Tag Archives: economics

A Google Duo and a Media Maven Explore a Hyper-Connected Planet

A brisk chat between Googlers and a media maven about the emerging Knowosphere. Originally posted here:  A Google Duo and a Media Maven Explore a Hyper-Connected Planet Related ArticlesObserved Earth: A New View of the SkyExtreme Weather in a Warming World, and the American MindEnergy Agreement Hidden by Climate Disputes

See more here: 

A Google Duo and a Media Maven Explore a Hyper-Connected Planet

Posted in alternative energy, eco-friendly, FF, G & F, GE, Monterey, ONA, solar, solar power, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on A Google Duo and a Media Maven Explore a Hyper-Connected Planet

Obama Hails 150th Year of Academy of Sciences

President Obama cheers on the National Academy of Sciences in its 150th year. See more here:  Obama Hails 150th Year of Academy of Sciences Related ArticlesAn Earth Scientist Explores the Biggest Climate Threat: FearA Cool But Splendid Spring in the NortheastSustaining Cities on a Crowding Planet

Read article here: 

Obama Hails 150th Year of Academy of Sciences

Posted in alternative energy, eco-friendly, FF, G & F, GE, Monterey, ONA, solar, solar power, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Obama Hails 150th Year of Academy of Sciences

Views Differ on Fracking’s Impact

Do the economic benefits outweigh the environmental risks? CREDO.fracking/Flickr The practice of hydraulic fracturing is under debate across the country in areas impacted by America’s ongoing natural gas boom. In the town of Findlay, Ohio, an increase in manufacturing in recent years has been accompanied by expanded natural gas drilling. That has Greg Auburn, professor of International Business at the University of Findlay feeling optimistic about Ohio’s future employment prospects. “The estimates (for jobs in the natural gas industry) range anywhere from 20,000 to 200,000 over the next 3 years,” he said. Along with employment projections, researchers have explored other possible costs and benefits of hydraulic fracturing, known colloquially as “fracking.” Studies conducted on the counties above the Marcellus and Barnett Shale for example — where extensive drilling has already taken place — present mixed economic results. Tim Kelsey is a Professor of Agricultural Economics at Penn State and author of “Economic Impacts of the Marcellus Shale in Pennsylvania: Employment and Income 2009.” He argues that possible benefits from increased drilling will impact different towns in different ways. “The potential benefits from hydraulic fracturing are tightly linked to the local labor force and infrastructure conditions as well as the structure and capacity of local governance.” Back in Findlay, Marathon Petroleum company headquarters sit directly on the town’s main street. According to Kelsey, the Midwest has a historical tradition entrenched in resource extraction through coal mining and oil drilling. Therefore the skilled labor and equipment necessary for hydraulic fracturing already exists in towns such as Findlay. However, the context is quite different in other communities open to shale plays across Ohio. To keep reading, click here. Link: Views Differ on Fracking’s Impact Related ArticlesObama Campaign Launches Plan to Shame Climate Sceptics in CongressRestoring the RockawaysClimate Desk Live 06/06/13: The Alarming Science Behind Climate Change’s Increasingly Wild Weather

Visit site – 

Views Differ on Fracking’s Impact

Posted in alo, ALPHA, Anchor, aquaponics, eco-friendly, FF, G & F, GE, horticulture, Monterey, ONA, solar, solar power, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Views Differ on Fracking’s Impact

A Cool But Splendid Spring in the Northeast

A short walk on a beautiful spring day. View original:   A Cool But Splendid Spring in the Northeast Related ArticlesStudy Charts 2,000 Years of Continental Climate ChangesSustaining Cities on a Crowding PlanetA Photographer’s Focus Shifts from Suffering to Serenity

Visit site – 

A Cool But Splendid Spring in the Northeast

Posted in alternative energy, aquaponics, eco-friendly, FF, G & F, GE, Monterey, Omega, ONA, PUR, solar, solar power, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on A Cool But Splendid Spring in the Northeast

The New $100 Bill Will Have Thousands of Tiny Lenses Built In

Photo: The US Treasury

As of October 8, a new $100 bill will be in circulation in the U.S. In an attempt to cut down on counterfeits, the Federal Reserve will add features such as a blue 3D security ribbon composed of thousands of tiny lenses and a disappearing Liberty Bell in an inkwell, USA Today reports.

The new bill is a bit late to arrive in Americans wallets. Originally, it was scheduled to be released in February 2011. But the Feds discovered an issue with unwanted wrinkles appearing in many of the notes, so they postponed its release indefinitely.

As for that blue security ribbon and its tiny lenses, the technology works by magnifying the objects underneath. When the bill is moved one way, whatever is underneath seems to move the opposite way. Though the $100 is the note most frequently targeted by counterfeiters, USA Today points out, it’s the last bill to undergo an upgrade to try and deter those fakes.

But as the Wall Street Journal points out, even with fancy new technology, the counterfeiters will likely find a way around the security measures. They always do. Ben Franklin himself lost sleep over this issue. He designed the country’s first bills, which immediately triggered a wealth of counterfeits despite his adding a “mysterious anticounterfeiting device.”

This was the so-called nature print, which consisted of an image of a leaf or leaves. It was extraordinarily lifelike, and with good reason. Franklin had devised a way of taking a plaster cast of the surface of a leaf. That in turn could be used to cast a lead plate that would be used to print the notes. Because every leaf was unique—with a complex web of veins of varying thickness—the notes were very difficult to counterfeit.

No surprise, though, the strategy didn’t work for very long. The British actually used counterfeits of Franklin’s bills as a means of undermining the impending war. While we’ve moved beyond Red Coat plots to crash the U.S. economy, as the Wall Street Journal writes, however many fancy security tactics are crammed onto a small slip of green paper, counterfeiters will eventually and inevitably crack that code.

More from Smithsonian.com:

The Art of Money 
To Save Money, Ask for Pretty New Dollar Bills

Visit link: 

The New $100 Bill Will Have Thousands of Tiny Lenses Built In

Posted in FF, GE, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The New $100 Bill Will Have Thousands of Tiny Lenses Built In

A Photographer’s Focus Shifts from Suffering to Serenity

A photographer whose career has focused on suffering turns to serenity. Link: A Photographer’s Focus Shifts from Suffering to Serenity Related ArticlesAn Earth Day Thought: Litter MattersArctic Nations Seek Common Management of Fishing as Open Water SpreadsBasketball Giant Keeps Pressing China on Rhinos and Ivory

From:

A Photographer’s Focus Shifts from Suffering to Serenity

Posted in alternative energy, eco-friendly, FF, G & F, GE, LG, Monterey, ONA, PUR, solar, solar power, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on A Photographer’s Focus Shifts from Suffering to Serenity

Op-Ed: Setting the record straight on U.S. gas prices

back

Op-Ed: Setting the record straight on U.S. gas prices

Posted 17 April 2013 in

National

Setting the record straight on U.S. gas prices
Politico 4/16/13
By: Tom Buis and Bob Dinneen

Last month, the Energy Information Administration announced that U.S. crude production will soon top oil imports for the first time in almost 20 years, and at the same time production of ethanol — which costs less than gasoline — has been increasing because of lower corn prices. That news was predictably followed by a drop in gasoline prices across the U.S. This is in marked contrast to predictions just a few weeks ago that an arcane trading market controlled by oil refiners and hedge funds would push gas prices to the stratosphere and wreck the economy. What’s going on?

The story here is simple. Opponents of renewable fuel, led by the oil industry, want to convince Capitol Hill that renewable identification numbers, or RINs, are the harbingers of doom for U.S. gas prices. Three facts every member of Congress should know about RINs: They are free, they are primarily traded by oil refiners to oil refiners, and they were created at the oil companies’ insistence. Early this year, the price of RINs rose dramatically, but since oil companies dominate the RINs market — and since ethanol supplies are increasing — we are hard-pressed to see a reason for that spike in prices.

Many in Congress agree that the market fundamentals do not account for that increase in prices and have called for investigations — a move that we support. But before the witnesses swear in, let’s set the record straight on RINs and gas prices.

First, RINs are not raising America’s gas prices. A new analysis conducted by Informa Economics showed that RINs are most likely contributing no more than $0.004 (four-tenths of one cent) to the retail price of a gallon of gasoline. Meanwhile, Informa found that ethanol costs significantly less than gasoline at the wholesale level, providing an average discount at the pump of $0.044 per gallon discount so far this year. So ethanol is still making gasoline cheaper than it would be if we had 100 percent petroleum fuel.

Second, we cannot drill our way to cheap gasoline in the long run. But don’t take our word for it. The International Energy Agency, in the same report often cited as proof that the U.S. can become “Saudi America,” also noted in a less-quoted section that even if the U.S. becomes “all but self-sufficient” thanks to domestic drilling, the price per barrel will still exceed $215 in 2035 — more than double today’s price. That’s because oil prices are set on a global market and global demand is skyrocketing.
So if drilling isn’t going to lower gas prices, what will? If you ask API, they’ll tell you that killing renewable fuel is the key, since it will free us from the perils of RINs. In fact, the opposite is true — we need to expand renewable fuel to save at the pump.

One way to do that is to make E15 widely available. Since E15 is a higher ethanol blend, it would save consumers — and cost oil companies — even more money, so it is no coincidence that API is also fighting to block E15. Ironically, widely available E15 would create an additional 6.5 billion RINs, driving RIN prices back down. In other words, oil companies are paying a premium to reject renewable fuel.

The real story here is oil’s determination to crush all forms of renewable fuel this year. API and its allies are spending millions of dollars on studies, PR and advertising and lobbying to block their competitors — all while hoping that Congress overlooks the fact that the oil industry created the very renewable fuel policies, including RINs, that they are now attacking.

To lower gas prices, we must ensure that the infrastructure needed to integrate more cheaper-than-gasoline ethanol is built. In 2007, the oil companies effectively pledged to invest in the facilities needed to meet the RFS obligations they agreed to. They have not kept up their end of the bargain. As soon as the oil industry stops obstructing the change mandated by the law, we will see choice at the pump increase, and prices at the pump decrease.

Tom Buis is CEO of Growth Energy. Bob Dinneen is the president and CEO of the Renewable Fuels Association.

Fuels America News & Stories

Fuels
Excerpt from – 

Op-Ed: Setting the record straight on U.S. gas prices

Posted in Anchor, FF, GE, ONA, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Op-Ed: Setting the record straight on U.S. gas prices

Sacred Economics: Money, Gift, and Society in the Age of Transition

[amzn_product_post]

Posted in EVOLVER EDITIONS | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Sacred Economics: Money, Gift, and Society in the Age of Transition

Activists to Interior: Stop letting coal companies pillage our land, atmosphere, and treasury

Activists to Interior: Stop letting coal companies pillage our land, atmosphere, and treasury

Shutterstock

On her first full workday at her new job, Interior Secretary Sally Jewell got a loud message from green groups: Stop selling publicly owned coal for a pittance and destroying our atmosphere.

AP reports:

Environmental groups are calling for a moratorium on coal leasing in the Powder River Basin of Montana and Wyoming until the federal government reviews the program.

Representatives of 21 groups including Greenpeace and the Sierra Club requested the moratorium Monday in a letter to newly confirmed Interior Secretary Sally Jewell. …

As companies seek to ramp up coal exports, the environmentalists say the government needs to make sure companies are paying proper royalties. They also want more attention given to the climate change impacts of greenhouse gasses emitted when coal is burned.

On the royalty issue, the enviros put it a little more sharply in their letter:

The Department of Interior must ensure that coal companies do not cheat U.S. taxpayers …

A 2012 report from the Institute of Energy Economics and Financial Analysis revealed that BLM’s inaccurate assessment of the “fair market value” of coal has cheated taxpayers out of almost $30 billion over the last thirty years, a massive subsidy to the coal industry.

David Roberts put it more sharply still in a post last year: “taxpayers are getting screwed.”

it’s time climate hawks clued in to the fact that the feds — that is to say, we, collectively — own a sh*tload of land and resources, much of which can be used for energy. Among other things, this land we own provides 43.2 percent of the nation’s coal. Not only do we offer this coal up, but we practically beg coal companies to mine it, offering them, [as the Center for America Progress puts it,] “billions of dollars in taxpayer subsidies via preferential tax treatments such as the ability to expense exploration and development costs, tax deductions to cover the costs of investments in mines, and favorable capital gains treatment on royalties.”

This week’s letter to Jewell means that a lot of climate hawks are cluing in. Policy analysts Matthew Stepp and Alex Trembath argue that it’s none too soon:

Targeting coal is … an appropriately ambitious strategy against climate change. While Keystone is a single project, U.S. coal is an entire energy system. A fight against it can draw support not only from Bill McKibben’s anti-Keystone troops but also from local clean-air organizers, conservationists who are against strip mining and mountaintop removal, and the many clean-energy industries that stand to gain from coal’s loss.

Indeed, McKibben’s 350.org is one of the groups that signed on to the letter. Activists from 350, the Sierra Club, and other groups know they have to do battle on multiple fronts. It’s not Keystone or coal. It’s Keystone and coal and fracking and offshore drilling and Arctic exploration …

Editor’s note: Bill McKibben is a member of Grist’s board of directors.

Lisa Hymas is senior editor at Grist. You can follow her on

Twitter

and

Google+

.

Find this article interesting? Donate now to support our work.Read more: Business & Technology

,

Climate & Energy

,

Politics

Also in Grist

Please enable JavaScript to see recommended stories

Continued: 

Activists to Interior: Stop letting coal companies pillage our land, atmosphere, and treasury

Posted in alo, Anchor, FF, G & F, GE, ONA, solar, solar panels, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Activists to Interior: Stop letting coal companies pillage our land, atmosphere, and treasury

Activists to Interior: Stop letting coal companies rape our land, atmosphere, and treasury

Activists to Interior: Stop letting coal companies rape our land, atmosphere, and treasury

Shutterstock

On her first full workday at her new job, Interior Secretary Sally Jewell got a loud message from green groups: Stop selling publicly owned coal for a pittance and destroying our atmosphere.

AP reports:

Environmental groups are calling for a moratorium on coal leasing in the Powder River Basin of Montana and Wyoming until the federal government reviews the program.

Representatives of 21 groups including Greenpeace and the Sierra Club requested the moratorium Monday in a letter to newly confirmed Interior Secretary Sally Jewell. …

As companies seek to ramp up coal exports, the environmentalists say the government needs to make sure companies are paying proper royalties. They also want more attention given to the climate change impacts of greenhouse gasses emitted when coal is burned.

On the royalty issue, the enviros put it a little more sharply in their letter:

The Department of Interior must ensure that coal companies do not cheat U.S. taxpayers …

A 2012 report from the Institute of Energy Economics and Financial Analysis revealed that BLM’s inaccurate assessment of the “fair market value” of coal has cheated taxpayers out of almost $30 billion over the last thirty years, a massive subsidy to the coal industry.

David Roberts put it more sharply still in a post last year: “taxpayers are getting screwed.”

it’s time climate hawks clued in to the fact that the feds — that is to say, we, collectively — own a sh*tload of land and resources, much of which can be used for energy. Among other things, this land we own provides 43.2 percent of the nation’s coal. Not only do we offer this coal up, but we practically beg coal companies to mine it, offering them, [as the Center for America Progress puts it,] “billions of dollars in taxpayer subsidies via preferential tax treatments such as the ability to expense exploration and development costs, tax deductions to cover the costs of investments in mines, and favorable capital gains treatment on royalties.”

This week’s letter to Jewell means that a lot of climate hawks are cluing in. Policy analysts Matthew Stepp and Alex Trembath argue that it’s none too soon:

Targeting coal is … an appropriately ambitious strategy against climate change. While Keystone is a single project, U.S. coal is an entire energy system. A fight against it can draw support not only from Bill McKibben’s anti-Keystone troops but also from local clean-air organizers, conservationists who are against strip mining and mountaintop removal, and the many clean-energy industries that stand to gain from coal’s loss.

Indeed, McKibben’s 350.org is one of the groups that signed on to the letter. Activists from 350, the Sierra Club, and other groups know they have to do battle on multiple fronts. It’s not Keystone or coal. It’s Keystone and coal and fracking and offshore drilling and Arctic exploration …

Editor’s note: Bill McKibben is a member of Grist’s board of directors.

Lisa Hymas is senior editor at Grist. You can follow her on

Twitter

and

Google+

.

Find this article interesting? Donate now to support our work.Read more: Business & Technology

,

Climate & Energy

,

Politics

Also in Grist

Please enable JavaScript to see recommended stories

This article – 

Activists to Interior: Stop letting coal companies rape our land, atmosphere, and treasury

Posted in alo, Anchor, FF, G & F, GE, ONA, solar, solar panels, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Activists to Interior: Stop letting coal companies rape our land, atmosphere, and treasury