Tag Archives: point

One giant coal plant reopening in Minnesota, another shuttering in Massachusetts

One giant coal plant reopening in Minnesota, another shuttering in Massachusetts

H.C. Williams

This coal power plant, Brayton Point, is shutting down in 2017.

For this coal-news update, we’ll get the depressing outlier out of the way first: One of the Midwest’s largest coal-burning plants is about to be fired back up following a two-year hiatus.

A filthy 900-megawatt generator in Minnesota was severely damaged in late 2011. But following $200 million in repairs, Xcel Energy says it should be up and running again within a week. From E&E Publishing:

Once at full power, Sherburne’s Unit 3, combined with two 750-megawatt coal burners, known as Units 1 and 2, should be able to produce 2,400 megawatts of electricity, according to Xcel.

The refired Unit 3 generator will also help burnish Sherco’s reputation as Minnesota’s largest point-source emitter of carbon dioxide, the primary greenhouse gas that scientists have linked to global climate change.

But the development is an unusual one in a world where coal is being slowly but surely kicked to the curb. This week, the private equity firm that just bought the coal-fired Brayton Point Power Station in Somerset, Mass., one of the biggest polluters in the region, announced it would shut down the facility in 2017. From the Providence Journal:

The New Jersey-based energy firm cited a host of issues in announcing its decision to close the plant, including low electricity prices because of the surplus of natural gas and the cost of meeting stricter environmental rules. The move comes just five weeks after it closed on the purchase of the facility from the Virginia-based energy conglomerate Dominion Resources.

The Sierra Club’s Beyond Coal campaign is cheering the news:

With [the] announcement that the Brayton Point Power Station in Massachusetts would retire by 2017, the campaign officially marked 150 coal plants that have announced plans to retire since 2010.

According to the Clean Air Task Force, retiring these 150 coal plants will help to save 4,000 lives every year, prevent 6,200 heart attacks every year and prevent 66,300 asthma attacks every year. Retiring these plants will also avoid $1.9 billion in health costs.

We’ll end this coal update with the sad news that coal miners continue to die on the job in America. The Wall Street Journal reports on three fatal mining accidents that occurred on three consecutive days. They happened while more than half of the federal Mine Safety and Health Administration staff is being furloughed by the government shutdown. “The fact that this occurred over the weekend, when there may be a greater expectation an MSHA inspector would not be present, is a red flag,” administration head Joseph Main told the newspaper.


Source
Coal on the decline — 150 coal plants set for retirement, Sierra Club
New owners to shutter outmoded Brayton Point Power Station in 2017, Providence Journal
Coal-Mining Accidents Kill Three in Three Days, The Wall Street Journal
Minnesota’s largest coal unit to restart, despite concerns over pollution, emissions, E&E Publishing

John Upton is a science fan and green news boffin who tweets, posts articles to Facebook, and blogs about ecology. He welcomes reader questions, tips, and incoherent rants: johnupton@gmail.com.

Find this article interesting? Donate now to support our work.Read more: Business & Technology

,

Climate & Energy

Originally from: 

One giant coal plant reopening in Minnesota, another shuttering in Massachusetts

Posted in Anchor, FF, G & F, GE, global climate change, ONA, PUR, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on One giant coal plant reopening in Minnesota, another shuttering in Massachusetts

The Noticer Returns – Andy Andrews

READ GREEN WITH E-BOOKS

The Noticer Returns

Sometimes You Find Perspective and Sometimes Perspective Finds You

Andy Andrews

Genre: Self-Improvement

Price: $9.99

Publish Date: October 1, 2013

Publisher: Thomas Nelson

Seller: HarperCollins


Perspective is a powerful thing. Andy Andrews has spent the past five years doing a double take at every white-haired old man he sees, hoping to have just one more conversation with the person to whom he owes his life. Through a chance encounter at a local bookstore, Andy is reunited with the man who changed everything for him – Jones, also known as “The Noticer.” As the story unfolds, Jones uses his unique talent of noticing little things that make a big difference. And these “little things” grant the people of Fairhope, Alabama, a life-changing gift – perspective. Along the way, families will be united, financial opportunities will be created, and readers will be left with powerfully simple solutions to the everyday problems we all face. Through the lens of a parenting class at the Grand Hotel in Point Clear, Alabama, Jones guides a seemingly random group to ask specific questions inspired by his curious advice that “You can’t believe everything you think.” Those questions lead to answers for which people have been searching for centuries: How do we begin to change the culture in which we live? What is the key to creating a life of success and value? What if what we think is the end…is only the beginning? What starts as a story of one person's everyday reality unfolds into the extraordinary principles available to anyone looking to create the life for which they were intended.

Link – 

The Noticer Returns – Andy Andrews

Posted in alo, FF, GE, ONA, PUR, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Noticer Returns – Andy Andrews

David and Goliath – Malcolm Gladwell

READ GREEN WITH E-BOOKS

David and Goliath

Underdogs, Misfits, and the Art of Battling Giants

Malcolm Gladwell

Genre: Psychology

Price: $12.99

Expected Publish Date: October 1, 2013

Publisher: Little, Brown and Company

Seller: Hachette Digital, Inc.


Malcolm Gladwell, the #1 bestselling author of The Tipping Point, Blink, Outliers, and What the Dog Saw, offers his most provocative—and dazzling—book yet. Three thousand years ago on a battlefield in ancient , a shepherd boy felled a mighty warrior with nothing more than a stone and a sling, and ever since then the names of David and Goliath have stood for battles between underdogs and giants. David's victory was improbable and miraculous. He shouldn't have won. Or should he have? In David and Goliath , Malcolm Gladwell challenges how we think about obstacles and disadvantages, offering a new interpretation of what it means to be discriminated against, or cope with a disability, or lose a parent, or attend a mediocre school, or suffer from any number of other apparent setbacks. Gladwell begins with the real story of what happened between the giant and the shepherd boy those many years ago. From there, David and Goliath examines Northern Ireland's Troubles, the minds of cancer researchers and civil rights leaders, murder and the high costs of revenge, and the dynamics of successful and unsuccessful classrooms—all to demonstrate how much of what is beautiful and important in the world arises from what looks like suffering and adversity. In the tradition of Gladwell's previous bestsellers— The Tipping Point , Blink , Outliers and What the Dog Saw— David and Goliath draws upon history, psychology, and powerful storytelling to reshape the way we think of the world around us.

Originally from:  

David and Goliath – Malcolm Gladwell

Posted in alo, FF, GE, Little, Brown and Company, ONA, PUR, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on David and Goliath – Malcolm Gladwell

Take Back the Asphalt

Cities find that when space reserved for cars is given over to other uses, lots of great things happen. Continue reading: Take Back the Asphalt ; ;Related ArticlesDot Earth Blog: Take Back the AsphaltWhere Will They Go When There’s No More Room in Arlington?Surfrider college club joins the offshore campaign ;

Originally from: 

Take Back the Asphalt

Posted in alternative energy, eco-friendly, FF, G & F, GE, Monterey, ONA, solar, solar power, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Take Back the Asphalt

Controversial California oyster farm fights to stay

Controversial California oyster farm fights to stay

It’s a salty Christmas miracle for Drakes Bay Oyster Company — albeit a temporary one.

two_wrongs

The bivalve purveyor in Point Reyes, just north of San Francisco, was set to be dissolved at the end of the year: equipment dismantled, employees laid off, land vacated. This was the plan all along for the feds, who had issued a 40-year lease to the company with the intent of its expiration on Jan. 1, 2013, at which time the land would be returned to federal wilderness and cute scampering seals on the Point Reyes National Seashore.

After the Interior Department refused to extend the company’s lease for another 10 years, Drakes vowed to fight the decision and filed suit. Now it’s reached at least a temporary agreement with Interior. From the Marin Independent Journal:

Under the agreement, the oyster company which has long been a fixture in Point Reyes National Seashore may continue activities involving planting and growing new oysters in the water at Drakes Estero, avoiding layoffs of one-third of its 30 employees right before the holidays …

Under the agreement, the oyster company has withdrawn its request for a temporary restraining order and instead will file a motion for a preliminary injunction challenging [Interior Secretary Kenneth] Salazar’s decision.

A hearing is set for Jan. 25 on the injunction.

Everyone loves them some seals, even in molting season (this is saying a lot, seals), and many environmentalists — the Sierra Club, the Natural Resources Defense Council, other usual suspects — support closing the farm, citing the importance of pure wilderness. But many other environmentalists support letting it stay, and their voices have grown stronger over the past couple of weeks. Writes Earth Island Journal editor Jason Marks:

Wilderness is all too rare (and becoming rarer) and we need more places that aren’t stamped with humanity’s insignia.

But Drake’s Estero is not that place. Having followed this controversy for years — and having spent several spells living in Point Reyes Station, the hamlet at the edge of the park — I strongly believe the oyster farm should stay.

It seems to me the debate over the ecological impact of Drakes Bay Oyster Company is all backwards. The issue isn’t whether shellfish farming is compatible with the ideal of wilderness. Rather, it’s whether a wilderness is compatible with the pastoral landscape that surrounds Drake’s Estero …

A National Academies of Science report from 2009 said the data on oyster farm-related harbor seal disturbance was so thin that it “cannot be used to infer cause and effect,” and called for “a more detailed assessment.” A professor from UC-Davis who reviewed the Park Service’s draft environmental impact study on the oyster farm removal observed that “impacts of oyster aquaculture on birds are speculative and unsupported by peer-reviewed publications.”

Some locals say the feds even took their comments out of context, misrepresenting them as being against the farm when they support it. One kayak touring company said paddling in the estero has only gotten more pleasant in recent years, under Drakes’ new ownership. “Not only have they cleaned and improved the physical location but they offer an educational and historical component that enhances our client’s experience of the area.” The kayakers also said they rely on the farmers for potential emergency rescue.

In the meanwhile, Drakes is still farming and harvesting per usual, and open for business. And if you’re feeling crafty, you can hit up its massive piles of castoff oyster shells and DIY one of these very eco-friendly holiday trees.

Peach Tree

Susie Cagle writes and draws news for Grist. She also writes and draws tweets for

Twitter

.

Read more:

Business & Technology

,

Food

Also in Grist

Please enable JavaScript to see recommended stories

View post:  

Controversial California oyster farm fights to stay

Posted in eco-friendly, GE, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Controversial California oyster farm fights to stay

An Indiana utility would like some of your money for creating less pollution

An Indiana utility would like some of your money for creating less pollution

Coal’s value proposition these days is this: 1) It is cheap, and 2) it is getting cleaner so it’s OK to use. Point 1 is hard to argue with; it is artificially cheap though getting more expensive. Point 2 is easy to rebut — coal itself is no cleaner than it ever was. But people are slowly waking up to the dangers of coal and demanding that the burning of it actually get cleaner. (Those people include the EPA.) Turns out, though, that making it cleaner 1) isn’t 100 percent effective, and 2) raises the cost of coal. It’s a conundrum!

llnlphotos

The best part is that the mandated and socially desired push to get coal cleaner introduces new points of pressure for people who want to phase out the use of coal, something that must be deeply annoying to coal companies (and, therefore, amusing to everyone else).

Case in point: an action in Indianapolis last week. The public utility, Indianapolis Power and Light, needed to upgrade some coal-burning power plants to bring the promise of “clean coal” a microscopic bit closer to reality. But activists rightly note that it’s ridiculous for ratepayers to bear the cost.

From Midwest Energy News:

In September IPL filed with the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission [PDF] to recover $606 million in investments in pollution controls.

At [a Nov. 28] rally, about 30 demonstrators wore T-shirts with the Sierra Club’s “Beyond Coal” logo, and chanted slogans on the steps of the Soldiers and Sailors Monument in downtown Indianapolis. They demanded the utility shut down two aging coal plants, particularly the controversial Harding Street plant, which was opened in 1954 and sits seven miles southwest—and often upwind—from downtown Indianapolis.

Then the groups delivered a petition with more than 2,000 signatures opposing those planned rate increases and asking IPL to invest instead in energy efficiency and renewable energy.

The purpose was “to send the message to IPL that ratepayers are not satisfied with multimillion dollar upgrades to aging coal plants,” said Megan Anderson of the Sierra Club, who organized the event.

What’s amazing about this is how it makes clear the externalization of coal costs, both directly and indirectly. Residents are frustrated with the air pollution from the plants — a cost incurred not by coal companies or IPL but by Hoosiers in increased medical costs and, eventually, by everyone in the world due to carbon dioxide emissions. But it’s also an explicit passing of the buck. IPL is charging the community not to poison them. I had a restaurant that worked that way once; I did 20 years in Sing Sing for extortion.

This protest points the way for other activists. If coal plants have to upgrade to be allowed to operate, it suggests to ratepayers another opportunity to twist the electricity provider’s arm.

And it’s a wind gust for coal companies as they try and make their way across a very shaky tightrope.

Source

Critics: Don’t charge ratepayers for Indianapolis coal plant upgrades, Midwest Energy News

Philip Bump writes about the news for Gristmill. He also uses Twitter a whole lot.

Read more:

Business & Technology

,

Climate & Energy

,

Politics

Also in Grist

Please enable JavaScript to see recommended stories

Source article: 

An Indiana utility would like some of your money for creating less pollution

Posted in GE, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on An Indiana utility would like some of your money for creating less pollution

Controversial California oyster farm returned to wilderness

Controversial California oyster farm returned to wilderness

How sustainable are California oysters? Trick question: not sustainable enough, apparently.

OrinZebest

A years-long battle over an oyster farm at Point Reyes National Seashore north of San Francisco ended this week in the farm’s definite closure. The 70-plus-year-old Drakes Bay Oyster Company will be forced to vacate the area before year’s end, turning it over in full to a colony of seals, who are adorable but kind of indifferent to all the people losing their jobs before the holidays.

The seashore area was added to the national parks system in 1962. Ten years later, a 40-year lease was granted to the oyster farm, with the understanding that it would then be returned from “potential wilderness” to the actual kind. The farm had been seeking a 10-year extension of its lease, but the feds decided to stick to the original plan.

Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar announced the decision yesterday. The Marin Independent Journal reports on reactions:

“This is going to be devastating to our families, our community and our county,” [oyster farm owner Kevin] Lunny said. “This is wrong beyond words in our opinion.” …

The oyster farm has outspoken supporters, Sen. Dianne Feinstein among them.

“I am extremely disappointed that Secretary Salazar chose not to renew the operating permit for the Drakes Bay Oyster Co.,” Feinstein said. …

Sierra Club Executive Director Michael Brune lauded the decision.

“We’re thrilled that after three decades this amazing piece of Point Reyes National Seashore will finally receive the protections it deserves,” he said. “Once the oyster factory operations are removed, as originally promised … this estuary will quickly regain its wilderness characteristics and become a safe haven for marine mammals, birds and other sea life.”

But how bad are the oysters for the adorable, indifferent seals, anyway? The science is not clear, as The New York Times reported last year:

“I don’t think the mariculture operation is incompatible with an objective of having a healthy population of harbor seals in Drakes Estero,” wrote Peter Boveng of the National Marine Fisheries Service.

His colleague Sean Hayes suggested that removing the oysters, which filter the estero’s water, could lead to a harmful accumulation of seal feces. “Attention needs to be placed on whether current mariculture is providing an ecosystem service to the Drakes Estero ecosystem today,” he wrote.

And, citing examples of harbor seals’ living placidly alongside oyster and crab operations elsewhere, Steven Jeffries of the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife wrote, “There is really no reason why oyster farming and harbor seals cannot coexist in a healthy and productive Drakes Estero ecosystem.”

But the necessary collaborative work between the parks service and the farm would, a report concluded, “not be a simple trivial matter.” More than a dozen other farms still operate in the Point Reyes park area — as more leases expire, we may find out just how not simple and not trivial these matters truly are. At least we have these guys.

arbabi

Susie Cagle writes and draws news for Grist. She also writes and draws tweets for

Twitter

.

Read more:

Food

Also in Grist

Please enable JavaScript to see recommended stories

Continue reading: 

Controversial California oyster farm returned to wilderness

Posted in GE, oven, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Controversial California oyster farm returned to wilderness