Tag Archives: organic

What do you catch when there are no more fish? Jellyballs

You ready for this jelly?

What do you catch when there are no more fish? Jellyballs

22 Sep 2014 7:06 AM

Share

Share

What do you catch when there are no more fish? Jellyballs

×

When you come across a slick of jellyfish packed bell-to-tentacle into an area the length of five or six city blocks, you may sense something is wrong with the picture. Massive jellyfish blooms have been sprouting more and more often in recent years, one even reaching 1,000 miles long, for reasons mysterious but generally agreed to be bad.

But where there’s a fork, there’s a way! If we can focus all the energy we’re using to overfish more conventional ocean edibles on jellies instead, maybe we stand a chance at pruning the bloom to a more manageable size. Apropos, Modern Farmer reported recently on U.S. fishermen in a tiny port in Georgia who are trawling for cannonball jellyfish, otherwise known as — wait for it — “jellyballs.”

First of all, what do you call it when you fish for jellyballs? Is it jelly-balling? Please, please let it be jelly-balling. From Modern Farmer:

“Jellyballs have been very, very good to me,” says [one fishing boat owner, Thornell] King, who has worked as a state trooper for the last 20 years, and might be the only jelly-balling cop in the country. This past season was particularly robust: King and his men caught
 an estimated 5 million-plus pounds of cannonball jellyfish. At what King says is this year’s price (seven cents a pound), this equates to $350,000. Statistics are absent in this burgeoning new industry, but … the market value of the jellies being fished in the U.S. can be estimated at somewhere in the low millions.

Yessss! Jelly-balling!

And what, pray tell, does one do with 5 million pounds of jellyballs? Typically, the answer is to dry them out and ship them to Japan and China, where they are rehydrated, cut into strips, and tossed into delicious salads. Apparently, prepared correctly, the brined jellies are crunchy “like a carrot.”

John Dreyer

Jellyball, the carrot of the sea?

Not enough to whet your appetite? Then try this for sauce:

And as climate change and the global industrial agriculture system continue on what many view as a doomed course, we may have no choice but to eat foods that make sense ecologically — or can at least thrive in a changed environment. Jellyfish, prolific breeders with low metabolic rates and the ability to eat almost anything (some breeds just ingest organic material through their epidermis), have survived in unfriendly environs for centuries.

I’ve been a proponent of eating invasive species before, and as ocean ecosystems are stressing out more delicate denizens, jellyfish are a hardy bet. That being said, if greener protein is your goal, you might be better off with crickets; jellyfish are made up of a little protein and salt floating in more than 95 percent water.

American foodies have been slow to champion the jelly cause, but if we could learn to eat sushi, we can learn to eat anything.

If you’ve made it this far and are still hungry for more jellyball, the Modern Farmer article is mouth-watering.

Source:
Jellyfish: It’s What’s For Dinner

, Modern Farmer.

Find this article interesting?

Donate now to support our work.Share

Please

enable JavaScript

to view the comments.

Get stories like this in your inbox

AdvertisementAdvertisement

See original article: 

What do you catch when there are no more fish? Jellyballs

Posted in Anchor, FF, G & F, GE, LG, ONA, organic, Sprout, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on What do you catch when there are no more fish? Jellyballs

Why millennials aren’t going cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs

Cheeri-NOs

Why millennials aren’t going cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs

12 Sep 2014 5:40 PM

Share

Share

Why millennials aren’t going cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs

×

The New York Times crunched the nation’s cereal-eating numbers this week, and it looks like the typical American breakfast is starting to include fewer sugary flakes and moon-shaped marshmallows.

The Times’ Stephanie Stroml reports that in the past decade, Americans have been eating less boxed cereal, preferring healthier options like juiced fruits and veggies and probiotic-rich Greek yogurt. Between 2003 and 2013, sales of the once-beloved flaky cereals (Corn Flakes, Frosted Flakes, etc.) decreased by 5.5 percent. Children’s cereals (Lucky Charms and good ol’ Cap’n Crunch) have plummeted 10.7 percent. Meanwhile, Muesli, a favorite of health nuts everywhere, is steadily gaining popularity, increasing in sales by 1.8 percent.

The article reads:

For the last decade, the cereal business has been declining, as consumers reach for granola bars, yogurt and drive-through fare in the morning. And the drop-off has accelerated lately, especially among those finicky millennials who tend to graze on healthy options — even if Cheerios and some other brands come in whole-grain varieties fortified with protein now.

As a millennial myself, I’d like to take this opportunity to say a little something to big breakfast cereal companies to give them a heads-up on why young people like me are opting out of their morning Cap’n Crunch:

Dearest Big Breakfast Cereal Companies (BBCCs),

Hello, I am your loyal fan Liz. I am particularly fond of Kellogg’s Raisin Bran Crunch, the perfect blend of whole-wheaty oats and sun-dried raisin chewiness. It’s my favorite thing to snack on while I scroll through my Instagram feed. So, to you I extend the deepest of gratitude.

But, BBCCs, I’m writing to tell you to CUT THE CRAP. We millennials are having a tough time believing the whole “Lucky Charms are a great source of whole-grains” thing when they actually contain 40 percent more sugar by weight than typical adult cereals. C’mon, people, we both know this is bogus. Sugary breakfast cereals are not health food, even if you pump them up with protein. It’s like trying to make “fetch” happen. And it’s not going to happen.

You see, it’s not that we don’t enjoy the taste of sugary deliciousness, it’s that we’re becoming smarter consumers. We’re smarter, BBCCs, because we’ve seen these tricks before. Other companies have been trying to sell us products that cater to millennial interests — by making cars more tech-friendly and fast-food look quaint and local. But those marketing ploys that tell us we should be slaves to the automobile, or that food products are healthy when the nutrition label reads, “sugars: 19 grams” — well, they’re starting to feel a little stale.

I probably won’t give up eating a bowl or two of cereal for dinner once in a while, but if you’re wondering why your sales continue to drop despite your new “heath conscious” advertising campaigns — it’s because when millennials want to get their daily fix of whole grains, we’ll reach for the organic barley, not the box of Fruit Loops.

Source:
Cereals Begin to Lose Their Snap, Crackle and Pop

, New York Times.

Find this article interesting?

Donate now to support our work.Share

Please

enable JavaScript

to view the comments.

Get stories like this in your inbox

AdvertisementAdvertisement

Link:

Why millennials aren’t going cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs

Posted in Anchor, ATTRA, FF, G & F, GE, LAI, LG, ONA, organic, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Why millennials aren’t going cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs

U.N. says the ozone layer will be a little less screwed — a long time from now

HAZY FORECAST

U.N. says the ozone layer will be a little less screwed — a long time from now

11 Sep 2014 7:56 PM

Share

Share

U.N. says the ozone layer will be a little less screwed — a long time from now

×

Remember those holes we poked in the ozone with refrigerants and chlorofluorocarbons during the 1980s? Well, a new United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) assessment reports that the ozone layer is well on its way to a full recovery.

The study has been framed as a victory for international action, but hold the toasts. UNEP scientists say we won’t get back to 1980 ozone levels — back when there was already an ozone hole over Antarctica bigger than 1 million square miles — until 2050. And this supposed good news about the ozone comeback comes just two weeks after NASA delivered another dose of reality: Researchers found out the atmosphere still holds a shit-ton of carbon tetrachloride, an ozone-depleting compound that was banned worldwide decades ago. Nobody knows where it came from.

More mixed news from the report: Phasing out the chlorofluorocarbons that eat up the ozone layer has meant switching to hydrofluorocarbons, which are extremely effective at heating the atmosphere. And, in a screwed-whatever-we-do twist, the release of CO2 and methane — the two greenhouse gases that are most responsible for climate change — can actually help correct ozone levels.

Folks who are susceptible to skin cancer (everyone?) aren’t yet rejoicing, either. Melanoma, the most common form of cancer in the U.S., is caused by too much exposure to the harmful ultraviolet rays that the ozone layer blocks. And the incidence of malignant skin cancer is still rising, unlike that of most cancers. I doubt we can blame that completely on tanning beds.

Of course, the U.N. report said nothing about the effects of Snooki’s Ultra Dark Tan Maximizer as a tanning agent. GTL at your own peril.

Source:
Ozone Layer on Track to Recovery: Success Story Should Encourage Action on Climate

, UNEP.

Find this article interesting?

Donate now to support our work.Share

Please

enable JavaScript

to view the comments.

Get stories like this in your inbox

AdvertisementAdvertisement

Link: 

U.N. says the ozone layer will be a little less screwed — a long time from now

Posted in alo, Anchor, Everyone, FF, G & F, GE, LG, ONA, organic, Safer, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on U.N. says the ozone layer will be a little less screwed — a long time from now

5 Non-VOC Paints for Crafters & Artists

Link – 

5 Non-VOC Paints for Crafters & Artists

Posted in FF, GE, LG, ONA, organic, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on 5 Non-VOC Paints for Crafters & Artists

Feed Your Garden with Your Disposable Plastic Trash

More – 

Feed Your Garden with Your Disposable Plastic Trash

Posted in FF, GE, LG, ONA, organic, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Feed Your Garden with Your Disposable Plastic Trash

Just living close to Walmart makes you fat

Just living close to Walmart makes you fat

15 Aug 2014 5:34 PM

Share

Share

Just living close to Walmart makes you fat

×

New research published in the Journal of Transport & Health offers more evidence to bolster theories we already had: People living in dense, urban environments are far healthier than people living in the ’burbs.

Specifically, according to two engineers at the University of Connecticut and Colorado University, it’s the design of the street grid that makes the biggest difference. The more intersections between streets, the lower the rates of those four American juggernauts: obesity, diabetes, high blood pressure, and heart disease. In other words, the more walkable the city, the better its residents’ health.

According to the report, broad, multi-laned streets, characteristic of suburban sprawl, are linked with higher levels of obesity and diabetes. Same goes for “big box” stores, which are associated with 24.9 percent higher rates of diabetes and 13.7 higher rates of obesity. The reason? Both factors indicate that the neighborhood is less friendly to pedestrians.

From The Atlantic:

68 percent of Americans are overweight or obese, which means that someone you know is overweight or obese. Most people don’t get the CDC’s minimum recommended amount of physical activity. Americans spend more time driving every year. So it is logical to conclude, as [Norman] Garrick and [Wesley] Marshall do in their paper, “The role of the street network and how we put together the bones of our communities should not be overlooked as a potential contributing factor to health outcomes.”

As the great urban-versus-suburban debate continues, it seems high time for city planners — and, oh, the federal government — to actually consider these scary health outcomes.

Oh, and that other thing. The planet.

Source:
Do We Look Fat in These Suburbs?

, The Atlantic.

Find this article interesting?

Donate now to support our work.Share

Please

enable JavaScript

to view the comments.

Get stories like this in your inbox

AdvertisementAdvertisement

Originally posted here: 

Just living close to Walmart makes you fat

Posted in Anchor, FF, G & F, GE, LG, ONA, organic, The Atlantic, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Just living close to Walmart makes you fat

Natural Vitality Organic Life Vitamins (1×30 OZ)

[amzn_product_post]

Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Natural Vitality Organic Life Vitamins (1×30 OZ)

Earth Mama Angel Baby Natural Nipple Butter, 2-Ounce Jar

[amzn_product_post]

Posted in Earth Mama Angel Baby | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Earth Mama Angel Baby Natural Nipple Butter, 2-Ounce Jar

ORGANIC Argan Oil For Hair & Face – 100% Pure & ECO Certified Organic – Larger 4 oz Bottle – Miracle Oil For Every Skin Condition, Hair, Nails, Anti-aging & More! Pure Moroccan Argan Oil – 100% Guaranteed to Work Wonders for Your Body!

[amzn_product_post]

Posted in VoilaVe | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on ORGANIC Argan Oil For Hair & Face – 100% Pure & ECO Certified Organic – Larger 4 oz Bottle – Miracle Oil For Every Skin Condition, Hair, Nails, Anti-aging & More! Pure Moroccan Argan Oil – 100% Guaranteed to Work Wonders for Your Body!

Shorter Trees Could Make Peaches Cheaper

Mother Jones

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC “-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN” “http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd”>

When it comes to peach and nectarine trees, bigger isn’t necessarily better. An orchard worker can spend as much as half of his or her day lugging around the ladders required to reach the branches of a typical 13-foot tree. Plus, the danger of climbing the ladders drives up the cost of workers’ compensation insurance—growers of peaches and nectarines pay about 40 percent more for it than growers of low-lying fruit like grapes.

Now scientists at the University of California are trying to shrink the cost of labor on peach and nectarine farms by shrinking the plants themselves. In a 4-acre orchard south of Fresno, researchers are growing trees that they expect to max out at seven or eight feet. They say the shorter trees, which would not require a ladder to harvest or prune, could cut down on worker injuries and slash labor costs by more than 50 percent. If cultivated correctly, the mini-trees could be as fruitful as their taller counterparts.

If the experimental orchard works, it could have environmental perks too. In comments to UC Davis, one farmer estimated it costs him $1,400 an acre to thin his 250-acre peach and nectarine farm. Because of the high cost of ladders, many of his fellow growers are switching to almonds, he said. And almonds, as we’ve said before, are sucking California dry.

Original source:  

Shorter Trees Could Make Peaches Cheaper

Posted in Anchor, FF, GE, LG, ONA, organic, PUR, Radius, Uncategorized, Venta | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Shorter Trees Could Make Peaches Cheaper