Tag Archives: china

Olympics to Crack Down on Human Rights Abuses…After 2022

Mother Jones

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC “-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN” “http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd”>

Following widespread allegations of wrongdoing in both the Beijing and Sochi Olympics, human rights protections will be added to the contracts signed by future Olympic host cities. The International Olympic Committee’s president presented this change to Human Rights Watch at an October 21 meeting.

The new language will contractually require host countries to “take all necessary measures to ensure that development projects necessary for the organization of the Games comply with local, regional, and national legislation, and international agreements and protocols, applicable in the host country with regard to planning, construction, protection of the environment, health, safety, and labour laws.”

These changes make the human rights requirements for Olympic host cities more explicit than ever before, particularly with the mentions of health, environmental, and labor concerns. The new “international agreements and protocols” rule makes it clear that hosts will be required to abide by laws like the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which prohibits forced labor, arbitrary arrest or detention, sentence without trial, and protects freedoms of assembly, religion, and opinion.

Beijing, China and Sochi, Russia floundered on some of these protections during the 2012 and 2014 Olympic Games. The international community criticized both host countries for corruption and exploitation of migrant construction workers: Sochi contractors cheated workers out of wages, required 12-hour shifts, and confiscated passports to keep laborers from leaving. In both countries, authorities regularly forced evictions and silenced media and activists. A Russian law passed in the months leading up to the Games that criminalized gay expression garnered global outrage.

Minky Worden, director of global initiatives at Human Rights Watch, says the planned wording will make it easier for the IOC to take official action if a host country breaks contract—through litigation or “the thermonuclear option,” termination. Even before such extreme consequences, she is optimistic the explicit wording will give the IOC more power to “put the scare in any host country that is not playing by the human rights rules.”

“This is a real rebuke to Russia,” she says. “The IOC wants to avoid a repeat.”

Since host cities for the next three Olympic Games have already been selected and signed contracts, host countries will be held to the new clause beginning with the 2022 Winter Olympics. Worden says this is particularly timely, as two of the finalists—Almaty, Kazakhstan and Beijing, China—have repressive governments. (The third finalist is Oslo, Norway.)

The human rights clause expands on another impending addition, previewed in a September letter from the IOC to the 2022 candidate cities. That statement promised that future host city contracts will have “an express reference…to the prohibition of any form of discrimination.”

Technically, host cities like Sochi and Beijing were already broadly obligated to steer clear of human rights violations and discrimination: The Olympic Charter calls for a respect for “human dignity” and bans discrimination “with regard to a country or a person on grounds of race, religion, politics, gender or otherwise.” But, “we’ve clearly reached a moment when the words of the Olympic Charter are not enough,” says Worden. “You have to put these guarantees in a contract and force the host country to sign it.”

Worden hopes the IOC’s action will be adopted by organizers of other mega-sporting events at risk of mishandling human rights, such as FIFA. Sharan Burrow, the general secretary of the International Trade Union Confederation, estimates in an ESPN documentary that, at current rates, 4,000 people will die in preparation of the 2022 World Cup in Qatar.

Jump to original – 

Olympics to Crack Down on Human Rights Abuses…After 2022

Posted in Anchor, FF, GE, LAI, LG, Mop, ONA, oven, Prepara, Radius, Uncategorized, Venta | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Olympics to Crack Down on Human Rights Abuses…After 2022

Dragons, Legos, and Solitary: Ai Weiwei’s Transformative Alcatraz Exhibition

Mother Jones

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC “-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN” “http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd”>

There is a question that every prisoner ponders once the realization sets in that his freedom is gone: Can the mind be liberated when the body is not? It’s been a while since I’ve asked myself such a thing—I was released from an Iranian prison three years ago—but a Chinese dragon in a former prison factory at Alcatraz makes me think about it again. Its multicolored face is baring its teeth at me when I enter the cavernous room. In this space, prisoners washed military uniforms during World War II.

The dragon is the first of many installations in the art exhibition by Chinese artist Ai Weiwei, called @Large. The beast is a startling greeter—its whiskers are paper flames—but the impression softens as I look closer. The long body, shaped like a traditional Chinese dragon kite and suspended by strings from the ceiling, snakes gracefully throughout the open factory floor, illuminated by the soft afternoon light spilling in through a multitude of little windows. Bird-shaped kites are suspended throughout the room. It is quiet. This prison room feels like freedom.

There is more to it. Every segment of the dragon’s long body is painted with flowers from countries that seriously restrict the civil liberties of their citizens, such as Saudi Arabia and Ethiopia. Other parts of the dragon are adorned with quotes by prominent dissidents. One is from Ai Weiwei himself: “Every one of us is a potential convict.”

A man listens to Ai Weiwei’s sound installation “Stay Tuned.” Shane Bauer

That’s something this man surely never forgets. The themes of Ai Weiwei’s art have not been popular with the Chinese authorities. In 2011, he was arrested for alleged tax crimes and held for 81 days without charge. He hasn’t been allowed to leave China since. There are cameras mounted outside his studio in Beijing, to monitor him.

Ai directed the layout of the exhibition through video conferences with Cheryl Haines, director of the San Francisco based For-Site foundation, who initially came up with the idea of an exhibition designed specifically for Alcatraz. After she got Ai to agree, the National Park Service, which manages the island, decided to consult with the State Department. “Having a prominent Chinese dissident set up such a large exhibition was politically sensitive,” Marnie Berk de Guzman, For-Site’s Special Projects Director, told me—though State officials readily approved the project. They knew the exhibition would deal with themes of freedom, captivity, and human rights. What they did not know is that the United States would be among the many countries Ai would call out for cracking down on dissidents.

In @Large, Ai gives us the opportunity to reflect on the psychological differences between the watcher and the watched. From the dragon room, a side door leads up a set of clanky metal stairs that open onto the “gun gallery,” a long narrow hallway that guards once walked to monitor the inmates on the shop floor below. From the guards’ vantage point, the dragon that was so graceful and beautiful up close looks like a caged, threatening beast. The flowers and quotes on his body appear muted through the cracked, foggy windows. My attention is constantly drawn back to the most dangerous aspect—his wild, burning head.

“Refraction” Shane Bauer

Walking down the gallery, I catch glimpses of “Refraction,” a gloomy, five-ton structure that gives the impression of a giant bird wing. I cannot get up close: The only way to view the piece is through the cracked windows of the gun gallery. The installation obliquely references Tibet: Its “feathers” are made of reflective panels originally used in Tibetan solar cookers. Whomever we are to imagine confining it did not find it necessary to imprison the giant bird itself, only the appendage that gives the animal its freedom.

One installation, “Trace,” has 175 portraits laid out in a field of Lego bricks. Each image is the colorful, pixelated likeness of someone who has been imprisoned or exiled because of their beliefs, political actions, or affiliations. There are more faces from China than any other country. Among them is Gedhun Choekyi Nyima, named the 11th Panchen Lama by the Dalai Lama. After his selection at age six in 1995, he was detained by Chinese authorities and hasn’t been seen since. Scattered among the Iranian, Bahraini, and Vietnamese faces are a few American ones: Martin Luther King Jr., Edward Snowden, Chelsea Manning. There is John Kiriakou, currently in prison for disclosing the name of a covert CIA officer who engaged in brutal Bush-era interrogation programs.

There is also Shakir Hamoodi, an Iraqi American imprisoned for violating sanctions by sending money to family and friends in Iraq during the Saddam Hussein era. He was convicted in 2012, nine years after Saddam’s fall. One of the largest faces is that of Shaker Aamer, a detainee who has been cleared for release by both the Bush and Obama administrations, but remains at Guantanamo 12 years after his arrest, still without charge or trial.

“Trace” features the faces of 175 political prisoners.

The large number of faces and names in “Trace” make it difficult to connect to each person, but in Alcatraz’s mess hall, there are people sitting at tables and writing messages to political prisoners. This installation, “Yours Truly,” offers free postcards decorated with national birds and flowers, each addressed to a specific prisoner. Ai understands that a prisoner’s greatest fear is being forgotten, and given that many of these postcards will certainly be intercepted before they arrive, the project may be intended to remind prison authorities that people are watching.

Alcatraz is an appropriate place for an exhibition about political imprisonment. While the island’s tourism literature focuses on hard-core criminals like Al Capone and the Birdman, it has also held hundreds of nonviolent political prisoners. Hutterite pacifists were put in solitary confinement here for refusing to serve in the military in 1918. World War I conscientious objector and anarchist Philip Grosser spent part of his year and a half on the island in “The Dungeon” where he subsisted on bread and water in complete darkness. Jackson Leonard was sent to Alcatraz in 1919 after distributing Industrial Workers of the World literature on an Army base. World War II veteran Robert George Thompson did time there in the early 1950s after joining the Communist Party USA.

This part of the island’s history is indirectly referenced in @Large. In the prison psych ward, opened exclusively for the exhibition, visitors can enter two “psychiatric observation cells,” small rooms lined with clinical looking green tiles where the mentally ill were kept in total isolation. There is nothing to see; the only thing to do is stand and listen to the traditional chants playing through hidden speakers. One is a Hopi song, a reminder of the 19 Hopis imprisoned here in 1895 for opposing the forced education of their children in government boarding schools.

The cells feel like an artifact of a bygone era, but prisons and jails around the country still routinely place the severely mentally ill in solitary cells, where they can languish for months or years. “It’s hard to imagine not going crazy in a room like that,” one of the @Large guides comments to me.

“Blossom” Shane Bauer

Down the hall is the “Blossom” installation. Thousands of tiny ceramic flowers, drained of color, evoke China’s Hundred Flowers campaign. In 1956, dissidents were crushed after a brief period of tolerance, banished to oblivion like these white heaps of flowers filling the sinks, bathtubs, and toilets of the psych ward.

There is one section of the prison the National Park Service did not initially offer Ai for his exhibition—the cell block. But he insisted on access, and NPS agreed.

Visitors enter the tiny cells—I can’t even fully extend my arms between the walls—and sit on a single metal stool at the center. In each one, I hear the music or poetry of dissident artists past or present. There is the screaming punk rock of Pussy Riot—”Virgin Mary, Mother of God, become a feminist, become a feminist, become a feminist!” There is the voice of Martin Luther King Jr. giving his “Beyond Vietnam” speech. There is Fela Kuti and Czech poets and singers from Tibet and Robben Island.

I sit in one of the cells and listen to the words of Ahmad Shamlu, an Iranian poet imprisoned by the Shah.

They sniff at your heart—
These are strange times, my dear
—and they flog love
By the side of the road by the barrier
Love must be hidden at home in the closet

In the background I can hear a guard shouting, clanging the cell doors shut repeatedly to show the tourists what it might sound like, had they been imprisoned here. Sitting in the tiny cell, facing the wall, it is not hard to imagine that the clamor is real. Looking at the vent, where the mournful poet’s voice comes in, it is not hard to imagine he is a neighbor, whispering to me secretly.

View the original here: 

Dragons, Legos, and Solitary: Ai Weiwei’s Transformative Alcatraz Exhibition

Posted in alo, Anchor, Citizen, FF, GE, LAI, LG, ONA, Radius, solar, Uncategorized, Venta | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Dragons, Legos, and Solitary: Ai Weiwei’s Transformative Alcatraz Exhibition

Here’s How President Obama Is Using the ‘Oil Weapon’—Against Iran, Russia, and ISIS

Mother Jones

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC “-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN” “http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd”>

This story first appeared on the TomDispatch website.

It was heinous. It was underhanded. It was beyond the bounds of international morality. It was an attack on the American way of life. It was what you might expect from unscrupulous Arabs. It was “the oil weapon”—and back in 1973, it was directed at the United States. Skip ahead four decades and it’s smart, it’s effective, and it’s the American way. The Obama administration has appropriated it as a major tool of foreign policy, a new way to go to war with nations it considers hostile without relying on planes, missiles, and troops. It is, of course, that very same oil weapon.

Until recently, the use of the term “the oil weapon” has largely been identified with the efforts of Arab producers to dissuade the United States from supporting Israel by cutting off the flow of petroleum. The most memorable example of its use was the embargo imposed by Arab members of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) on oil exports to the United States during the Arab-Israeli war of 1973, causing scarcity in the US, long lines at American filling stations, and a global economic recession.

Continue Reading »

View original:

Here’s How President Obama Is Using the ‘Oil Weapon’—Against Iran, Russia, and ISIS

Posted in Anchor, Citizen, FF, GE, LAI, LG, ONA, oven, PUR, Radius, Uncategorized, Venta | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Here’s How President Obama Is Using the ‘Oil Weapon’—Against Iran, Russia, and ISIS

‘Putin’s Tiger,’ in a Territory Grab All His Own, Swims to China

A Siberian tiger released into the wild in Russia in the spring crossed a river this week into China, where wildlife officials are tracking his whereabouts. Taken from –  ‘Putin’s Tiger,’ in a Territory Grab All His Own, Swims to China ; ; ;

This article is from: 

‘Putin’s Tiger,’ in a Territory Grab All His Own, Swims to China

Posted in alo, eco-friendly, FF, G & F, GE, Monterey, ONA, oven, solar, solar power, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on ‘Putin’s Tiger,’ in a Territory Grab All His Own, Swims to China

New CO2 Emissions Report Shows China’s Central Role in Shaping World’s Climate Path

Fresh data reveal the central role of China in driving the global buildup of greenhouse gases — and its daunting challenge if it chooses to cut emissions. Taken from: New CO2 Emissions Report Shows China’s Central Role in Shaping World’s Climate Path ; ; ;

Original source:

New CO2 Emissions Report Shows China’s Central Role in Shaping World’s Climate Path

Posted in alternative energy, eco-friendly, FF, G & F, GE, Monterey, ONA, PUR, Ringer, solar, solar power, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on New CO2 Emissions Report Shows China’s Central Role in Shaping World’s Climate Path

Here Are the 10 Best Songs for Scotland’s Historic Vote for Independence

Mother Jones

Scotland is heading to the polls right now to decide on whether or not to become an independent country. A “Yes” vote would be the biggest constitutional change for the United Kingdom in over three centuries, splintering a long-held relationship that has seen the good times and the bad, and weathered plenty of mutual disagreements up until now. And like any pending break-up, we find that music helps soothe or heighten the experience, and connects us to the universal themes of love and loss. So, Scottish chums, whatever side you’re on, here’s a playlist for you, on this almighty day-of-days.

1. Queen: I Want to Break Free

Obviously. One for the “Yes” camp. (Worth it in my opinion just for Freddy with a mustache in drag vacuuming the carpet.) “I want to break free from your lies/You’re so self-satisfied I don’t need you/I’ve got to break free!” Sing it Freddy. Sing it Scotland.

2. Natalie Imbruglia: Torn

If Scotland votes “Yes” and leaves the union bereft and sobbing, this Aussie songtress might be blaring from a few stereos across the Isles tomorrow: “Nothing’s fine, I’m torn.” Sing it England! Sing it Wales!

3. â&#128;&#139;â&#128;&#139;Björk: Declare Independence

This is a song that famously landed the Icelandic singer in hot water with the Chinese authorities after a 2008 concert in Shanghai in which she called for Tibetan independence. Brave. She faced a ban from future performances on the mainland after that. It’s easy to see why China’s famously censorial authorities were not impressed: “Start your own currency!/Make your own stamp/Protect your language/Declare independence/Don’t let them do that to you!”

4. Oasis: Don’t Look Back In Anger

No matter what happens, some good advice for both sides. “My soul slides away, but don’t look back in anger.”

5. Alicia Keys: Try Sleeping with a Broken Heart

Here’s one for an emotional Prime Minister David Cameron, potentially presiding over a messy, painful divorce. “I’m going to find a way to make it without you/Tonight, I’m going to find a way to make it, without you.” Ouch. Let it out.

â&#128;&#139;

6. â&#128;&#139;Thelma Houston: Don’t Leave Me This Way

That beat speaks for itself.

7. Beyonce: Irreplaceable

“Don’t ever get to thinking you’re irreplaceable,” sings Queen Bey. This is the anthem for pretending everything will be fine post-breakup, that it’s not a big deal, that you can find another, just as easily, and that it wasn’t that good anyway, so don’t go thinking you meant anything to me… Get lost.

(I love you, come back).

8. Boyz II Men: End of the Road

“Although we’ve come to the end of the road/Still I can’t let you go/It’s unnatural, you belong to me, I belong to you.”

9. Mariah Carey: We Belong Together

Who could miss this song in any breakup playlist? It’s worth watching to the part of the video where Mariah is losing her shit in the apartment, writhing in the short tunic-shirt thing, near the end of this narratively nonsensical clip.

10. Alice Deejay: Better Off Alone

Mm. And lastly, any break-up is incomplete without some sweet late-90s Top 40.

Taken from:

Here Are the 10 Best Songs for Scotland’s Historic Vote for Independence

Posted in alo, Anchor, FF, GE, LAI, LG, ONA, Radius, Uncategorized, Venta, Vintage | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Here Are the 10 Best Songs for Scotland’s Historic Vote for Independence

We fixed the ozone layer (sort of). Can we fix the climate?

We fixed the ozone layer (sort of). Can we fix the climate?

15 Sep 2014 12:50 PM

Share

Share

We fixed the ozone layer (sort of). Can we fix the climate?

×

So 300 scientists working for the United Nations Environment Program are claiming that the ozone — that blanket of O3 in the stratosphere — is back on track to keep nasty ultraviolet radiation at bay for generations to come. Everyone’s rightly giving all the credit to the Montreal Protocol, an international agreement created in the 1980s to produce and consume fewer ozone-depleting substances.

For the moment, let’s ignore how dubious the optimism of the recent U.N. report is. This is big news: an example of international action to resolve a global atmospheric problem that really works!

George Monbiot makes the easy connection in The Guardian, arguing that governments need to collaborate on climate change the same way. He’s not the first one to ask what the ozone-protecting treaty means for global climate agreements; the question has been posed seemingly every time world leaders get together.

But Monbiot is realistic about the state of the world, admitting that such purposeful international action isn’t possible nowadays due to the extreme market fundamentalism that dominates politics today. This doctrine does not allow governments to intervene with big corporate profits, even to save the climatic conditions that allow the survival of humans (and big corporate profits, for that matter).

When the Montreal Protocol was written, this neoliberal agenda was just beginning to infiltrate the political world. As for the improbability of re-creating such cooperation now, Monbiot smartly speculates:

[W]ere the ozone hole to have been discovered today, governments would have announced talks about talks about talks, and we would still be discussing whether something should be done as our skin turned to crackling.

The differences between addressing global warming and the ozone holes go beyond political conditions and ideologies, though. Solving the ozone problem meant agreeing to stop using a few ozone-depleting chemicals, and replace them with some differently harmful alternative chemicals. To stop disrupting the climate, nations will have to all agree to remake our energy systems, redesign our economies, stand up to powerful corporate interests, and get over the weird fetish for growth and more.

That’s not all. Making all these changes will inevitably mean those who have the most power in today’s world will be less powerful in the climate-stable future world — yes, that’s you, America. If transforming the world as we know it doesn’t sound difficult enough to you, remember that the nation-states and mega-corporations with the most power have decision-making bodies by the balls.

Speaking of world power structures, the simple fact that there’s no longer one big, scary global hegemon has slowed climate talks, according to Hannes Stephan of the University of Stirling. Mat Hope of The Carbon Brief reports:

The Montreal protocol was agreed at a time when the US was considered to be the world’s dominant superpower. That allowed the US … to cajole other countries into taking action, Stephan says.

This is no longer the case. In the international climate negotiations there are at least four major players that don’t see eye to eye: the US, China, India and the EU.

To further complicate matters, Hope also points out that ozone science is easier than climate science:

In CFCs case, it was clear their use was creating a hole in the atmosphere and scientists could present this in a simple, startling way … [b]ut when it comes to climate change, the impacts are more complex. Greenhouse gas emissions cause multiple impacts across the world at different times. It’s an environmental challenge that encompasses the whole planet.

Holes in the ozone layer mean our skin burns to a crisp right now and then we get cancer later on. Even though the age of climate consequences has clearly arrived, the most extreme repercussions of global warming are in the future. (And the worst effects will always lie ahead of us while we keep increasing emissions. Think about it.) “Now” and “cancer” hit harder than “weather events” and “the future.”

I’ll add one more possible explanation for our failure to address climate change, even while we apparently fixed the ozone hole. The most visible effect of ozone depletion is skin cancer, a disease that preys predominantly on the epidermises of white people. Climate change, on the other hand, promises to ravage the whole world, disproportionately affecting those who have emitted the least, can least afford to escape or alleviate the damage, and, crucially, have the least political power to demand global action.

Is it really surprising that the powers-that-be reacted swiftly and decisively to an environmental issue that threatens their own? Or that now they’re hemming and hawing at an impending doomsday that they can’t avert without giving up some of their power?

To sum up, even if we pretend that the ozone layer really is recovering smoothly thanks to the great success of a global treaty (an iffy conclusion at best), extending this method of success to the wicked problem that is climate change lies a few more leaps and bounds away. That Kyoto thing sure didn’t work.

Source:
Stopping climate meltdown needs the courage that saved the ozone layer

, The Guardian.

Find this article interesting?

Donate now to support our work.Share

Please

enable JavaScript

to view the comments.

Get stories like this in your inbox

AdvertisementAdvertisement

Original post – 

We fixed the ozone layer (sort of). Can we fix the climate?

Posted in Anchor, Everyone, FF, G & F, GE, LAI, LG, ONA, Oster, PUR, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on We fixed the ozone layer (sort of). Can we fix the climate?

Your iPhone is about to get (a little) less toxic

Your iPhone is about to get (a little) less toxic

Ian Higgins

Apple is upping its green game in a big way, thanks in no small part to former-EPA-chief-turned-Apple-exec Lisa Jackson. On Wednesday, the company announced an official ban of two toxins from its iPhone and iPad production lines, following a five-month-long “Bad Apple” campaign launched by China Labor Watch and Green America.

Benzene and n-hexane, used primarily to clean and polish electronics during the final stages of production, are known to cause a slew of negative health effects including leukemia and nerve damage. Activist groups harangued the company for its use of the chemicals until it conducted its own investigation of 22 of its plants.

Naturally, Apple’s internal probe found nothing of consequence (the use of the chemicals wasn’t widespread, it insists, and didn’t endanger a single worker; what little it did find fell well within the company’s existing safety standards). In true EPA style, though, Jackson and her team tightened the existing rules to explicitly prohibit the use of benzene and n-hexane in final assembly processes. Although the company will still use a tiny bit during the earlier stages of production, Apple, Jackson writes, “treats any allegations of unsafe working conditions extremely seriously.” Hmm.

From the AP:

“This is doing everything we can think of to do to crack down on chemical exposures and to be responsive to concerns,” Lisa Jackson, Apple’s vice president of environmental initiatives, said in an interview with The Associated Press. “We think it’s really important that we show some leadership and really look toward the future by trying to use greener chemistries.”

Hear, hear. And at least Apple has now released an actual list of the substances it regulates to the public, making world domination by iThings a little more transparent.


Source
Apple Bans Use of 2 Chemicals in iPhone Assembly, Associated Press

Sara Bernard is a Grist fellow, wilderness junkie, and globetrotter. Follow her on Twitter.

Find this article interesting? Donate now to support our work.Read more: Business & Technology

,

Living

Follow this link:  

Your iPhone is about to get (a little) less toxic

Posted in Anchor, FF, GE, Hagen, LG, ONA, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Your iPhone is about to get (a little) less toxic

Is There a Hillary Doctrine?

Mother Jones

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC “-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN” “http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd”>

Jeffrey Goldberg’s interview with Hillary Clinton is being taken as an effort by Hillary to distance herself from President Obama. Here’s the most frequently quoted snippet:

HRC: Great nations need organizing principles, and “Don’t do stupid stuff” is not an organizing principle. It may be a necessary brake on the actions you might take in order to promote a vision.

….JG: What is your organizing principle, then?

HRC: Peace, progress, and prosperity. This worked for a very long time. Take prosperity. That’s a huge domestic challenge for us. If we don’t restore the American dream for Americans, then you can forget about any kind of continuing leadership in the world. Americans deserve to feel secure in their own lives, in their own middle-class aspirations, before you go to them and say, “We’re going to have to enforce navigable sea lanes in the South China Sea.”

I’ve seen the first part of this excerpt several times, and each time I’ve wondered, “So what’s your organizing principle.” When I finally got around to reading the interview, I discovered that this was Goldberg’s very next question. And guess what? Hillary doesn’t have one.

She’s basically hauling out an old chestnut: We need to be strong at home if we want to be strong overseas. And that’s fine as far as it goes. But it’s not an organizing principle for foreign policy. It’s not even close. At best, it’s a precursor to an organizing principle, and at worst it’s just a plain and simple evasion.

It so happens that I think “don’t do stupid stuff” is a pretty good approach to foreign policy at the moment. It’s underrated in most of life, in fact, while “doctrines” are mostly straitjackets that force you to fight the last war over and over and over. The fact that Hillary Clinton (a) brushes this off and (b) declines to say what her foreign policy would be based on—well, it frankly scares me. My read of all this is that Hillary is itching to outline a much more aggressive foreign policy but doesn’t think she can quite get away with it yet. She figures she needs to distance herself from Obama slowly, and she needs to wait for the American public to give her an opportunity. My guess is that any crisis will do that happens to pop up in 2015.

I don’t have any problems with Hillary’s domestic policy. I’ve never believed that she “understood” the Republican party better than Obama and therefore would have gotten more done if she’d won in 2008, but I don’t think she would have gotten any less done either. It’s close to a wash. But in foreign policy, I continually find myself wondering just where she stands. I suspect that she still chafes at being forced to repudiate her vote for the Iraq war—and largely losing to Obama because of it. I wouldn’t be surprised if she still believes that vote was the right thing to do, nor would I be surprised if her foreign policy turned out to be considerably more interventionist than either Bill’s or Obama’s.

But I don’t know for sure. And I probably never will unless she gets elected in 2016 and we get to find out.

Link to article:  

Is There a Hillary Doctrine?

Posted in FF, GE, LAI, LG, ONA, Uncategorized, Venta | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Is There a Hillary Doctrine?

Montana Democrat Ends Senate Campaign Over Plagiarism

Mother Jones

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC “-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN” “http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd”>

Republicans’ path to taking over the Senate just got a little bit easier. Sen. John Walsh (D-Mont.) announced on Thursday he would end his Senate campaign after the New York Times reported last month that he had plagiarized portions of his 2007 Army War College thesis. Walsh, a former lieutenant governor and adjutant general of the state national guard, was appointed to the seat vacated by Ambassador to China Max Baucus but struggled to generate much enthusiasm among voters. Montana Democrats have until August 20 to find a new nominee. But whoever wins the Democratic nod will have a tough row to hoe against GOP Rep. (and creationism advocate) Steve Daines, who held a 16-point lead in a CBS/New York Times poll taken lost month.

Don’t plagiarize, kids.

Continue reading: 

Montana Democrat Ends Senate Campaign Over Plagiarism

Posted in Anchor, FF, GE, LG, ONA, PUR, Radius, Uncategorized, Venta | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Montana Democrat Ends Senate Campaign Over Plagiarism