Tag Archives: association

Pennsylvania’s ag-gag law could protect frackers

Pennsylvania’s ag-gag law could protect frackers

Shutterstock /

World Resources

Put that video camera away or else.

Film a fracker, go to jail?

It could become illegal to document many of the fracking operations in Pennsylvania under an ag-gag bill being considered in the state House.

Ag-gag laws have been introduced or passed in more than a dozen states, aiming to prevent animal-welfare activists from documenting systemic abuses at corporate farms and slaughterhouses. They do this in a variety of ways, mostly by making it illegal to film such abuse; by requiring any such footage be handed over immediately to law enforcement officials (thereby hobbling activists’ ability to document patterns of abuse, rather than one-off instances); and/or by requiring job applicants to reveal any activist affiliations.

But experts warn that Pennsylvania House Bill 683 would go further by also protecting frackers from unwanted scrutiny when they operate on farmland. A fracking spree is underway in the state, which sits atop the natural-gas-rich Marcellus Shale deposit, and much of the fracking is conducted on agricultural lands.

From a report in the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review:

Ross Pifer, director of the Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center at Penn State University’s Dickinson School of Law, said hydraulic fracturing operations could be protected under the bill because gas companies often lease land from farmers.

“If you view it expansively, you’d have to view it as: Anything that takes place on that land (is protected),” Pifer said.

Melissa Troutman, outreach coordinator at Mountain Watershed Association, which investigates and records fracking activity, said the law would open the door for gas companies to hide activities legally.

“If it passes, what’s next? No documenting commercial or recreational activity?” Troutman said. “Right now it’s legal to photograph industrial operations on public lands. Will that be illegal next?

“If you’re not doing anything wrong, there’s nothing to hide. So why is there a need for this bill?”

John Upton is a science aficionado and green news junkie who

tweets

, posts articles to

Facebook

, and

blogs about ecology

. He welcomes reader questions, tips, and incoherent rants:

johnupton@gmail.com

.

Find this article interesting? Donate now to support our work.Read more: Business & Technology

,

Climate & Energy

,

Politics

Also in Grist

Please enable JavaScript to see recommended stories

See the original article here – 

Pennsylvania’s ag-gag law could protect frackers

Posted in Anchor, FF, G & F, GE, LG, ONA, Pines, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Pennsylvania’s ag-gag law could protect frackers

Will natural-gas cars start to catch on?

Will natural-gas cars start to catch on?

Wikipedia / Mariordo

Honda’s natural-gas-powered Civic.

Could the U.S. boom in natural gas lead to a boom in natural-gas cars? It can cost as little as $1 a gallon to fill them up in the U.S., says Bloomberg Businessweek, and there could be 25 million of them on roads worldwide by 2019.

To provide demand for a swelling supply of natural gas, the rush is on for investors, entrepreneurs, and the auto and energy industries to figure out how to power our transportation fleet with this abundant and relatively cleaner-burning fuel. Bloomberg reports:

Commercial vehicles, which generally rack up two or more times the annual mileage of consumer cars, are going first. In the last year many companies, including GE, UPS, FedEx, AT&T, PepsiCo, and Waste Management, the biggest trash hauler in the U.S., have announced plans to begin or expand conversions of their fleets to natural gas. Cities such as Los Angeles, New York, Phoenix, Fort Worth, Dallas, and San Francisco all have CNG [compressed natural gas] bus fleets. Large fleets of airport shuttles are converting as well.

According to the American Public Transit Association, nearly one-fifth of all transit buses were run by either CNG or LNG [liquefied natural gas] in 2011. Almost 40 percent of the nation’s trash trucks purchased in 2011 were natural gas-powered, the association said. Garret Alpers, founder and CEO of World CNG, a Seattle-based company that converts traditional gasoline cars into dual-fuel vehicles for as little as $8,000, estimates a taxi owner could recoup his expense in a year.

There are around 120,000 natural gas-powered vehicles on U.S. roads today, and over 1,000 natural-gas fueling stations (although only about half of those are open to the public). To encourage the fuel’s expansion from the commercial to the consumer realm, President Obama has advocated for the $7,500 tax credit for hybrids and plug-in vehicles to apply to natural gas-powered ones too, and in January he signed a bill extending a 50-cent-per-gallon tax credit for natural gas used in vehicles.

Brad Plumer says not to expect a natural-gas revolution on our roads anytime soon, though, pointing out that prices for natural gas-powered vehicles and conversions haven’t fallen enough yet:

The vehicles are still far pricier than gasoline-powered cars — or even hybrids. It can take between 13 and 20 years for drivers to recoup those savings in lower fuel costs. What’s more, fueling stations are hard to find.

Case in point: Honda has been selling a Civic that runs on compressed natural gas since 2008. So far, sales have been fairly torpid, with just 1,500 sold last year. Why is that? Well, for one, the price starts at $26,305, or about $8,000 more than a gasoline-powered Civic and $2,000 more than the hybrid version.

Plumer says this could change if oil keeps getting pricier and the technology surrounding natural-gas vehicles — manufacturing, building fueling stations, etc. — keeps getting cheaper. But, he wonders, …

… does it make sense to promote natural-gas vehicles at the expense of other technologies — like hybrids or plug-ins? [An] MIT report suggested that it might just be easier and more efficient to use America’s natural gas to power electric cars rather than set up an entirely new fueling infrastructure. And, so far, the country is nudging along in exactly that direction.

Indeed, Plumer notes, EV charging stations are proliferating much faster than natural-gas fueling stations, so it’s easier to fill up your car with electricity than natural gas. Bonus: EVs can also be charged with solar and wind power, so fracking is not necessarily required.

Claire Thompson is an editorial assistant at Grist.

Find this article interesting? Donate now to support our work.Read more: Business & Technology

,

Climate & Energy

Also in Grist

Please enable JavaScript to see recommended stories

Source article: 

Will natural-gas cars start to catch on?

Posted in alo, Anchor, FF, G & F, GE, LG, ONA, Pines, PUR, solar, solar power, Uncategorized, wind power | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Will natural-gas cars start to catch on?

New Mexico county is first in the nation to ban all drilling and fracking

New Mexico county is first in the nation to ban all drilling and fracking

jimmywayne

The ruins of Fort Union in Mora County, N.M.

Mora County, N.M., has a message for the oil and gas industry: “You’re not welcome here.”

County commissioners voted 2-1 on Monday to ban all oil and gas extraction in their drought-ravaged county near Santa Fe, home to fewer than 5,000 people. A temporary drilling moratorium is already in place in neighboring San Miguel County, but it is believed that Mora County is the first in the nation to impose an outright ban on all oil and gas drilling.

From E&E Newsvia NRDC:

Commissioner Alfonso Griego said “he supported the measure because he feels that federal and state laws fail to adequately protect communities from the impacts of hydraulic fracturing, or fracking.” He also stated: “They just come in and do whatever is necessary for them to make profits. There is technology for them to do it right, but it’s going to cost them more money. They’re not willing to do that yet. So we don’t want any oil and gas extraction in the county of Mora. It’s beautiful here.”

Any detractors? Oh, yeah, here’s an industry guy saying things to the AP:

Wally Drangmeister, a spokesman for the New Mexico Oil and Gas Association, said the potential of the natural gas deposits in the area may never be known if exploration isn’t allowed and that could result in lost revenues for the county, as well as the rest of New Mexico.

The county commissioners also adopted a bill of rights that asserts Mora County’s right to block drilling, even if the state or federal governments try to allow it. Again from the AP:

In addition to putting the county off limits to oil and gas development, the ordinance establishes a bill of rights aimed at affirming the county’s right to local autonomy and self-governance.

The ordinance states that any permits or licenses issued by either the federal or state government that would allow activities that would compromise the county’s rights would be considered invalid.

“This is the fight that people have been too chicken to pick over the last 10 years, which is essentially deciding who makes decisions about the future of the places where we live,” said Thomas Linzey, executive director of the Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund. “Either it’s the people who live there or it’s the corporations that have an interest in exploiting them. It’s very basic.”

Congratulations, Mora County. May you continue to conserve and enjoy your precious groundwater supplies and clean environment.

John Upton is a science aficionado and green news junkie who

tweets

, posts articles to

Facebook

, and

blogs about ecology

. He welcomes reader questions, tips, and incoherent rants:

johnupton@gmail.com

.

Find this article interesting? Donate now to support our work.Read more: Climate & Energy

,

Politics

Also in Grist

Please enable JavaScript to see recommended stories

More:

New Mexico county is first in the nation to ban all drilling and fracking

Posted in Anchor, ATTRA, FF, G & F, GE, LG, ONA, Pines, solar, solar power, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on New Mexico county is first in the nation to ban all drilling and fracking

Wisconsin left way, way behind in wind energy boom

Wisconsin left way, way behind in wind energy boom

The state of Wisconsin is seriously lagging in the wind power boom that’s sweeping much of the rest of the nation — and it’s not because it lacks for wind.

From Midwest Energy News:

In 2012, a year that saw a nationwide surge in wind farm installations as developers rushed to beat expiring tax credits, Wisconsin added only 18 megawatts of capacity.

By comparison, Michigan and Ohio, with much lower wind potential, had already installed 138 MW and 308 MW in just the first three quarters.

Compared to other Midwestern states, Wisconsin ranks at the bottom in both wind projects under construction and in queue, according to the American Wind Energy Association.

Challenges to wind energy have come from nearly every level of government.

Shutterstock

/ Ralf BroskvarA coal-fired power plant pumping out pollution in Sheboygan County, where a small town is worried about the health effects of four proposed wind turbines.

Gov. Scott Walker (R) has pushed legislation that would hamper wind developments, and some state lawmakers and local officials have also tried to throw roadblocks in front of the wind industry.

The town of Sherman, Wis., for example, is kicking up a fuss over a wind developer’s application to build four wind turbines, enough to power 4,000 homes. Town officials have asked the state to impose a moratorium on pending wind farm applications.

From the Sheboygan Press:

[U]nder state law, town leaders were given 45 days … to review the developer’s application to ensure it’s complete. Once the application is deemed complete, they’ll have another 90 days to hold a public hearing and then vote to approve or reject it.

But Sherman Town Chairman William Goehring said town officials feel that the state-imposed time line should be put on hold given unresolved questions about potential health risks with wind farms and a lack of clarity under state law on how wind farms can meet noise standards.

Never mind that there’s no scientific evidence that wind turbines make people sick (though they do make some people annoyed).

When will the Badger State pull its head out of the snow and join the rest of the nation in the wind- and solar-powered energy and jobs boom?

John Upton is a science aficionado and green news junkie who

tweets

, posts articles to

Facebook

, and

blogs about ecology

. He welcomes reader questions, tips, and incoherent rants:

johnupton@gmail.com

.

Find this article interesting? Donate now to support our work.Read more: Business & Technology

,

Climate & Energy

,

Politics

Also in Grist

Please enable JavaScript to see recommended stories

See more here:  

Wisconsin left way, way behind in wind energy boom

Posted in alo, Anchor, FF, G & F, GE, ONA, solar, solar panels, Uncategorized, wind energy, wind power | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Wisconsin left way, way behind in wind energy boom

This bipartisan energy-efficiency bill might actually be able to pass Congress

This bipartisan energy-efficiency bill might actually be able to pass Congress

U.S. Senate

A Democrat and a Republican, working together. Weird.

Sens. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.) and Rob Portman (R-Ohio) have come up with an energy-efficiency bill that they think has a real chance of passing the U.S. Senate. And then the U.S. House. In this Congress. Really!

From Politico:

The legislation, known as the Energy Savings and Industrial Competitiveness Act, focuses on improving energy efficiency in commercial buildings, the manufacturing sector and the federal government.

Among other things, the bill strengthens building codes to make new homes and buildings more efficient, creates a new Energy Department program called SupplySTAR to improve the efficiency of companies’ supply chains and requires the federal government — the country’s largest energy user — to adopt strategies to conserve the electricity used for computers.

It’s a scaled-back version of a bill they introduced last year. To preempt conservative objections, it drops a provision that would have expanded a Department of Energy loan program. After Solyndra, “Department of Energy loan program” is not a phrase Republicans are warm to.

A bipartisan duo — Reps. David McKinley (R-W.Va.) and Peter Welch (D-Vt.) — will be pushing a similar bill in the House.

More from Politico:

“As we see a divided Congress, it’s nice to see something that we can agree on. I think this bill is one of them,” Portman told POLITICO in a joint interview with Shaheen ahead of the bill’s official release. “We’re optimistic that we can make progress in the Senate in the short run and get it through the House in the next year and then get it signed into law.”

The bill’s success is far from certain, but the senators say they’ve taken every precaution to prevent the measure from going down in flames.

Over the course of months-long negotiations, the senators have won the buy-in of more than 200 organizations, from the Union of Concerned Scientists to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce … [to] the Natural Resources Defense Council, the Alliance to Save Energy and the National Association of Manufacturers.

According to a press release from Shaheen and Portman, “A study [PDF] by experts at the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy found that last year’s version would have saved consumers $4 billion [a year] by 2020 and helped businesses add 80,000 jobs to the economy.”

It’s not a price on carbon, but hey, it’s a start.

Lisa Hymas is senior editor at Grist. You can follow her on

Twitter

and

Google+

.

Find this article interesting? Donate now to support our work.Read more: Business & Technology

,

Climate & Energy

,

Politics

Also in Grist

Please enable JavaScript to see recommended stories

Excerpt from:  

This bipartisan energy-efficiency bill might actually be able to pass Congress

Posted in alo, Anchor, FF, G & F, GE, ONA, solar, solar panels, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on This bipartisan energy-efficiency bill might actually be able to pass Congress

Fact Check: Forbes on the RFS

back

Fact Check: Forbes on the RFS

Posted 18 April 2013 in

National

In his recent Forbes piece, Robert Bradley harps on tired claims that we’ve tackled before: on E15 and consumer benefits; fuel safety (our friends at RFA said it best!); the role that renewable fuel plays in lowering gas prices; farmers’ ability to feed AND fuel Americans (we’ve taken on the “corn tortilla” confusion before); and the bright future for cellulosic fuels.

Oh, and, there’s plenty of support for the RFS from both sides of the aisle, at the state and national level (contrary to what Bradley claims).

Here’s what Forbes missed, and what you need to know: the RFS is working for consumers, and it’s working well.

 

Ethanol is blended into 97% of gasoline in America
That’s displaced as much gasoline as would have been made from 462 million barrels of imported oil last year
Renewable fuel blending slashed our spending on imported oil by $44 billion in 2012
Ethanol production has gotten increasingly efficient, generating 5% more ethanol from a bushel of corn than a decade ago, while water use has been reduced by 40%
And the renewable fuel industry is supporting thousands of jobs across the country (87,000 last year alone)

 

We could go on and on, but encourage you to visit the Renewable Fuel Association and check out their great round up of the benefits.

In light of all of this evidence, perhaps what Bradley is really trying to say is that the RFS isn’t working. . . for the oil industry. While Americans may want – and deserve – options when it comes to filling up their cars, the oil industry is clinging to it’s long-held monopoly.

When it comes to what benefits Americans, what is really counterproductive are attempts to undermine the RFS, and with it, our chance at fuel diversity.

 

Fuels America News & Stories

Fuels
Jump to original – 

Fact Check: Forbes on the RFS

Posted in alo, Anchor, FF, GE, ONA, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Fact Check: Forbes on the RFS

Op-Ed: Setting the record straight on U.S. gas prices

back

Op-Ed: Setting the record straight on U.S. gas prices

Posted 17 April 2013 in

National

Setting the record straight on U.S. gas prices
Politico 4/16/13
By: Tom Buis and Bob Dinneen

Last month, the Energy Information Administration announced that U.S. crude production will soon top oil imports for the first time in almost 20 years, and at the same time production of ethanol — which costs less than gasoline — has been increasing because of lower corn prices. That news was predictably followed by a drop in gasoline prices across the U.S. This is in marked contrast to predictions just a few weeks ago that an arcane trading market controlled by oil refiners and hedge funds would push gas prices to the stratosphere and wreck the economy. What’s going on?

The story here is simple. Opponents of renewable fuel, led by the oil industry, want to convince Capitol Hill that renewable identification numbers, or RINs, are the harbingers of doom for U.S. gas prices. Three facts every member of Congress should know about RINs: They are free, they are primarily traded by oil refiners to oil refiners, and they were created at the oil companies’ insistence. Early this year, the price of RINs rose dramatically, but since oil companies dominate the RINs market — and since ethanol supplies are increasing — we are hard-pressed to see a reason for that spike in prices.

Many in Congress agree that the market fundamentals do not account for that increase in prices and have called for investigations — a move that we support. But before the witnesses swear in, let’s set the record straight on RINs and gas prices.

First, RINs are not raising America’s gas prices. A new analysis conducted by Informa Economics showed that RINs are most likely contributing no more than $0.004 (four-tenths of one cent) to the retail price of a gallon of gasoline. Meanwhile, Informa found that ethanol costs significantly less than gasoline at the wholesale level, providing an average discount at the pump of $0.044 per gallon discount so far this year. So ethanol is still making gasoline cheaper than it would be if we had 100 percent petroleum fuel.

Second, we cannot drill our way to cheap gasoline in the long run. But don’t take our word for it. The International Energy Agency, in the same report often cited as proof that the U.S. can become “Saudi America,” also noted in a less-quoted section that even if the U.S. becomes “all but self-sufficient” thanks to domestic drilling, the price per barrel will still exceed $215 in 2035 — more than double today’s price. That’s because oil prices are set on a global market and global demand is skyrocketing.
So if drilling isn’t going to lower gas prices, what will? If you ask API, they’ll tell you that killing renewable fuel is the key, since it will free us from the perils of RINs. In fact, the opposite is true — we need to expand renewable fuel to save at the pump.

One way to do that is to make E15 widely available. Since E15 is a higher ethanol blend, it would save consumers — and cost oil companies — even more money, so it is no coincidence that API is also fighting to block E15. Ironically, widely available E15 would create an additional 6.5 billion RINs, driving RIN prices back down. In other words, oil companies are paying a premium to reject renewable fuel.

The real story here is oil’s determination to crush all forms of renewable fuel this year. API and its allies are spending millions of dollars on studies, PR and advertising and lobbying to block their competitors — all while hoping that Congress overlooks the fact that the oil industry created the very renewable fuel policies, including RINs, that they are now attacking.

To lower gas prices, we must ensure that the infrastructure needed to integrate more cheaper-than-gasoline ethanol is built. In 2007, the oil companies effectively pledged to invest in the facilities needed to meet the RFS obligations they agreed to. They have not kept up their end of the bargain. As soon as the oil industry stops obstructing the change mandated by the law, we will see choice at the pump increase, and prices at the pump decrease.

Tom Buis is CEO of Growth Energy. Bob Dinneen is the president and CEO of the Renewable Fuels Association.

Fuels America News & Stories

Fuels
Excerpt from – 

Op-Ed: Setting the record straight on U.S. gas prices

Posted in Anchor, FF, GE, ONA, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Op-Ed: Setting the record straight on U.S. gas prices

Wind produces almost twice as much power as nuclear in California

Wind produces almost twice as much power as nuclear in California

Shutterstock

/ Tim MessickBlowing away the competition in California

When winds were at their strongest in California this month, wind turbines were providing the state with nearly twice as much electricity as nuclear reactors.

The Golden State saw a surge in new wind farms last year, taking its wind power capacity to 5,544 megawatts. That put it second in the nation behind Texas, which has more than 12,000 MW of installed wind capacity.

From the Los Angeles Times:

California also ranks second in the U.S. in the amount of employment associated with the wind industry, with more than 7,000 jobs, the [American Wind Energy Association] said.

Nationally, wind energy production grew 28% in the U.S. last year in what AWEA describes as the industry’s best year to date.

“We had an incredibly productive year in 2012,” said Rob Gramlich, interim chief executive of AWEA. “It really showed what this industry can do and the impact we can have with a continued national commitment to renewable energy.”

The wind isn’t blowing everywhere all the time, so actual electricity production from wind turbines is never as high as total capacity. But storms earlier this month pushed wind power generation in California above 4,000 MW. From Greentech Media:

Winds that reached over 90 miles per hour on mountain ridges blew down through the wind farms in California’s Altamont, San Gorgonio, and Tehachapi Passes and across the state’s wind installations, raising their outputs to a record-shattering 4,196 megawatts on [the evening of April 7], according the California Independent System Operator …

Peak wind output came at 6:44 PM. Total system generation was 23,923 megawatts at the time, making wind 17.5 percent of the state’s electricity supply.

The total system peak output was 27,426 megawatts at 4:07 p.m. that afternoon. In the hour before that, with the total system producing 23,145 megawatts, California got 6,677 megawatts of its electricity, or 28.8 percent, from renewables.

By comparison, the state has two nuclear power plants. Diablo Canyon’s twin reactors are capable of producing up to 2,200 MW of power. San Onofre hasn’t generated any electricity since January 2012, when radiation leaked into the ocean from damaged tubes, although regulators are considering allowing operations to resume soon at reduced capacity.

John Upton is a science aficionado and green news junkie who

tweets

, posts articles to

Facebook

, and

blogs about ecology

. He welcomes reader questions, tips, and incoherent rants:

johnupton@gmail.com

.

Find this article interesting? Donate now to support our work.Read more: Business & Technology

,

Climate & Energy

Also in Grist

Please enable JavaScript to see recommended stories

Visit site:

Wind produces almost twice as much power as nuclear in California

Posted in alo, Anchor, FF, G & F, GE, LG, ONA, solar, solar panels, Uncategorized, wind energy, wind power | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Wind produces almost twice as much power as nuclear in California

CNN: White House Honors Farmer Fighting Climate Change

back

CNN: White House Honors Farmer Fighting Climate Change

Posted 15 April 2013 in

National

Fred Yoder, a fourth generation farmer, past President of the National Corn Growers Association, and renewable fuel champion was honored by the White House late last week for his contributions to agricultural innovation and leadership in fighting climate change.

Passionate about feeding and fueling the world, it all started when he inherited his family farm and was told by his father to “leave the land in better shape than you found it.” Read more at CNN.com.

Fuels America News & Stories

Fuels
Continued:

CNN: White House Honors Farmer Fighting Climate Change

Posted in Anchor, FF, GE, ONA, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on CNN: White House Honors Farmer Fighting Climate Change

Obama to require climate assessments for big projects like highways and pipelines

Obama to require climate assessments for big projects like highways and pipelines

White House

“Say, Jack, what if we used NEPA to slow down them there rising seas?”

Industries that warm the globe, take note: It might be time to freak out.

The Obama administration will soon start requiring federal agencies to consider climate change when analyzing the environmental impacts of major projects that need federal approval. This would include pipelines, highways, coal and natural-gas export facilities, and even new logging roads, if they’re on public land or subject to federal oversight.

That’s according to Bloomberg, which reports that Obama will be issuing new guidance under the 1970 National Environmental Policy Act, which requires the federal government to conduct environmental impact assessments for significant projects.

The change wouldn’t mean that any project affecting the climate would be nixed, but industry lobbyists worry it could lead to more delays and lawsuits.

The move is being welcomed by environmentalists. From Bloomberg:

“Agencies do a pretty poor job of looking at climate change impacts,” Rebecca Judd, a legislative counsel at the environmental legal group Earthjustice in Washington. “A thorough guidance would help alleviate that.”

Industry reps are less enthusiastic:

“It’s got us very freaked out,” said Ross Eisenberg, vice president of the National Association of Manufacturers, a Washington-based group that represents 11,000 companies such as Exxon-Mobil Corp. and Southern Co. The standards, which constitute guidance for agencies and not new regulations, are set to be issued in the coming weeks, according to lawyers briefed by administration officials.

Well, with the weather quickly turning freaky, maybe some freakouts are long overdue.

John Upton is a science aficionado and green news junkie who

tweets

, posts articles to

Facebook

, and

blogs about ecology

. He welcomes reader questions, tips, and incoherent rants:

johnupton@gmail.com

.

Read more:

Climate & Energy

,

Politics

Also in Grist

Please enable JavaScript to see recommended stories

Continued: 

Obama to require climate assessments for big projects like highways and pipelines

Posted in ALPHA, Anchor, FF, G & F, GE, LG, ONA, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Obama to require climate assessments for big projects like highways and pipelines