Tag Archives: industry

California Is Giving Tesla Another Huge Tax Break. Good Move.

Mother Jones

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC “-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN” “http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd”>

This story originally appear on Slate and is reproduced here as part of the ClimateDesk collaboration.

This is going to drive the Tesla-haters crazy. The luxury electric-car maker is getting a huge new tax break from California, SFGate reports. The state will let it off the hook for sales and use taxes on some $415 million in new equipment it’s purchasing in order to expand production of the Model S at its Bay Area factory. That amounts to a $34.7 million tax break to produce more of a vehicle whose sticker price starts above $70,000.

Tax breaks for the rich! Corporate giveaways! The working people forced to pay for tech titans’ fancy rides!

Well, sort of. But as SFGate‘s David R. Baker explains:

California is one of the few states to tax the purchase of manufacturing equipment, a policy that California business associations have spent years trying to change. But the state does grant exemptions for clean-tech companies as a way to encourage the industry’s growth. The exemptions are issued by the California Alternative Energy and Advanced Transportation Financing Authority, chaired by State Treasurer Bill Lockyer.

So, in fact, it isn’t Tesla per se that’s getting special treatment from the state. It’s the clean-tech industry in general, which California is very keen to promote for two reasons. One, it wants to establish itself as a leader in a sector that it believes will be a big driver of its economy in the decades to come. And two, it’s one of the few states in the country that’s actually, genuinely serious about reducing its greenhouse-gas emissions. Promoting clean energy is a crucial part of its strategy.

More broadly, whatever sense a tax on the purchase of manufacturing equipment might once have made for California, it’s patently counterproductive in the context of clean-tech startups in the 21st century. Add to that some of the highest income and sales taxes in the nation, and it’s no wonder California is worried about companies like Tesla picking up stakes and heading elsewhere. Businessweek notes that new manufacturing jobs in the state have risen less than 1 percent since 2010, compared with nearly 5 percent nationally. Gov. Jerry Brown has been chipping away at the tax already, and Tesla is just the latest example.

Nor is the deal likely to burden the state’s taxpayers. Tesla’s Model S is in huge demand, and the company has been scrambling since its launch to ramp up production. SFGate reports the new equipment will help Tesla boost production by some 35,000 vehicles a year from its current annual rate of 21,000. State analysts predict the added jobs and vehicle sales are expected to bring in more money to the state than the tax break will take away.

For all that, I think some criticism might still be justified if Tesla in the end simply remains a producer of luxury cars for the wealthiest consumers. But the company has insisted from the outset that its ultimate goal is to produce an all-electric car that middle-class buyers can afford. A Tesla spokeswoman told me last week the company is still on track to release its third-generation vehicle by 2016 or 2017. The price is widely expected to be about half that of the Model S—not cheap, but certainly headed in the right direction.

Meanwhile, the success of the Model S has kickstarted the industry as a whole and made California the epicenter of the electric-car world. That’s thanks in part to a similar tax break the state gave the company several years ago to manufacture its cars there in the first place. I’d say there are worse ways for a state to spend a few tens of millions. But if you’re still convinced that tax breaks to big manufacturers are unfair and wrong, you might want to train your ire on a state a little further north, which just offered an all-time record $8.7 billion in tax breaks to a company that manufactures perhaps the least-green transportation technology of all. The worst part: Boeing might just move out anyway.

Follow this link:  

California Is Giving Tesla Another Huge Tax Break. Good Move.

Posted in alternative energy, FF, GE, LAI, LG, ONA, PUR, Uncategorized, Venta | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on California Is Giving Tesla Another Huge Tax Break. Good Move.

Today’s Senate Hearing: E15 and GHGs

back

Today’s Senate Hearing: E15 and GHGs

Posted 11 December 2013 in

National

Today, the Senate Environment and Public Works (EPW) Committee is holding a hearing on the Renewable Fuel Standard and an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposal that would lower the amount of renewable fuel in the nation’s fuel supply next year.

Representatives from the Environmental Working Group (EWG) and the American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers (AFPM) plan to cite a number of bogus and debunked studies related to E15 and greenhouse gas emissions in their testimony.

Here’s what you need to know:

E15 Safety

Either you can trust the 43 studies that show E15 does not show differences in “any performance category” when compared to the gasoline that nearly all drivers use today, or you can chose to believe the single study – funded by the American Petroleum Industry – that claims E15 damages car engines.

GHG Emissions

Either you can trust Argonne National Laboratory, Purdue University, the University of Nebraska, Michigan State University,Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Duke University, and the University of Illinois-Chicago–all institutions that have published work in just the past few years documenting the GHG benefits of ethanol compared to oil, or you can chose to believe a 2008 report that shows renewable fuel is worse than oil based on hypothetical emissions that have been shown to be overblown by at least nine more recent studies.

 

Fuels America News & Stories

Fuels
More – 

Today’s Senate Hearing: E15 and GHGs

Posted in Anchor, FF, GE, LAI, ONA, PUR, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Today’s Senate Hearing: E15 and GHGs

Newly Discovered Greenhouse Gas ’7,000 Times More Powerful Than CO2′

Perfluorotributylamine is an unregulated, long-living industrial chemical that breaks all records for potential climate impacts. Corey’sWorld (MDCoreBear)/Flickr A new greenhouse gas that is 7,000 times more powerful than carbon dioxide at warming the Earth has been discovered by researchers in Toronto. The newly discovered gas, perfluorotributylamine (PFTBA), has been in use by the electrical industry since the mid-20th century. The chemical, that does not occur naturally, breaks all records for potential impacts on the climate, said the researchers at the University of Toronto’s department of chemistry. “We claim that PFTBA has the highest radiative efficiency of any molecule detected in the atmosphere to date,” said Angela Hong, one of the co-authors. The study, published in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, found PFTBA was 7,100 times more powerful at warming the Earth over a 100-year time span than CO2. To keep reading, click here. Originally from:  Newly Discovered Greenhouse Gas ’7,000 Times More Powerful Than CO2′ ; ;Related ArticlesWhy Congress Needs to Extend the Wind Energy Tax CreditUS Navy Predicts Summer Ice Free Arctic by 2016Scientists Re-Trace Steps of Great Antarctic Explorer Douglas Mawson ;

This article: 

Newly Discovered Greenhouse Gas ’7,000 Times More Powerful Than CO2′

Posted in alo, Annies, eco-friendly, FF, G & F, GE, LAI, LG, Monterey, ONA, OXO, Pines, Ringer, solar, solar power, Uncategorized, wind energy, wind power | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Newly Discovered Greenhouse Gas ’7,000 Times More Powerful Than CO2′

Why Congress Needs to Extend the Wind Energy Tax Credit

green4us

The wind energy industry and environmental groups are calling on Congress to renew the credit. ali_pk/Flickr The wind energy production tax credit is a tougher issue than you might imagine for some good liberal wonks. On the one hand, wind power is great. On the other hand, tax credits are a market-distorting, inefficient way of making policy. They are basically spending disguised as tax cuts. Most tax credits that affect the environment — accelerated depreciation for the fossil fuel industry, the home mortgage interest deduction — incentivize sprawl, driving, and profligate dirty energy use. It is a rare, and tantalizing, point of agreement between good government advocates across party lines that we should throw out the whole system and operate a cleaner tax code. So it might be tempting, when you see Tea Party–affiliated, Koch brothers–backed groups such as Americans for Prosperity pushing to eliminate the wind energy tax credit, to say, “Hey, I agree!” Tempting but wrong. Continue reading at Grist.

Read more: 

Why Congress Needs to Extend the Wind Energy Tax Credit

Related Posts

Green Levies May Well be ‘Crap’. The Way to Deal with Carbon is to Bury It
Watch: How Climate Change Became the “Killing Fields” of Australian Politics
Large Companies Prepared to Pay Price on Carbon
Senate Bill Sweetens Loans for Energy-Efficient Homes
Top 4 Reasons the US Still Doesn’t Have a Single Offshore Wind Turbine

Share this:

Excerpt from: 

Why Congress Needs to Extend the Wind Energy Tax Credit

Posted in alo, Annies, eco-friendly, FF, G & F, GE, LAI, LG, Monterey, ONA, OXO, solar, solar power, Uncategorized, wind energy, wind power | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Why Congress Needs to Extend the Wind Energy Tax Credit

Legalize pot, save a lot of energy

Legalize pot, save a lot of energy

Shutterstock

[COUGH! COUGH!] What were we talking about? Oh right, right, right. Marijuana’s continued prohibition in 48 mellow-harshing states has an unintended side effect (besides making Phish unlistenable): It narfs $6 billion in energy costs and pumps out as much greenhouse gas as 3 million cars. Scientists from the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory found that the marijuana industry is responsible for about 1 percent of all U.S. electricity usage.

The reason is simple. To evade detection, growers work indoors — where lights, ventilation, temperature controls, and presumably industrial-grade lava lamps suck up a lot of juice. From ThinkProgress:

… Colorado growers with utility bills of $20,000 to $100,000 per month are warning that indoor growth may not be sustainable.

“Energy consumption in this business is pretty astronomical,” marijuana business owner John Kocer told CBS Denver. “As this industry expands at its current pace I do believe that we will be a tax on the energy grid: something has to change.” …

Marijuana growers cultivate indoors for several reasons. But one of the primary ones is to keep their business hidden from view. Even in states where marijuana is legal, growing marijuana outside would put their federally illegal operations right under the noses of passers-by. It also makes them vulnerable to theft from the still-vibrant illicit marijuana market.

So long as marijuana is federally prohibited and regulation is suppressed, this will be one of many adverse environmental consequences of illicit marijuana growing. Unregulated outdoor farms impose harms from unchecked forest clearing, filling and diversion of streams, use of toxic pesticides, and even road building.

Washington and Colorado, the two states that legalized recreational marijuana in 2012, each allow outdoor crops. But since the medicine Schedule I drug remains federally prohibited, both states incentivize contained, indoor crops. (In Washington, for example, indoor farmers can harvest four times a year, while outdoor growers can only harvest twice a year.)

Here’s where we could go on forever about about the winds of culture and how climate hawks and weed ravens ought to join forces and get organized to move this issue forward. But since Grist’s offices are in Seattle, I’m just gonna switch over to side B of “Dark Side of the Moon” while you contemplate the injustice.


Source
How Marijuana Prohibition Drives Up Energy Costs And Warms The Planet, ThinkProgress
Find this article interesting? Donate now to support our work.Read more: Uncategorized

Original article: 

Legalize pot, save a lot of energy

Posted in Anchor, FF, G & F, GE, growing marijuana, LG, ONA, Pines, solar, Uncategorized, wind energy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Legalize pot, save a lot of energy

Study reveals how badly frackers lie about jobs

Study reveals how badly frackers lie about jobs

Shutterstock

The fracking industry wouldn’t lie, would it? But how else to explain the massive discrepancies between the number of jobs that it claims to create and the number of jobs that it actually creates? Perhaps it’s just confused about what’s going on at its own operations.

Whatever the reason, the gulf between fracking propaganda and reality has been laid bare in a new report led by the Multi-State Shale Research Collaborative, a watchdog group that studies employment trends, economic development, and community impacts associated with fracking and proposed fracking in New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and West Virginia.

“Industry supporters have exaggerated the jobs impact in order to minimize or avoid altogether taxation, regulation, and even careful examination of shale drilling,” Frank Mauro, one of the authors of the report, told the Rochester Democrat and Chronicle.

For example, the report debunks industry-backed claims [PDF] that each fracking well in the Pennsylvania Marcellus Shale directly employs 31 people. From the report summary:

Between 2005 and 2012, less than four new direct shale-related jobs have been created for each new well drilled, much less than estimates as high as 31 direct jobs per well in some industry-financed studies.

Region-wide, shale-related employment accounts for just one out of every 795 jobs. By contrast, education and health sectors account for one out of every six jobs. …

The report also questions claims about how many indirect jobs are supported through fracking:

Industry-funded studies have used questionable assumption in economic modeling to inflate the number of jobs created in related supply chain industries (indirect jobs) as well as those created by the spending of income earned from the industry or its suppliers (induced jobs).

The fracking industry blithely dismissed the findings in the report, pointing out that it was financed by philanthropic groups that have provided grants to opponents of fracking. “It’s like the pot calling the kettle black,” John Holko of the Independent Oil and Gas Association told the newspaper. “They complain about the industry, but yet it’s a report done by an anti-industry group.”

Hey, we just remembered another time the fracking industry lied, when it forged Colorado business owners’ signatures on a pro-industry petition. So it’s not completely unprecedented.


Source
New Report Examines Shale Drilling Impact, Fiscal Policy Institute
Report: Industry-backed studies exaggerate fracking job estimates, Rochester Democrat & Chronicle

John Upton is a science fan and green news boffin who tweets, posts articles to Facebook, and blogs about ecology. He welcomes reader questions, tips, and incoherent rants: johnupton@gmail.com.

Find this article interesting? Donate now to support our work.Read more: Business & Technology

,

Climate & Energy

Taken from:  

Study reveals how badly frackers lie about jobs

Posted in ALPHA, Anchor, FF, G & F, GE, LAI, ONA, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Study reveals how badly frackers lie about jobs

Obamacare Has a Friend in the Health Care Industry

Mother Jones

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC “-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN” “http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd”>

In the LA Times today, Noam Levey writes that Obamacare has an ace in the hole: the insurance industry. Sure, they have their gripes:

But since 2010, they have invested billions of dollars to overhaul their businesses, design new insurance plans and physician practices and develop better ways to monitor quality and control costs.

Few industry leaders want to go back to a system that most had concluded was failing, as costs skyrocketed and the ranks of the uninsured swelled. Nor do they see much that is promising from the law’s Republican critics. The GOP has focused on repealing Obamacare, but has devoted less energy to developing a replacement.

…. For many of these organizations, the prospect of new customers and a more rational system outweighs their sometimes intense irritation with the Obama administration. Insurance executives, in particular, have gnashed their teeth at the president’s attacks on their industry….Despite the frustrations, most insurers remain committed to moving to a new market that would achieve the central promise of the Affordable Care Act: that all consumers can buy health plans even if they have preexisting medical conditions.

This is really a crucial point. Like it or not, the entire health care industry has spent the past three years gearing up for the rollout of Obamacare. At this point, they’re committed—and doubly so since the Republican Party very clearly has no real alternative for them. This means that all the doom-mongering on Fox News is basically just chum for the rubes: Obamacare isn’t going anywhere, and everyone knows it. The health care industry will do everything it can to make it work, and one way or another, it’s going to work. Even the Medicaid expansion is almost certain to be taken up eventually by nearly every state as passions cool down a bit and hospitals start complaining about the lost income.

The tea party may not quite know yet that it’s lost the war, and Republican politicians have every reason to egg them on in this delusion, but the war is well and truly lost. It’s all mopping up now.

Originally posted here:

Obamacare Has a Friend in the Health Care Industry

Posted in FF, GE, LAI, LG, Mop, ONA, Uncategorized, Venta | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Obamacare Has a Friend in the Health Care Industry

These Members of Congress Are Bankrolled by the Fracking Industry

green4us

A new report finds that the industry is giving out “gushers” of money, mainly to congressional Republicans. jessie owen/Flickr The growing fracking industry is “yielding gushers” of campaign donations for congressional candidates—particularly Republicans from districts with fracking activity—according to a new report from the watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington. The report, “Natural Cash: How the Fracking Industry Fuels Congress,” examines a period spanning from 2004 to 2012. In that time, CREW finds, contributions from companies that operate hydraulic fracturing wells and fracking-related industry groups rose 180 percent, from $4.3 million nine years ago to about $12 million in the last election cycle. These donations are flowing to members of Congress at a time when some legislators are trying to increase regulation of fracking, a process in which drillers inject a mixture of water, sand, and chemicals into the bedrock to release oil and natural gas reserves. The most serious of these legislative efforts is the FRAC Act. First introduced in 2009, the act would require EPA regulation of the industry and would force fracking companies to disclose the chemicals that they inject under high pressure into the ground. Both the House and Senate versions of the bill are stalled in committee. To keep reading, click here.

More:

These Members of Congress Are Bankrolled by the Fracking Industry

Related Posts

Fracking Fight Focuses on a New York Town’s Ban
Can This Contraption Make Fracking Greener?
Colorado Cities’ Rejection of Fracking Poses Political Test for Natural Gas Industry
Views Differ on Fracking’s Impact
Obama Campaign Launches Plan to Shame Climate Sceptics in Congress

Share this:

See original:

These Members of Congress Are Bankrolled by the Fracking Industry

Posted in alo, Citadel, Citizen, eco-friendly, FF, G & F, GE, LAI, Monterey, ONA, OXO, Pines, PUR, solar, solar power, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on These Members of Congress Are Bankrolled by the Fracking Industry

CHART: These Members of Congress Are Bankrolled by the Fracking Industry

Mother Jones

The growing fracking industry is “yielding gushers” of campaign donations for congressional candidates—particularly Republicans from districts with fracking activity—according to a new report from the watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington.

The report, “Natural Cash: How the Fracking Industry Fuels Congress,” examines a period spanning from 2004 to 2012. In that time, CREW finds, contributions from companies that operate hydraulic fracturing wells and fracking-related industry groups rose 180 percent, from $4.3 million nine years ago to about $12 million in the last election cycle.

These donations are flowing to members of Congress at a time when some legislators are trying to increase regulation of fracking, a process in which drillers inject a mixture of water, sand, and chemicals into the bedrock to release oil and natural gas reserves. The most serious of these legislative efforts is the FRAC Act. First introduced in 2009, the act would require EPA regulation of the industry and would force fracking companies to disclose the chemicals that they inject under high pressure into the ground. Both the House and Senate versions of the bill are stalled in committee.

Continue Reading »

Credit:

CHART: These Members of Congress Are Bankrolled by the Fracking Industry

Posted in Citizen, FF, GE, LG, ONA, Uncategorized, Venta | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on CHART: These Members of Congress Are Bankrolled by the Fracking Industry

Read our statement on EPA’s 2014 Renewable Volume Obligations (RVOs)

back

Read our statement on EPA’s 2014 Renewable Volume Obligations (RVOs)

Posted 15 November 2013 in

National

The Fuels America coalition responded today to the Environmental Protection Agency’s proposal related to the amount of renewable fuel that will be blended in the nation’s fuel supply next year:

We are astounded by the proposal released by the Administration today. It reflects an “all of the above, except biofuels” energy strategy. If implemented, would cost American drivers more than $7 billion in higher gas prices, and hand the oil companies a windfall of $10.3 billion.

The impact of this proposal on the renewable fuel industry– both first and second generation – cannot be overstated. It caps the amount of renewable fuel used in our gasoline far below what the industry is already making, and could make next year, using an approach that is inconsistent with the RFS.

It would siphon investment in cellulosic and advanced renewable fuels off to other countries and put U.S. jobs at risk. And it will idle ethanol plants, adding to the unemployment rolls and devastating rural economies.

This proposal embraces the fictional ‘blend wall’, a narrative created by the oil industry to stifle competition and deny Americans higher blends of renewable fuel. Oil companies have slowed the adoption of higher blends by discouraging and intimidating station owners from upgrading their infrastructure, fear mongering around E15, and filing lawsuits.

First and second-generation renewable fuel producers have invested billions in America and in clean fuel technology that will move us forward. Lowering renewable fuel targets will wipe away years of that progress.

We appreciate the Administration’s sentiment that they are committed to the renewable fuel industry and look forward to working with them to ensure the final proposal reflects realities within the industry, and a smarter, cleaner energy future for the U.S.

Fuels America News & Stories

Fuels
This article – 

Read our statement on EPA’s 2014 Renewable Volume Obligations (RVOs)

Posted in Anchor, FF, GE, ONA, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Read our statement on EPA’s 2014 Renewable Volume Obligations (RVOs)