striped-shirt gentleman and the guttural curses of the fruit stand vendors who shake their fists as you unnecessarily plough through their wares.

Source

Premature Retirement? Old-Car Owners Bristle at Proposed Ban, New York Times

Philip Bump writes about the news for Gristmill. He also uses Twitter a whole lot.

Read more:

Cities

,

Climate & Energy

,

Living

Also in Grist

Please enable JavaScript to see recommended stories

View this article – 

Paris to ban older cars, ruining all of your chase scenes

Posted in GE, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Paris to ban older cars, ruining all of your chase scenes

Modern-day Robin Hoods: Stealing construction supplies from the rich to give to the Sandy-hit poor

Modern-day Robin Hoods: Stealing construction supplies from the rich to give to the Sandy-hit poor

Superstorm Sandy not only revealed the massive class divisions in New York City, but also made them worse. As wealthier areas in Manhattan recover, poor and working-class communities in Brooklyn, Queens, and Staten Island are still struggling.

Some New Yorkers have taken a decidedly illegal tack to solving this problem. From their press release:

Over the past two weeks, a group of concerned New Yorkers has been expropriating thousands of dollars worth of tools and materials from luxury residential developments across Manhattan and delivering them to neighborhoods devastated by Superstorm Sandy.

The confiscated materials, some of them never even used, include: shovels, wheelbarrows, hand trucks, pry bars, tarps, buckets, hard bristle brooms, industrial rope, contractor trash bags, particulate masks, work lights, work gloves, flashlights, heat lamps, and gasoline.

Liberated from their role in building multimillion-dollar pieds-à-terre for wealthy CEOs and Hollywood celebrities, these tools are now in the collective hands of some of the hardest-hit communities in the city where they are now being allocated and shared among the people who need them most. These expropriations will continue as long as the demand for them exists.

The project — can I call it a project? — has far bigger ambitions than just wheelbarrows.

Here is New York: a city in which people write rent checks by candlelight, huddle around gas ovens for warmth, and are housed in shelters that are literally prisons — this is a city in which the darkness and misery are indeed all too literal. Luxury up front, desolation behind: this New York is but a cruel Dickensian reboot of a city.

A cold winter is nearly upon us. In the coming days, Bloomberg will doubtless be seen doling out turkeys and vague promises at any variety of overflowing city shelters while the shutters snap away. As the rich and powerful ladle out their meager scraps and twist their faces into caring regard, those of us who envision a better world will be out in the streets, maneuvering in the dark, trying.

Another world is possible, but capital’s scraps won’t get us through this holiday season, let alone the long, hot future ahead.

Susie Cagle writes and draws news for Grist. She also writes and draws tweets for

Twitter

.

Read more:

Living

,

Politics

Also in Grist

Please enable JavaScript to see recommended stories

Link:  

Modern-day Robin Hoods: Stealing construction supplies from the rich to give to the Sandy-hit poor

Posted in GE, oven, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Modern-day Robin Hoods: Stealing construction supplies from the rich to give to the Sandy-hit poor