Tag Archives: living

Please resist the urge to take a selfie with this cute seal

SEALFIE TIME

Please resist the urge to take a selfie with this cute seal

By on May 29, 2016Share

Seals, like the Sirens of Greek myth who perched on rocky shores to lead passerby astray, are trying to lure you — and you must not give in. Their weapon: those photogenic little faces.

Let Atlas Obscura set the scene:

Imagine: it’s the tail end of Memorial Day Weekend. All your friends have been posting pictures of themselves laughing it up in various attractive early summer situations. You, on the other hand, have found yourself at a relatively average New England beach — gritty sand, cloudy sky, some water. There is no Instagram filter that can enhance this. How to set yourself apart?

Look! There, down the beach — a lone seal pup, wriggling in the sand. Do you approach the seal? Do you click that little button that switches to the front-facing camera? Do you put your head near the pup’s head, as though you are pals, and smile?

No. Do not do it, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association said in a recent press release. Do not take a selfie with the seal.

If Mommy Seal, who is probably nearby hunting for food, sees you with Baby Seal, she might abandon her young pup forever. (So much for maternal instincts.) Trust me: You don’t want that kind of guilt on your hands, and you sure don’t want any photos around to verify your disgraceful affront to sealkind.

If that’s not enough to keep you away, NOAA also wants you to know this: “Seals have powerful jaws, and can leave a lasting impression.”

So next time you encounter a cute, squirmy wild animal, keep your cellphone-wielding flippers to yourself and recall the immortal words of NOAA: “There is no selfie stick long enough!”

Get Grist in your inbox

Source: 

Please resist the urge to take a selfie with this cute seal

Posted in alo, Anchor, ATTRA, FF, G & F, GE, LG, ONA, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Please resist the urge to take a selfie with this cute seal

It’s official: This summer will be a miserable inferno

It’s official: This summer will be a miserable inferno

By on May 26, 2016Share

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association (NOAA) has released its outlook for summer temperatures, and, in the words of the American poet Nelly: It’s getting hot in herre.

Temperatures all across the country are facing increased odds for well above average summer temps: From Seattle to Sag Harbor, boob sweat and swamp ass will abound. The only exceptions in these United States are South Dakota, Nebraska, and Kansas — so pack your bags, babies! We’re heading to Omaha.

NOAA

Beside the basic discomfort of hot-as-balls weather, exceptionally high temperatures are bad news for things like drought, wildfire, and curly hair. This could mean an especially difficult year for parts of California and the Southwest that are already suffering from years of high temps and low precipitation.

Howard Diamond, scientist at NOAA, put it this way:

“Yes, parts of California already under severe drought could again be in for more of the same.” But, he adds, “Please also remember that the climate outlooks below for June-July-August are just that — outlooks. They are not specific forecasts, but based on past climatology, and models give us a possible snapshot of what conditions will most likely be like.”

In other words, it looks bad, but there’s always a chance that the predictions are off and the drought is over and there will be no more wildfires and we’ll all be blissfully basking in 70 degree days for the next three months.

Here’s hoping.

Get Grist in your inbox

Continue at source: 

It’s official: This summer will be a miserable inferno

Posted in alo, Anchor, Everyone, FF, G & F, GE, ONA, Uncategorized, wind energy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on It’s official: This summer will be a miserable inferno

You’ve geeked out over “An Inconvenient Truth.” Watch these next.

You’ve geeked out over “An Inconvenient Truth.” Watch these next.

By on May 24, 2016Share

Along with a good chunk of the environmental space, Grist is celebrating the 10-year anniversary of the release of An Inconvenient Truth, the Oscar-winning documentary that dragged climate change in front of the eyeballs of millions. (Check out our complete oral history of the film and interviews with the activists, politicians, and artists it influenced.)

Perhaps you’re in celebration mode, too, and have re-watched the documentary in all its early-2000s Keynote glory. (If not, you can for free today!) Perhaps you’re feeling inspired. Stand tall! Sub out that incandescent sack of filaments for a lovely compact fluorescent lamp! You’re an environmentalist!

Now wipe your brow with a recyclable, grab an armload of in-season fruit, and binge watch these classic environmental docs next.


Food, Inc.

From Participant Media (the same folks that produced An Inconvenient Truth), Food, Inc. tells the story of our utterly zany industrial food system. After watching, this author stopped eating fast food for good (though, to be honest, not for lack of desire). Watch: Netflix.

Gasland

Josh Fox’s documentary on hydraulic fracturing helped launch the anti-fracking movement. A true conversation about climate change isn’t “possible without the awareness An Inconvenient Truth brought,” he told Grist, but here’s a conversation-starter, by way of the energy system. Watch: Netflix.

Chasing Ice

Photographer James Balog traveled to the Arctic to capture photos of dramatically receding — and in some cases, disappearing — ice. If you weren’t already convinced climate change is serious, these glaciers beg to differ. Watch: Netflix.

This Changes Everything

When Naomi Klein published This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. the Climate in 2014, she pointed to climate change as an opportunity to rework our entire economic system. But what about the people in that system? The film project of the same name is, according to director Avi Lewis, “a portrait of community struggle around the world on the front lines of fossil fuel extraction and the climate crisis.”

For the optimal dose of anger and action, don’t sub the book out for the movie: Soak ’em both in back-to-back. Watch: iTunes, Amazon.

Under the Dome

China has an air pollution problem. In Under the Dome, that problem is laid out with pressing slideshow wizardry. Remind you of another environmental movie? Deborah Seligsohn, former principal adviser to the World Resources Institute’s China energy and climate program, points to the documentary as An Inconvenient Truth’s most immediate descendent. “In four days, it had 250 million views on the web. That’s the influence,” she told Grist. Watch: YouTube (below!).

Catching the Sun

Catching the Sun confronts the big questions imposed by a burgeoning global solar industry. Is a 100-percent solar-powered world achievable? And if so, who stands to benefit? Director Shalini Kantayya has called mainstream environmentalism “a thing for the privileged.” As she told Grist, “If you have extra money, you can put solar panels on your home or pay for organic food.”

The documentary is Kantayya’s take on where environmentalism should be heading. Spoiler alert: It’s a story of hope, not doom. Watch: Netflix.

Share

Get Grist in your inbox

Continued: 

You’ve geeked out over “An Inconvenient Truth.” Watch these next.

Posted in alo, Anchor, FF, G & F, GE, Keurig, LAI, ONA, organic, solar, solar panels, solar power, Sprout, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on You’ve geeked out over “An Inconvenient Truth.” Watch these next.

Edible six-pack rings are a brilliant answer to plastic pollution

Edible six-pack rings are a brilliant answer to plastic pollution

By on May 23, 2016Share

Happy World Turtle Day!

Didn’t know that’s a thing? Unlike other made-up holidays — say, National Hug Your Boss Day — the occasion is both adorable and important.

Turtles are at risk all over the planet. For some species of turtles, life is so precarious that less than 0.1 percent will survive to adulthood. Turtles have an array of natural predators to worry about, as well as man-made hazards like cars. The lucky ones that manage to avoid humans and predators still risk getting trapped in or ingesting our garbage.

Now, one brewery has a plan that could help sea turtles and other ocean animals.

Saltwater Brewing, a beer manufacturer based in Florida, was founded by a group of surfers and all around ocean lovers. Aware that six-pack beer rings are some of the more common and deadly detritus found in the ocean, Saltwater created a six-pack ring that can actually be eaten. And it’s made from spent grain, the by-product of the beer itself, that would otherwise get tossed out.

While edible six-pack ring isn’t exactly health food for turtles, at least it won’t kill them. “It’s kind of like having a Sour Patch Kid,” brewery founder Chris Gove told Upworthy. “You’d rather have your kid eat a Sour Patch Kid than a Lego. That’s kind of how I see it.”

Learn more about the edible six-pack ring below:

Get Grist in your inbox

See the original post – 

Edible six-pack rings are a brilliant answer to plastic pollution

Posted in alo, Anchor, Casio, FF, GE, LG, ONA, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Edible six-pack rings are a brilliant answer to plastic pollution

Check out these photos of bad-ass climate activists around the world

Check out these photos of bad-ass climate activists around the world

By on May 16, 2016Share

Over the weekend, tens of thousands of activists in 13 countries on six continents protested against climate change and the burning of fossil fuels.

Part of the Break Free campaign, activists from the coal fields of Germany to the oil wells of Nigeria to the rail lines of Washington state showed up with the same message: keep fossil fuels in the ground and transition to renewable energy.

In Proschim, Lusatia, Germany

Break Free

In Anacortes, Wash., 52 climate activists were arrested after blocking train tracks servicing refineries owned by Shell and Tesoro, two of the largest sources of greenhouse gas emissions in the state. The three-day protest in Anacortes also included community workshops, kayaktivists, and a three-mile march along Fidalgo Bay, right in front of the oil refineries.

In Anacortes, Wash.

Break Free

Five activists were also arrested for blocking a train outside Albany, New York.

“From rising sea levels to extreme storms, the need to act on climate change has never been more urgent,” reads a statement released by Break Free. “Added to that, the fossil fuel industry faces an unprecedented crisis — from collapsing prices, massive divestments, a new global climate deal, and an ever-growing movement calling for change. The time has never been better for a just transition to a clean energy system.”

Highlights from the actions, according to Break Free, included halting $20 million worth of coal shipments Newcastle, Australia; the 48-hour occupation of a lignite mine and power station by 3,500 activists in Germany; and a 10,000-person march against a proposed coal plant in Batangas City, Philippines.

See more photos from the worldwide protests below:

In Batangas City, Philippines. 

Break Free

In Batangas City, Philippines. 

Break Free

In Johannesburg, South Africa. 

Break Free

In Aliağa, Turkey. 

Break Free

In Washington, D.C. 

Break Free

In Vancouver, Canada. 

Break Free

In Vancouver, Canada. 

Break Free

In Newcastle, Australia. 

Break Free

In Newcastle, Australia. 

Break Free

In Jakarta, Indonesia.

Break Free

In Proschim, Lusatia, Germany. 

Break Free

In Anacortes, Wash. 

Break Free

In Anacortes, Wash. 

Break Free

In Anacortes, Wash. 

Break Free

In Anacortes, Wash. 

Break Free

In Anacortes, Wash. 

Break Free

In Anacortes, Wash. 

Break FreeShare

Find this article interesting?

Donate now to support our work.

Get Grist in your inbox

Original link: 

Check out these photos of bad-ass climate activists around the world

Posted in alo, Anchor, FF, GE, LG, ONA, Pines, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Check out these photos of bad-ass climate activists around the world

Cities ask residents to snitch on illegal Airbnb rentals

Cities ask residents to snitch on illegal Airbnb rentals

By on May 13, 2016 12:44 pmShare

Rental services like Airbnb and VRBO take up valuable real estate for short-term stays. This can mean that housing supply goes down, rent goes up, and residents get displaced by visitors, as we noted last week. That’s a big enough problem that now at least two German cities are asking their citizens to snitch on neighbors who are illegally renting homes to tourists.

Berlin, which has banned most vacation apartment rentals, has a website that enables people to anonymously inform on law-breaking landlords. And now Munich, which has also introduced laws cracking down on short-term rentals, is considering launching a snitch site as well, CityLab’s Feargus O’Sullivan reports. Even before the city’s leaders started talking about setting up such a site, the Munich Renters’ Association publicized an email address that people can use to tattle on their neighbors.

It’s an interesting concept, but one O’Sullivan finds problematic. “The plan to create a special website for informing on your neighbors might ultimately help the city become an easier place for permanent residents to find a home,” he writes. But, “It might also, in its own modest, quiet way, make Munich a place in which some would shudder to live.”

Personally, I see nothing wrong with tattling on scofflaw landlords, who probably deserve it. Cities aren’t just built for visitors, after all; they’re built for the people who live in them.

Find this article interesting?

Donate now to support our work.

Get Grist in your inbox

View this article – 

Cities ask residents to snitch on illegal Airbnb rentals

Posted in alo, Anchor, Citizen, FF, G & F, GE, LAI, ONA, Ultima, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Cities ask residents to snitch on illegal Airbnb rentals

Hey, energy geeks, there’s now a podcast just for you

Hey, energy geeks, there’s now a podcast just for you

By on May 13, 2016 6:00 amShare

Podcasts are cool. Government agencies, generally speaking, are not. What happens when you mix the two together?

Judging by Episode 1 of the Department of Energy’s new podcast, Direct Current, the result is surprisingly charming — and not at all like listening to an audio version of the congressional yawn that is C-SPAN.

The episode (listen above) dives into rooftop solar and problems that arise after people install rooftop panels. It contains moments of levity, too, like a spoof of a familiar public radio show (with host “Ira Fiberglass” hosting This American Lightbulb), and an off-the-wall story about Don Quixote discovering a windmill and mistaking it for a giant.

The Verge described this podcast as coming “from out of nowhere” — and granted, when you think of up-and-coming podcast creators, the Department of Energy isn’t a prime suspect. But maybe we shouldn’t be totally surprised that in the post-Serial world, a decade after podcasts became popular, the government is finally catching up. The Department of Energy’s podcast represents a government agency’s attempt to venture outside its jargon-laden domain into a more approachable realm, one in which actual human beings live, listen, and learn.

In the era of thumb-scrolling through Facebook, podcasts are seen as a return to intimacy: a more theatrical medium that allows listeners to engage more slowly and deeply with what’s being said. Any subject is fair game, from concrete to rhino hunters. And now, courtesy of the government, rooftop solar panels.

Find this article interesting?

Donate now to support our work.

Get Grist in your inbox

View this article: 

Hey, energy geeks, there’s now a podcast just for you

Posted in alo, Anchor, FF, G & F, GE, LAI, ONA, solar, solar panels, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Hey, energy geeks, there’s now a podcast just for you

John Oliver does the lord’s work on dumb science articles

John Oliver does the lord’s work on dumb science articles

By on May 9, 2016Share

If your Facebook feed is anything like mine, you probably see a lot of posts with the words “study finds” in the headlines. Here are a few examples, taken from a quick search of Facebook on Monday morning:

Study Finds Monkeys With Smaller Testicles Scream Louder to Compensate
Study Finds Cheese Triggers the Same Part of the Brain as Hard Drugs
Study Finds Smelling Farts Makes You Live Longer

These are just a few examples of the Study Finds Industrial Complex, in which the media takes scientific studies — some of which aren’t even valid in the first place — adds a layer of bullshit, and then delivers them to our televisions and Facebook feeds. John Oliver takes bad science writing to task in the latest episode of Last Week Tonight.

Take the fart-sniffing article: The source is a 2014 study that found that treating distressed mouse cells with a compound called AP39 could protect mitochondria. If the authors of the article read the actual study — instead of the countless articles misinterpreting a quote in a press release —  they would have noticed it had nothing to do with farts, or smelling them. Nothing.

Bad science writing is especially prevalent with studies of food, which — on a regular basis — tell us that coffee/wine/chocolate/etc. can cure cancer/obesity/depression/etc., despite mounds of conflicting evidence. As Oliver points out, not only do these studies give us poor guidelines for how to live, they have also led lots of folks to mistrust science and think that climate change isn’t real or vaccines cause autism.

Regardless, Study Finds You Don’t Want To Miss This Show. Watch above.

Find this article interesting?

Donate now to support our work.

Get Grist in your inbox

View the original here:  

John Oliver does the lord’s work on dumb science articles

Posted in alo, Anchor, FF, G & F, GE, LAI, ONA, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on John Oliver does the lord’s work on dumb science articles

Here’s An Idea For Urban Living

Mother Jones

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC “-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN” “http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd”>

A couple of days ago I read a post at New York magazine about a new kind of apartment:

This weekend, residents will begin moving into New York’s newest experiment in communal living: a blocky red-and-white building in Williamsburg, nestled snugly against the BQE. It’s run by the company Common, which sells “co-living,” a relatively new product that’s a start-up version of rental roommate shares.

Click the link for the full story, but it brought to mind a random thought that’s been on my mind for a long time. I’ve never mentioned it since it’s light years outside my wheelhouse of knowledge, but it’s Monday, so why not?

As near as I can tell, the Common approach is a building full of bedrooms of various sizes and prices. There are common bathrooms and dining areas in various places, and the rent ranges from $2,250 to $3,190. But if you’re going to go the dorm route, why not do it better? Take a look at the floor plan below:

I chose the bedroom size because it’s the size of my master bedroom. It’s plenty large and comfy, with room for two, lots of closet space, and a nice private bathroom. Five of these bedrooms enclose a 1,100 square foot common area, which is about the size of the entire downstairs of my house. In real life it would be divided into various areas, either via walls or potted plants or what have you. There’s plenty of space for a large kitchen in the center and various dining, seating, and TV rooms around it. The entire thing is 3,162 square feet, and every bedroom has two doors: one into the common area and a private door to the outside. The building would presumably have the usual amenities depending on how upscale it is: fitness center, laundry facilities, storage areas, etc.

So I’m curious: why doesn’t anyone do this? Are there regulatory issues? Has it been tried and failed? It seems like a decent idea that provides a lot of space for the money, and plenty of privacy too if you build the bedrooms right (i.e., good soundproofing). If five roommates are just too many, you could do the same thing with three bedrooms at a somewhat higher cost.

Obviously this isn’t ideal for everyone, but especially in high-cost urban areas it seems like a decent compromise between commune and private apartment that could be rented out for a reasonable price. Has this been done? If so, is there something I’m not thinking of that kept it from catching on?

Read article here:  

Here’s An Idea For Urban Living

Posted in alternative energy, Everyone, FF, GE, LG, ONA, solar, Uncategorized, Venta | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Here’s An Idea For Urban Living

Trump supporters believe in Trump and, weirdly, science

Trump supporters believe in Trump and, weirdly, science

By on May 5, 2016Share

Donald Trump may believe that climate change is a myth created by the Chinese to weaken American manufacturing, but believe it or not, a majority of his supporters — 56 percent — say that climate change is real.

Trump supporters are more likely to have a grasp on climate reality than supporters of ex- presidential candidate and Zodiac Killer Ted Cruz. According to a new report released today by the Yale Project on Climate Change Communication, 38 percent of Ted Cruz supporters said that climate change is stone-cold fact. Like Trump, Cruz denies climate change; unlike Trump, he holds the more shopworn theory that it’s a hoax created by scientists out to scare everybody.

Meanwhile, most supporters of Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders think climate change is happening — 92 percent and 93 percent, respectively. Of those, 83 percent of Clinton supporters and 80 percent of Sanders supporters said that they actually worried about it. Some 79 percent of Sanders supporters and 76 percent of Clinton supporters believe that humans are causing it (and the rest believe that it’s due to natural changes in the environment).

This is some crazy news. According to polling data, belief in climate change has waxed and waned over the years. Concern about climate change in America has been rising overall since a not-particularly-mysterious drop around 2008, when the American economy nearly went under, but climate change has been viewed throughout as a margin issue.

Times are changing. Nearly every registered voter who is not a fan of Ted Cruz, regardless of political affiliation, said that they were more likely to vote for a presidential candidate who strongly supports taking action to reduce global warming, regulating carbon dioxide as a pollutant, and requiring fossil fuel companies to pay a carbon tax (provided other taxes, like income tax, were cut).

A majority of all candidates’ supporters, even Cruz’s, want more money for research into renewable energy. They also favor tax rebates for people who buy energy-efficient vehicles or solar panels — all while they continue to endorse expanding drilling for oil and natural gas off the coast of the United States.

Why is this happening? Here’s my theory: Climate change has finally become a part of the national conversation. It’s officially a thing talked about by politicians not named Al Gore. Last year, a coalition of ranchers, Native Americans, and climate activists blocked Keystone XL, a pipeline whose construction seemed inevitable just a few years earlier. Climate change, rarely mentioned in presidential debates, has been a subject of serious discussion this year. President Obama talks about it, often.

That doesn’t mean people know much about climate science. Only a little more than a third of Clinton and Sanders’ supporters, for example, know the extent of the scientific consensus on climate change. That’s despite the fact that research says that said consensus is the single most persuasive fact about climate change, and would theoretically be as familiar to climate change believers as an ice cream truck jingle.

Two of the researchers behind this study, Anthony Leiserowitz, and Ed Maibach, have spent years arguing that climate change is an issue that has the potential to cut across political boundaries. This is just one study, but it bears that theory out.

Share

Find this article interesting?

Donate now to support our work.

Get Grist in your inbox

Link:

Trump supporters believe in Trump and, weirdly, science

Posted in alo, Anchor, FF, G & F, GE, LAI, ONA, solar, solar panels, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Trump supporters believe in Trump and, weirdly, science