Tag Archives: flickr

Obama Campaign Launches Plan to Shame Climate Sceptics in Congress

Campaign group Organizing for Action says it is time to call out US politicians who deny the science behind climate change. Mundoo/Flickr The campaign group formed to support Barack Obama‘s political agenda has launched an initiative to shame members of Congress who deny the science behind climate change. In an email to supporters on Thursday, Organizing for Action said it was time to call out members of Congress who deny the existence of climate change, saying they had blocked efforts to avoid its most catastrophic consequences. The email linked to a video mocking Republicans who reject the science on climate change. “Right now, way too many lawmakers in Washington flat-out refuse to face the facts when it comes to climate change,” Jon Carson, executive director of Organizing for Action wrote in the email. “We’re never going to make real progress on this issue unless members of Congress get serious.” To keep reading, click here. View original –  Obama Campaign Launches Plan to Shame Climate Sceptics in Congress Related ArticlesClimate Desk Live 06/06/13: The Alarming Science Behind Climate Change’s Increasingly Wild WeatherRestoring the RockawaysThe Drought-Stricken Midwest’s Floods: Is This What Climate Change Looks Like?

Excerpt from: 

Obama Campaign Launches Plan to Shame Climate Sceptics in Congress

Posted in ALPHA, Anchor, eco-friendly, FF, G & F, GE, horticulture, Monterey, ONA, solar, solar power, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Obama Campaign Launches Plan to Shame Climate Sceptics in Congress

Are Fuel Exports Driving Up the Price of Gas?

green4us

Yes, they probably are. But here’s why that’s OK. raindog/Flickr The U.S. fossil fuel renaissance has sparked job booms in the oil fields of North Dakota and Texas, shrunk our national import tab, and led to a whole lot of talk about energy independence. But, as BloombergBusinessweek noted recently, one thing it hasn’t done is lower the price of gasoline for American motorists, who are still paying $3.71 a gallon. Why not? There are a lot of ways to answer that question, the simplest being that despite all our drilling, oil is remains expensive. Worldwide, demand still beats supply. And since the cost of crude accounts for 72 percent of the cost of gasoline,* pump prices have stayed high. But that doesn’t quite put the issue to bed. After all, Americans are driving and fueling up less, which should theoretically encourage the oil refiners that produce our gasoline and diesel to cut their prices. Businessweek points to a few reasons why that hasn’t happened, but I want to focus on just one of them: exports. To keep reading, click here.

Continued – 

Are Fuel Exports Driving Up the Price of Gas?

Share this:

Source: 

Are Fuel Exports Driving Up the Price of Gas?

Posted in eco-friendly, FF, G & F, GE, LG, Monterey, ONA, solar, solar power, The Atlantic, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Are Fuel Exports Driving Up the Price of Gas?

Can You Have Too Much Solar Energy?

green4us

Germany’s little-guy suppliers are destabilizing big power companies. doviende/Flickr It’s been a long, dark winter in Germany. In fact, there hasn’t been this little sun since people started tracking such things back in the early 1950s. Easter is around the corner, and the streets of Berlin are still covered in ice and snow. But spring will come, and when the snow finally melts, it will reveal the glossy black sheen of photovoltaic solar panels glinting from the North Sea to the Bavarian Alps. Solar panels line Germany’s residential rooftops and top its low-slung barns. They sprout in orderly rows along train tracks and cover hills of coal mine tailings in what used to be East Germany. Old Soviet military bases, too polluted to use for anything else, have been turned into solar installations. Twenty-two percent of Germany’s power is generated with renewables. Solar provides close to a quarter of that. The southern German state of Bavaria, population 12.5 million, has three photovoltaic panels per resident, which adds up to more installed solar capacity than in the entire United States. To keep reading, click here.

Original article:  

Can You Have Too Much Solar Energy?

Share this:

Visit site:  

Can You Have Too Much Solar Energy?

Posted in alo, ALPHA, eco-friendly, FF, G & F, GE, Monterey, ONA, PUR, solar, solar panels, solar power, Sprout, Uncategorized, Vintage | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Can You Have Too Much Solar Energy?

Beware! How 10 Dangerous Materials Are Recycled

Trash is always messy, but what happens when recycling gets downright dangerous? From heavy metals to undetonated explosives, check out the ways Americans are recycling perilous materials into useful new products.

Photo: Shutterstock

Explosives available for reuse and recycling range from unused fireworks to unexploded landmines and other heavy propellants, called

unexploded ordnance

or UXOs.

Generally, explosives are taken to a safety range where they are ignited and the hazardous chemicals are burnt off.

However, metals such as brass, steel and aluminum typically remain at the end of the detonation process, totaling up to 60 percent of the total weight, and these will be recycled.

Technologies are also emerging to convert unexploded propellants into commercial mining explosives and even fertilizer – proving that even uncommon materials can be put to good use.

Photo: Shutterstock

It probably doesn’t come as a surprise that industrial acids, such as oxalic, formic and hydrochloric acids, are challenging to recycle. But technologies are growing to dispose of acids safely without burying them in chemical landfills.

By diluting industrial acid, such as hydrochloric acid common to the steel industry, to 5 percent volume and balancing it to a neutral pH, the solution is no longer corrosive and can be disposed of down the drain in some jurisdictions.

Systems also exist to reprocess industrial acids for reuse, reducing the need for virgin acids and eliminating the disposal of spent acid and neutralized sludge.

Photo: Shutterstock

Firearms are often recycled through

community gun melts

, in which unwanted weapons are rounded up and melted down for scrap metal. Metals recovered from gun melts are then used in new products, such as washing machines, car parts and refrigerators.

Empty shell casings and other ammunition can be reloaded and reused, as well as being melted down for scrap.

In addition to conventional recycling methods, creative greenies have repurposed unwanted armaments and ammunition into loads of unusual products, from jewelry to building materials for the 2012 Olympic Games.

Photo: Shutterstock

As a known carcinogen, asbestos is no longer permitted for use in the U.S. But

before 1978

, the material was widely used for a variety of applications, from walls and insulation to adhesives – meaning there’s still plenty of it around that needs to be disposed of properly.

The most common way to dispose of asbestos is to wet the material, seal it with plastic and transport it to a regulated chemical landfill. But in recent years, cutting-edge technologies are emerging to recycle the hazardous material rather than simply burying it away.

By heating asbestos to high temperatures in a process called vitrification, the material can be converted into harmless palex or borosilicate glass for use in ceramics products – creating a range of new options for asbestos disposal.

Note: Although our ability to recycle asbestos is growing, you should never try to remove or recycle asbestos yourself. The best thing to do when confronted with the material is to contact a specially licensed asbestos abatement company for proper disposal.

Photo: Spirit of America/Shutterstock

Lead in good condition is not considered hazardous, but lead from paint chips or dust can be dangerous if not handled properly.

Today, about 80 percent of lead is used in lead acid batteries (such as car batteries), which are readily recyclable. Additional uses for lead include radiation shielding, cable sheathing and lead sheet used by the building industry.

All totaled, about 90 percent of lead is used in readily recyclable products, and almost all of it is recycled in the U.S.

Although it may sound like tricky business, recycling lead is not all that different from reprocessing other metals. To see the process up close, check out this lead recycling video from How Stuff Works.

Photo: Shutterstock

They may be produced for safety, but fire extinguishers can be tough to recycle.

For starters, the contents are under high pressure and may explode if the tank is punctured or the contents are mixed with other materials. Very old fire extinguishers may also contain carbon tetrachloride, a known carcinogen.

However, the tank of a fire extinguisher is made of highly-recyclable steel, while the spraying mechanism contains brass and plastic.

So, how are fire extinguishers recycled? Dry chemical extinguishers can be discharged, and then the casing can be recycled with scrap metal.

Carbon dioxide fire extinguishers are refillable and should be refilled after each use. Contact your local fire department or a fire extinguisher recharging company in your area for details.

Photo: Flickr/edcrowle

Commonly referred to as Freon, a

registered trademark of DuPont

, refrigerants are used for cooling in cars, refrigerators, air conditioners and other appliances.

The EPA requires that all refrigerants, including Freon and similar chemicals, go through a recovery, recycling or reclamation process in accordance with strict guidelines.

To recycle refrigerants, licensed technicians go through a variety of processes to remove the chemicals from automobiles and appliances. From there, they are sent through an oil separator, filter and dryer and processed for reuse.

Want to learn more about how refrigerants are recycled? Check out this truly amazing GE recycling plant in Philadelphia that processes more than 1 million appliances per year and salvages refrigerants and other components for recycling.

Photo: Shutterstock

Pesticides, herbicides and fungicides are, by nature, highly poisonous and extremely dangerous materials – meaning it’s vital to dispose of them properly at licensed hazardous waste facilities.

After being dropped off at HHW facilities, pesticides are typically sent to a secure chemical landfill or incinerator.

While these materials cannot be recycled, many pesticides dropped off at HHW collectors are still usable. Usable items are often made available to the public for free at HHW “swap shops,” reducing the need for disposal.

Systems also exist to chemically degrade chlorinated hydrocarbon pesticides, but these methods are still being tested and are not yet considered a viable large-scale disposal option.

Fortunately, gardeners and farmers have loads of options when it comes to producing healthy crops without pesticides, including integrated pest management (IPM) and other organic gardening methods.

Photo: Shutterstock

They’re made to save your life, but recycling smoke detectors is often messier than it looks.

The majority of all household smoke detectors in the United States contain a radioactive element, americium-241. While the amount of Am-241 is small enough to be considered harmless, additional care must be taken when disposing of smoke detectors.

That said, these common household products contain circuit boards that can be recycled with other e-waste. The battery, hard plastic case and remaining metals are also recyclable after radioactive elements are removed and managed properly.

Most smoke detectors are disposed of through manufacturer take-back programs. Curie Environmental Services also provides a first-of-its kind mail-back program for all brands of smoke detectors.

Photo: Shutterstock

Improper disposal of discarded medical sharps, both by home users and health care facilities, can pose potential health risks to the public, waste workers, janitors and anyone who handles the garbage.

For example, waste workers may be exposed to potential needle stick injuries and infection when sharp containers break open inside garbage bags or are mistakenly sent to a recycling center – making proper disposal crucial for this common medical waste material.

After used sharps are transported to a hazardous waste collector, they are often disposed of in medical waste incinerators.

However, innovators are exploring ways to recover valuable resources from used sharps. Through a partnership with Waste Management, medical tech company BD currently accepts used sharps and recycles them into useful new products, such as its BD Recykleen sharps collectors.

More Answers from Earth911: 10 Recycling Mysteries, Solved!

Homepage Image: Shutterstock

Source:  

Beware! How 10 Dangerous Materials Are Recycled

Posted in GE, LG, PUR, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Beware! How 10 Dangerous Materials Are Recycled

How NASA Scientists Are Turning L.A. into One Big Climate-Change Lab

green4us

From airborne to chemicals to sunshine itself, measuring change in the West Coast’s biggest city. Ben Amstutz/Flickr Southern California’s Mount Wilson is a lonesome, hostile peak — prone to sudden rock falls, sometimes ringed by wildfire — that nevertheless has attracted some of the greatest minds in modern science. George Ellery Hale, one of the godfathers of astrophysics, founded the Mount Wilson Observatory in 1904 and divined that sunspots were magnetic. His acolyte Edwin Hubble used a huge telescope, dragged up by mule train, to prove the universe was expanding. Even Albert Einstein made a pilgrimage in the 1930s to hobnob with the astronomers (and suffered a terrible hair day, a photo shows). To keep reading, click here.

Source article:

How NASA Scientists Are Turning L.A. into One Big Climate-Change Lab

Share this:

Link to original: 

How NASA Scientists Are Turning L.A. into One Big Climate-Change Lab

Posted in ATTRA, eco-friendly, GE, LG, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on How NASA Scientists Are Turning L.A. into One Big Climate-Change Lab

Feds mark territory all over L.A. wildlife habitat

Feds mark territory all over L.A. wildlife habitat

Los Angelenos may be fond of their cars, but they’re also fond of their diverse wildlife. That’s probably not what the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers was counting on when it unilaterally and without warning decided to clear-cut 43 acres of wildlife habitat on L.A.’s Sepulveda Basin.

From the Los Angeles Times:

Much of the area’s vegetation had been planted in the 1980s, part of an Army Corps project that turned that portion of the Los Angeles River flood plain into a designated wildlife preserve.

Tramping through the mud Friday, botanist Ellen Zunino — who was among hundreds of volunteers who planted willows, coyote brush, mule fat and elderberry trees in the area — was engulfed by anger, sadness and disbelief.

“I’m heartbroken. I was so proud of our work,” the 66-year-old said, taking a deep breath. “I don’t see any of the usual signs of preparation for a job like this, such as marked trees or colored flags,” Zunino added. “It seems haphazard and mean-spirited, almost as though someone was taking revenge on the habitat.”

In 2010, the preserve had been reclassified as a “vegetation management area” — with a new five-year mission of replacing trees and shrubs with native grasses to improve access for Army Corps staffers, increase public safety and discourage crime in an area plagued by sex-for-drugs encampments.

The Army Corps declared that an environmental impact report on the effort was not necessary because it would not significantly disturb wildlife and habitat.

By Friday, however, nearly all of the vegetation — native and non-native — had been removed. Decomposed granite trails, signs, stone structures and other improvements bought and installed with public money had been plowed under.

Since the razing, the Corps has posted many photos of happy birds in other parts of the basin habitat in an attempt to reassure the public, or at least the public that is aware of its Flickr page. The Corps said that “somehow” it “didn’t clearly communicate” its intentions to plow under the habitat. Is it any wonder that excuse didn’t go over so well with, well, anyone?

The state water agency, state senators, and city council members are demanding an explanation by Feb. 11, and a plan to remediate the newly crushed area. So far the Corps’ explanation has been, essentially, “Oops.” Char Miller at KCET is not having any of it:

Did the Corps believe that no one would care? Or that even if people came upon its hack job that the traumatized terrain would elicit no comment? Or did the agency simply decide to act as it so often has in the past with little regard to the environmental consequences, and the public be damned?…

It is impossible to imagine that the Corps’ construction of this sterile monoculture, so consistent with its concrete fixation, will ever come close to matching the rich biota that citizen-led restoration efforts have nurtured on and attracted to the site. Like a wolf peeing on its territorial boundaries, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, with bulldozer and chainsaw, has marked its turf, and the result has been a scandalous diminishing of nature and democracy.

Like a wolf peeing on its territorial boundaries. The Corps might’ve razed the land, but Miller’s raised standards when it comes to awesomely and appropriately rude similes to apply to the federal government.

Susie Cagle writes and draws news for Grist. She also writes and draws tweets for

Twitter

.

Read more:

Cities

Also in Grist

Please enable JavaScript to see recommended stories

View original post here: 

Feds mark territory all over L.A. wildlife habitat

Posted in Citizen, GE, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Feds mark territory all over L.A. wildlife habitat