Tag Archives: change-on-the

If These 35,000 Walruses Can’t Convince You Climate Change Is Real, I Don’t Know What to Tell You

Mother Jones

AP Photo/NOAA, Corey Accardo

This an image from a NOAA research flight over a remote stretch of Alaska’s north shore on Saturday. It shows approximately 35,000 walruses crowded on a beach, which according to the AP is a record number for this survey program.

Bear in mind that each of the little brown dots in this image can weigh over 4,000 pounds, placing them high in the running to be the world’s biggest climate refugees.

Why are so many walruses “hauled out” on this narrow strip of land? Part of the reason is that there’s not enough sea ice for them to rest on, according to NOAA.

On September 17, Arctic sea ice reached its minimum extent for 2014, which according to federal data is the sixth-lowest coverage since the satellite record began in 1979.

“The massive concentration of walruses onshore—when they should be scattered broadly in ice-covered waters—is just one example of the impacts of climate change on the distribution of marine species in the Arctic,” Margaret Williams, the managing director of WWF’s Arctic program, said in a statement.

If you’ve ever seen these blubbery beasts duke it out, then you know there’s some serious marine mammal mayhem in store. Thanks, climate change!

Source: 

If These 35,000 Walruses Can’t Convince You Climate Change Is Real, I Don’t Know What to Tell You

Posted in Anchor, Everyone, FF, GE, LG, ONA, Radius, Uncategorized, Venta | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on If These 35,000 Walruses Can’t Convince You Climate Change Is Real, I Don’t Know What to Tell You

“The best outcome for the oil companies is if nothing changes”

back

“The best outcome for the oil companies is if nothing changes”

Posted 26 April 2013 in

National

“The best outcome for the oil companies is if nothing changes”

–Paul Bryan, former Chevron executive

This week, oil companies are releasing their quarterly financials and Chevron, like the rest of the industry, has managed once again to amass exorbitant profits at the expense of the American taxpayer – $6.2 billion dollars in the last three months alone.

Now if oil companies like Chevron were actually interested in reducing the squeeze on our wallets, they would reinvest some of those billions into the research and infrastructure we need to support alternative, renewable fuels. But instead, Chevron “quietly shelved” its renewable fuel projects in 2010, despite assurances from their own scientists that their research had yielded a “technical winner.”

This is all part of a larger pattern. Oil companies were willing to support renewable fuel last decade, when they didn’t see it as viable competition. But now that they see real change on the horizon, they’re more worried about protecting their monopoly than ushering in the next generation of transportation fuel. That’s why API and its corporate backers (like Chevron) will go to any lengths to kill the Renewable Fuel Standard because they know that if gas prices stay high, so do their profits.

If this makes you mad (it sure makes us mad), then take a stand and sign the pledge to support renewable fuel!

Fuels America News & Stories

Fuels
View original article:

“The best outcome for the oil companies is if nothing changes”

Posted in alo, Anchor, FF, GE, ONA, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on “The best outcome for the oil companies is if nothing changes”