Category Archives: OXO

Mark Ruffalo Wants You to Imagine a 100 Percent Clean Energy Future

green4us

The celebrity activist isn’t just against fracking; he wants to turn the conversation to green solutions. Mark Ruffalo at a New York City anti-fracking demonstration in 2010. Bryan Smith/ZUMA For Mark Ruffalo, environmental activism started out with something to oppose, to be against: Fracking. It all began when the actor, perhaps best known for his role as Bruce Banner (The Hulk) in Marvel’s The Avengers, was raising his three small children in the town of Callicoon, in upstate New York. At that time the Marcellus Shale fracking boom was coming on strong and was poised to expand into New York, even as the area also saw a series of staggering floods, each one seemingly more unprecedented than the last. “That was alarming,” remembers Ruffalo on the latest episode of the Inquiring Minds podcast (stream below). “Not only alarming to me, but also alarming to all the farmers who used to make fun of me for talking about climate change and global warming.” In response, Ruffalo launched Water Defense, a nonprofit that takes on fracking and extreme or unconventional energy extraction in general (from mountaintop removal mining to deep sea drilling), and does so with a focus on grassroots activism. In the process, Ruffalo has become quite the visible spokesman: He even unleashed some Hulk-style anger toward the energy industry on the Colbert Report. But if you think Ruffalo is just another celeb with an anti-corporate tilt, you’re missing the real story. His true passion is promoting a clean energy solution to our climate and water problems, and demonstrating how feasible it is. Today. Like, now. Mark Ruffalo The Toronto Star/ZUMA “For the first time in human history, we’re actually at a place, technologically speaking, where we can make this transition,” explains Ruffalo. “And the amount of money, and resources, that we pour into this fossil fuel infrastructure, which has been an appendage to us, like a third leg that we’re dragging around, will be freed up, and no longer will we be worrying about having to extract energy. We’ll be just harvesting what’s already pouring on us every single day.” Ruffalo’s shift toward clean energy advocacy was a natural evolution from the fracking fight. “What I started to feel was, you can’t credibly say ‘no’ to something unless you can come up with an alternative that is equal to or better than what is being offered,” he says. And for that alternative, he naturally turned to scientists. Ruffalo had come across research by Mark Jacobson, a Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Stanford, on the potential for the US to move to 100 percent renewable energy in the coming decades. “So I went to him and I said, ‘Hey Mark, could you make a plan for New York state based on this broad concept that the United States could actually do it, and do it in my lifetime hopefully, and definitely in my kids’ lifetime?” Jacobson initially demurred, saying he didn’t have time to write down much more than a few paragraphs. But he didn’t hold out for long. “The next day in my email inbox I had 40 pages of what is now a feasibility study on moving New York state from fossil fuels to renewable energy by 2030,” laughs Ruffalo. That study is here; it describes a state drawing 50 percent of its power from wind (10 percent onshore and 40 percent offshore), 38 percent from various forms of solar power, and the remainder from sources like geothermal and hydroelectric power—all while saving money, producing more jobs, and even saving lives (thanks to cleaner air). Notably, the New York state plan doesn’t just eliminate oil and coal; it also avoids nuclear power and natural gas. Here’s a figure from Jacobson’s paper, showing how much of New York’s total area would have to be devoted to clean energy projects to pull it off: Area required to implement a 100 percent clean energy plan for New York based on wind, water, and solar (“WWS”). Mark Jacobson et al, Energy Policy. To be sure, critics have questioned the feasibility of such a swift and absolute energy transformation. But Ruffalo isn’t deterred; the New York state study was just the beginning. “In the next few months, we will be dropping 50 plans for 50 states,” he says. The draft plans for California and Washington are already available. Meanwhile, Jacobson, Ruffalo, banker Marco Krapels, and documentary filmmaker Josh Fox have formed a new organization called the Solutions Project, which declares that “it’s not enough to simply be against something”; rather, the organization wants to use “science + business + culture to accelerate the transition to 100% renewable energy.” So is all of this just crazy and unrealistic? Consider some facts about the impressive growth of solar energy of late: A solar energy system is now installed every four minutes in the US, according to GTM Research. By 2016, that’s projected to be down to 83 seconds. According to the Solar Energy Industry Organization, the price of a solar panel has declined 60 percent just since 2011. Walmart is now producing more solar power at its stores than 38 US states. But the most impressive statistics about solar power involve its abundant supply and stunning potential. According to one estimate, the amount of solar energy reaching the Earth’s surface in one and half hours exceeds the entire world energy consumption in the year 2001. Such are the facts, but grasping what they really mean is another matter. And to hear Ruffalo talk about clean energy is to encounter a degree of optimism that is as infectious as it is rare. “We’re not getting the messaging about how wonderful a world we’re going to be living in when we make this change,” he says. People don’t know, Ruffalo continues, “what it will look like to go outside and see no smog. What it will look like to have cars that don’t make any noise, or have any exhaust come out of them.” To help in that visualization, Ruffalo is teaming up with the filmmaker and TV personality Jason Silva to make short-subject videos about “this beautiful concept of the abundance that will be manifested to us once we move to renewable energy.” And he has partnered with Mosaic, a company that helps to crowd-fund solar projects, in a “Put Solar on It” campaign to rapidly increase the number of US solar installations in 2014 (while making money for investors along the way). Just last week on the Fox Business Network, Ruffalo could be found promoting the Mosaic project to an audience of not-exactly-lefty investors. So will Ruffalo ever act in or produce a clean energy or global warming movie? He’s “mulling it over,” he says. “An issue has got to mature to a place that that story can be told without it smacking as a polemic,” he adds. You have to hit a kind of cultural sweet spot, sort of like what happened with Ruffalo’s influential 2010 film The Kids Are All Right, about same-sex parenting. In the meantime, Ruffalo wants you to simply imagine what our energy future could be. “A spill for a solar panel,” he says, “is a sunny day.” You can stream the full Inquiring Minds interview with Mark Ruffalo here: This episode of Inquiring Minds, a podcast hosted by best-selling author Chris Mooney and neuroscientist and musician Indre Viskontas, also features a discussion of what the year 2013 meant for climate and energy. To catch future shows right when they are released, subscribe to Inquiring Minds via iTunesorRSS. You can also follow the show on Twitter at @inquiringshow and like us on Facebook. Inquiring Minds was also recently singled out as one of the “Best of 2013″ shows on iTunes—you can learn more here.

More:  

Mark Ruffalo Wants You to Imagine a 100 Percent Clean Energy Future

Related Posts

Views Differ on Fracking’s Impact
After Sandy, Scientists Hunt for Sewage in New York City’s Harbors
Podcast: What It’s Like To Spend 55 Days in Space
Charts: The Smart Money is on Renewable Energy
Television Review: Josh Fox’s ‘Gasland Part II’ Is to Be Shown on HBO

Share this:

Read this article: 

Mark Ruffalo Wants You to Imagine a 100 Percent Clean Energy Future

Posted in alo, Anker, Citadel, eco-friendly, FF, G & F, GE, LAI, Monterey, ONA, OXO, PUR, solar, solar power, Uncategorized, Vintage | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Mark Ruffalo Wants You to Imagine a 100 Percent Clean Energy Future

Global Warming Will Intensify Drought, Says New Study

A new paper concludes droughts will probably set in more quickly and become more intense. Flooding in New Delhi. Partha Sarkar/Xinhua/ZUMA When scientists think about climate change, we often focus on long term trends and multi-year averages of various climate measures such as temperature, ocean heat, sea level, ocean acidity, and ice loss. But, what matters most in our day-to-day lives is extreme weather. If human-caused climate change leads to more extreme weather, it would make taking action more prudent. It is clear that human emissions have led to increased frequencies of heat waves and have changed the patterns of rainfall around the world. The general view is that areas which are currently wet will become wetter; areas that are currently dry will become drier. Additionally, rainfall will occur in heavy doses. So, when you look at the Earth in total, the canceling effects of wetter and drier hides the reality of regional changes that really matter in our lives and our economies. Keep reading at The Guardian. Taken from: Global Warming Will Intensify Drought, Says New Study Related Articles A Glitter-Covered Banner Got These Protesters Arrested for Staging a Bioterror Hoax Oil and Dolphins Don’t Mix Dot Earth Blog: Climate Scientists, Then and Now, Espousing ‘Responsible Advocacy’

Original article: 

Global Warming Will Intensify Drought, Says New Study

Posted in alo, Citadel, Dolphin, eco-friendly, FF, G & F, GE, LAI, Monterey, ONA, OXO, solar, solar power, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Global Warming Will Intensify Drought, Says New Study

PHOTOS: 2013′s Most Terrifying Weather Disasters

Many may be harbingers of a changing climate. The year 2013 has seen no less than 39 weather-related disasters costing $1 billion or more in damage. That’s far more than last year, when there were only 27, according to an analysis of disaster statistics by the Weather Underground’s Jeff Masters—and very near the all time high of 40, in 2010. In other words, even as most of us lived in relative comfort this year, we shouldn’t forget that nature dealt out quite a lot of misery and suffering in the world around us. So here’s a rundown of some of the most extreme weather events of 2013, from around the world: 1. BRAZIL’S WORST DROUGHT IN 50 YEARS Dead farm animals in Pernambuco, northeastern Brazil. Rodrigo Lobo/ZUMA From January through May, northeastern Brazil experienced a devastating drought. According to the agricultural secretary of the Brazilian state of Bahia, it was the worst in 50 years. All told, the damage toll was an estimated $8 billion. The drought was so powerful that some experts speculated that the dryness influenced the North Atlantic hurricane season, which was much quieter than expected. 2. AUSTRALIA’S HOTTEST SUMMER EVER A bushfire in Tasmania on Jan. 4, 2013. ToniFish/Wikimedia Commons The continent had never seen a summer like it. January 2013 was Australia’s hottest month since recordkeeping began. Sydney set a new record temperature of 114.4 degrees Fahrenheit on Jan. 18, and that’s just one in a very, very long list of heat records. A study subsequently published in the journal Geophysical Research Letters found that global warming had increased the odds of this type of extreme heat wave. 3. OKLAHOMA’S TERRIFYING TORNADOES Moore, Okla., on May 23. Zhang Yongxing/ZUMA The US always has tornadoes, but this year they were particularly devastating. The May 20 Moore, Okla., tornado was the third most destructive in history. It was an EF-5 on the Enhanced Fujita scale, the highest classification. Twenty-four people were killed, and the total damage was on the order of $2 billion, due to the fact that the tornado stayed on the ground for a long time in a highly populated area. And the Moore tornado was followed shortly afterward by the largest tornado on record on May 31: The El Reno tornado, an EF-5 whose winds reached 295 miles per hour, and whose maximum width was 2.6 miles. (Whenever there are devastating tornadoes, some ask whether climate change could be responsible. The answer is that at this point, top experts just don’t know what effect global warming may be having on tornadoes.) 4. CENTRAL EUROPE’S HISTORIC FLOODING Budapest, Hungary, on June 9. Attila Volgyi/ZUMA In late May and early June, many Central European countries—including Germany, Switzerland, Austria, and the Czech Republic—experienced record flooding as the Danube, Vltava, and Rhine rivers overtopped their banks. The result was $22 billion in damage, representing the fifth costliest non-US weather disaster on record. It was the worst European flooding “since the Middle Ages,” according to weather expert Jeff Masters. As with so many extremes of late, the flooding was tied to “blocked weather” as a result of a stuck jet stream pattern, which led to extreme rains. Some climate experts think global warming is producing more of these blocking patterns and the resultant extremes. 5. HEAT RECORDS FALL FROM SHANGHAI TO SLOVENIA Pedestrians in Shanghai cover themselves from the sun on Aug. 6. Imaginechina/ZUMA In many parts of the northern hemisphere, the summer of 2013 brought record heat. Alaska tied its all-time heat record of 98 degrees Fahrenheit during a July heat wave. As for Death Valley, Calif., 129.2 degrees Fahrenheit on June 30 just might be Earth’s overall heat record (see discussion here). Austria, Slovenia, and Shanghai also all set new heat records. On Aug. 7, Shanghai’s temperature hit 105.4 degrees. 6. NORTH INDIA’S DEADLY MONSOON FLOODS Flooding in New Delhi. Partha Sarkar/Xinhua/ZUMA According to data from the reinsurance industry intermediary firm Aon Benfield, the deadliest weather event officially recorded so far in 2013 occurred in June in northern India and Nepal, where severe flooding claimed 6,500 lives. The disaster was caused by extreme monsoon rains over the Indian state of Uttarakhand, whose capital, Dehradun, received more than 14 inches of rain in a 24-hour period, a new record. Monsoon floods are often deadly, but this single event may be the deadliest ever. 7. CALIFORNIA’S MASSIVE RIM FIRE A firefighter in Groveland, Calif., battles the Rim Fire. Elias Funez/Modesto Bee/ZUMA After starting in late August, the enormous Yosemite Rim fire eventually grew to encompass more than 250,000 acres, gaining it a ranking of the third largest in California history. To put that in perspective, the Rim Fire grew almost as large as all the other 2013 California fires combined (thus far). It was not fully contained until October 26, more than two months after it formed. (Notably, seven of the 10 largest California fires have occurred since the year 2000.) 8. COLORADO’S THOUSAND YEAR FLOOD Country Road 34 near Platteville, Colo., on Sept. 14. Dejan Smaic/ZUMA The local office of the National Weather Service just went ahead and called it “biblical.” NOAA climate scientist Martin Hoerling added that “this single event has now made the calendar year (2013) the single wettest year on record for Boulder.” The rains that fell in Colorado in September were so intense, and the flooding so damaging, that in some areas, it was the kind of disaster that will only happen once in a thousand years. (The total damage was estimated at $2 billion.) Was climate change involved? For extreme rainfall events, global warming is already contributing a small percentage of additional rainfall through increased atmospheric water vapor. What’s more, the Colorado Floods were also tied to yet another suspicious atmospheric blocking pattern. 9. THE BAY OF BENGAL’S MASSIVE CYCLONE PHAILIN Cyclone Phailin on Oct. 10. NASA The deadliest cyclones in the world, historically, have occurred in the Bay of Bengal. So when a storm here named Phailin reached Category-5 strength in October, fears were great that it could rival the deadly 1999 Odisha Cyclone, which killed as many as 10,000 people in India. Fortunately, evacuation planning and preparedness measures prevented a comparable disaster when Phailin made landfall in India at near full strength. Due to data problems, it is hard to say whether Phailin was the strongest storm ever observed in the Bay of Bengal, but it was certainly close. 10. SUPER TYPHOON HAIYAN DEVASTATES THE PHILIPPINES The devastated town of Tanauan, the Philippines. Lucas Oleniuk/The Toronto Star/ZUMA Super Typhoon Haiyan in the Northwestern Pacific didn’t just reach Category-5 strength: With winds of 195 miles per hour, it may be the strongest hurricane by wind speed ever reliably observed. We’ve all seen the ensuing images of disaster: The death toll is over 6,000, and there are still more than 1,000 people missing. In the end, Haiyan may be 2013′s deadliest weather event as well. Read article here:   PHOTOS: 2013′s Most Terrifying Weather Disasters ; ; ;

Link to original – 

PHOTOS: 2013′s Most Terrifying Weather Disasters

Posted in Annies, eco-friendly, FF, G & F, GE, LAI, LG, Monterey, Northeastern, ONA, oven, OXO, Pines, Ringer, solar, solar power, The Atlantic, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on PHOTOS: 2013′s Most Terrifying Weather Disasters

Oil and Dolphins Don’t Mix

Study: Dolphins In Louisiana’s Barataria Bay Are Much Sicker After the BP Oil Spill. Pannochka/Shutterstock A year after BP’s disastrous 2010 oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, a team of researchers found that dolphins in the vicinity of the spill showed major signs of sickness, a new study says. According to a new peer-reviewed study published Wednesday in the journal Environmental Science & Technology, a team of government, academic and non-governmental researchers identified previously unseen health issues in bottlenose dolphins examined in August 2011 in Louisiana’s Barataria Bay. Researchers examined 32 dolphins, including 29 that received comprehensive physical and ultrasound examinations. Nearly half of the sampled population were identified as being in “guarded or worse” condition, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Another 17 percent were in poor or grave condition and “not expected to survive.” Among the health problems were lung damage and low levels of adrenal stress-response hormones. A quarter of the dolphins were also underweight. To keep reading, click here. Continue reading:   Oil and Dolphins Don’t Mix ; ;Related ArticlesA Glitter-Covered Banner Got These Protesters Arrested for Staging a Bioterror HoaxHow Beyoncé Is Saving the Planet With Her New AlbumSurge Seen in U.S. Oil Output, Lowering Gasoline Prices ;

Jump to original – 

Oil and Dolphins Don’t Mix

Posted in Annies, Dolphin, eco-friendly, FF, G & F, GE, LAI, LG, Monterey, ONA, OXO, Ringer, solar, solar power, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Oil and Dolphins Don’t Mix

How Beyoncé Is Saving the Planet With Her New Album

Purchasing “Beyoncé” online instead of on CD could cut greenhouse gas emissions by up to 80 percent. Courtesy Columbia Records Last Friday, in an act of screw-you-I’m-Beyoncé badassness, the singer and Columbia Records dropped her entire self-titled fifth album exclusively for digital download on iTunes. Of course, it’s not the first digital launch, but it’s one of the most successful: So far,”Beyoncé” has smashed records, moving more than 800,000 electronic copies in just three days to become the US iTunes Store’s fastest selling album ever; it is currently number one on iTunes in 104 countries, and it’s only a matter of time before it takes pole position on the Billboard 200. As Beyoncé raps on the track “Flawless”: Bow down bitches. While the world collectively freaks out over the singer’s scarily impeccable secrecy (a leaky NSA could learn a few tricks), let’s take a moment to enjoy what Beyoncé’s digital-first release means for the planet. Given its size, and recent industry trends, this may well be one of the most climate-friendly major studio releases yet. Beyoncé has promised physical CDs (remember those?), saying they’ll hit shelves in time for stocking-stuffing. And while we don’t know yet how many of them she plans to issue, there’s reason to believe that digital downloads are beginning to erode the need for a massive physical rollout: Target, estimated to be the nation’s fourth biggest music retailer, has already decided not to sell the CD version because of low sales projections. This chart, from MusicTank, shows just how little energy it takes to consume a three-minute track of digital music, compared to a physical CD: MusicTank compares the energy consumption of various ways to listen to music. “The Dark Side of the Tunes” report by MusicTank, at the University of Winchester. According to the Record Industry Association of America, digital music accounted for nearly 60 percent of the total US market last year (by dollar value), after crossing the 50 percent mark for the first time in 2011. At the same time, the physical CD market has declined in value, from $3.4 billion in 2011 to $2.8 billion in 2012, according to RIAA numbers. It’s not only iTunes—which says it is the world’s most popular music store—but also the rise of streaming services like Pandora and Spotify, which last year accounted for 15 percent of the industry, compared to 3 percent just five years before. As album sales (distinct from singles sales) declined in the first nine months of this year compared to the same period in 2012, thedigital proportion of those sales went up, according to Neilsen figures reported by Billboard. Research shows that this shift to digital is a net win for the planet. According to the EPA, 100,000 pounds of CDs “become obsolete“—either outdated, useless or unwanted—every month. CDs are made from polycarbonate plastics and a layer of a reflective metal like silver or gold, and can be recycled by companies that crush and blend them into other plastics. (Rules on whether you can put them in your recycling bin vary from place to place.) Purchasing “Beyoncé” on iTunes instead of as a CD could result in a greenhouse-gas-emissions savings of between 40 and 80 percent, according to a 2009 study for Intel and Microsoft by researchers from a group drawn from Carnegie Mellon University, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, and Stanford. The lower end of that estimate assumes users finally burn their music to CDs; the upper end is pure downloads. One of the researchers, Jonathan Koomey, a research fellow at Stanford University, told me that while the carbon footprint of CD production has largely stayed the same since 2009, when the study was published, online music has gotten greener. “A CD is still a CD and it’s pretty likely that the delivery of that CD is not very different from three or four years ago,” he says. “But typically the internet doubles in efficiency every couple of years, and so the picture is even better for downloads now than it was a few years ago.” Another 2009 study found the average compact disc sold in the UK produces around 2.2 pounds of greenhouse gases across its lifecycle: recording, manufacturing, packaging, distribution, transport and promotion. Packaging accounted for more than a third of these emissions. (Beyoncé’s record and its videos were produced around the globe in Australia, the US, France and Brazil; we’re still waiting for some enterprising climate mathematician to calculate the total carbon miles spent.) And let’s not forget Beyoncé’s complete lack of pre-promotion for the album. Every year, tens of thousands of embargoed CD singles are shipped to radio stations to set the hype machine in motion. (I used to work at a radio station and can attest to the teetering towers of plastic that haunted staff members tasked with health and safety.) A UK report from data collected in 2009 for the British Music Recorded Music Industry and the Association of Independent Music (UK), shows the current emissions from promo CDs from the indie music sector alone is around 1,700 metric tons—equivalent to more than three times the annual energy, water and waste emissions from a single music arena. By completely switching to digital delivery of these releases, the independent music sector could save 1,525 metric tons of CO2 annually. That’s a reduction of 86 percent. One caveat: While streaming once is, by far, better than buying a physical CD, streaming multiple times begins to wrack up energy consumption. (Server farms and your internet connection use energy to deliver you that product.) A report by MusicTank—an a business development organization based at University of Westminster, UK—shows that streaming an album of 12 tracks just 27 times by one user would, in energy terms, “equate to the production and shipping of one physical 12-track CD album.” Another potential downside: Streaming and downloading doesn’t pull in as much revenue for the artists. Beyoncé raps on “Haunted,” somewhat audaciously for a woman swimming in cash: “Probably won’t make no money off this, oh well.” Oh well, indeed. More: How Beyoncé Is Saving the Planet With Her New Album ; ;Related ArticlesNewly Discovered Greenhouse Gas ’7,000 Times More Powerful Than CO2′CHART: How Much Do Exxon and Google Charge Themselves for Climate Pollution?Why Congress Needs to Extend the Wind Energy Tax Credit ;

Source article:

How Beyoncé Is Saving the Planet With Her New Album

Posted in alo, ALPHA, Citadel, eco-friendly, FF, G & F, GE, LAI, Monterey, ONA, OXO, Pines, PUR, Ringer, solar, solar power, Uncategorized, wind energy, wind power | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on How Beyoncé Is Saving the Planet With Her New Album

CHART: How Much Do Exxon and Google Charge Themselves for Climate Pollution?

green4us

The world’s biggest polluters know a price on carbon isn’t far off. Tim McDonnell/Climate Desk Most experts agree that slowing climate change is going to have to involve some kind of price on carbon dioxide pollution. Although the last attempt to pass a federal carbon price in the US failed in 2009, some of the world’s most-polluting companies haven’t let down their guard. A report last week from the nonprofit Carbon Disclosure Project found that 29 companies that operate or are headquartered in the US are planning for the future by using their own internal carbon price. So how much do these companies think carbon pollution is worth? Not every company released a specific number, but we plotted those that did on the chart above. As you can see, there’s quite a broad range, with the price officially recommended by the Obama White House ($37 per metric ton of carbon) falling north of the middle. For comparison, we also included the current prices in British Columbia (which levies a flat tax) and the European Union (which operates a carbon credit-trading market). An oversupply of credits on the EU market has recently driven the price to record lows, below where most economists believe it can be effective in curbing emissions. But a decision yesterday by the European Parliament to slash the number of available credits is expected to drive the price up 35 percent over the next year. For most companies, the purpose of adding a hypothetical carbon tax to their balance sheets is to prepare for what could become a significant expense in the future. This is especially true for energy companies that produce large amounts of carbon pollution and would therefore be hit hardest by a carbon price; ExxonMobil, with the highest reported internal price, is the world’s second-biggest corporate carbon polluter, while non-energy companies like Walt Disney and Microsoft reported lower internal prices. Zoe Tcholak-Antitch, a spokesperson for CDP North America and its former director, said working on the assumption of a high carbon price is “a very prudent approach” for big energy producers, because it builds a degree of flexibility into their budgets. “ExxonMobil invests billions of dollars in energy projects which take decades to plan and execute,” company spokesperson Alan Jeffers said in a statement. “For the purposes of our business planning we assume that governments will continue to gradually adopt a wide variety of more stringent policies to help stem greenhouse gas emissions.” In other words, the company isn’t actually shelling out $60 for each ton of carbon it emits, but the bottom line ExxonMobil brass see in revenue projections for the future accounts for the price as if it was. That way, if and when a price is set, the company’s balance sheet will be prepared to absorb even a relatively high new cost. And “if the market chooses a lower price, it makes it that much easier” to accommodate, Tcholak-Antitch said. For at least one of the companies, there wasn’t much of a choice: Xcel Energy, an electric and natural gas utility, was ordered by the Colorado state utility commission to include a carbon price in a recent proposal for future electricity infrastructure investments. The idea, Xcel spokesperson Mark Stutz said, was to compare the future cost-effectiveness of different sources of energy, including coal, natural gas, wind, and solar; if carbon pricing tomorrow were to make coal all but unaffordable to burn, it might be a better use of ratepayer money today to build a wind farm instead. Although in fact, the company’s analysis found solar and wind to be a better bargain than coal and gas even without a carbon price. Companies outside the energy sector are playing along, too: The Walt Disney Company reported that its internal carbon price was a product of its policy of purchasing carbon offsets and charging those costs back to its own divisions based on their energy consumption; having a concrete price helps those divisions decide what kinds of sustainability efforts will be most cost-effective. Wells Fargo told CDP that its internal carbon price helps the bank determine how likely it is that clients from carbon-intensive sectors, like energy, will be able to repay loans. And Delta Air Lines said it considers the EU carbon price in setting routes into Europe, and weighs an undisclosed internal price when considering airplane purchases. The difficulty for US-based companies, CDP’s Tcholak-Antitch said, is that the lack of a clear signal from the US government makes it hard to know exactly where to pin the price, which explains the wide range seen in the graph above. “Some may be setting a very low price just so that they have something that isn’t zero,” she said. Since the private sector loves little more than long-term stability, she said, that’s all the more reason for US policymakers to reopen the debate.

Follow this link:

CHART: How Much Do Exxon and Google Charge Themselves for Climate Pollution?

Related Posts

MAP: Is Your State Ready for Climate Disasters?
Obama’s New New Climate Plan
Obama’s Ambitious Global Warming Action Plan
Dot Earth Blog: Obama’s Ambitious Global Warming Action Plan
Can a Carbon Tax Work Without Hurting the Economy? Ask British Columbia

Share this:

Read article here: 

CHART: How Much Do Exxon and Google Charge Themselves for Climate Pollution?

Posted in alo, Annies, eco-friendly, FF, G & F, GE, LAI, LG, mixer, Monterey, ONA, OXO, PUR, Ringer, solar, solar power, Uncategorized, wind energy, wind power | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on CHART: How Much Do Exxon and Google Charge Themselves for Climate Pollution?

Newly Discovered Greenhouse Gas ’7,000 Times More Powerful Than CO2′

Perfluorotributylamine is an unregulated, long-living industrial chemical that breaks all records for potential climate impacts. Corey’sWorld (MDCoreBear)/Flickr A new greenhouse gas that is 7,000 times more powerful than carbon dioxide at warming the Earth has been discovered by researchers in Toronto. The newly discovered gas, perfluorotributylamine (PFTBA), has been in use by the electrical industry since the mid-20th century. The chemical, that does not occur naturally, breaks all records for potential impacts on the climate, said the researchers at the University of Toronto’s department of chemistry. “We claim that PFTBA has the highest radiative efficiency of any molecule detected in the atmosphere to date,” said Angela Hong, one of the co-authors. The study, published in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, found PFTBA was 7,100 times more powerful at warming the Earth over a 100-year time span than CO2. To keep reading, click here. Originally from:  Newly Discovered Greenhouse Gas ’7,000 Times More Powerful Than CO2′ ; ;Related ArticlesWhy Congress Needs to Extend the Wind Energy Tax CreditUS Navy Predicts Summer Ice Free Arctic by 2016Scientists Re-Trace Steps of Great Antarctic Explorer Douglas Mawson ;

This article: 

Newly Discovered Greenhouse Gas ’7,000 Times More Powerful Than CO2′

Posted in alo, Annies, eco-friendly, FF, G & F, GE, LAI, LG, Monterey, ONA, OXO, Pines, Ringer, solar, solar power, Uncategorized, wind energy, wind power | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Newly Discovered Greenhouse Gas ’7,000 Times More Powerful Than CO2′

US Navy Predicts Summer Ice Free Arctic by 2016

Is conventional modelling out of pace with speed and abruptness of global warming? Incredible Arctic/Shutterstock An ongoing US Department of Energy-backed research project led by a US Navy scientist predicts that the Arctic could lose its summer sea ice cover as early as 2016 – 84 years ahead of conventional model projections. The project, based out of the US Naval Postgraduate School‘s Department of Oceanography, uses complex modelling techniques that make its projections more accurate than others. Keep reading at The Guardian. Read this article:  US Navy Predicts Summer Ice Free Arctic by 2016 ; ;Related ArticlesWhy Congress Needs to Extend the Wind Energy Tax CreditScientists Re-Trace Steps of Great Antarctic Explorer Douglas MawsonHere’s Why Developing Countries Will Consume 65% of the World’s Energy by 2040 ;

See original: 

US Navy Predicts Summer Ice Free Arctic by 2016

Posted in alo, Annies, eco-friendly, FF, G & F, GE, LAI, LG, Monterey, ONA, OXO, solar, solar power, Uncategorized, wind energy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on US Navy Predicts Summer Ice Free Arctic by 2016

Why Congress Needs to Extend the Wind Energy Tax Credit

green4us

The wind energy industry and environmental groups are calling on Congress to renew the credit. ali_pk/Flickr The wind energy production tax credit is a tougher issue than you might imagine for some good liberal wonks. On the one hand, wind power is great. On the other hand, tax credits are a market-distorting, inefficient way of making policy. They are basically spending disguised as tax cuts. Most tax credits that affect the environment — accelerated depreciation for the fossil fuel industry, the home mortgage interest deduction — incentivize sprawl, driving, and profligate dirty energy use. It is a rare, and tantalizing, point of agreement between good government advocates across party lines that we should throw out the whole system and operate a cleaner tax code. So it might be tempting, when you see Tea Party–affiliated, Koch brothers–backed groups such as Americans for Prosperity pushing to eliminate the wind energy tax credit, to say, “Hey, I agree!” Tempting but wrong. Continue reading at Grist.

Read more: 

Why Congress Needs to Extend the Wind Energy Tax Credit

Related Posts

Green Levies May Well be ‘Crap’. The Way to Deal with Carbon is to Bury It
Watch: How Climate Change Became the “Killing Fields” of Australian Politics
Large Companies Prepared to Pay Price on Carbon
Senate Bill Sweetens Loans for Energy-Efficient Homes
Top 4 Reasons the US Still Doesn’t Have a Single Offshore Wind Turbine

Share this:

Excerpt from: 

Why Congress Needs to Extend the Wind Energy Tax Credit

Posted in alo, Annies, eco-friendly, FF, G & F, GE, LAI, LG, Monterey, ONA, OXO, solar, solar power, Uncategorized, wind energy, wind power | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Why Congress Needs to Extend the Wind Energy Tax Credit

Here’s Why Developing Countries Will Consume 65% of the World’s Energy by 2040

China and India hold the world’s fate in their hands as energy use skyrockets in poorer countries. Barefoot Photographers of Tilonia/Flickr The Energy Shift now under way is as much geographical as it is technological. Case in point: By 2040, the developing world will account for 65 percent of the world’s energy consumption, according to a report released today by the United States Energy Information Administration. That’s up from 54 percent in 2010, and over the next three decades energy consumption is predicted to grow at a 2.2 percent annual clip in non-OCED (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) countries. OCED nations – including Europe, the US, Canada and Australia – in contrast, will see their energy use increase by just 0.5 percent a year, roughly in line with population growth. To keep reading, click here. View post:  Here’s Why Developing Countries Will Consume 65% of the World’s Energy by 2040 ; ;Related ArticlesScientists Re-Trace Steps of Great Antarctic Explorer Douglas MawsonHow Do Meteorologists Fit into the 97% Global Warming Consensus?Why Climate Change Skeptics and Evolution Deniers Joined Forces ;

See original article here – 

Here’s Why Developing Countries Will Consume 65% of the World’s Energy by 2040

Posted in alo, eco-friendly, FF, G & F, GE, Monterey, ONA, OXO, solar, solar power, The Atlantic, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Here’s Why Developing Countries Will Consume 65% of the World’s Energy by 2040