Tag Archives: arizona

Obama Announces New Plan to Strengthen Gun Control Legislation Without Congress

Mother Jones

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC “-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN” “http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd”>

President Barack Obama formally unveiled new executive actions on Tuesday aimed at expanding background checks and strengthening existing federal gun control laws in America.

“I want to be absolutely clear at the start, I believe in the second amendment,” he said. “It’s there written on the paper—it guarantees the right to bear arms. No matter how many times people try to twist my words around—I taught constitutional law, I know a little about this. But I also believe we can find ways to reduce violence consistent with the second amendment.”

“I’m not on the ballot again,” Obama added. “I’m not looking to score some points.”

The president made the announcement flanked by Vice President Joe Biden as well as victims and family members affected by gun violence. Gabby Giffords, the former Arizona congresswoman who was shot during a political event outside a supermarket in 2011, was also in the room.

The press conference comes a day after the White House released a memo outlining the president’s proposal to reduce gun violence without Congress—a move that has prompted swift backlash from Republican presidential candidates:

“Let’s be specific: the president is not circumventing Congress,” White House senior adviser Valerie Jarrett said on Tuesday, ahead of Obama’s press conference. “They have made it very clear they are not going to act and the president is doing what is well within his executive authority to do so.”

The president also met with Attorney General Loretta Lynch on Monday to confirm his plan was constitutionally legal.

In the aftermath of the 2012 massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary, the president’s initiative to pass a gun reform package was ultimately blocked by a Democratic-controlled Senate. Obama has previously called Congress’ failure to act on the issue the “biggest frustration” of his presidency.

“Every time I think about those kids, it makes me mad,” Obama said on Tuesday, wiping away tears.

For a detailed look at the president’s plan, head to our explainer here.

View the original here: 

Obama Announces New Plan to Strengthen Gun Control Legislation Without Congress

Posted in Anchor, FF, GE, LAI, LG, ONA, Radius, Ultima, Uncategorized, Venta | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Obama Announces New Plan to Strengthen Gun Control Legislation Without Congress

Obamacare Is Facing Yet Another Legal Challenge

Mother Jones

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC “-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN” “http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd”>

Do you remember John Boehner’s House lawsuit against President Obama over some details of Obamacare? When it was finally unveiled, it turned out it had two parts. The first challenged a delay in implementing the employer mandate. That was a big meh. Even if the suit prevailed, it would be meaningless by the time it finished its trip through the court system.

But the second part was a surprise. It challenged the outlay of $175 billion as part of the Cost Sharing Reduction program, which pays out money to insurance companies and lowers premiums, primarily for the poor. Obama claims that CSR is like Medicare or Social Security: a mandatory payment that doesn’t require yearly authorizations. Congress claims it does, and went to court to fight its case. So how is that going? David Savage of the LA Times gives us an update:

In May, U.S. District Judge Rosemary Collyer voiced exasperation when a Justice Department lawyer tried to explain why the Obama administration was entitled to spend the money without the approval of Congress. Why is that “not an insult to the Constitution?” Collyer asked.

But the more formidable barrier now facing the lawsuit is a procedural rule. Judges have repeatedly said lawmakers do not have standing to re-fight political battles in court….But in late June, the high court gave the House lawsuit an apparent boost when it ruled the Arizona Legislature had standing to sue in federal court to defend its power to draw election districts….Ginsburg in a footnote said the court was not deciding “the question of whether Congress has standing to bring a suit against the president.” But administration supporters acknowledge the high court’s opinion in the Arizona case increases the odds the suit will survive.

….Washington attorney Walter Dellinger, a former Clinton administration lawyer, believes the courts will not finally rule on the House lawsuit. “There has never been a lawsuit by a president against Congress or by Congress against the president over how to interpret a statute,” he said.

If the courts open the door to such claims, lawmakers in the future will opt to sue whenever they lose a political battle, Dellinger said. “You’d see immediate litigation every time a law was passed,” he said.

In other words, this is starting to look an awful lot like King v. Burwell: a case that initially seemed like an absurd Hail Mary by conservatives, but that eventually started to look more formidable. In the end, King still lost, but not before plenty of liberals lost a lot of sleep over it.

I think that’s still the most likely outcome here. Allowing Congress to sue the president would be a huge reversal for the Supreme Court, and it’s not clear that even the conservatives on the court want to open up that can of worms.

But there’s more to this. If the Supreme Court rules that Congress has no standing to sue, but it looks like they might treat the case sympathetically on the merits, conservatives merely have to find someone who does have standing to sue. That probably won’t be too hard. It may take years, but one way or another, this might end up being yet another legal thorn in the side of Obamacare.

Excerpt from:  

Obamacare Is Facing Yet Another Legal Challenge

Posted in FF, GE, LAI, LG, ONA, Uncategorized, Venta | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Obamacare Is Facing Yet Another Legal Challenge

Stop Buying in Bulk

Mother Jones

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC “-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN” “http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd”>

This story was originally published by Slate and is reproduced here as part of the Climate Desk collaboration.

If you’re like me, you writhe in guilt-ridden anguish each time you forget to bring your canvas tote to the grocery store. But in the rare times we do remember our reusable bags, Americans tend not to think much about what we actually put inside them, according to a new survey. The takeaway: We waste a lot of extra food (and money) simply because we don’t shop often enough.

As big of a problem as it is, food waste rarely makes the news. There was some buzz a while back about France’s ban on grocery stores throwing out edible food, but the numbers show that this is only a small part of the problem. Americans vastly underestimate their own food waste, which turns out to be driven mostly by a desire to avoid getting sick—even though saving money is also a top priority. That means we end up stocking our shelves with more than we need to ensure we’ll always have something fresh when we want it.

That sort of behavior is encouraged at bulk stores like Costco and Walmart, which operate on the myth that buying in bulk helps you save money. But new evidence shows that the push for huge quantities of cheap, high-quality food has caused us to be more wasteful than ever. Simply put: We’re throwing away more in food waste than we are saving by buying in bulk.

“People almost entirely neglect the cost of the food they’re throwing away from their kitchen,” says Victoria Ligon of the University of Arizona, who led the new study. “If you throw away a meal because you’ve eaten out when you weren’t planning to, the cost of that restaurant meal is higher than you think. People don’t account for that at all.”

Ligon’s study examined shopping patterns of several households through in-depth interviews and food diaries. The results found that people are generally too ambitious in their grocery shopping—buying ingredients for meals days or weeks in advance—when our brains and appetites are hard-wired for little more than the next meal. Our lives get busy, we may schedule a few impromptu evenings out with friends, and suddenly we have a pile of furry cucumbers at the bottom of the fridge. As most people who have ever cooked a meal know, planning meals days in advance is almost impossible.

“Every single person I talked to in my study felt very uncomfortable at the idea of throwing away food,” says Ligon. “We have very strong norms in our culture around not wasting.” But Ligon says people shouldn’t feel guilty: “This is not a problem that stems from individual apathy. It’s a structural problem.”

The bulk stores know this—their whole business model is to trick us into buying more than we need, and all the better if the food seems healthy and good for the planet. During a green push several years ago, Walmart became the biggest grocery store chain in the country. In May, Costco—that wonderland of 9-pound cases of bison jerky and terrier-sized tubs of licoricebecame the leading purveyor of organic grocery items, dethroning Whole Foods. Walmart’s Sam’s Club stores, which operate on a similar membership-based, it-takes-two-people-to-push-a-cart style of warehouse retail, is reportedly moving in a similar direction and greatly expanding its organic offerings. Organic food is becoming big business, at least partly because stores are able to charge higher markups.

Which brings us back to food waste. As much as 40 percent of America’s food supply gets thrown away every day, with perishable items like dairy, breads, meats, fruits, and vegetables leading the way. The total annual bill of food waste for consumers is a whopping $162 billion, which works out to about $1,300 to $2,300 per family per year. Clearly, that much food could feed a lot of people who otherwise go hungry.

But even that huge sum doesn’t factor in knock-on effects: Wasting food means we’re throwing away money, but we’re also throwing away 35 percent of the nation’s fresh water supply and 300 million gallons of oil each year. That makes tackling food waste the low-hanging fruit amid growing concern over drought and climate change. Next to paper and yard trimmings, food takes up the biggest share of the nation’s landfills—and contributes about 20 percent of the country’s methane emissions.

Ligon thinks she’s found the start of a solution: Just shop more often.

“When you’re talking about food, feeling really plays a big role. Things like predicting how hungry you are, your appetite, and what you’re in the mood for—in the future—turn out to be very challenging,” Ligon says. “If you’re shopping more frequently, you can purchase food that is meant to be eaten in a shorter time frame.”

But there’s a catch. Ligon’s research also revealed that people regularly buy groceries from three to seven different stores. With so many choices, there’s an incentive to overbuy at each stop—especially if you don’t plan on being back for a few days. We’ve all done this: You go into Trader Joe’s planning to buy some nectarines, and you come out with an armful of specialty potato chips and four frozen pizzas.

Ligon says same-day food delivery services like AmazonFresh (which charges $299 per year for free deliveries over $50 and provides you with a magic wand by which you can place your orders) and soon-to-emerge smartfridges that suggest recipes for you based on your food that’s about to go bad (like this one Samsung showcased in 2013) might be among the most promising ways to cut down on waste, with big rewards in water, energy, and climate change—and money.

After all, you can’t waste what you don’t buy in the first place.

This article is from – 

Stop Buying in Bulk

Posted in alo, Anchor, FF, GE, LG, ONA, organic, PUR, Radius, Smith's, Uncategorized, Venta | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Stop Buying in Bulk

Can This Awesome Solar-Powered Plane Make It Across the Pacific?

Mother Jones

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC “-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN” “http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd”>

This story originally appeared on Wired and is republished here as part of the Climate Desk collaboration.

Later this week, a single-seat, solar-powered plane with a wingspan longer than that of a Boeing 747 will take off from Nanjing, China, headed for Honolulu. For a normal passenger jet, that’s about a 12-hour flight. Solar Impulse 2, the 5,000-pound plane powered by nothing but sunshine, will take five days.

This is by far the hardest part of the plane’s journey around the world, which started in Abu Dhabi last month, and should finish there in August. Swiss pilots Bertrand Piccard and André Borschberg have been working up to this for 12 years, and they’re fully aware of how trying it will be.

“If we are optimistic, we will say that we’ve done six legs out of 12,” Piccard says. “And if we are pessimistic, we will say have have traveled 8,000 kilometers out of 35,000.”

Which is to say, things are going according to plan, but there’s much left to do, including the flight to Honolulu, then a 3,000-mile leap over the rest of the Pacific to Phoenix, Arizona.

The trick to staying aloft for days at a time is straightforward. The solar panels that cover the wings and fuselage of Solar Impulse 2 charge four extra-efficient batteries, which power the 17.4-horsepower motors. You charge up when the sun’s out and cruise at up to 28,000 feet. At night, you drop to about 5,000 feet, converting altitude into distance.

There are two factors that make the Pacific crossing especially challenging: The ocean’s size and the pokey speed of the plane (try 20 to 90 mph) mean each pilot will need to spend four or five days and nights aloft to reach land, in a cockpit that resembles a tube hotel in miniature. The second problem is the weather: Solar Impulse 2 needs pretty specific conditions to takeoff, cruise, and land—and that all needs to be planned out five days in advance.

André Borschberg has spent 72 hours at a time in a simulator to prepare for this flight. Niels Ackermann/Rezo.ch/Solar Impulse

Borschberg is scheduled to take off from Nanjin on May 7, at the earliest. If the flight goes as expected, he will take five days to make the trip to Honolulu. Then Piccard will make the four-day trip to Phoenix.

Pilot Preparation

It doesn’t sound like much fun: There’s no walking around, or even standing up in, the 135-cubic foot cockpit. The cabin is neither heated nor pressurized, though it is insulated.

To get used to the cramped conditions, the pilots have spent long stretches in a simulator. They use meditation, breathing exercises, and whatever yoga they can manage to keep their bodies and minds feeling as fresh as possible.

Piccard and Borschberg will sleep in 20 minute stretches (the aircraft has autopilot functions and there’s not much to collide with over the Pacific), six to eight times a day. It’s hardly a good night’s rest, but it’s enough to get by, and the seat fully reclines. They have an alarm set to wake them up, but their bodies have gotten used to the routine, and don’t really need it, Piccard says. “It’s very interesting how the human mind can adapt to this type of new situation.”

The grub sounds pretty good, especially for air travel: Nestlé made special meals that can survive temperatures from -4 to 95 degrees Fahrenheit. There’s mushroom risotto, chicken with rice, and potatoes with cream and cheese. “It’s very nice,” Piccard says. The toilet, FYI, is built into the seat.

It may seem difficult to stay focused when you’ve seen nothing but ocean for days on end, but it’s not a major concern to the pilots. “There’s quite a lot of things to do,” Borschberg says. More importantly, they’ve been working up to this for more than a decade. They’re jazzed.

Of course, they’ve got to be ready for things to go wrong. In the event of a sudden catastrophe, like an engine or battery fire, they’ve trained for bailing. If cloudy weather stops the panels from charging the batteries adequately, Piccard and Borschberg will take their time putting on the dry suit, preparing the parachute, alerting mission control, and switching on an emergency beacon. “You get out very peacefully,” Piccard says.

The cockpit of Solar Impulse 2 resembles a tube hotel, in miniature. Solar Impulse/Pizzolante

They key in any situation is getting away from the plane—there’s a serious risk of electrocution when you fly a pile of electronics and batteries into the ocean. Then you settle into your life raft, because you’re thousands of miles from land, and major shipping lanes, it may take two or three days to be picked up.

The Weather Game

There’s a lot to take into account, says team meteorologist Luc Trullemans. Routes are decided using radar and satellite data, and flight simulations. Equipment from engineering consultancy Altran and a team mathematician lend a hand. Cloudy skies mean the solar panels can’t recharge the batteries. Wind conditions are crucial: Tailwinds are best, and the team will tolerate cross tailwinds up to 45 degrees (90 degrees would be blow fully sideways). Headwinds are a problem for a plane with limited power: Between Myanmar and Chongqing, China, Piccard found himself flying backwards at one point.

The six legs of the Solar Impulse 2 journey already completed have been relatively short affairs, between 15 and 20 hours. That’s not so tricky to plan, because at the time of takeoff, you have an excellent idea of what the weather will look like for the whole flight.

All that gets way more difficult now, because the team can’t predict the weather with the accuracy it wants more than three days in advance. “We must be 100 percent certain with our weather forecasts for the first three days of the flight and of course, the takeoff conditions,” says Trullemans. After that, the route can always be changed … on the fly … but major deviations are best avoided. The plan is to keep a sharp eye on coming conditions. The pilot can fly to the north or south to avoid a cold front, for example.

Beyond that, you hope for the best: Tailwinds, clear skies, and no need to inflate that life raft.

View original article – 

Can This Awesome Solar-Powered Plane Make It Across the Pacific?

Posted in alo, Anchor, FF, GE, LG, ONA, Prepara, PUR, Radius, solar, solar panels, solar power, Uncategorized, Venta | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Can This Awesome Solar-Powered Plane Make It Across the Pacific?

Put Yourself in the Jury Box: Did These 8 Men Deserve to Die?

Mother Jones

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC “-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN” “http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd”>

In the sentencing phase of a death penalty trial, a good defense lawyer presents mitigating evidence. That’s information that may show that the defendant lacks the “extreme culpability” the courts require for execution—in theory, at least. He may be intellectually disabled (a.k.a. mentally retarded), a circumstance for which the Supreme Court has issued a blanket exception (although it is not always heeded). He may be insane, a harder-to-prove designation that applies only to certain defendants with severe mental illness. He may (and many do) have a history of severe trauma. Or he may simply be young. The Supreme Court has banned the execution of anyone under 18 at the time of his crime, although that, of course, is arbitrary. Lawyers for Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, who was 19 when he helped his older brother carry out the Boston Marathon bombings, have spent the past couple of weeks arguing that he should be spared, essentially because he was a kid in the thrall of his brother, the alleged ringleader.

After scrutinizing all of the mitigating factors in 100 recent execution cases, legal researchers Robert Smith, Sophie Cull, and Zoë Robinson published their results in Hastings Law Journal last year. They concluded that only 13 of the 100 prisoners executed had actually met the legal criteria for extreme culpability. (To see why that didn’t save them, read my accompanying story: “87 Reasons to Rethink the Death Penalty.“) Below you’ll find brief summaries from eight of the cases they examined. Let’s assume that you believe the death penalty is warranted in some circumstances. Put yourself in the jury box, read these case details and ask: How would I have voted?

Name: Roy Willard Blankenship
Executed: Georgia, 2011
Mitigating factors: Trauma

Blankenship’s family had a history of mental illness. His uncle spent most of his life in an institution and his twin sisters had paranoid schizophrenia. Blankenship was raised by an abusive alcoholic father who regularly beat his mother, including when she was pregnant. The family was so poor they couldn’t afford a crib, so he slept in a dresser drawer. Days after his birth, Blankenship’s father came home drunk and slammed the drawer closed; the dresser fell over, nearly killing the infant.

In the years after his father and aunt died of carbon monoxide poisoning in a hotel room, Blankenship’s mother remarried three times. One of the stepfathers beat Blankenship frequently and tortured and killed his pets in front of him. A neighbor sodomized Blankenship when he was eight or nine, and when a witness reported these assaults to his mother, she beat her son. She later abandoned her children entirely. Blankenship was convicted and sentenced to death in 1978 for the murder of an elderly woman, whom he also raped.

Name: Elmer Carroll
Executed: Florida, 2013
Mitigating factors: Intellectual disability, trauma

Carroll started out at a disadvantage thanks to fetal alcohol syndrome. His parents were abusive alcoholics who found it amusing to feed their toddler booze until he got sick or fell down. His father once chopped up a live puppy in front of his kids. His mother was mentally ill and would beat her head against walls. According to court documents, she at one point threw Carroll’s brother, six at the time, “into” a woodstove, leaving him permanently scarred. She also would beat Carroll with a hickory stick until she passed out or grew too exhausted. She would also claim he was possessed by demons, and perform exorcisms on him.

By age six, Carroll himself was an alcoholic. When he was 12, a neighbor began forcing him to perform oral sex, and occasionally urinated on the boy’s face—the abuse lasted a year before the man was arrested. Carroll dropped out of middle school. As a teen, he was a serious drunk who experienced blackouts and hallucinations from binge drinking. He was later tested and determined to have brain damage as the result of the fetal alcohol syndrome, the beatings, and trauma from barroom fights—one of which caused a “significant head injury.” He also was diagnosed with borderline mental retardation that left him the intellectual equivalent of an 11-year-old.

Name: Elroy Chester
Execution place and year: Texas, 2013
Mitigating factors: Intellectual disability

From the age of seven up through his stint on death row for rape and murder, Chester was given five IQ tests. On four of them, he tested below 70, a score the Supreme Court has identified as strong evidence of intellectual disability. Chester spent most of his school years in special education, and never advanced beyond a third-grade level. When he was in prison, Texas enrolled him in its Mentally Retarded Offenders Program. Far from disputing his intellectual disability, the state argued that it was a compelling reason the jury should vote for death.

Name: Richard Cobb
Executed: Texas, 2013
Mitigating factors: Youth, trauma

Had Richard Cobb been born five months earlier, it would have been illegal to execute him. As is, he was born with brain damage due to alcohol exposure in the womb, which his lawyers argued made him effectively intellectually disabled. His mother would pick him up from daycare drunk—when she bothered to pick him up at all. It was mandatory daycare, ordered by child welfare authorities, and Richard and his brothers arrived there bruised, hungry, and underweight, according to the staff. One day after his mother left him there, a worker took Cobb home to find his baby brother home alone in a crib, covered in roaches.

Mental illness ran in the family; one brother was diagnosed with bipolar disorder, another with paranoid schizophrenia. Richard and his younger brother were taken from their mother when he was three and adopted to another family. When he was 16, his mother informed him that the man he knew as his father was not. Five months past his 18th birthday, Cobb was arrested with an accomplice for killing a man and shooting two others they’d taken as hostages in a convenience store robbery. He was executed at 29. After the drugs were administered, his final words were: “Wow! That is great. That is awesome! Thank you, warden! Thank you fucking warden!”

Name: Daniel Cook
Executed: Arizona, 2012
Mitigating factors: Trauma

The abuse Daniel Cook experienced was almost beyond comprehension. He started out with brain damage thanks in part to his manic-depressive mother’s substance abuse during pregnancy. He was sexually abused by his mother, father, and grandparents. His grandmother’s husband forced him to have sex with his sister, according to court documents, and his biological father burned his son’s penis with a lit cigarette—a crime Cook would eventually replicate in the rape and murder of a roommate that led to his death sentence.

Placed in foster care and group homes, he continued to endure horrific abuse: In one home, the adults would handcuff him to a bed in a “peek-a-boo room” with a one-way mirror, allowing others to watch while a foster parent raped him. The same foster parent forcibly circumcised him at age 15 and coerced other boys in the home to gang-rape him. Cook, not surprisingly, developed drug and alcohol problems and was hospitalized several times for trying to kill himself. His case was so extreme that the prosecutor who’d put him on death row tried to save him once his past came to light—which it never did at trial, since Cook had initially represented himself and asked for the death penalty. Arizona obliged.

Name: Cleve Foster
Executed: Texas, 2012
Mitigating factors: Trauma

Foster, who said he was routinely beaten with belts and tree branches as a child, saw his alcoholic father sexually abuse his brother repeatedly and later learned that his father had molested his sisters as well. He joined the Army and served in Operation Desert Storm. He was later diagnosed with PTSD and became a meth addict. When Foster was around 30, his brother was murdered. When he visited the crime scene with his mother after the burial, he discovered decomposing body parts missed by the people who had removed the rest of his brother’s corpse. He and another man were tried and convicted for the 2002 rape and murder of a woman they’d met in a Fort Worth bar.

Name: George Ochoa
Executed: Oklahoma, 2012
Mitigating factors: Mental illness, mental disability, youth

Ochoa was 18 when he was accused of murdering two people during a home invasion. After his arrest, he was sent to a mental hospital for evaluation for psychosis, and his competency for trial was questioned. His lawyers argued that he was borderline mentally retarded. He also suffered from a neurological disorder, had abused inhalants and booze from an early age—which interfered with his mental development, his lawyers argued—and had brain trauma from a fall.

Before he was executed, his lawyers appealed to the federal courts for a stay because his mental state had deteriorated further in prison. They reported being unable to communicate with Ochoa because he’d become delusional and fixated on the voices he was hearing and his belief that he was being shocked all over his body all day long. Death row staff reported that Ochoa repeatedly kicked the toilet in his cell because he thought it was electrocuting him and that voices were coming out of it. He was so delusional that a defense psychiatrist couldn’t even evaluate him. The courts still deemed him sane enough to execute.

Name: Edwin Hart Turner
Executed: Mississippi, 2012
Mitigating factors: Mental illness, trauma, youth

Turner spent most of his life wearing a towel around his face to hide his disfigurement after he tried to kill himself with a rifle at age 18. His parents were abusive drunks, and his mother twice attempted suicide. His father died when Turner was 12 after shooting at a shed full of dynamite in what family members assumed was a suicide. (A friend from school called to say he’d seen police on TV putting pieces of Turner’s dad into garbage bags.) His mother hit the skids after that, drinking even more heavily. She married another abusive drunk, who beat her kids black and blue.

Turner’s grandmother and great-grandmother were both committed to mental institutions due to schizophrenia. By 15, Turner was showing symptoms of mental illness, too, and his mother twice took him to mental hospital for treatment. Two weeks after the second hospital visit he shot himself in the face. His parents eventually threw him out of the house, so he began living in a tent in the woods. He was repeatedly hospitalized for his mental illness in the four years after the first suicide attempt. Then, in 1995, he slit his wrists and was hospitalized for several weeks. He was released and then promptly sent back to the hospital for an involuntary commitment. After his subsequent release, with a prescription for Prozac, his behavior grew even more manic and bizarre. Doctors later confirmed he had bipolar disorder, a disease whose manic symptoms are exacerbated by Prozac. Six weeks later, at the age of 22, he murdered two people in a string of random convenience store robberies.

See more here: 

Put Yourself in the Jury Box: Did These 8 Men Deserve to Die?

Posted in alo, Anchor, Casio, FF, GE, LAI, LG, ONA, Oster, PUR, Radius, Uncategorized, Venta | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Put Yourself in the Jury Box: Did These 8 Men Deserve to Die?

There’s a Fight Brewing Over Who Profits From Solar Power

Mother Jones

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC “-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN” “http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd”>

In the ongoing wars over solar energy, one power company is consistently painted as the archetypal, mustache-twirling nemesis of clean electricity: Arizona Public Service. So you might be surprised to learn that this same company is about to become a big new producer of rooftop solar power.

APS is an unlikely solar patron: In the summer of 2013, the Phoenix-area utility launched a campaign to weaken Arizona’s net metering rule, which requires utilities to buy the extra solar power their customers generate and provides a major incentive for homeowners to install rooftop panels. A few months later, APS admitted giving cash to two nonprofits that ran an anti-solar ad blitz in the state. Early this year, the Arizona Center for Investigative Reporting revealed that a letter criticizing the solar industry’s business practices, sent by members of Congress to federal regulators, was originally authored by an employee of APS. And a couple weeks ago, APS asked state regulators to let the company quadruple the fees it tacks on to the monthly bills of solar-equipped homeowners.

It makes sense that the company would be worried about solar’s epic takeoff. In many ways, the solar boom poses an unprecedented threat to big electric utilities, which have done business for a century with essentially zero competition. In the first quarter of this year, applications for solar permits in APS’s service area were 112 percent higher than the same period last year, and every one of those is one less customer for APS’s regular power supply, 40 percent of which comes from coal. Now the company thinks it has found a solution to the problem: It wants to start owning its own rooftop solar.

In December, the Arizona Corporation Commission gave a green light to APS to plunk down $28.5 million on 10 megawatts of solar panels, enough to cover about 2,000 of its customers’ roofs. (Tucson Electric Power, another utility in the state, was also approved for a smaller but similar plan.) The idea is that APS will target specific rooftops it wants to make use of—in areas where the grid needs more support, for example, or west-facing roofs, which produce the most power in the late afternoon, when demand is the highest. APS would offer homeowners a $30 credit on their monthly bill, according to Jeff Guldner, an APS vice president for public policy.

The credit essentially serves as rent for the roof, where an APS-contracted local installer will set up a solar array. APS owns the panels, can use the power however it wants, and gets to improve its clean energy portfolio without losing customers to third-party solar companies. Meanwhile, the homeowner gets a lower bill.

Continue Reading »

Original source – 

There’s a Fight Brewing Over Who Profits From Solar Power

Posted in alo, Anchor, ATTRA, Everyone, FF, GE, Green Light, LG, ONA, Radius, solar, solar panels, solar power, Ultima, Uncategorized, Venta | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on There’s a Fight Brewing Over Who Profits From Solar Power

This Lawmaker Publicly Discussed Her Rape and Abortion. And Some Dude Laughed.

Mother Jones

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC “-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN” “http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd”>

While speaking out against a proposed bill in Ohio that aims to ban abortions once a fetal heartbeat is detected, Rep. Teresa Fedor (D-Toledo) revealed on Wednesday she had been raped during her time in the military and chose to have an abortion.

“You don’t respect my reason, my rape, my abortion, and I guarantee you there are other women who should stand up with me and be courageous enough to speak that voice,” Fedor said before the state senate. “What you’re doing is so fundamentally inhuman, unconstitutional, and I’ve sat here too long.”

Her testimony comes just weeks after an Arizona lawmaker shared details about her own abortion, which she had after being sexually assaulted by a male relative when she was a young girl. In a later editorial for Cosmopolitan, Rep. Victoria Steele said that while she was glad to have spoken out and share her story during the legislative debate, she resented the fact that “women have to tell their deepest, darkest traumas in public” in order for lawmakers to grasp how dangerous such anti-abortion bills were to women and their health.

In Fedor’s case, not only did she feel she had to share her trauma with her colleagues, at one point she was forced to pause and address the fact a man appeared to be laughing at her while she spoke.

“I see people laughing and I don’t appreciate that,” she said. “And it happens to be a man who is laughing. But this is serious business right now and I’m speaking for all the women in the state of Ohio who didn’t get the opportunity to be in front of that committee and make this statement.”

Ohio’s House Bill 69 eventually passed with a 55-40 vote. The legislation now goes to the senate, and if passed, will make it a fifth-degree felony and result in up to $2,500 and possible jail time for doctors who perform the abortions.

Original source:

This Lawmaker Publicly Discussed Her Rape and Abortion. And Some Dude Laughed.

Posted in Anchor, FF, G & F, GE, LG, Mop, ONA, organic, Radius, Uncategorized, Venta | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on This Lawmaker Publicly Discussed Her Rape and Abortion. And Some Dude Laughed.

Vaccines Are One of Our Best Weapons Against Global Warming

Climate change could make deadly diseases like rotavirus even worse. A doctor administers measles vaccinations to children displaced by flooding in northern India in 2008. Manish Swarup/AP Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) has suggested that vaccines cause ”profound mental disorders.” Paul has also said he’s “not sure anybody exactly knows why” the climate changes. So the likely presidential contender would probably find this fact pretty confusing: According to leading scientists, vaccines are among the “most effective” weapons in our arsenal for combating the threats that global warming poses to human health. In its landmark report (PDF) last year, the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change warned that global warming poses a range of health threats—especially in the developing world. Warmer temperatures and changes in rainfall will reduce crop production, leading to malnutrition. Foodborne and waterborne illnesses will become a bigger problem. And, some scientists argue, diseases like malaria will spread as the insects that carry them migrate to new areas. So how should humanity adapt to these dangers? The IPCC report lays out a slew of public health interventions, including widespread vaccination: The most effective measures to reduce vulnerability in the near term are programs that implement and improve basic public health measures such as provision of clean water and sanitation, secure essential health care including vaccination and child health services, increase capacity for disaster preparedness and response, and alleviate poverty. There are a number of reasons that vaccines will play an important role in our efforts to adapt to a warming world. The most obvious is their ability to protect vulnerable populations from diseases that will be made worse by climate change. A prime example is rotavirus, a vaccine-preventable disease that can cause severe diarrhea. It killed roughly 450,000 children in 2008—mostly in South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, according to the World Health Organization. “There is evidence that case rates of rotavirus are correlated with warming temperatures and high rainfall,” according to Erin Lipp, an environmental health professor at the University of Georgia and a contributor to the IPCC report. This is particularly true in developing countries with poor sanitation and drinking water sources, Lipp explained in an email. There are other, less direct, ways in which climate change can exacerbate a wide range of existing public health problems. Take measles, which is currently making a comeback in the United States—thanks in large part to the unscientific claims of the anti-vaccination movement. Measles killed nearly 150,000 people worldwide in 2013; it’s particularly common in parts of sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia that have extremely low vaccination rates—areas that will be hit especially hard by the impacts of climate change. Unlike with rotavirus, there’s no direct relationship between measles and global warming. But Kirk Smith—an environmental health expert at UC, Berkeley, and a lead author of the IPCC chapter on health impacts—points out that “a child weakened by measles is more likely to die from the malnutrition caused by climate change.” In other words, anything we can do to reduce the impact of existing health problems will be even more important in a warming world. And vaccinating children, he says, is one of the most cost-effective public health tools we have. Diseases like measles pose another threat, as well, says Alistair Woodward, who is also a lead author of the IPCC chapter. Woodward, an epidemiologist at the University of Auckland, points out that extreme climate events—crop failures in Africa, flooding in Bangladesh, and even storms like Hurricane Katrina—can displace large numbers of people. “In these circumstances, with crowding and poor living conditions, all the basic public health services are put under great strain,” said Woodward in an email. “The risks of infection go through the roof, for all communicable diseases…So ensuring that people are vaccinated is a logical thing to do as part of managing the risks of a rapidly changing climate.” Of course, making sure people are inoculated against deadly diseases isn’t easy. In the developing world, vaccination campaigns have to overcome transportation and security issues, as well as poor local health care systems. And these challenges, says Woodward, can dwarf the problems caused by the anti-vaxxer movement. Taken from: Vaccines Are One of Our Best Weapons Against Global Warming

Original source:

Vaccines Are One of Our Best Weapons Against Global Warming

Posted in eco-friendly, FF, G & F, GE, growing marijuana, horticulture, LAI, Landmark, Monterey, ONA, OXO, solar, solar power, Uncategorized, Venta | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Vaccines Are One of Our Best Weapons Against Global Warming

Here’s Some of the Dumb Stuff People Did With Drones Last Year

Mother Jones

Thanks to the federal intelligence employee who got buzzed and crashed a remote-controlled quadcopter on the White House grounds earlier this week, there’s a renewed interest on drones’ potential to cause mayhem.

Last November, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) released a list of 193 incidents of “drone misbehavior” (as the New York Times put it) reported to air traffic control officials in 2014. The list didn’t include incidents reported to law enforcement, so it’s not necessarily comprehensive. But it does offer a glimpse of the challenges of incorporating flying robot vehicles into everyday life.

Some highlights from the report (see the full list at the end of this post):

Drones and sports: There were more than a half-dozen incidents of people flying drones near crowded sporting events. Drones were spotted near games at the University of Arizona in Tucson; Neyland Stadium in Knoxville, Tennessee (twice); Camp Randall Stadium in Madison, Wisconsin; the Big House in Ann Arbor during a University of Michigan game; FedEx Field during a Washington REDACTED game; and Citi Field during a Mets game.

Drone strike: Of all the incidents listed in the FAA report, just one involved a drone striking a person. In October, a small drone flying low over the Daytona Beach Municipal Stadium struck “a citizen causing (a) minor abrasion.”

Close calls: One of the obvious concerns is that some yahoo (or even a skilled pilot) will fly drone into a aircraft with actual people on board. The FAA report lists several close calls and near misses in 2014. On September 30, the pilot of an inbound regional jet reported a flying device that almost hit the plane at 4,000 feet, just north of the Verrazano-Narrows Bridge. In August, a medevac helicopter in Las Vegas reported almost getting hit by a drone at 200 feet as it was trying to leave a hospital. In June, a helicopter pilot in Stockton, California, reported almost hitting two remote controlled gliders at about 750 feet. And in March, a pilot in Tallahassee, Florida, said he almost struck a “remote controlled aircraft” while flying at 2,300 feet. One pilot had to take evasive action in the skies above Oklahoma City in October when a two-foot wide drone came within 10 to 20 feet of his plane at roughly 4,800 feet.

High altitude: There are at least 18 incidents involving drones flying above 4,000 feet, with some as high as 15,000 feet. (Most of the drones available to the general public fall into the FAA’s Model Aircraft category, which means they’re supposed to stay under 400 feet.) In a report from last May, a pilot approaching LaGuardia Airport reported seeing a 10- to 15-foot-wide drone at 5,500 feet above the southern tip of Manhattan.

Grounded: In August, a pilot was arrested after getting stuck in a tree at Freedom Plaza in Washington, DC after climbing up to retrieve a crashed drone.

From – 

Here’s Some of the Dumb Stuff People Did With Drones Last Year

Posted in alo, Anchor, Citizen, FF, GE, LG, ONA, Radius, Uncategorized, Venta | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Here’s Some of the Dumb Stuff People Did With Drones Last Year

FAA to Football Fans: Super Bowl Is a No-Drone Zone

Mother Jones

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC “-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN” “http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd”>

On Wednesday, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) released a 15-second warning to football fans eager to sneak a bird’s-eye look at this Sunday’s Super Bowl: Leave your drones at home.

The No Drone Zone campaign is part of the FAA’s ongoing efforts to regulate small drones flying over crowded stadiums. The Washington Post reported last November that the aviation agency was investigating a rash of incidents involving drones hovering over major sporting events. A month earlier, the agency extended its ban on airplane flights over large open-air stadiums to include unmanned and remote controlled aircraft.

Drones over sporting events have occasionally raised alarms. In August, a man was detained after he flew a drone that flew over a preseason NFL game between the Carolina Panthers and Kansas City Chiefs. A month later, police questioned a University of Texas student who was flying a drone around Royal-Texas Memorial Stadium. Last October, a drone carrying an Albanian flag during a soccer match between Serbia and Albania sparked a riot in Belgrade.

Earlier this month, the FAA issued an advisory reiterating the civil and criminal penalties for pilots who drone the Super Bowl. (Also banned in the airspace above the University of Phoenix Stadium in Glendale, Arizona: gliders, parachutes, hang gliders, balloons, crop dusters, model aircraft, and model rockets.) The Goodyear blimp will be allowed.

Excerpt from – 

FAA to Football Fans: Super Bowl Is a No-Drone Zone

Posted in alo, Anchor, Casio, FF, G & F, GE, LG, ONA, Radius, Uncategorized, Venta | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on FAA to Football Fans: Super Bowl Is a No-Drone Zone