Category Archives: OXO

World Bank to Focus Future Investment on Clean Energy

World Bank will only fund coal projects in cases of ‘extreme need’ due to the risk climate change poses to ending world poverty, says Jim Yong Kim. Jupiterimages/Thinkstock The World Bank will invest heavily in clean energy and only fund coal projects in “circumstances of extreme need” because climate change will undermine efforts to eliminate extreme poverty, says its president Jim Yong Kim. Talking ahead of a UN climate summit in Peru, Kim said he was alarmed by World Bank-commissioned research from the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany, which said that as a result of past greenhouse gas emissions the world is condemned to unprecedented weather events. “The findings are alarming. As the planet warms further, heatwaves and other weather extremes, which today we call once­-in­-a-century events, would become the new climate normal, a frightening world of increased risk and instability. The consequences for development would be severe, as crop yields decline, water resources shift, communicable diseases move into new geographical ranges, and sea levels rise,” he said. Read the rest at the Guardian. Link:  World Bank to Focus Future Investment on Clean Energy ; ; ;

This article is from:  

World Bank to Focus Future Investment on Clean Energy

Posted in alo, ALPHA, eco-friendly, FF, G & F, GE, growing marijuana, horticulture, Jason, Monterey, ONA, OXO, solar, solar power, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on World Bank to Focus Future Investment on Clean Energy

5 Striking Things We’ve Learned About Pesticides in California

Pesticides have been linked to everything from bee deaths to the hole in the ozone layer. blueenayim/Thinkstock California keeps detailed data on every commercial pesticide applied across the state. It provides a unique look at how, where and when chemicals are used. The Center for Investigative Reporting obtained more than two decades’ worth of that data from the state – the equivalent of more than 56 million pesticide applications. We used the data to build this app that lets you search for pesticide use around your home, workplace or anywhere else in California. And it helped inform our investigation into the pesticides used by the strawberry industry. As we played with the data, we came across some nuggets that didn’t make it into that story. Here are five of the most interesting things we pulled out of the data: Read the rest at The Center for Investigative Reporting. Continued: 5 Striking Things We’ve Learned About Pesticides in California

View original: 

5 Striking Things We’ve Learned About Pesticides in California

Posted in alo, Citadel, eco-friendly, FF, G & F, GE, LG, Monterey, ONA, OXO, solar, solar power, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on 5 Striking Things We’ve Learned About Pesticides in California

“So Little Time Between Hope and Death”

This fall, Kashmir saw its worst floods in more than half a century. My family and I barely survived them. A Kashmiri Muslim man carries an electric transformer through floodwaters. Dar Yasin/AP When Kashmir’s uprising was at its peak in the late 1990s, I used to walk along the banks of the Jhelum River after school. Amid the fighting between India, which controls the part of Kashmir where I grew up, and armed groups battling for independence or union with Pakistan, the river was calm in a way that the rest of the region wasn’t. I moved away from my home in Srinagar, the summer capital of India-administered Kashmir, six years ago, but every time I come back, I try to walk on the bridge over the river, to watch the water flow with the same serenity that it had when I was a child. The same river submerged my family’s house this fall in Kashmir’s worst flooding in more than half a century, which ultimately killed more than 400 people on both the Indian and Pakistani sides of the region’s disputed border. But that river wasn’t the Jhelum of my childhood. It wasn’t the Jhelum I loved. When the river started to breach banks and burst levees on September 6, I was at my parents’ house in Srinagar, visiting my sister, who had just given birth to a daughter. By then, it had been raining for days. But that evening was almost completely ordinary. We heard the occasional sounds of cars rushing past. Loudspeakers in the nearby mosque broadcast periodic announcements that residents should move to higher floors of their houses in case of flooding, as well as requests for young men to help reinforce the river’s embankment with sandbags. Read the rest at The Atlantic. This article: “So Little Time Between Hope and Death”

Source article: 

“So Little Time Between Hope and Death”

Posted in alo, Casio, GE, ONA, OXO, The Atlantic, Ultima, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on “So Little Time Between Hope and Death”

Even Global Warming Can’t Convince Republicans That Global Warming Exists

Polling data suggests that even when the heat is on, political ideology outweighs facts. Eunika Sopotnicka /Shutterstock Scientists and science journalists like to say that one of the best ways to tell that climate change is real is to take a look at the changes we can already see: This year is on track to be the hottest ever recorded, and glaciers, corn, and even grizzly bears are responding to the warming. But all those shifts won’t be enough to convince most conservative climate skeptics, a new study in Nature Climate Change finds. A growing body of recent research suggests a person’s political ideology, economic philosophy, and religious beliefs tend to overwhelm observed facts about global warming. The new study, which was released Monday, put that hypothesis to the test by analyzing Gallup polls taken just after the unusually warm winter of 2012. It found that both Democrats’ and Republicans’ perceptions of the warmer weather in their state tracked fairly well with actual satellite temperature data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. But “for people who said their local winter was warming, the observed temperature anomalies had no effect on the tendency to attribute that to global warming,” explains Aaron McCright, a sociologist at Michigan State University who authored the study. In other words, the actual temperature had no bearing on whether people believed in climate change. Instead, McCright says, “one of the strongest predictors” is party affiliation: Republicans were far less likely to attribute the warming they felt to man-made climate change than were Democrats. Other variables—gender, age, and level of education—were far less reliable as predictors of a person’s global warming beliefs. The findings suggest that the political polarization of climate change has become so great that the path of least resistance for most people is to hew to their party line, McCright says. Interesting, Democrats in the polling data were guilty of a different kind of bias: Overall, they perceived local temperatures to be warmer than their Republicans neighbors did—a reminder, McCright says, that confirmation bias exists on the left, too. An unrelated national survey taken after 2012′s record-breaking hot summer found that a growing majority of Americans are making the connection between temperature extremes and climate change. But that survey didn’t account for political affiliation. McCright’s research suggests that convincing Republicans will be a different challenge than convincing the public at large, and that references to extreme weather aren’t the best rhetorical strategy to deal with that challenge. The political chasm on climate change is gaping—a Pew poll last year found 44 percent of Republicans believed there was “solid evidence the earth is warming” versus 87 percent of Democrats. That imbalance sets the stage for partisan gridlock on climate action in Congress; Senate Republicans have said they plan to make attacking President Obama’s climate policies a priority when they take control next year. So the stakes are high for winning more conservatives to accept the mainstream scientific consensus on climate change, and this study finds that changes in the weather might not be enough to change many minds. “If we wait around for that to happen, we’ll be waiting for a while,” McCright says. View article:   Even Global Warming Can’t Convince Republicans That Global Warming Exists ; ; ;

See original article here:

Even Global Warming Can’t Convince Republicans That Global Warming Exists

Posted in eco-friendly, FF, G & F, GE, LAI, Monterey, ONA, OXO, solar, solar power, Ultima, Uncategorized, wind energy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Even Global Warming Can’t Convince Republicans That Global Warming Exists

Europe’s plastic bag rule is a breath of fresh air

Europe’s plastic bag rule is a breath of fresh air

By on 24 Nov 2014commentsShare

Plastic bags are the worst. They’re made of oil, they’re filling up the oceans, they’re showing up in sea turtles, they’re killing birds and plankton, too, and they’re even threatening human health, as plastic works its way up the food chain to the top predator: us.

That’s why the European Union worked so hard on a new compromise aimed at cutting Europe’s throwaway plastic bag use by 80 percent over the next decade. E.U. governments unanimously approved the measure last Friday, reports Newsweek.

Yes, that’s right. Political actors from states like Denmark, where folks use four lightweight plastic bags per year, on average, found a happy medium with the likes of Portugal, whose residents go through them at 100 times that rate, and all sides agreed to the deal because the ecological damage is too great to ignore. Having lived scarcely two decades, I can’t remember anything quite like this multinational legislation.

The original proposal’s outright ban on so-called oxodegradable bags was downgraded to appease the U.K., a country that remains displeased with the binding elements of the agreement. The Guardian explains the ratified deal:

Under the new proposal, EU states can opt for mandatory pricing of bags by 2019, or binding targets to reduce the number of plastic bags used annually per person from 191 now to 90 by 2019 and 40 in 2025. Measures such as bag taxes could also be considered as equivalent.

Even as communities around the world do their damnedest to oust this ubiquitous symbol of modern consumerism, Big Plastic will try anything to keep us addicted to the convenient, single-use totes: Slap on misleading labels, dub them reusable to get around bans, and, of course, put nearly every product, even fruits and veggies at many stores, into its own plastic bag called packaging. Despite the countermovement, we use more than a million plastic bags every minute worldwide, each one for an average of 15 minutes.

What to do about this oceanic mess? Involving a higher authority like the E.U. sounds like an alright complement to the proliferating small-scale measures to sack the sack.

Celebrate the progress, but beware of complacency. In terms of environmental impact, the type of bag we use is far less important than what we put inside it (or don’t).

As for the new rule, my question is (as always): Does it apply to produce bags or only at the checkout line?

Source:
EU Government Approves Law to Curb Plastic Bag Use

, Newsweek.

Find this article interesting?

Donate now to support our work.Share

Please

enable JavaScript

to view the comments.

Get stories like this in your inbox

AdvertisementAdvertisement

See the original article here:  

Europe’s plastic bag rule is a breath of fresh air

Posted in Anchor, FF, G & F, GE, LAI, LG, ONA, organic, oven, OXO, PUR, solar, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Europe’s plastic bag rule is a breath of fresh air

BREAKING: The Senate Just Voted Not to Approve the Keystone XL Pipeline

green4us

Republicans have vowed to try again next year when they control the Senate.  Senator Mary Landrieu (D-La.) is rounding up support for a Senate vote tomorrow on the Keystone XL pipeline. James Berglie/ZUMA UPDATE (11/18/14, 6:17 pm ET): A controversial bill to approve construction of the Keystone XL oil pipeline failed in the US Senate Tuesday evening. It received 59 “aye” votes, just shy of the 60 needed to send the bill to President Obama’s desk. The fight isn’t over yet; Republicans have said they plan to prioritize approving the pipeline once they take control of the Senate next year. Below the headlines last week about President Obama’s major climate agreement with China, another environmental story was gaining steam: A vote in Congress to force approval of Keystone XL, a controversial pipeline that would carry crude oil from Canada down to refineries on the Gulf Coast. On Thursday, the House voted overwhelmingly in favor of the pipeline, as it has done numerous times in the past. The Senate is expected to vote on an identical bill tomorrow. Previous Keystone legislation has always stalled in the Senate due to opposition from Democrats. But the vote tomorrow will likely have more Democratic support than ever before, making it the closest the pipeline has yet come to approval. Here’s what you need to know: What’s happening with Keystone this week? As of Sunday, according to Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), the bill is still one vote shy of the 60 it would need to break a Senate filibuster, pass Congress, and land on the president’s desk. If enacted, the legislation would green-light a construction permit for the pipeline, removing that authority from the State Department, which currently has the final say because the project crosses an international border. President Obama has said that his administration would only approve the project if it didn’t increase total US carbon emissions; a State Department report in January suggested that the pipeline was unlikely to effect America’s carbon footprint because the oil it would carry would get exported and burned one way or the other. But the final decision was postponed indefinitely in April and is awaiting the outcome of a court case in Nebraska that could alter the pipeline’s route. Congressional Republicans have accused Obama of willfully kicking the decision down the road for as long as possible; on Thursday Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said this week’s vote was long overdue after years of the administration “dragging its feet.” Why is the vote happening now? When Republicans take control of the Senate next year, with a host of new climate skeptics in tow, they could pass a new round of Keystone legislation—perhaps even with enough support to override a presidential veto. So why rush? The answer revolves around the Senate race in Louisiana, where incumbent Democrat Mary Landrieu is locked in a run-off campaign with Republican challenger Bill Cassidy, who currently serves in the House. The special election is scheduled for Dec. 6, and Landrieu appears to be trailing Cassidy. Landrieu represents a state with close ties to the oil industry, and she has long been one of the pipeline’s most vocal advocates. Last week she introduced the Keystone bill in what many on Capitol Hill have described as a last-ditch political maneuver to score points with her constituents before the runoff. Cassidy introduced the House version of the bill shortly thereafter. This morning, anti-pipeline activists set up shop in front of Landrieu’s residence in Washington: A pipeline has gone up on Sen Landrieu’s front lawn as ClimateChange activists protest expected up vote @350 #NoKXL pic.twitter.com/aixaZF0Vpd — john zangas (@johnzangas) November 17, 2014 If the bill passes, will President Obama sign it into law? Probably not. At a press conference in Burma last week, Obama said that his “position hasn’t changed” and that the approval process should go through the proper State Department channels. It’s hard to imagine that after all of Obama’s statements on Keystone’s carbon footprint, the approval process, and his series of climate promises last week, he would capitulate on the pipeline merely for the benefit of one Senate Democrat who appears unlikely to win anyway. It seems more likely that he would save Keystone approval as a bargaining chip to keep the GOP-run Congress from attacking his other hard-won climate initiatives. We’ll have to wait and see how this all plays out over the next few days.

View the original here: 

BREAKING: The Senate Just Voted Not to Approve the Keystone XL Pipeline

Related Posts

Senate Now Has Enough Votes To Pass Keystone XL Pipeline Approval Bill
Meet the Senate’s New Climate Denial Caucus
Amid Pipeline and Climate Debate, Energy-Efficiency Bill Is Derailed
Why Big Coal’s Export Terminals Could be Even Worse Than the Keystone XL Pipeline
Is Shipping Oil by Rail As Dangerous As the Keystone Pipeline?

Share this:






Originally posted here:  

BREAKING: The Senate Just Voted Not to Approve the Keystone XL Pipeline

Posted in alo, eco-friendly, FF, G & F, GE, Green Light, Monterey, ONA, OXO, solar, solar power, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on BREAKING: The Senate Just Voted Not to Approve the Keystone XL Pipeline

The US and China Just Announced a Huge Deal on Climate—and It’s a Game Changer

green4us

The surprise agreement aims to double the pace of carbon pollution reduction in the United States. President Obama and Chinese President Xi Jinping met Tuesday in Beijing. Ju Peng/Xinhua/ZUMA In a surprise announcement Tuesday night, the world’s two biggest economies and greenhouse gas emitters, United States and China, said they will partner closely on a broad-ranging package of plans to fight climate change, including new targets to reduce carbon pollution, according to a statement from the White House. The announcement comes after President Obama met with Chinese President Xi Jinping today in Beijing, and includes headline-grabbing commitments from both countries that are sure to breathe new life into negotiations to reach a new climate treaty in Paris next year. According to the plan, the United States will reduce carbon emissions 26-28 percent below 2005 levels by 2025, nearly twice the existing target—without imposing new restrictions on power plants or vehicles. Tuesday’s announcement is equally remarkable for China’s commitment. For the first time, China has set a date at which it expects its emissions will “peak,” or finally begin to taper downward: around 2030. China is currently the world’s biggest emitter of carbon pollution, largely because of its coal-dependent economy, and reining in emissions while continuing to grow has been the paramount challenge for China’s leaders. The White House said in a statement that China could reach the target even sooner than 2030. It “expects that China will succeed in peaking its emissions before 2030 based on its broad economic reform program, plans to address air pollution, and implementation of President Xi’s call for an energy revolution.” But the White House was more cautiously optimistic on China’s goal of reaching the goal of 20 percent total energy consumption from zero-emission sources by 2030. It painted a picture of the challenges ahead for the energy-hungry giant: “It will require China to deploy an additional 800-1,000 gigawatts of nuclear, wind, solar and other zero emission generation capacity by 2030—more than all the coal-fired power plants that exist in China today and close to total current electricity generation capacity in the United States.” This is the first time such a policy has come from the very top, President Xi Jinping. Previously, the first and only mention of “peaking” came from Vice Premier Zhang Gaoli at the UN climate talks in New York in September. “This is clearly a sign of the seriousness and the importance the Chinese government is giving to this issue,” said Barbara Finamore, Asia director for the Natural Resources Defense Council, the environmental advocacy group, in an interview from Hong Kong. “The relationship [between the US and China] is tricky, but climate has been one of the areas where the two sides can and are finding common ground.” The announcement also sets the stage for conflict with the Senate’s new Republican leadership, which just today signaled that attacking Obama’s climate initiatives will be a top priority in 2015. The plan does not entail using the US Environmental Protection Agency’s authority to regulate greenhouse gases, as the bulk of Obama’s existing climate strategy does. Instead, it involves a series of initiatives to be undertaken in partnership between the two countries, including: Expanding funding for clean energy technology research at the US-China Clean Energy Research Center, a think tank Obama created in 2009 with Xi’s predecessor Hu Jintao. Launching a large-scale pilot project in China to study carbon capture and sequestration. A push to further limit the use of hydroflourocarbons, a potent greenhouse gas found in refrigerants. A federal framework for cities in both countries to share experiences and best practices for low-carbon economic growth and adaptation to the impacts of climate change at the municipal level. A call to boost trade in “green” goods, including energy efficiency technology and resilient infrastructure, kicked off by a tour of China next spring by Commerce Secretary Penny Pritzker and Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz. NRDC’s Finamore said the magnitude of the agreement—which was made well in advance of expectations—will provide fresh impetus to the drive for a new global climate agreement in Paris next year. “Hopefully this will give new ambition to other countries as well to move forward quickly,” she said. The agreement “sends a powerful signal to every other country that they are serious and are willing to come to the table to reach a global agreement.” “Even if the targets aren’t as ambitious as many might hope, the world’s two largest carbon emitters are stepping up together with serious commitments,” said Bob Perciasepe, president of the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions, a Washington policy group. “This will help get other countries on board and greatly improves the odds for a solid global deal next year in Paris.” “For too long it’s been too easy for both the US and China to hide behind one another,” he said. Or as UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon put it: “Today, China and the United States have demonstrated the leadership that the world expects of them.”

See the original post:  

The US and China Just Announced a Huge Deal on Climate—and It’s a Game Changer

Related Posts

Here’s Why an Obama Plan to Regulate Carbon Could Work
U.S. and China Pledge New Model of Cooperation
White House Pushes Financial Case for Carbon Rule
White House Report Presses Economic Case for Carbon Rule
This One Weird Trick Will Help You Cut Carbon Emissions Overnight

Share this:






Continued:

The US and China Just Announced a Huge Deal on Climate—and It’s a Game Changer

Posted in alo, eco-friendly, FF, G & F, GE, Monterey, ONA, OXO, Pines, solar, solar power, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The US and China Just Announced a Huge Deal on Climate—and It’s a Game Changer

What’s Wrong With the Science of “Interstellar”?

green4us

Source:  

What’s Wrong With the Science of “Interstellar”?

Posted in Down To Earth, FF, GE, LAI, ONA, OXO, Smith's, solar, Ultima, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on What’s Wrong With the Science of “Interstellar”?

Here Comes the Sun: America’s Solar Boom, in Charts

green4us

It’s been a bit player, but solar power is about to shine. Izu navi/Flickr Last week, an energy analyst at Deutsche Bank came to a startling conclusion: By 2016, solar power will be as cheap or cheaper than electricity from the conventional grid in every state except three. That’s without any changes to existing policy. In other words, we’re only a few years away from the point where, in most of the United States, there will be no economic reason not to go solar. If you care about slowing climate change or just moving toward cleaner energy, that is a huge deal. And solar energy is already going gangbusters. In the past decade, the amount of solar power produced in the United States has leaped 139,000 percent. A number of factors are behind the boom: Cheaper panels and a raft of local and state incentives, plus a federal tax credit that shaves 30 percent off the cost of upgrading. Still, solar is a bit player, providing less than half of 1 percent of the energy produced in the United States. But its potential is massive—it could power the entire country 100 times over. So what’s the holdup? A few obstacles: pushback from old-energy diehards, competition with other efficient energy sources, and the challenges of power storage and transmission. But with solar in the Southwest already at “grid parity”—meaning it costs the same or less as electricity from conventional sources—Wall Street is starting to see solar as a sound bet. As a recent Citigroup investment report put it, “Our viewpoint is that solar is here to stay.” Some numbers that tell the story: Sources Solar growth: Solar Energy Industries Association New solar installations: SEIA Sunlight: Sandia National Lab, Energy Information Agency/National Renewable Energy Laboratory Electricity generating capacity: SEIA Carbon savings, electricity demand: SEIA, EIA/NREL Installed PV capacity: International Energy Agency Solar jobs: The Solar Foundation, Bureau of Labor Statistics Solar panels on a typical house: NREL Panel cost, VC funding: Greenpeace; Mercom Capital Group (2013 & 2014) Image credits: Shutterstock (Earth, USA); Maurizio Fusillo/Noun Project (solar panel); Okan Benn/Noun Project (car); Q. Li/Noun Project (chart); Sergey Krivoy/Noun Project (coal trolley); Marcio Duarte/Noun Project (worker); Alex Berkowitz/Noun Project (cash)

More – 

Here Comes the Sun: America’s Solar Boom, in Charts

Related Posts

The Key to Cheap Renewable Energy? Robots
Three Reasons Why Germany Is Kicking Our Arsch on Solar
Here Comes the Son: Barry Goldwater Jr. Fights for Solar Power in Arizona
China’s Feud With West on Solar Leads to Tax
7 Scary Facts About How Global Warming Is Scorching the United States

Share this:






This article is from – 

Here Comes the Sun: America’s Solar Boom, in Charts

Posted in alo, ALPHA, eco-friendly, FF, G & F, GE, growing marijuana, horticulture, Monterey, ONA, oven, OXO, solar, solar panels, solar power, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Here Comes the Sun: America’s Solar Boom, in Charts

Senate Now Has Enough Votes To Pass Keystone XL Pipeline Approval Bill

McConnell finally has the chance he’s been waiting for. Gage Skidmore/Flickr WASHINGTON -– The new Senate Republican majority creates an opportunity for likely Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) to force a vote on the proposed Keystone XL pipeline he’s been waiting years to hold. By The Huffington Post’s count, the new Senate will have at least 61 votes in favor of a measure forcing the pipeline’s approval — a filibuster-proof majority. Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus said Tuesday in an appearance on MSNBC that passing a Keystone approval bill would be the second item on the Republican agenda, after a budget. “I actually think the president will sign the bill on the Keystone pipeline because I think the pressure — he’s going to be boxed in on that, and I think it’s going to happen,” Priebus said. To keep reading, click here. View original:  Senate Now Has Enough Votes To Pass Keystone XL Pipeline Approval Bill ; ; ;

Source:

Senate Now Has Enough Votes To Pass Keystone XL Pipeline Approval Bill

Posted in alo, eco-friendly, Eureka, FF, G & F, GE, LAI, Landmark, Monterey, ONA, oven, OXO, solar, solar power, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Senate Now Has Enough Votes To Pass Keystone XL Pipeline Approval Bill