Tag Archives: health

Ebola’s Legacy: A Potentially Horrifying Measles Outbreak in West Africa

Mother Jones

Since the first case was detected last March, Ebola has claimed the lives of over 10,000 people in Liberia, Sierra Leone, and Guinea. The total death toll just surpassed 10,000, as of Thursday. But the deadliest and costliest outbreak since the virus was discovered in 1976 finally abated this month, with Liberia’s final patient leaving treatment last week. The bad news, though, is not over. The epidemic and the destruction it wreaked on West Africa’s fragile healthcare system could result in a new and deadly public health crisis: thousands of additional deaths from measles because of the lack of vaccinations. So says a new study released on Thursday in Science by a team of researchers—experts in epidemiology and public health—from Johns Hopkins, Princeton University, and four other institutions.

“Measles is highly transmissible, so it is one of the first diseases to circulate when vaccination is reduced due to healthcare disruptions,” Justin Lessler, one of the authors and a professor of epidemiology at Johns Hopkins, observes.

If measles strikes Liberia, Guinea, or Sierra Leone in the coming months, the infection rate would be likely almost double than before the Ebola outbreak, these researchers say. That means potentially as many as 16,000 deaths from measles infections and 227,000 total infections. An additional 20,000 young children—from nine months to five year olds—would be infected for every month that West African healthcare systems continue at their current and decreased rate of functioning. If the healthcare systems are not revitalized, almost half of the children in this region would go unvaccinated, compared to only 4 percent who were unvaccinated before the Ebola outbreak. Side effects in nonfatal measles infections include blindness, deafness, and brain damage.

The researchers are urging the World Health Organization, the local ministries of health, and other health organizations that conduct vaccination campaigns to act quickly.

Vaccinations plummeted in West Africa during the Ebola outbreak because health care facilities shut down, and people stayed away from remaining open clinics out of fear of being contaminated. In Monrovia, Liberia, at least half of the health care centers closed. A report from Sierra Leone noted that the admission rate at open clinics dropped 70 percent during the outbreak. Physicians from other countries were viewed with suspicion; some West Africans believed Westerners had brought the disease with them. “The Ebola crises has made an already complex relationship between the public health community and locals only more so,” says Lessler.

The World Health Organization and the Measles and Rubella Initiative is currently advising that vaccination campaigns be postponed in areas affected by Ebola until 42 days following the determination an area is free of Ebola. The new study suggests that a measles epidemic can be prevented now in regions where the Ebola crisis has passed. The WHO is advising a catch-up campaign: a large number of vaccinations will need to be administered to all the infants and children who went unvaccinated during the crisis.

Each vaccine costs only $1 dollar to purchase and deliver. A recent report by Good Governance Africa, a research and advocacy organization based out of Johannesburg, South Africa, noted that 16 African countries have near 100 percent vaccination rates and have decreased the number of measles related deaths by the thousands. More than 90 percent of children in Liberia, Guinea, and Sierra Leone had been vaccinated before the Ebola epidemic struck.

“The high mortality rate that has been seen from measles in previous humanitarian crises is particularly concerning,” Lessler says, noting that mass measles outbreaks often follow disasters. He points to measles epidemics in Syria during the civil war in 2013, in Ethiopia following deadly famine in in 2000, in the Democratic Republic of Congo during unrest between 2010 and 2013, and in Nigeria now in areas hit by Boko Haram.

“While the downstream effects of Ebola are many, we can actually do something about measles relatively cheaply and easily, saving many lives by restarting derailed vaccination campaigns,” Lessler says.

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Department of Homeland Security, and the National Institutes of Health funded the study.

More here:

Ebola’s Legacy: A Potentially Horrifying Measles Outbreak in West Africa

Posted in Anchor, Eureka, FF, G & F, GE, LAI, LG, ONA, PUR, Radius, Uncategorized, Venta | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Ebola’s Legacy: A Potentially Horrifying Measles Outbreak in West Africa

4 Surprising Facts About Wheat and Gluten

Mother Jones

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC “-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN” “http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd”>

Is wheat a “perfect, chronic poison,” in the words of Wheat Belly author William Davis, or an innocuous staple that has been demonized to promote a trendy line of gluten-free products? I dug into the issue of wheat and its discontents recently, and walked away with some informed conjectures, but also a sense that the science is deeply unsettled. Now, a group of Cornell researchers (joined by one from Thailand) have performed a great service: For a paper published in the journal Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, they’ve rounded up and analyzed the recent science on wheat and the potential pitfalls of eating it. Here are the key takeaways:

Continue Reading »

Link: 

4 Surprising Facts About Wheat and Gluten

Posted in Anchor, ATTRA, Everyone, FF, G & F, GE, LAI, LG, ONA, Oster, Radius, Sprout, Uncategorized, Wiley | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on 4 Surprising Facts About Wheat and Gluten

Antibiotics Are No Longer Making Pigs Bigger

Mother Jones

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC “-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN” “http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd”>

For decades, it’s been thought that low, regular doses of antibiotics help livestock grow big—thus increasing meat producers’ profits. So common is the practice of lacing farm animals’ feed with the drugs that an astonishing four-fifths of all antibiotics in the United States now go to livestock.

But a new meta-analysis by two Princeton researchers shows that antibiotics aren’t as effective at promoting growth as they used to be. Studies from 1950-1985 suggested that antibiotics increased weight of young pigs by an average of about 17 older pigs by 4 percent. But similar studies since 2000 found much less dramatic results: 1 percent increase for young pigs and no measurable increase for older pigs.

No one knows why the drugs have become less effective—and in fact, there’s no consensus on how exactly antibiotics increased growth in animals to begin with. One theory is that the drugs fight low-level infections, which allows the animal to use its energy for growing instead of warding off germs. The authors of the new analysis theorize that as hygiene at livestock operations improve, the rate of infections might be decreasing, thus negating the need for antibiotics.

Another (scarier) possibility: Bugs that cause common animal infections are becoming resistant to the antibiotics. The consequences of antibiotic resistance, of course, go far beyond pigs’ rates of growth. As my colleague Tom Philpott has reported, superbugs can jump from animals to humans. Antibiotic-resistant infections already kill 700,000 people every year worldwide. A recent UK report predicted that number will rise to 10 million by 2050.

“If the benefits of antibiotics for animal growth have diminished, then it becomes reasonable to be cautious and avoid the potential public health costs,” write the new report’s authors. “Antibiotics are not needed to promote growth, but they are essential to treat infectious diseases and maintain animal health.”

Link: 

Antibiotics Are No Longer Making Pigs Bigger

Posted in Anchor, FF, G & F, GE, LG, ONA, Radius, solar, solar power, Uncategorized, Venta | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Antibiotics Are No Longer Making Pigs Bigger

White Men Are Overdosing on Heroin at a Record Rate

Mother Jones

A decades-long surge in heroin use has left behind a trail of overdose victims. A Centers for Disease Control and Prevention report released this week found that the number of heroin overdoses quadrupled from 1,842 in 2000 to 8,257 in 2013—with a significant boost among people between the ages of 18 and 44, particularly white men.

Dr. Len Paulozzi, a medical epidemiologist who studies drug overdoses at the CDC’s Injury Center, says that both the growing availability of heroin nationwide and the shift among prescription drug users to heroin use may have contributed to the dramatic rise in deaths. “Thirty years ago, people snorting heroin never used OxyContin or Vicodin before” using heroin, says Paulozzi, who did not contribute to the CDC report. But now the drug’s abusers start with prescription drugs, he says, turning these meds into gateway drugs. A National Survey on Drug Use and Health study found that heroin abuse was 19 times higher among people who had previously abused pain relievers.

The increase in overdoses follows a federal crackdown on prescription painkillers, beginning toward the end of the Clinton era and lasting through the Bush administration, that resulted in a rash of arrests for illegal use during the mid-2000s. While the rate of deaths involving prescription painkillers like OxyContin appears to have leveled off, heroin overdoses have risen 348 percent. Most of the deaths occurred after 2010. That year, a new tamper-resistant form of Oxy hit the market, making it less potent and harder to abuse.

The rate of heroin deaths accelerated among people between the ages of 18 and 24, from 0.8 deaths per 100,000 people in 2000 to 3.9 deaths per 100,000 in 2013. For people between 25 and 44 years old, the rate jumped from 1.3 deaths per 100,000 people in 2000 to 5.4 per 100,000 in 2013. Among young and middle-aged white people, that death rate reached 7.0 per 100,000 by 2013.

The CDC report also highlighted the stark gender and regional disparities among those who overdose. Deaths among men from heroin overdoses were four times higher than those among women between 2000 and 2013. While heroin overdoses increased throughout the country, the greatest number occurred in the Northeast and Midwest. In those regions, particularly near cities, the Justice Department observed the illicit drug as a rising threat—especially given the reported spike in the use of fentanyl, a synthetic opioid some 30 times more potent than heroin.

According to the Washington Post, the Justice Department predicted the emerging trend in 2002: “As initiatives taken to curb the abuse of OxyContin are successfully implemented, abusers of OxyContin…also may begin to use heroin, especially if it is readily available, pure, and relatively inexpensive.” A flood of heroin from Mexico, the world’s third-largest opium producer, also factored into the drug’s availability in the United States. In 2013, the Drug Enforcement Administration seized 2,196 kilograms of powder and black tar at the US-Mexico border, a nearly 160 percent bump from 2009.

View original – 

White Men Are Overdosing on Heroin at a Record Rate

Posted in Anchor, FF, GE, LAI, LG, ONA, PUR, Radius, Uncategorized, Venta | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on White Men Are Overdosing on Heroin at a Record Rate

Ozonated, Mineral & Distilled: Decoding Water Bottle Labels

Continue reading here: 

Ozonated, Mineral & Distilled: Decoding Water Bottle Labels

Posted in FF, GE, LG, ONA, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Ozonated, Mineral & Distilled: Decoding Water Bottle Labels

8 Scariest Facts About Seafood

Link: 

8 Scariest Facts About Seafood

Posted in alo, FF, GE, LG, ONA, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on 8 Scariest Facts About Seafood

GOP Chair of the Science and Tech Subcommittee: I Didn’t Vaccinate My Kids

Mother Jones

Rep. Barry Loudermilk, a Georgia Republican who recently became the chair of a key congressional subcommittee on science and technology, didn’t vaccinate most of his children, he told a crowd at his first town hall meeting last week.

Loudermilk was responding to a woman who asked whether he’d be looking into (discredited) allegations that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) had covered up information linking vaccines to autism. He responded with a rather unscientific personal anecdote: “I believe it’s the parents’ decision whether to immunize or not…Most of our children, we didn’t immunize. They’re healthy.”

Loudermilk’s comment sparked sharp criticism, including from Rick Wilson, a prominent Republican strategist who called for the congressman’s resignation.

Having “healthy,” unvaccinated kids does not mean that they aren’t at risk, or that they won’t put others at risk later if they become infected. So far this year, there have been 154 cases of measles and three outbreaks; one outbreak sickened 86 people and landed 30 babies in home isolation. The disease spreads rapidly, afflicting not only those who lack immunization due to parental choice, but also those who haven’t been vaccinated because they are immunocompromised. Prior to the advent of the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine, measles was responsible for up to 500 deaths in the United States every year. Due to low vaccination rates, 2014 saw the most confirmed cases of measles since 2000, when the CDC had declared the illness all but eliminated in the United States.

If Loudermilk is unconcerned about the potential health effects of once-common diseases, he may want to note the economic repercussions. The 107 confirmed cases of measles during the 2011 outbreak cost taxpayers $5.3 million to contain. Rigorous scientific research—including the 2004 CDC study cited by Loudermilk’s constituent—has shown that theories about a supposed connection between vaccines and autism are unfounded.

The CDC study in question looked at children with and without autism to find out if there was any difference in their rates of MMR vaccination. The researchers found none. The so-called “cover-up” originated from a secretly recorded and cherry-picked conversation between William Thompson, a senior scientist at the CDC, and Brian Hooker of Focus for Health, an organization that seeks “to put an end to the needless harm of children by vaccination and other environmental factors.” In the conversation, Thompson allowed that among African-American boys, in a small subset of children studied, the incidence of autism was higher for those who were vaccinated than those who were not. That statement landed in a wildly misleading video released on YouTube produced by Hooker and Andrew Wakefield, a British researcher whose medical license was revoked in 2010. A year later, a journal that published Wakefield’s paper linking autism and vaccines determined his findings were fraudulent.

We’ve reached out to Rep. Loudermilk for comment.

Watch the full press conference, via Georgiapolitics.org, here. (Vaccines enter the fray at 1:26:00)

View the original here – 

GOP Chair of the Science and Tech Subcommittee: I Didn’t Vaccinate My Kids

Posted in Anchor, ATTRA, FF, G & F, GE, LAI, LG, ONA, Radius, Uncategorized, Venta | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on GOP Chair of the Science and Tech Subcommittee: I Didn’t Vaccinate My Kids

5 Ways the Keystone Pipeline Might Make People Sick

Read article here:  

5 Ways the Keystone Pipeline Might Make People Sick

Posted in FF, GE, LAI, LG, ONA, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on 5 Ways the Keystone Pipeline Might Make People Sick

How Big a Deal Would It Be If Red States Lost Their Obamacare Subsidies?

Mother Jones

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC “-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN” “http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd”>

What happens if the Supreme Court somehow persuades itself that Obamacare subsidies shouldn’t be available to people in states that rely on the federal exchange? Answer: in the red states that have refused to operate their own exchanges, lots of people would lose their subsidies—and most likely lose their health insurance too, since they could no longer afford it.

We already know that most red-state governors don’t care about that. After all, if they did care they’d accept Obamacare’s Medicaid expansion, which would provide health care to millions of their residents. So Greg Sargent takes a different tack today. What would it mean to state economies if their subsidies go away? Sargent’s rough calculations are on the right. Florida, for example, would lose about $5 billion per year, which would be a hit to its economy. Would that be likely to convince its governor to start up a state exchange so that subsidies would keep flowing?

Sadly no. Florida has a state GDP of about $750 billion. The loss of $5 billion would represent about half a percent of the state’s economy. That’s not nothing, but it’s close. And it’s certainly not enough to make up for the opprobrium of being thought soft on Obamacare.

So….nice try. But I think we’re pretty much where we’ve always been: it’s going to be yelling and screaming from constituents and lobbyists that eventually gets red-state governors (and legislatures) to accept any part of Obamacare that they have a choice about. It’s anyone’s guess when that yelling will finally get loud enough.

Visit link: 

How Big a Deal Would It Be If Red States Lost Their Obamacare Subsidies?

Posted in FF, GE, LG, Mop, ONA, oven, Uncategorized, Venta | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on How Big a Deal Would It Be If Red States Lost Their Obamacare Subsidies?

Is The Government About To Warn America Against Meat?

Mother Jones

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC “-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN” “http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd”>

Every five years, the United States Departments of Agriculture (USDA) and Health and Human Services (HHS) get together to revise their recommendations about what Americans should eat. These guidelines influence doctors’ health advice, food labels, the ever evolving food pyramid-turned-plate, and what goes into school lunches. For instance, in 2010, a time when more than half of adults were overweight or obese, the agencies recommended things like drinking water instead of sugary beverages, filling half your plate with fruits and veggies, cutting sodium, and just eating less in general.

It’s 2015, so time for some new advice. The guidelines draw on input from the Dietary Guidelines for Americans Committee (DGAC), which will publish a report sometime this winter. So what are the hottest items under debate this year? Here’s a run-down of what to look for in the upcoming Dietary Guidelines for Americans report:

The meat vs. plants showdown: It probably comes as no surprise that Americans eat a diet lacking in fruits and vegetables and full of too many solid fats. In fact, vegetable consumption was on the decline between 2001 and 2010 even as each of us now eat 202.3 pounds of meat a year; a bit less red meat than a few years ago but more poultry than ever before. In the past, the government has warned against overdoing it with red meat and urged people to chow down on lean meats like chicken and fish instead. But this year, for the first time, the committee might caution against overconsumption of all kinds of meat—and not just for health reasons, but also because of meat’s environmental footprint. Livestock operations now produce 15 percent of the world’s carbon emissions. Eating fewer animal-based foods “is more health promoting and is associated with a lesser environmental impact,” the committee suggested in its draft report.

Which of course has ruffled the meat industry. Removing lean meat from healthy diet recommendations is “stunning,” read a recent statement by the North American Meat Institute. “The committee’s focus on sustainability is questionable because it is not within the committee’s expertise.”

Cholesterol is back: Your body makes its own cholesterol but you also get some when you eat animal fats, including eggs. Previous guidelines warned that too much of the waxy substance in the blood leads to higher risk of heart disease, and recommended that adults consume no more than 300 milligrams of cholesterol a day. But this year’s guidelines might downplay dietary cholesterol’s risk, marking the comeback of the daily omelet. The DGAC’s December meeting notes stated that “cholesterol is not considered a nutrient of concern for overconsumption.”

“We now know that cholesterol in the diet makes very little difference in terms of bad cholesterol in the blood,” University of Pennsylvania’s molecular biologist Dan Rader told Forbes. People get high cholesterol in the blood because of their genes or because the body’s mechanisms for cleaning out blood cholesterol aren’t working properly, he explains.

We’ve been cautioned against cholesterol in our diets for the last fifty years, ever since the American Heart Association warned about it in 1961, reports the Washington Post. But in late 2013, a task force including the AHA found “insufficient evidence” in studies it reviewed to warn most people against eating foods high in the substance, such as eggs, shellfish, and red meat.

Put down the soda: I repeat: Put down the soda. Americans consume way too much added sugar, 22 to 30 teaspoons a day by some estimates, or nearly four times the healthy limits proposed by the AHA. And sugar-sweetened drinks account for nearly half of these added sugars. As Mother Jones has reported over the years, these jolts of added sugar have been linked with obesity, diabetes, metabolic disease, and a whole host of other ailments.

The World Health Organization turned heads last year when it reduced its recommendation about healthy added sugar intake from roughly 12 teaspoons to around 6 teaspoons a day (aka less than one can of Coke). The Dietary Guidelines might not go that far, but this year the committee will likely propose limits on added sugar for the first time: No more than 10 percent of your daily energy should come from added sugar, the committee suggests, which comes out to about 12 teaspoons a day for an adult with an average BMI.

Not sure how we feel about salt: “Sodium is ubiquitous in the food supply,” noted the Committee in its December meeting notes. The 2010 Guidelines recommended that adults consume less than 2,300 milligrams of sodium a day, a far cry from the 3,400 mg we inhale on average. The Guidelines also suggested that certain at-risk groups like people over age 51 and diabetics should eat less than 1,500 mg a day.

But while a 2013 report by the Institute of Medicine stated that reducing sodium intake is important for heart health, it also pointed to recent research suggesting that “sodium intakes that are low may increase health risks—particularly in certain groups”—like people with diabetes or kidney disease. The report asserted that there’s no evidence of benefits in reducing sodium intake to 1,500 mg for these subgroups or for the general population. While the Committee seems to want to warn people off sodium-laden diets for the 2015 guidelines, given these mixed findings about levels it seems unlikely that it will set a new defined limit.

View original:  

Is The Government About To Warn America Against Meat?

Posted in Anchor, FF, G & F, GE, LAI, LG, Mop, ONA, Radius, Uncategorized, Venta | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Is The Government About To Warn America Against Meat?