Tag Archives: commission

Are Brits going to get screwed by pricey nuclear power?

Are Brits going to get screwed by pricey nuclear power?

EDF Energy

This nuclear plant would be really, really expensive.

New nuclear power has become so expensive that Britain intends to allow a nuke plant operator to charge double the market rate for electricity. The European Union is investigating whether that amounts to illegal government aid to a company.

French nuclear energy giant EDF wants to build a $26 billion facility in southwest England, the Hinkley Point C nuclear plant. The U.K. government’s philosophy is that nuclear power is desirable; the new plant could meet 7 percent of Britain’s electricity needs without hurting the climate. So, the power plant would be heavily subsidized by utility customers paying roughly double the rate set by the free market for electricity.

Some say that plan violates E.U. rules that restrict government aid for individual companies. From Reuters:

The European Commission will open an investigation next week into planned British support for a new nuclear power plant, three people familiar with the matter said, in a precedent-setting case for future nuclear funding in Europe. …

If the Commission refuses state aid approval, the Hinkley Point project could fail, threatening the British government’s long-term energy and environmental plans which call for nuclear power.

“The project could not proceed,” an EU diplomatic source said when asked what would happen if the Commission rules against the plan.

Another possibility is the directorate could call for modification of the government’s planned support, involving the guaranteed price or the contract’s length.

If you think opening a nuclear power plant is a dicey and pricey proposition these days, wait until you hear how much it costs to shut one down.

The Crystal River nuclear plant in Florida went offline in 2009, following a series of maintenance-related accidents, because it could no longer compete with fossil fuels or renewables on price. This week, Duke Energy told regulators that the shutdown and cleanup will cost $1.2 billion and take 60 years. That’s nearly twice as long as the plant was in operation.


Source
EU to launch probe into British nuclear state aid next week — sources, Reuters
Shutting down Crystal River nuclear plant will cost $1.2 billion, take 60 years, Tampa Bay Times

John Upton is a science fan and green news boffin who tweets, posts articles to Facebook, and blogs about ecology. He welcomes reader questions, tips, and incoherent rants: johnupton@gmail.com.

Find this article interesting? Donate now to support our work.Read more: Business & Technology

,

Climate & Energy

,

Politics

From: 

Are Brits going to get screwed by pricey nuclear power?

Posted in Anchor, Brita, FF, G & F, GE, ONA, solar, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Are Brits going to get screwed by pricey nuclear power?

Colorado frackers paying tiny fines for keeping chemicals secret

Colorado frackers paying tiny fines for keeping chemicals secret

Shutterstock

What exactly are Colorado frackers pumping into the soil? They’re supposed to be telling us.

One of the few things that frackers need to do when they operate in fracker-friendly Colorado is post information about some of the chemicals they pump into the ground. But even that seems too hard for the industry.

Following press reports that Colorado frackers were failing to report their chemicals as required on the FracFocus website, the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission warned companies it would begin actively enforcing its rules in the summer.

Since then, 11 companies have been cited for failing to disclose their chemicals on the website. From EnergyWire:

Seven of the companies have agreed to settle the cases with $1,000 fines, and commission staff is still negotiating with one of the companies. Two cases have been continued to December, and one case, against Marathon Oil Corp., has been set for a contested hearing at the commission’s Oct. 28 meeting in the eastern Colorado city of Limon. …

Bruce Baizel, director of Earthworks’ Oil & Gas Accountability Project, said he’s glad to see the state following through on its promise of more diligent enforcement.

But he said it showed that industry groups “should be spending more on educating members about compliance with regulatory requirements and less on fighting residents over drilling in backyards.”

So frackers in Colorado have paid a total of $7,000 in fines so far. Meanwhile, they’ve spent $606,000 fighting anti-fracking ballot initiatives in four Colorado cities.


Source
Hydraulic fracturing: Colo. starts levying fines for late FracFocus reports, EnergyWire

John Upton is a science fan and green news boffin who tweets, posts articles to Facebook, and blogs about ecology. He welcomes reader questions, tips, and incoherent rants: johnupton@gmail.com.

Find this article interesting? Donate now to support our work.Read more: Business & Technology

,

Climate & Energy

More here:

Colorado frackers paying tiny fines for keeping chemicals secret

Posted in Anchor, FF, G & F, GE, LG, ONA, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Colorado frackers paying tiny fines for keeping chemicals secret

Defending Their Bottom Line

back

Defending Their Bottom Line

Posted 8 October 2013 in

National

When it became apparent that the oil industry has been doing everything in its power to block renewable fuel alternatives like E15 from coming to gas stations, a bipartisan team of Sens. Grassley (R-IA) and Klobuchar (D-MN) asked the Federal Trade Commission and the Justice Department to investigate these anti-competitive practices. While one might expect that the self-described champions of the free market at the Wall Street Journal would embrace this initiative, their editorial in this morning’s edition points to a more troubling trend: at every opportunity, the Wall Street Journal has defended the oil industry’s bottom line at the expense of cheaper, less carbon-intensive alternatives.

Most tellingly, the Journal’s editorial relies on one of Big Oil’s favorite talking points, the so-called “blend wall”:

Refiners are thus crashing against the 10% “blend wall”; beyond that concentration in gasoline, ethanol begins to damage motors.

The truth? Gasoline containing 15% ethanol is safe for all cars model year 2001 or later. What’s more, the Department of Energy put E15 through 6.5 million miles of trials, making it the most tested fuel in history, and the EPA has approved its sale in American gas stations. Here’s how the editorial concludes:

If ethanol is the miracle its supporters claim, it shouldn’t need a mandate or subsidies. And it shouldn’t need to bully the oil industry to do its selling for it.

It’s convenient that the Journal ignores the century of subsidies and special privileges afforded to the oil industry, advantages that have enabled it to cement its near-monopoly on our fuel supply to the detriment of our environment, our economy and our national debt. If the Wall Street Journal were truly committed to healthy, competitive markets, it would support the introduction of viable alternatives. There is a market for renewable fuels like E15 (as our recent polling indicates), but as long as the oil industry and its allies in the media continue to spread misinformation, American consumers will continue to lose out.

Fuels America News & Stories

Fuels
Original post – 

Defending Their Bottom Line

Posted in Anchor, FF, GE, LAI, ONA, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Defending Their Bottom Line

North Carolina rejects federal funds for fracking studies

North Carolina rejects federal funds for fracking studies

Shutterstock

North Carolina is begging for some fracking.

North Carolina’s water department doesn’t know if fracking will poison drinking water or despoil wetlands — and that’s just how department leaders like it.

We told you recently that the state is pushing to allow oil and gas companies to use hydraulic fracturing without property owners’ permission. It’s part of a Republican-led push to hurry-the-fuck-up-already on fracking, environmental and health concerns be damned.

Now comes news that Republican Gov. Pat McCrory’s administration has turned down a pair of EPA grants that would have paid for monitoring of water quality and wetlands as the much-ballyhooed fracking bonanza gets underway. Because, um, well, they say it’s because the fracking boom isn’t happening quickly enough to justify any pre-fracking baseline environmental monitoring.

The state wetlands program’s development unit applied for the two EPA grants before Gov. McCrory was sworn into office in January. Under McCrory, however, the unit was dissolved amid a bureaucratic restructure, and the Division of Water Resources turned down the nearly $600,000 worth of federal assistance that the state had previously requested.

The Daily Tar Heel reports that the division’s director, Tom Reeder, defended the decision on Friday during a meeting of the Mining and Energy Commission, which is responsible for developing the state’s fracking rules. But not everyone was convinced:

“I find when you get in these types of discussions when there’s a lot of accusations being made, it’s good to inject a little reality into the discussion now and again,” Reeder told the commission.

Reeder said one of the reasons the department returned the grant is because the funded studies would have covered a broader region than the proposed fracking area and would be completed too far in advance of drilling to be a useful baseline testing.

But George Matthis, a former DENR employee who spoke before the commission, said EPA grants are usually able to be amended and timelines can be extended.

“This whole business with the grant returns really got under my skin,” Matthis said in an interview. “Having managed grants for 15 years for this department, it just doesn’t make any sense.”

We share Matthis’s hunch that the decision has more to do with the division’s pro-business slant than any trivial concerns over the finer details of the studies. Reeder says “a little reality” is what’s needed in this discussion, but reality is exactly what he’s trying to avoid.


Source
State returns EPA grants to study fracking, The Daily Tar Heel

John Upton is a science fan and green news boffin who tweets, posts articles to Facebook, and blogs about ecology. He welcomes reader questions, tips, and incoherent rants: johnupton@gmail.com.

Find this article interesting? Donate now to support our work.Read more: Climate & Energy

,

Politics

See the article here – 

North Carolina rejects federal funds for fracking studies

Posted in ALPHA, Anchor, Brita, FF, G & F, GE, ONA, solar, solar panels, solar power, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on North Carolina rejects federal funds for fracking studies

Nuclear plant spills radiation into Lake Michigan

Nuclear plant spills radiation into Lake Michigan

NRC

Palisades Nuclear Generating Station

Last summer, a leaky tank led to the shutdown of the Palisades nuclear power plant in Michigan. So plant owner Entergy patched up the leak, fired back up the reactor, and hoped for the best.

Unfortunately, the best did not materialize.

The tank began leaking again. But no worries, thought the Einsteins at Entergy, it was only leaking a gallon a day. That was OK, they figured, because the NRC had allowed it to leak up to 38 gallons a day. As of Friday, they were still doing that whole “hoping for the best” thing.

But on Saturday the leaky drip turned into a gush, and all the hoping in the world couldn’t hold back the tide of spilling radioactive water. Nearly 80 gallons of water containing small amounts of radioactive tritium and possibly trace amounts of cobalt and cesium spewed into Lake Michigan, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission told the AP.

Early Sunday morning, the tank was ruled inoperable and the nuclear power plant began powering down. This is reportedly the ninth time that the facility has been shut down since 2011.

The Kalamazoo Gazette reports:

Leaks have been an ongoing issue at Palisades, owned by New Orleans-based Entergy Corp., which shut down four times in 2012 and twice so far this year. Most recently, in February, the plant shut down for six days to repair a component cooling water heat exchanger and replace a damaged switch.

The NRC resident inspectors monitored the shutdown and are closely watching repairs, [said the NRC’s Viktoria Mitlyng], and the NRC is sending an additional inspector. There is no current timeline for when Palisades might resume service, she said.

Palisades has been under extra scrutiny after a series of safety issues in 2011. In September, the NRC conducted an 11-day inspection of the plant and determined that those problems had been “adequately addressed” by operators, but that additional monitoring was warranted. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has scheduled an extra 1,000 hours of inspection at Palisades during 2013.

Rep. Fred Upton (R-Mich.), chair of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, is usually a good friend of energy companies (the dirty kind, at least), but in this case, with a leaky nuke plant in his district, he’s all about safety. Upton is demanding that Entergy consider replacing the entire leaky tank to prevent a repeat of the weekend’s accident before the power plant is fired back up.

From a followup article in the Kalamazoo Gazette:

Upton said that he plans to visit Palisades with one of the five members of Nuclear Regulatory Commission in the “very near future.”

“When it comes to nuclear energy, safety must always come first, and without that assurance by the NRC, the facility needs to stay offline,” said Upton. …

“It is my understanding that the water tank will be emptied by the end of the week with the hope that the cause of the leak can be identified shortly thereafter,” said Upton. “Every option must be on the table — including a full replacement of the tank — to ensure that the continuing leak will not occur again.”

Meanwhile, the AP assures us that the radioactive leak won’t hurt anybody. But it wonders whether Entergy might:

The amount of radiation the NRC says was released is near the background level — what is found occurring in the environment on a daily basis — and shouldn’t raise any public concern, said Ronald Gilgenbach, chairman of the nuclear engineering and radiological sciences department at the University of Michigan.

The public can generally count on the NRC’s risk assessments and its willingness to get tough with operators of nuclear plants that have recurring problems, said Alan Jackson, a radiation health physicist at Henry Ford Health System in Detroit.

What should be of concern to regulators and the public, Jackson said, is whether any nuclear power plant has enough of a culture of safety in place. That’s especially important because of the intense pressures in the electrical power industry to keep costs low.

John Upton is a science aficionado and green news junkie who

tweets

, posts articles to

Facebook

, and

blogs about ecology

. He welcomes reader questions, tips, and incoherent rants:

johnupton@gmail.com

.

Find this article interesting? Donate now to support our work.Read more: Business & Technology

,

Climate & Energy

,

Politics

Also in Grist

Please enable JavaScript to see recommended stories

From – 

Nuclear plant spills radiation into Lake Michigan

Posted in Anchor, FF, G & F, GE, LG, ONA, Pines, solar, solar power, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Nuclear plant spills radiation into Lake Michigan

Solar panels can protect you from terrorism

Solar panels can protect you from terrorism

Shutterstock

To the rescue!

Holy crime-fighting photovoltaic generation, Solar Panelman!

America’s top energy regulator says the solar panels that are proliferating on rooftops all over the country could protect against power outages triggered by terrorists.

From Bloomberg:

The U.S. power grid is vulnerable to terrorist attacks, and the growing use of rooftop solar panels will provide protection against lengthy blackouts, the chairman of the U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission said.

“It wouldn’t take that much to take the bulk of the power system down,” FERC Chairman Jon Wellinghoff said [Wednesday] at the Bloomberg New Energy Finance summit in New York. “If you took down the transformers and the substations so they’re out permanently, we could be out for a long, long time.”

Distributing generation units more widely on the grid, such as by deploying fuel cells and rooftop solar panels, will help consumers avoid blackouts. The trend also threatens to cut into revenue that utilities count on to maintain the transmission system, he said.

“A more distributed system is much more resilient,” he said. “Millions of distributed generators can’t be taken down at once.”

Nice to know that solar panels aren’t just saving us from deadly fossil fuel emissions. They’re also ready to step up as superheros and protect Americans from bad guys.

John Upton is a science aficionado and green news junkie who

tweets

, posts articles to

Facebook

, and

blogs about ecology

. He welcomes reader questions, tips, and incoherent rants:

johnupton@gmail.com

.

Find this article interesting? Donate now to support our work.Read more: Business & Technology

,

Climate & Energy

Also in Grist

Please enable JavaScript to see recommended stories

Continue at source:  

Solar panels can protect you from terrorism

Posted in Anchor, FF, G & F, GE, ONA, solar, solar panels, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Solar panels can protect you from terrorism

Fertilizer facility blast in Texas claims multiple lives, destroys homes

Fertilizer facility blast in Texas claims multiple lives, destroys homes

A fertilizer mixing and storage facility exploded in rural Texas on Wednesday evening, killing at least five people, injuring more than 160 others, destroying homes, and filling the air with noxious fumes.

Reuters / Mike Stone

As many as 15 are feared dead, including five firefighters who responded to the fire that preceded the extraordinary blast at the facility in the small town of West, near Waco.

From The New York Times:

Homes and businesses were leveled in the normally quiet town of West, and there was widespread destruction in the downtown area, Sgt. W. Patrick Swanton of the Waco Police Department said Thursday morning.

“At some point this will turn into a recovery operation, but at this point, we are still in search and rescue,” he said.

Five to 15 people were killed and more than 160 people were being treated at area hospitals, Sergeant Swanton said, while also emphasizing that those early estimates could change. As many as five firefighters are still missing, he said.

There is no evidence indicating criminal activity, Sergeant Swanton said, “but we’re not ruling that out.”

It began with a smaller fire at the plant, West Fertilizer, just off Interstate 35, about 20 miles north of Waco that was attended by local volunteer firefighters, said United States Representative Bill Flores. “The fire spread and hit some of these tanks that contain chemicals to treat the fertilizer,” Mr. Flores said, “and there was an explosion which caused wide damage.”

Agricultural fertilizer is a big business — and it’s a notoriously dangerous business, involving vast volumes of ammonium nitrate.

From The Guardian:

One of the most common ingredients found in fertilizer is ammonia — made out of nitrogen and hydrogen — which is created by sending natural gas, steam and air into a large container. The nitrogen and hydrogen is isolated before an electric current is sent through to turn it into ammonium, which in this case was mixed with nitric acid to create the potentially explosive ammonium nitrate. This and all the other components of fertilizer have to then be whittled down and then mixed together before the final product is created.

Ammonium Nitrate is a strong oxidant — and is highly flammable in its raw state.

From Newstalk 1010:

The plant uses ammonium nitrate in fertilizer production, the same chemical used in 1995′s Oklahoma City Bombing. 2 tons of ammonium nitrate were used in Oklahoma City to set off a blast that killed 168 people & hurt hundreds. The West Fertilizer plant may have had as much as 100 tons of the chemical on hand.

From Slate:

The West blast comes one day after the 66th anniversary of the deadliest industrial accident in U.S. history: the Texas City disaster of 1947, a fertilizer explosion that killed more than 580 people when a French-flagged vessel hauling ammonium nitrate caught fire, resulting in a chain reaction of fires and explosions that destroyed much of the port city.

UPDATE: The Dallas Morning News takes a look at the plant’s record:

Texas regulators knew in 2006 that the fertilizer facility that burned and exploded Wednesday night had two 12,000-gallon tanks of anhydrous ammonia and was near a school and neighborhood, documents show.

However, West Fertilizer Co., of West, Texas, told Texas Commission on Environmental Quality permit reviewers that emissions from the tanks would not pose a danger.

That assertion was based on expected routine emissions, not the possibility of a catastrophic failure.

The AP raises more concerns:

The Texas fertilizer plant … was cited for failing to obtain or to qualify for a permit in 2006.

The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality investigated West Fertilizer on June 20, 2006, after receiving a complaint June 9 of a strong ammonia smell. Agency records show that the person who lodged the complaint said the ammonia smell was “very bad last night” and lingered until after he or she went to bed.

And from The Washington Post’s Wonkblog: “The Texas fertilizer industry has only seen six inspections in the past five years – and the West Texas Fertilizer Co. plant was not one of them.”

Watch an absolutely chilling video of the West fertilizer explosion here, about 30 seconds in. Be warned that it includes audio of a terrified girl in pain after the blast:

John Upton is a science aficionado and green news junkie who

tweets

, posts articles to

Facebook

, and

blogs about ecology

. He welcomes reader questions, tips, and incoherent rants:

johnupton@gmail.com

.

Find this article interesting? Donate now to support our work.Read more: Business & Technology

,

Food

Also in Grist

Please enable JavaScript to see recommended stories

This article: 

Fertilizer facility blast in Texas claims multiple lives, destroys homes

Posted in alo, Anchor, FF, G & F, GE, ONA, solar, solar panels, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Fertilizer facility blast in Texas claims multiple lives, destroys homes

Energy-efficiency program killed in Louisiana

Energy-efficiency program killed in Louisiana

Facebook

This guy just killed an energy-efficiency program.

Ooh, so close. Louisiana was about to become the 47th state to help electricity customers buy efficient appliances and make other energy-saving investments.

The Louisiana Public Service Commission had voted 3-2 to in December to approve an energy-efficiency program. Money raised from a new fee on electricity sales would be funneled back to customers in the form of energy-saving subsidies. But then longtime board member Jimmy Field, a supporter of the program, retired from the commission. He was replaced by Scott Angelle, Gov. Bobby Jindal’s former natural resources secretary.

And then commission chairman Eric Skrmetta, who opposed the energy-efficiency program, decided it was time for the commission to cast new votes.

Angelle voted “no” on the program, killing with a 3-2 vote what the Baton Rouge Advocate newspaper described as “the product of an alliance between consumer groups, environmentalists, privately owned utility corporations and the major manufacturers to provide discounts for many home improvements.”

Skrmetta refused to allow the public to voice their support (or opposition) to the program before the commissioners cast their new votes Wednesday, saying they had heard plenty enough testimony back in December, which was before Angelle joined the commission. And that wasn’t the extent of the funny business. From The Advocate:

Jordan Macha, associate regional organizer for the Sierra Club, said the issue was added to the PSC agenda late Friday, giving proponents only two business days’ notice of the move to abandon the program that took three years to put together.

And with that bastardization of democracy, Skrmetta dashed the Cajun State’s glorious prospects of making history by becoming not quite the very last state to adopt such an energy-saving program.

John Upton is a science aficionado and green news junkie who

tweets

, posts articles to

Facebook

, and

blogs about ecology

. He welcomes reader questions, tips, and incoherent rants:

johnupton@gmail.com

.

Read more:

Business & Technology

,

Climate & Energy

,

Politics

Also in Grist

Please enable JavaScript to see recommended stories

See original:  

Energy-efficiency program killed in Louisiana

Posted in GE, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Energy-efficiency program killed in Louisiana

European agency declares popular pesticide too dangerous for bees

European agency declares popular pesticide too dangerous for bees

Are you sick of hearing about colony collapse? Hey, me too! But I’m guessing the bees are even more fed up at this point.

For the first time, Europe’s food safety agency this week officially labeled the world’s most popular insecticide, imidacloprid, as so dangerous as to be unacceptable for use on crops pollinated by bees, though the body lacks the power to ban the chemical. The report also called into question two other types of neonicotinoid pesticides. All three sound super-evil.

From The Guardian:

[Imidacloprid’s] manufacturer, Bayer, claimed the report, released on Wednesday, did not alter existing risk assessments and warned against “over-interpretation of the precautionary principle”.

The report comes just months after the UK government dismissed a fast-growing body of evidence of harm to bees as insufficient to justify banning the chemicals. …

Scientists at the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), together with experts from across Europe, concluded on Wednesday that for imidacloprid “only uses on crops not attractive to honeybees were considered acceptable” because of exposure through nectar and pollen. Such crops include oil seed rape, corn and sunflowers. EFSA was asked to consider the acute and chronic effects on bee larvae, bee behaviour and the colony as a whole, and the risks posed by sub-lethal doses. But it found a widespread lack of information in many areas and had stated previously that current “simplistic” regulations contained “major weaknesses”.

Bayer and other chemical giants published their own report this week, claiming that banning neonicotinoids would cost farmers hundreds of millions. But neonicotinoid manufacturers will still have to give the European Commission a response to the EFSA report by the end of this month, and the Commission could actually possibly maybe ban the pesticides.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Department of Agriculture have expressed concern over the chemicals in the past, but pretty much stopped there — at concern. And then approval. And then widespread spraying on just about everything we and the bees eat!

The EFSA isn’t a regulatory board, just an advisory one, so the E.U. doesn’t have to listen to its warnings. But bee health seems to be EFSA’s jam, and it’s not likely to back down. Last summer, the organization put together this video on all the threats to our tiny, stingy, pollinatey pals. It’s as cute as it is horrifying.

The more we learn about exactly what’s killing all the bees, the more the problem seems fixable, at least in theory. If the E.U. really goes to war with big chemical companies over tiny bees, it could be a game-changer. Meanwhile, the U.S. will be over here, still spraying with abandon.

Susie Cagle writes and draws news for Grist. She also writes and draws tweets for

Twitter

.

Read more:

Business & Technology

,

Food

Also in Grist

Please enable JavaScript to see recommended stories

Read More:  

European agency declares popular pesticide too dangerous for bees

Posted in GE, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on European agency declares popular pesticide too dangerous for bees