Tag Archives: hurricanes

New Documentary Gives the Facts About Climate Change but Few Solutions

Is it too late to stopclimate change? Almost.

Polar ice caps are melting. The Amazon is being clear cut. Wildlifefrom orangutans to migrating birds are losing their habitat and suffering under the ability to evolve quickly enough to tolerate the hothouse their world has become.

“By the end of this century we could trigger runaway climate change that is … beyond our control,” says Steven Chu, a Nobel Prize-winning scientist and the former Secretary of Energy for the Obama Administration, in the new documentary “Time to Choose.”

Why are we in this predicament? And really, are there any choices we can make at this point to save the planet?

The chief causes of this calamity, narrates actor Oscar Isaac in the film, have to do with what we use for energy, where we live and what we eat:

Burning coal, oil and natural gas emitcarbon dioxide and other pollutants, turningthe atmosphere into a greenhouse that is causing temperatures on Earth to heat up beyond what Naturecan tolerate.
Urban sprawl forces millions of people to live far away from their jobs and the infrastructure they need to go about daily lifecreating more demand for fossil fuels.
Deforestation, primarily to produce soybeans to feed to livestock, is destroying the forests that help moderate climate change by absorbing carbon dioxide and releasing sustaining oxygen back into the air.
Industrial agriculture demands land and petrochemical-based fertilizers and insecticides to produce food for the animals we raise on the land we’ve deforested. Talk about a vicious cycle.

Here’s just one of the many startling statistics the film cites to make its point, delivered by sustainable food guru Michael Pollan: “It takes up to ten times more land to feed ourselves with meat than with vegetables.”

In just one state, Mato Grosso, Brazil, over 20,000 square miles have been deforested just to grow soybeans for animal feed. In fact, soybeans are the most prominent driver of deforestation in South America, while 30 percent of Earth’s land is being used to produce livestock which by the way, belch methane gas, another potent contributor to climate change.

That loss of forests has shrunk drinking water supplies in Brazil. Forests both create rain and protect groundwater, so when forests are cut down, precipitation drops drastically and drinkingwater supplies literally evaporate. Footage in “Time to Choose” shows an expanse of cracked land as arid as a desert. The caption on the screen reveals that this wasteland is a reservoir.

Meanwhile, as the southern hemisphere’s forests are chopped downand the planet heats up, frozen water thousands of miles away in the northern hemisphere is equally affected. Greenland’s ice shield is contracting under Earth’s hotter temperatures, raising sea levels as the region’s enormous glaciers literally melt into the oceans surrounding them.

Climate scientist Dr. James Hansen predicts sea levels will rise 23 feet, threatening more than 600 million people living in San Francisco, Istanbul, Mumbai, London, Singapore, Amsterdam, Bangladesh, Miami and many other coastal communities. Meanwhile, extreme temperature shifts are triggering devastating cyclones and hurricanes. Remember SuperstormSandy? You ain’t seen nothin’ yet.

After persuasively presenting the evidencethatclimate change is happening and why, the film doesn’t make nearly as compelling a case for the choices we can maketo solve the problems. It highlights the need to transition to electric cars and to build more self-contained communities so that people don’t need to drive to jobs or social services, but that’s hardly enough to make a dent in the problem. And besides, how many of us can buy a Tesla?

Michael Pollan reminds viewers that they’ll be healthier as well as shrink their carbon footprint if they eat more plants and less meat. But he doesn’t suggest the best choices to make to get started. The Sierra Club’s Michael Brune, another prominent expertin this film, says that renewable technologies offer a “huge opportunity,” but how is the viewer supposed to take advantage of it?

The “Time to Choose” website could be more helpful by providing specific suggestions to enablethe public take the next step. Its “Paths to Change” section is too vague to get people to actually choose a wind-based provider for their local utility, for example, while the “Resources” section contains promotional material for the film, rather than useful resources to help viewers choose among the generic options provided.

These flaws can be easily fixed by adding links to some of the excellent “how to” information organizations, like Brune’s own Sierra Club offers or how to take a stand in your own community with online petitions, like Care2′s.

Related:
10 Simple Things You Can Do to Save Money & Energy
5 Ways to Make Your Car More Eco-Friendly
Not a Vegetarian Yet? 13 Ways to Get Started

Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

View this article:

New Documentary Gives the Facts About Climate Change but Few Solutions

Posted in alo, eco-friendly, FF, GE, LAI, LG, ONA, PUR, Radius, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on New Documentary Gives the Facts About Climate Change but Few Solutions

The forecast for the next century? Scary with a chance of dying

The forecast for the next century? Scary with a chance of dying

By on 23 Jun 2015commentsShare

Time for a quiz! Climate change will increase the size and frequency of which of the following?

A) Droughts B) Floods C) Hurricanes or D) Blizzards.

Sorry — trick question! A new study in medical journal The Lancet adds more credence to the theory that climate change will bring more of E) All of the above — and what’s more, that many more people will be directly endangered by these natural turbo-disasters. Since most climate assessments look at models averaged over the whole globe — including huge unpopulated swaths like, say, the Pacific Ocean (no shade to whales) — this study offers new insight by focusing on where (and how) actual humans are living.

The New York Times explains:

The report, published online Monday, analyzes the health effects of recent episodes of severe weather that scientists have linked to climate change. It provides estimates of the number of people who are likely to experience the effects of climate change in coming decades, based on projections of population and demographic changes.

The report estimates that the exposure of people to extreme rainfall will more than quadruple and the exposure of people to drought will triple compared to the 1990s. In the same time span, the exposure of the older people to heat waves is expected to go up by a factor of 12, according to Peter Cox, one of the authors, who is a professor of climate-system dynamics at the University of Exeter in Britain. …

Says Cox: “We are saying, let’s look at climate change from the perspective of what people are going to experience, rather than as averages across the globe,” he said. “We have to move away from thinking of this as a problem in atmospheric physics. It is a problem for people.”

Wait just one second: Is this a study that focuses on the actual, meaningful impacts that climate change will have on the lives of humans, as opposed to the parts per million of carbon in the atmosphere? Yes, please, scientists!

Source:
Risk of Extreme Weather From Climate Change to Rise Over Next Century, Report Says

, New York Times.

Share

Please

enable JavaScript

to view the comments.

Find this article interesting?

Donate now to support our work.

Get Grist in your inbox

Link: 

The forecast for the next century? Scary with a chance of dying

Posted in Anchor, Brita, Citizen, FF, G & F, GE, LAI, LG, ONA, Radius, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The forecast for the next century? Scary with a chance of dying

Your odds of getting struck by lightning just increased

Shocking news

Your odds of getting struck by lightning just increased

13 Nov 2014 6:43 PMShare

Share

Your odds of getting struck by lightning just increased

×

We already know that climate change is bringing more hurricanes, floods, droughts, typhoons, heat waves, and extreme rainfall. Now comes the hair-raising news that we’ll get more lightning, too.

Researchers from the University of California, Berkeley, explore the climate-lightning connection in a paper coming out tomorrow in the journal ScienceThe Guardian explains how these scientists put numbers on a link that was already well-known but under-investigated:

The researchers used data from federal government agencies to establish the connection between warming temperatures, more energetic storms, and increased lightning strikes, and combined the findings with 11 climate models.

And the not-so-shocking results:

The scientists found lightning strikes would increase by about 12 percent for every 1C of warming, resulting in about 50 percent more strikes by 2100.

See what they did there? Assumed nearly 4 DEGREES of warming this century! These scientists-of-little-faith evidently doubt that we’re going to pull off the climate comeback, and stop warming before we hit the agreed-upon 2-degree doomsday threshold.

The take-away message: 2100 will feature three lightning bolts for every two today unless humanity gets its shit together and stops burning fossil fuels.

Think these findings aren’t a big deal? Or that it only means more dazzling displays of electric energy from the heavens? Well, you obviously don’t live in Florida, the state that leads the nation in lightning-related injuries and fatalities. Six people have been struck dead in the Sunshine State this year alone.

Then again, Florida is already going to be fucked by sea-level rise, whether or not we get our collective act together. But looking on the bright side, LARPers will dig all the additional lightning bolts.

Source:
Lightning strikes will increase due to climate change

, The Guardian.

Projected increase in lightning strikes in the United States due to global warming

, Science.

Find this article interesting?

Donate now to support our work.Share

Please

enable JavaScript

to view the comments.

Get stories like this in your inbox

AdvertisementAdvertisement

Original source:

Your odds of getting struck by lightning just increased

Posted in alo, Anchor, FF, G & F, GE, LAI, LG, ONA, organic, Pines, solar, solar panels, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Your odds of getting struck by lightning just increased

Sexism Makes Female-Named Storms More Deadly

Taken from – 

Sexism Makes Female-Named Storms More Deadly

Posted in FF, GE, LG, ONA, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Sexism Makes Female-Named Storms More Deadly

Storm that already hit Mexico turns into a hurricane, threatens to strike again

Storm that already hit Mexico turns into a hurricane, threatens to strike again

NOAAForecast wind strength from Hurricane Manuel. Click to embiggen.

More storm-blown devastation is headed for Mexico, which has already been hammered by the remnants of hurricanes on its east and west coasts during the past week. The tropical storms left at least 80 dead, with dozens more still missing.

And as Mexicans brace for a hurricane that has formed off its west coast, meteorologists are warning U.S. Gulf of Mexico residents that a tropical storm could reach there next week.

Tropical storm Manuel hit Mexico’s western coastline on Sunday before heading back over the Pacific Ocean. But before it left it dumped enough rain to trigger a landslide in a mountainside coffee-growing village, burying homes and leaving 58 people unaccounted for. Tropical storm Ingrid hit the county’s east coast at about the same time, wreaking carnage and leaving tourists stranded in Acapulco.

Since returning to the ocean, Manuel has been picking up strength. Early Thursday, the U.S. National Hurricane Center warned that Manuel was a Category 1 hurricane that was “crawling” northward — back in the direction of Mexico’s coastline. From an A.P. report:

The storm that devastated the Pacific resort over the weekend regained strength on Wednesday and became hurricane Manuel, taking a route that could see it make landfall on Mexico’s north-western coast. It would be a third blow to a country still reeling from the one-two punch of Manuel’s first landfall and hurricane Ingrid on Mexico’s eastern coast.

Meanwhile, meteorologists are warning that a tropical storm appears to be forming over Mexico’s Yucatan Peninsula that may veer north and slam into the U.S. Gulf Coast. From USA Today:

Once it forms, the storm is expected to wander around the Gulf for a while, and potentially could hit the U.S. Gulf Coast next week, according to some of the computer models that meteorologists use to forecast weather, says Weather Underground meteorologist Jeff Masters.

Regardless of its exact track, heavy rain from the system is likely to drench part of northeastern Mexico and the Texas coast this weekend, says AccuWeather meteorologist Alex Sosnowski. Flash floods are possible along the Texas coast, along with rough surf and strong rip currents, he adds.

In eastern Mexico, rain from the storm “could cause life-threatening floods and mudslides over areas already impacted by torrential rains during the past several days,” the hurricane center forecasts in an online report.

The wild coastal weather follows what had been a calm summer free of hurricanes. These recent storms struck just as we passed the traditional peak time for such tempests, but the season still has a long way to go:

NOAA

Click to embiggen.

John Upton is a science fan and green news boffin who tweets, posts articles to Facebook, and blogs about ecology. He welcomes reader questions, tips, and incoherent rants: johnupton@gmail.com.Find this article interesting? Donate now to support our work.Read more: Climate & Energy

See the original post:

Storm that already hit Mexico turns into a hurricane, threatens to strike again

Posted in alo, ALPHA, Anchor, FF, G & F, GE, LG, Northeastern, ONA, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Storm that already hit Mexico turns into a hurricane, threatens to strike again

Right-wingers’ dream town is a new urbanist paradise, but full of guns

Right-wingers’ dream town is a new urbanist paradise, but full of guns

Remember this?

This was Glenn Beck’s worst nightmare. Sustainable planned communities were going to destroy our future, he feared.

But over the past few weeks, Beck seems to have had a change of heart. He’s now promoting his own Independence, USA, a “city-theme park hybrid” to be located somewhere in Texas with abundant “craftmen and artisan” small businesses and stores, a working ranch “where visitors can learn how to farm and work the land,” an innovation center, and dedicated mixed-income housing.

Hold on to your hats, though, folks, because Beck is not alone. The dense green community idea is catching on among the right-wing crowd, and these people even use some of Beck’s dreaded key words.

The Citadel, a sort of castle-themed survivalist compound planned for the eastern mountains of Idaho, will have a dense town center and farmers market. The fortress aims to protect residents in part by “physical preparedness to survive and prevail in the face of natural catastrophes — such as Hurricanes Sandy or Katrina.” Calling all green-minded fans of The Games of Thrones: Homes will be made of poured concrete “for exceptional durability,” and may have those cute little windows for shooting arrows out of.

However, the website declares:

Marxists, Socialists, Liberals, and Establishment Republicans may find that living within our Citadel Community is incompatible with their existing ideology and preferred lifestyles.

It’s kind of not though — the design hews pretty close to the core tenets of smart growth. But it also kind of is, because the Citadel’s main purpose is “preservation of liberty,” i.e. having all of the guns.

Not sure which eco-friendly neo-libertarian planned community to choose? Gawker has a breakdown of each community’s salient points, and declares Independence the winner (maybe because Beck also plans to include that theme park).

Has everything you thought you knew about political ideologies and lifestyles been destroyed now? I’m sorry. But if the right is going to run away to delusional Disneylands, they might as well be dense and livable, right?

And if they’re going to fill those places with guns and plop them in the boonies way the hell away from the rest of us, I’m not complaining.

Susie Cagle writes and draws news for Grist. She also writes and draws tweets for

Twitter

.

Read more:

Cities

Also in Grist

Please enable JavaScript to see recommended stories

Read this article – 

Right-wingers’ dream town is a new urbanist paradise, but full of guns

Posted in eco-friendly, GE, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Right-wingers’ dream town is a new urbanist paradise, but full of guns