Tag Archives: coastal

Wilderness Areas Worth Protecting Now

September is National Wilderness Month. What better time to focus on public lands that should be federally designated as wilderness under the Wilderness Act?

Here are 5 places that particularly deserve to become official wilderness. But first,what does it actually mean to be officially classified as wilderness under the Wilderness Act?

The Wilderness Act, which became law in 1964,recognized wilderness as an area where the earth and its community of life are untrammeled by man, where man himself is a visitor who does not remain.

The Wilderness Act created a National Wilderness Preservation System that now includes more than 106 million acres of federal public lands as wilderness, 44 million acres of whichare in 47 parks. Fifty-three percent of the lands in our national parks are also classified as wilderness.

Designated wilderness is the highest level of conservation protection for federal lands. Wilderness areas are supposed to be regions left to the forces of nature, though the Wilderness Act does acknowledge the need to provide for human health and safety, protect private property, control insect infestations and fight fires within the area.

Congress may designate wilderness or change the status of wilderness areas, which is why, given this era of political gridlock, so few public lands have been designated as wilderness in the last couple of decades. Conservationists, environmentalists, biologists and ecologists usually favor protecting wild public lands as wilderness. The coal, oil, natural gas and mineral extraction industries do not.

The President of the United States can protect public lands by giving them National Monument status when Congress won’t protect them as wilderness. However, national monument status may still allow mining, grazing and road development if these things were occurring at the time the area was designated. Wilderness designation prevents these activities from occurring on pristine public lands so they remain in their natural state.

Here are 5 proposed regions of the United States that environmentalists are working to get Congress to protect as federal wilderness.


Photo Credit: Wikimedia Commons

The Coastal Plain of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge

The Udall-Eisenhower Wilderness Act would protect the birthing ground for thousands of caribou, migratory and resident birds and polar bearsan area of unmatched ecological importance for the human inhabitants and wildlife of the region. The region faces continual threats from oil drilling.


Photo Credit:The Armchair Explorer

Maine Coastal Islands

The Maine Coastal Islands Wilderness Actwould protect13 remote, uninhabited islands off the coast of Maine, especially the nesting habitat they provide for a variety of sea birds. Wilderness preservation would also enable kayakers and boaters to continue to enjoy the ocean and beaches there.


Photo Credit: Wikimedia Commons

The Rocky Mountain Front

The Rocky Mountain Front forms the eastern edge of the already existingBob Marshall wilderness. It provides habitat for elk and native trout and is one of the last places in America where grizzly bears still roam the plains. The Front is a world-class destination for hunting, wildlife viewing, birding, backpacking and horseback riding. The Rocky Mountain Front Heritage Act will provide permanent protection for this ecosystem.

Photo Credit: Wikimedia Commons

Cerros del Norte in New Mexico

The Cerros del Norte Conservation Act would expand protection of lands northwest of Taos, New Mexico to safeguard what the

Campaign for America’s Wilderness

calls “one of the world’s great avian migratory routes.” The areas are also home to elk, deer, turkeys, golden eagles, and other wildlife.


Photo Credit: Flickr

Devil’s Staircase, Oregon

The Devils Staircase Wilderness Actwould permanently protect 30,000 acres of forest close to the southern coast of Oregon as wilderness. It would also place stretches of Wasson and Franklin Creeks into the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System. Theproposed wildernessis characterizedby rare old-growth forest and an abundance of wildlife,including elk, deer, river otters, black bears and spotted owls.

Related:

President Obama Creates Three New National Monuments
Support Tennessee Wilderness and Protect Our Wildlife and Outdoor Heritage

Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

See the original post: 

Wilderness Areas Worth Protecting Now

Posted in FF, GE, LAI, LG, ONA, PUR, Radius, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Wilderness Areas Worth Protecting Now

Investigation Into Sailors Captured By Iran Appears to Be Winding Down

Mother Jones

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC “-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN” “http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd”>

Hey, remember those ten sailors who were briefly held by Iran a few months ago when they drifted into Iranian waters? Of course you do. Donald Trump and Fox News will never let you forget. Well, it looks like maybe the investigation is finally starting to wrap up:

The head of a riverine squadron at the center of an international incident in January was fired Thursday….Cmdr. Eric Rasch, who at the time of the Jan. 12 incident was the executive officer of the Coastal Riverine Squadron 3, was removed from his job … for what a Navy Expeditionary Combat Command release said was “a loss of confidence” in his ability to remain in command.

Cmdr. Gregory Meyer, who was commanding officer at the time of the incident, is currently with Coastal Riverine Group 1, and has been put on “administrative hold,” meaning the Navy will not transfer him out of the unit, while a high-level review of the Navy’s investigation into the incident continues, said two officials familiar with internal deliberations.

Four months seems like a long time for an investigation like this, but I suppose you can’t be too careful. In any case, if people are being fired, I assume that means the Navy is finally convinced that it has a pretty good idea of what happened.

This article is from: 

Investigation Into Sailors Captured By Iran Appears to Be Winding Down

Posted in FF, GE, LG, ONA, Uncategorized, Venta | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Investigation Into Sailors Captured By Iran Appears to Be Winding Down

Here’s Why Sea World in San Diego Can’t Breed Killer Whales Any Longer

Mother Jones

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC “-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN” “http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd”>

You may have seen the news that Sea World in San Diego will no longer be allowed to breed killer whales:

After an all-day meeting that drew hundreds of supporters and critics of the park, the California Coastal Commission moved to ban captive whale breeding and drastically restrict the movement of whales in and out of the park.

The California Coastal Commission? Why do they have any say over Sea World’s orca breeding? One of the charmingly idiosyncratic aspects of governance in California is that the Coastal Commission regulates all construction done within about 1000 yards of the coastline. As you can see, Sea World is well within that boundary, and it so happens that they wanted to build a bigger tank for their killer whales. But they could only do this if the Coastal Commission approved it.

Still confused? Well, the initiative that created the Coastal Commission didn’t really put any boundaries on the commission’s power. They can pretty much cut any deal they want, which is why they’re so furiously hated by every gazillionaire who lives near the coast. In this case, their deal was this: you can build the bigger tank, but only if you stop breeding whales and don’t bring any new ones in. And that was that.

This has been today’s California Explainer for all you poor folks who are forced to live in less desirable parts of the country and don’t understand our tribal customs. You’re welcome.

See original article here: 

Here’s Why Sea World in San Diego Can’t Breed Killer Whales Any Longer

Posted in FF, GE, LAI, LG, ONA, Uncategorized, Venta | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Here’s Why Sea World in San Diego Can’t Breed Killer Whales Any Longer

What is Marine Spatial Planning?

Spend a few minutes and get up to speed on what it takes to protect our coasts for decades to come. View this article –  What is Marine Spatial Planning? ; ;Related ArticlesThanks for the wavesEmbracing the surfboard fin while moving ocean conservation forwardDrinking fountain comes full circle ;

View original article: 

What is Marine Spatial Planning?

Posted in alo, Annies, eco-friendly, FF, G & F, GE, LAI, LG, Monterey, ONA, solar, solar power, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on What is Marine Spatial Planning?

Bobby Jindal to axe officials who took on Big Oil

Bobby Jindal to axe officials who took on Big Oil

Gage Skidmore

Lawsuits against Big Oil make Bobby Jindal feel emotions.

We told you last month that Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal (R) doesn’t want Big Oil to be forced to spend billions of dollars to repair the marshes that once protected his state from floods.

Now comes news of the extreme steps Jindal is willing to take to ensure that the gas and oil industry, which has paid more than $1 million into his election campaigns, is protected from a lawsuit filed in July by the Southeast Louisiana Flood Protection Authority-East.

The flood authority is suing BP, ExxonMobil, and other oil companies in a bid to force them to spend billions restoring shorelines that they tore up while exploring and drilling for gas and oil and building pipelines. Those shorelines had been home to marshes and other coastal ecosystems that naturally buffered the New Orleans area from rising seas and storm surges.

The flood-control officials would like those marshes back, pretty please. But Jindal thinks their lawsuit is an outrageous attack on a wholesome industry that shouldn’t be held accountable for its own actions. He’s moving to kill the lawsuit by reshaping the authority’s 11-person board, axing members who support it. From the New Orleans Times-Picayune:

Garret Graves, chairman of the Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority, said Friday that Jindal “will not” reappoint Tim Doody, president of the levee authority, and Vice President John Barry. Both Doody and Barry, whose terms officially expired June 30, have faced attacks from the Jindal administration, which opposes the levee authority’s controversial lawsuit demanding that 97 energy firms repair wetlands damage or pay to repair the damage. …

“Barry and Doody will not be reappointed,” Graves said. “In regard to other members of the board, we plan to continue working with them to better understand the implications of the lawsuit.”

The authority was created after Hurricane Katrina to serve as an independent body that would oversee flood protection in the New Orleans area. By axing these two commissioners, Jindal is not only tampering with the authority’s supposed independence — he is promoting deadly flooding in his own state.

John Upton is a science fan and green news boffin who tweets, posts articles to Facebook, and blogs about ecology. He welcomes reader questions, tips, and incoherent rants: johnupton@gmail.com.Find this article interesting? Donate now to support our work.Read more: Climate & Energy

,

Politics

Follow this link: 

Bobby Jindal to axe officials who took on Big Oil

Posted in ALPHA, Anchor, FF, G & F, GE, LAI, ONA, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Bobby Jindal to axe officials who took on Big Oil

Offshore fracking in California: What could go wrong?

Offshore fracking in California: What could go wrong?

Exciting new update in the chronicles of America’s domestic oil-and-gas boom: Not only is offshore fracking a thing, but it’s been happening off the coast of California for a good 15 years now, in the same sensitive marine environments where new oil leases have been banned since a disastrous 1969 spill.

Berardo62

Drillin’ U.S.A.

If that’s news to you, you’re not alone — the California Coastal Commission was unaware, until recently, that the seafloor was being fracked. Because these drilling operations happen more than three miles off the coast, they’re under federal jurisdiction, but the state has the power to reject federal permits if water quality is endangered.

The Associated Press has the story:

Federal regulators thus far have exempted the chemical fluids used in offshore fracking from the nation’s clean water laws, allowing companies to release fracking fluid into the sea without filing a separate environmental impact report or statement looking at the possible effects. That exemption was affirmed this year by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, according to the internal emails reviewed by the AP. …

The EPA and the federal agency that oversees offshore drilling, the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement or BSEE, conduct some routine inspections during fracking projects, but any spills or leaks are largely left to the oil companies to report.

Although new drilling leases in the Santa Barbara Channel’s undersea oil fields are banned, drilling rights at 23 existing platforms were grandfathered in. Offshore fracking — pumping hundreds of thousands of gallons of water, sand, and chemicals into the sea floor — can stimulate these old wells into production again.

Companies don’t have to disclose the exact combination of chemicals in their fracking fluids — that information is protected as a trade secret — and none of the experts AP interviewed knew of any study on the fluids’ underwater effects. But some of the chemicals known to be used in fracking are toxic to bottom dwellers like fish larvae and crustaceans, and research has shown that fluids used in traditional offshore drilling can mess with some marine animals’ reproductive systems.

The AP describes one major offshore fracking operation:

In January 2010, oil and gas company Venoco Inc. set out to improve the production of one of its old wells with what federal drilling records show was the largest offshore fracking operation attempted in federal waters off California’s coast. The target: the Monterey Shale, a vast formation that extends from California’s Central Valley farmlands to offshore and could ultimately comprise two-thirds of the nation’s shale oil reserves.

Six different fracks were completed during the project, during which engineers funneled a mix of about 300,000 pounds of fracking fluids, sand and seawater 4,500 feet beneath the seabed, according to BSEE documents.

Venoco’s attempt only mildly increased production, according to the documents. Venoco declined to comment.

Other companies’ offshore fracking explorations have yielded similarly lukewarm results. Chevron’s one effort failed, and only one of Nuevo Energy’s nine attempts was considered successful.

Now that the Coastal Commission has wised up, it plans to ask operators proposing new offshore drilling projects whether they’ll be fracking, and may look into requiring a separate permit and stricter review process for such operations.

At least one BSEE employee appeared skeptical of the environmental safety of offshore fracking, according to internal agency emails obtained by AP. Pacific regional environmental officer Kenneth Seeley wrote this in an email to colleagues in February:

We have an operator proposing to use “hydraulic stimulation” (which has not been done very often here) and I’m trying to run through the list of potential concerns. The operator says their produced water is Superclean! but the way they responded to my questions kind of made me think this was worth following up on.

Still, that application, from privately held oil-and-gas company DCOR LLC, ended up being approved.

Claire Thompson is an editorial assistant at Grist.

Find this article interesting? Donate now to support our work.Read more: Business & Technology

,

Climate & Energy

Also in Grist

Please enable JavaScript to see recommended stories

From:

Offshore fracking in California: What could go wrong?

Posted in alo, Anchor, Dolphin, FF, G & F, GE, LAI, Monterey, ONA, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Offshore fracking in California: What could go wrong?